Comments by "silat13" (@silat13) on "The Rubin Report" channel.

  1. 8
  2. 8
  3. 7
  4. 4
  5. 4
  6. Here is the K0CH platform. I see no reason to find common ground with those that want to destroy government and sell America to the highest bidder. KOCH GAME PLAN When David Koch ran as the Vice Presidential candidate on the Libertarian ticket in 1980 this was their platform for that year. It is a manifesto of what David and Charles Koch expect to receive in return for their large investment in American politics. • We urge the repeal of federal campaign finance laws, and the immediate abolition of the despotic Federal Election Commission.” • “We favor the abolition of Medicare and Medicaid programs.” • “We oppose any compulsory insurance or tax-supported plan to provide health services, including those which finance abortion services.” • “We also favor the deregulation of the medical insurance industry.” • “We favor the repeal of the fraudulent, virtually bankrupt, and increasingly oppressive Social Security system. Pending that repeal, participation in Social Security should be made voluntary.” • “We propose the abolition of the governmental Postal Service. The present system, in addition to being inefficient, encourages governmental surveillance of private correspondence. Pending abolition, we call for an end to the monopoly system and for allowing free competition in all aspects of postal service.” • “We oppose all personal and corporate income taxation, including capital gains taxes.” • “We support the eventual repeal of all taxation.” • “As an interim measure, all criminal and civil sanctions against tax evasion should be terminated immediately.” • “We support repeal of all law which impede the ability of any person to find employment, such as minimum wage laws.” • “We advocate the complete separation of education and State. Government schools lead to the indoctrination of children and interfere with the free choice of individuals. Government ownership, operation, regulation, and subsidy of schools and colleges should be ended.” • “We condemn compulsory education laws … and we call for the immediate repeal of such laws.” • “We support the repeal of all taxes on the income or property of private schools, whether profit or non-profit.” • “We support the abolition of the Environmental Protection Agency.” • “We support abolition of the Department of Energy.” • “We call for the dissolution of all government agencies concerned with transportation, including the Department of Transportation.” • “We demand the return of America's railroad system to private ownership. We call for the privatization of the public roads and national highway system.” • “We specifically oppose laws requiring an individual to buy or use so-called "self-protection" equipment such as safety belts, air bags, or crash helmets.” • “We advocate the abolition of the Federal Aviation Administration.” • “We advocate the abolition of the Food and Drug Administration.” • “We support an end to all subsidies for child-bearing built into our present laws, including all welfare plans and the provision of tax-supported services for children.” • “We oppose all government welfare, relief projects, and ‘aid to the poor’ programs. All these government programs are privacy-invading, paternalistic, demeaning, and inefficient. The proper source of help for such persons is the voluntary efforts of private groups and individuals.” • “We call for the privatization of the inland waterways, and of the distribution system that brings water to industry, agriculture and households.” • “We call for the repeal of the Occupational Safety and Health Act.” • “We call for the abolition of the Consumer Product Safety Commission.” • “We support the repeal of all state usury laws.” Every single one of these ideas is rooted in John Birch Society dogma. His sons are just expanding capacity for them now, not abandoning their principles. Keep this list handy. You're going to need it in the days to come.
    4
  7. 4
  8. 4
  9. Wow. So he is for racial profiling. He just said it. To be clear I think it is responsible to profile those that fit the PROFILE. So why are so many of you arguing that he did not say that he supported "racial" profiling. And I argue that in America it is white right wing Christians that should be profiled as they are purveyors of the vast majority of terrorism in America. RIGHT WING EXTREMISTS A report published by the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point Military Academy on Jan. 15 discusses the potential dangers of “violent far-right” organizations, which has angered some conservatives that believe the military should focus on international threats. The executive summary of the paper, “Challengers from the Sidelines: Understanding America’s Violent Far-Right,” claims that “since 2007, there has been a dramatic rise in the number of attacks and violent plots originating from individuals and groups who self- identify with the far-right of American politics.” Written by Arie Perliger, Director of Terrorism Studies at the Combating Terrorism Center and an Assistant Professor at the Department of Social Sciences at West Point, the paper asserts that three distinct ideologies exist in the “American violent far right.” Those are “a racist/white supremacy movement, an anti-federalist movement and a fundamentalist movement,” the last of which “includes mainly Christian Identity groins such as the Aryan Nations.” “Findings indicate that…it is not only feelings of deprivation that motivate those involved in far right violence, but also the sense of empowerment that emerges when the political system is perceived to be increasingly permissive to far right ideas,” it later reads. The rise in attacks in the 21st century were significant, as “Although in the 1990s the average number of attacks per year was 70.1, the average number of attacks per year in the first 11 years of the twenty-first century was 307.5, a rise of more than 400%.” The study also found that “presidential election years and the preceding year are characterized by an increase of far-right violence,” leading the author to conclude that “in general, far-right groups and individuals are more inclined to engage in violence in a contentious political climate.” Furthermore, it found that the number of Republicans in the House was positively correlated with an increase in far-right violence, although the causes were not immediately clear. The study posits that it could mean those groups believed those legislators might be “more tolerant of their activities” or possibly that “the high expectations of far-right activists during a conservative legislature” were not “fulfilled.” Some conservatives object to the report. The Washington Times, The National Review, and World Net Daily all report on critical reactions from the right, according to the Atlantic Wire, with blogger Pamela Geller calling it an “appalling attempt to demonize loyal Americans and whitewash the Islamic threat.”
