Comments by "MaquaCR" (@maquacr7014) on "TED-Ed" channel.

  1. Jinnah was in Indian national congress himself but left it after he realized that Indian national congress only cared about Hindu majority and planned to sideline minority Muslims. His belief got solidified during 1937-39 congress rule.
    29
  2.  @hwfq34fajw9foiffawdiufhuaiwfhw  Your mom.
    27
  3.  @maryp.v.2013  Courtesy of messy lines drawn by British such as Redcliff line and Mcmahon line. There is Durand line on Pak-Afghan border which is also messed up.
    11
  4.  @maryp.v.2013  Border disputes.
    10
  5.  @indopew2319  Lol. What kind of history do they teach you in India?
    9
  6.  @anujyoutube58  Nope. KPK and Balochistan have nothing to do with India. Only Punjab and Sindh were historically sub-continent. Balochistan and Afghanistan were under Iranian/Central Asian influence.
    7
  7.  @hwfq34fajw9foiffawdiufhuaiwfhw  They happened because of Kashmir - a legacy of messy borders drawn. Kashmir is the only reason hate exists between two countries. Kashmir is also the reason Pakistan joined Western camp and made USSR its enemy. Both India and Pakistan got played by white man.
    7
  8.  @The_Sigillite  It was an International conspiracy which drew these messy borders. People scapegoat Radcliffe. He was either complicit or got played. A divided India with two independent states being hostile to each other would serve two purposes. 1. One of the states would have to rely on West (UK and USA) so China and USSR won't make the whole region communist. 2. A unified India would make East massively strong and West would loose its hegemony. Since USA and UK already had three of the strongest and most influential Muslim states (Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Iran) on their side, it would be easier to convince Pakistan to join this camp. Also, India would be forced to not be in total alliance with USSR and to balance relationship between capitalist West and communist/socialist USSR. That is exactly what happened. USSR couldn't access Indian ocean and failed in Afghanistan - thanks to Pakistan.
    5
  9.  @QuadLamb  I'm sure it is a watered down version of history where white people are heroes.
    5
  10.  @travelleryu  US is even worse than GB. GB did it when there were no rules. US violates International law and shows complete disregard to its so called rivals/enemies.
    4
  11.  @darkthunder7441  Jinnah did not cause these problems. Nehru did. Jinnah was in favor of united India with separate administrative units up until 1946.
    3
  12.  oh  Kashmir Muslims are happy? Seriously.
    3
  13.  @matnotyou  Hindus burned each other's temples too. Read history.
    3
  14.  @shahrock6969  Congress did it to maintain good relationship with Arab states particularly Saudi Arabia. BJP trolls lack nuance in International relations or anything worthwhile.
    3
  15.  @dograkhalsa1098  Uttar Pardesh is the most intolerant state in India. How about Southern states like Kerala?
    3
  16.  @sidjhajharia92  Even Hindu kingdoms fought each other. Ranjhit Singh had Muslim generals in his army.
    3
  17.  @hwfq34fajw9foiffawdiufhuaiwfhw  I'm glad the globalists are finally delivering you the punishment you deserve.
    3
  18.  @BruceWayne-xx1vx  Hindu kingdoms used to destroy each other's temples too. There was no unity hence it was so easy for foreigners to establish their rule.
    2
  19.  @alokbaluni8760  Industrialization started in West. Mughal India contributed 25% to world's economy - only behind China. European countries managed to colonize the world because of industrialization and technology.
    2
  20.  @rrr-Indian  India is colonizing Kashmir as of this moment. Where did those morals and ethics go?
    2
  21.  @rescuestark6895  Classic British.
    2
  22.  @guardianoffire8814  If you're referring to Bosnians, they are Slavs not Turks. Balkan issue is complex. Even Croats and Serbians fight each other. The conflict, in its current form, was engineered by USA in 90s.
    2
  23.  @nemezizthedestroyer5237  Then why do all Indians I encounter on web are clueless as to what really happened.
    2
  24. Considering how Muslim league was sidelined after formation of Pakistan, this is anything but true. Who was the first governor general of India? Oh yes. Lord Mountbettan.
    1
  25.  @chitranshnigam4796  Jinnah was sick with tuberclosis lmao. You Indians have been taught to put all the blame on Jinnah.
