Comments by "MaquaCR" (@maquacr7014) on "Jordan B Peterson" channel.

@pqlr8763 Ukranians are saying, 'we are not Russians' and people in Donbass are saying, 'we are not Ukranians'. That technically makes Russia on the right side of history. Besides, Palestine problem is even more complex. It is an old nation trying to revive a country/nation which existed 2000 years ago and is finding its basis from Old testament. This makes it not only a territorial issue but religious issue as well.
3
@thigilman88 Your propaganda against CCP wouldn't work here. China isn't the only place Muslims are being oppressed. Yet Westerners only see Muslims being oppressed in China and not anywhere else. Last time, Muslims took it upon themselves to defeat commies in Afghanistan, terrorist organizations were created. No Muslim country is foolish enough to repeat the samr mistake. America has committed even worse atrocities in the Middle East than China. What's the claim? Allegedly, one million Uyghurs in concentration camps? Compare that to killing of 1.5 million Iraqis, 500000 Libyans and 400000 Afghans due to direct intervention of Murica and killing of about 700000 Syrians, 200000-300000 Yemenis and 70000 Pakistanis as a result of bogus war on terror. Numbers don't lie. Jeez. I haven't even mentioned Palestinians here.
2
@Kalimdor199Menegroth Ignorant. West speaks out against Myanmar because Myanmar is allied with China. West doesn't care about Rohingya. Except UK, no Western country speaks out against India regarding the issue of Kashmir. 'Yemenis that died, died because of Iran, Saudi Arabia or UAE'. Both Saudi Arabia and UAE have trash millitaries. That is, their millitary equipment is being maintained by US technicians. Also, blockade of Yemen is only made possible because of USA. Also, who is the biggest supplier of weapons to KSA and UAE? Also USA. Even if we were to entertain your claim regarding Iran which is the only trouble maker in the region not allied to USA, then USA is responsible for belligerent behavior of Iran as well. There was delicate balance in political affairs of Middle East as long as Saddam was alive. Murica took him out and handed over entire Middle East to Iran in plate. Besides, I was talking about drone strikes. You have no idea about drone strikes carried out by USA in Yemen and Pakistan because you are either ignorant or you are deliberately hiding information.
2
@rorschach4391 Also, West is seculsr not Christian. Poland wouldn't tolerate Muslims at all. So false comparison in the first place.
2
@xiouee What?
1
@ImpressionsFromEverywhere Hijab was mocking the Darwin's theory of natural selection by saying that Muslims are having more children and thus winning from an evolution perspective. As far as point of having lesser GDP and PCI is concerned, JBP was right. But Hijab explained that this wasn't always the case. He gave examples of Ottomans to make a case for GDP and Muslim spain to make a case for technological advancement.
1
@genigee Yes. Murica is an example. Where would Murica be without Middle Eastern oil? America certainly wouldn't enjoy superpower status had it not been for Soviets failing in Afghanistan.
1
@David-ic2lz Muslims were ruling half the world before Brits and French went industrialization mode and colonized entire Muslim world bar Turkey.
1
@Kalimdor199Menegroth Also, re-read my comment again. I attributed killings in Yemen, Syria and Pakistan to bogus war on terror launched by USA. I didn't say US directly killed people in Yemen and Pakistan even though it did via drone strikes. Not only are you ignorant, you also have comprehension problems. Keep on writing CCP bad. That's the best you can do.
1
@thigilman88 Not really. Muslims conquered territory for spread of religion. They didn't conquer territory to loot the world of its resources. Also, there wasn't disproportionate hoarde of wealth on one specific place compared to other. Umayyads originally belonged to Hejaz but made Damascus their capital. Ottoman subjects in Balkans were wealthier than Ottoman subjects in Anatolia even though Anatolia had Turks and Balkans had other ethnicities. Colonialism is only referred to the period of 1600-onwards. Any decent book on history of empires would confirm this.
1
@thigilman88 Yes. They did.
1
@thigilman88 No they didn't. People are rewriting history nowadays. Also, what happened in the past should stay in the past. Now we have International law and multiple International platforms to enforce that law. Lastly, stop @ me. I can't be bothered to open a notification to see your verbal diarrhoea.
1
@thigilman88 You have no idea about Islam. Stop embarrassing yourself.
1
@PointsofInterestEDU I didn't defend CCP once in any of my comments I posted. I was just pointing out the hypocrisy. Nice try.
1
@rorschach4391 Pakistan and Afghanistan were radicalized because of Soviet expansionism. ISIS is khawaij and kills more Muslims than non-Muslims. Iran is okay. Indonesia is fine too except Aceh region.
1
@rorschach4391 You don't have to be secular to be tolerant towards other religions. Again, a false statement.
1
@rorschach4391 Mullahs had no power in 50s and 60s. Mullahs were given power in 70s and 80s to counter socialist ideas. You're unaware of history and yet you're out here making positive statements like they are some facts.
1
@astilen5647 Muslims aren't anti-technology. They never have been. Muslims are against post-modernity and the idea that technological advancement eliminates the need for God to be there. Because that is what has happened with West.
1
@tonylong2977 Which Muslim country is in conflict with Christians today?
1