Comments by "MaquaCR" (@maquacr7014) on "The British Colonization of India Explained" video.

@mkplays3361 Mughals didn't take wealth of India outside of India. They were better in that regard.
2
@Sevens3591 China was not colonized but was subjected to opium wars by same Brits which left large chunk of its population addicted to drugs. Chinese call that time period their century of humiliation.
2
@Sevens3591 Romans and Persians weren't great. If they were, they wouldn't have gotten conquered by camel herders in Arabia.
2
@OldScientist Youtube knows you have nothing meaninfulto say.
2
@OldScientist I have seen your comments elsewhere. You got disproved so hard.
2
@OldScientist Silence, westoid.
1
@mkplays3361 They race mixed with local Indians.
1
@mkplays3361 My point is that they have no comparison with Brits. They were indeed outsiders but settled in the land and married Indian women. They didn't take Indian wealth outside of India either. They were far better than Brits.
1
@mkplays3361 You initially claimed Mughals were no better. They were indeed better. I never claimed Mughals were hallmark of civilizational behavior.
1
@mkplays3361 As per what metric?
1
@Sevens3591 Silence, westoid.
1
@drakenkraken8455 Look up revolt in 1857.
1
@drakenkraken8455 What are you even on about? A technologically advanced nation has more money to buy locals to be on its side against their other fellow locals? How does that absolve Brits of anything? And we saw how revolts were violently suppressed regardless of their intensity or scale.
1