    1
  26.  The PussyCat  Secular nation. Yeah, tell that to Sikhs in Canada who blame their forefathers for not siding with Jinnah
    1
  27.  @KrishnaRaj-pk3ti  So? Zakaat is implemented on Muslims. Jizya is implemented on non-Muslims. It is taxation. Those who pay Jizya are called Dhimmis. They are allowed to practise their religion freely and must be protected from external and internal aggression. They are even exempt from joining army. While Zakaat tax is usually fixed, it is upto the ruler to decide how much Jizya tax would be charged from non-Muslims. Most of the time, Jizya tax was lesser than Zakaat tax across multiple Muslim empires throughout history. You should be happy that Turkic Muslim rulers ruled India and not Christians. Otherwise, India would be a Christian state today.
    1
  28.  @KrishnaRaj-pk3ti  Which experts say it? Orientalists? They say nice things about Hinduism as well. Go read English writers.
    1
  29.  @KrishnaRaj-pk3ti  How is it humiliation when non-Muslims are exempt from fighting in case of war? Go do a comparison between how Jews were treated under Muslim rule vs Christian rule.
    1
  30.  @KrishnaRaj-pk3ti  Hinduism is not an organized religion. It has no political, economic or legal system. Islam has all of the things mentioned above.
    1
  31.  @hmm7458  He is partially right. It was International conspiracy (capitalism vs communism) and interests of businessmen on both sides.
    1
  32.  @Desi.Superman  Why do you put all the blame on Jinnah?
    1
  33.  @Desi.Superman  Jinnah was pro Muslim Hindu unity till 1928 but changed his mind later on. And Muslims of North West India wanted a separate independent state.
    1
  34.  @Desi.Superman  Hindutva was the root cause. Indian congress never cared for Muslims. There was Hindi-Urdu conflict. Bengal was divided by UK in 1906. Congress showed its real face in 1937-39. Jinnah gave up on Hindu-Muslim unity after Nehru report.
    1
  35.  @Desi.Superman  Lol. Historical inaccuracies lmao. Muslim league was formed in 1906 in Dhaka. Division of Bengal took place in 1906. Bengal was united again in 1911 after 5 years. They wanted more representatives to safeguard rights of Muslims since they had clear majority in Western provinces and Eastern Bengal.
    1
  36.  @Desi.Superman  Jinnah joined Muslim league in 1913 and left congress in 1920 when he found out that Congress wasn't representative of Muslims in any case. He was still pro Hindu-Muslim unity till 1928.
    1
  37.  @Desi.Superman  Go read up Lucknow pact.
    1
  38.  @josephstalin9604  We are in FATF because we don't want USA in the region.
    1
  39.  @darkcomet1607  Had Indians truly accepted partition and not made an ego issue on Kashmir by claiming that Hindu land is sacred, there would have been peace.
    1
  40.  @25fpslagger81  Many Sikhs and Hindus meet Pakistanis living in Pakistan when they come to Kartarpur. Many Indians have made vlogs about it too. Jokes on you mate.
    1
  41. @vasudev kamath It hasn't dropped to 1%. Hindus were primarily in East Pakistan. West Pakistan has sustained Hindu population growth since 1947. I know Pakistan has problems related to extremism but the country is headed towards right direction.
    1
  42.  @BruceWayne-xx1vx  Wealth still remained in India and an average citizen fared far better under Mughal rule. UK left both China and India in extreme poverty. China has recovered just this last decade while India is still recovering.
    1
  43.  @sleepifiy2096  This is Asian century. Unless West somehow manages to contain China's rise which looks extremely difficult at this moment. West has completely lost it.
    1
  44.  @BruceWayne-xx1vx  That elite didn't discriminate against Hindus and Muslims. And India still benefits from all the historical buildings and structures Mughals built. Taj Mahal is one example. Does India benefit from artefacts in British museum? Try taking back Koh-i-Noor from GB lmao. 18 temple destruction events. Damn. Tell that to bigoted people in your country who blame the whole religion + common folk for something Mughal rulers and so called elite class (having many Hindus too. Mughal rulers had Hindu wives) did.
    1
  45.  @BruceWayne-xx1vx  And feudalism does tend to create wealth gap just like capitalism which tends to take things a step further with innate imperialistic tendenices. Go study Marx.
    1
  46.  @BruceWayne-xx1vx  There was peace under several Mughal rulers too. Akbar is just one example. Stop reading RSS sponsored history and read actual one.
    1
  47.  @Archius_09  Conversion to Islam doesn't correlate with forgetting ancestral roots. There are Muslim Rajputs and Jutts.
    1
  48.  @hmm7458  Muslim league had little support in 1937 elections but won almost all seats in Muslim majority provinces in 1945-46 elections. A lot happened during that period, apparently.
    1
  49.  @puneetmishra4726  Go read about hegemony of congress after winning seats during 1937-1939.
    1
  50. You follow Western monetary system as well which is really problematic.
    1