    4
  10. 3
  11. 3
  12. 3
  13. ***** DAY IN THE LIFE OF Mr. Ayn L. Rand : Mr. Ayn L. Rand Independent gets up at 6:00am to prepare his morning coffee. He fills his pot full of good clean drinking water because some liberal fought for minimum water quality standards. He takes his daily medication with his first swallow of coffee. His medications are safe to take because some liberal fought to insure their safety and work as advertised. All but $10.00 of his medications are paid for by his employers medical plan because some liberal union workers fought their employers for paid medical insurance, now Joe gets it too. He prepares his morning breakfast, bacon and eggs this day. Joe's bacon is safe to eat because some liberal fought for laws to regulate the meat packing industry. Mr. Ayn L. Rand Independent takes his morning shower. Reaching for his shampoo; His bottle is properly labeled with every ingredient and the amount of its contents because some liberal fought for his right to know what he was putting on his body and how much it contained. Joe dresses, walks outside and takes a deep breath. The air he breathes is clean because some tree-hugging liberal fought for laws to stop industries from polluting our air. It's noon time, Mr. Ayn L. Rand Independent needs to make a Bank Deposit so he can pay some bills. Mr. Ayn L. Rand Independent Republican deposit is federally insured by the FSLIC because some liberal wanted to protect Joe's money from unscrupulous bankers who ruined the banking system before the depression. Mr. Ayn L. Rand Independent is home from work, he plans to visit his father this evening at his farm home in the country. He gets in his car for the drive to dad's; his car is among the safest in the world because some liberal fought for car safety standards. He is happy to see his dad who is now retired. His dad lives on Social Security and his union pension because some liberal made sure he could take care of himself so Mr. Ayn L. Rand Independent wouldn't have to. After his visit with dad he gets back in his car for the ride home. He turns on a radio talk show, the host says that liberals are bad and conservatives are good (He doesn't tell Mr. Ayn L. Rand Independent that his beloved Republicans fought against every protection and benefit he enjoys throughout his day). Joe agrees, "We don't need big government liberals ruining our lives; I'm a self-made man who believes everyone should take care of themselves, just like me. Adapted from John Gray's Day in the Life of Joe Middle-Class Republican
    3
  14. 3
  15. 3
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. +djole94hns Miscarriage? That is Cods fault right? Dear Forced Birther... Your Cod Is Not Pro Life You might find that statement surprising, but I know this from your own holy book. Despite what you may have been told, the Bible is not a pro-life document. It is, in many parts, pro-death. In one of the first stories in the Bible, God murders millions of people through a global flood — including born and unborn children. Unborn children — the ones you fight for. God only wanted to get rid of them. Later in your holy book God commands the death of nation after nation because they happen to inhabit the land he plans to give the Israelites (Josh 7-9). He commands Israel to kill women and children (1 Sam 15). When he wanted to make a point to the Egyptians, he murdered all the firstborn sons of Egypt. Innocent children. And when King David killed a man and slept with his wife, God punished him by killing his unborn child. This same God does nothing while billions of people throughout history have been starved, drowned, raped and murdered. He sits on the sidelines and watches. That is not a God who is pro-life! On top of all that, at least 25% of all pregnancies end in “natural” abortion — which you believe your God either designed or actively performed — an act you consider murder. No, your God is not pro-life. By your own standards, he is a murderer — the most prolific abortionist of all time. So don’t tell us you base your morality on the Bible or on the character of God. Don’t tell us you’re sent from your God to protect the lives of the innocent. Despite what your pastor says, your God is not pro-life. He has been killing, maiming, and letting people suffer for ages.
    1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1