Comments by "MaquaCR" (@maquacr7014) on "Bosnia in danger of breaking up" video.

  1.  @arolemaprarath6615  Cow worshipper talking crap as usual.
    65
  2.  @zoemaliya6408  Balkans never had any problem with Arabs. They were occupied by Turks hence the hatred against anyone from Turkey. Indians taunt Pakistanis of adopting so called Arab religion (it isn't an Arab religion) and dividing sub-continent. This shit is complicated. And I'm hundred percent sure Prarath is from India.
    28
  3.  @zoemaliya6408  Because of internet experience. They behave like this 99/100 times.
    27
  4.  @zoemaliya6408  Also, look at the last name Prarath. He has posted comments like these in multiple threads. A European wouldn't do this.
    24
  5. Smart people in this thread except one idol worshipper.
    20
  6.  @golagiswatchingyou2966  Muhammad is a chad unlike Jesus - the so called God - who got lynched by bunch of Roman soldiers. Looks like Muhammad had more divine help than Jesus.
    11
  7.  @obrnenydrevokocur9344  Obviously. Quran also claims Roman soldiers didn't lynch him. He is one of the mightiest Abrahamic prophets and God doesn't leave His special people alone. And don't come at me with human sacrifice prophesies. All of that is made up.
    8
  8.  @vojislavl6665  Exactly the same thing is happening in the Muslim/Arab world. Different tribeal leaders get instigated by Murica. Guess who pays the price? Common people.
    8
  9.  @golagiswatchingyou2966  Then the most important Abrahamic prophet according to Jews - Moses - is also a warlord.
    7
  10.  @KING-ef2wm  USA pushed for separatism in Chechnya and Dagestan as well.
    7
  11.  @scudb5509  Yeah. Killing 8000 men in cold blood in the presence of UN isn't cleansing at all. The audacity.
    6
  12.  @hobog  CCP isn't corrupt. China wouldn't have developed so quickly if CCP were corrupt. Compare China with India.
    6
  13.  @arolemaprarath6615  Ottomans were ahead of their time in terms of diversity and religious tolerance. stealing ideas from conquered lands Every empire did that. Like I said, Middle East remained peaceful for the most part under Ottomans. That's a miracle. There was somewhat peace in Balkans too.
    5
  14.  @arolemaprarath6615  'European empires modernized the world.' More like plundered the world and left behind a legacy the effects of which can still be seen after decades. Brits alone left China poverty stricken which contributed around 27% to the world economy in 1800s and looted sub-continent dry which contributed 24% to world economy. Ethnic cleansing took place in North America and Australia while cultural genocide took place in South America and Africa.
    5
  15.  @golagiswatchingyou2966  We'll see how peaceful Jesus is on his second coming.
    4
  16.  @LancesArmorStriking  Russia ethnically cleansed Muslim Circassians in the past. But I doubt you're aware of your own history. Even Crimea was populated by Turkic people in the past. Nowadays, you'll hardly find any of those Turkic people in Crimea. Where did ISIS come from? ISIS didn't appear before 2011. And Russian FSB bombed its own metro station to rally support for invasion of Chechnya. It is common knowledge. I've nothing against Russia and I'm not in favor of secession of different ethnic concentrated areas from any UN member country. But do not mix things. And KSA doesn't act alone. It does what USA tells it to do.
    4
  17.  @fearmaniac721  God allows abortion according to both Judaism and Islam under specific conditions. 1. Either the woman is raped. 2. If the new born baby has some life threatening disease or threatens life of mother in anyway. 3. Abortion is only allowed before 12 weeks according to both Judaism and Islam. After 12 weeks, abortion is forbidden. It is funny that Chirstianity allows pork and alcohol but takes a hard stance against abortion.
    4
  18.  @cuculan1978  'There is no compulsion in religion.' Quran.
    4
  19. Ottomans miraculously maintained peace in Balkans and Middle East. Then Christian Rusians and Christian West started spreading its influence and now there is no peace at all. Ottomans are underrated.
    3
  20.  @gorantomic7150  Gad Saad. Who is he? Is he an authority? Has he published any work? Is his work peer reviewed? Why should I listen to this guy? Qaddafi warned Europe about immigrant crisis if he were taken town. But I bet you don't even know who he is.
    3
  21.  @joestendel1111  Russia wanted to teach Armenia a lesson because Armenia was adopting pro-American policies. Besides, why would Russia help Armenia and sideline Azerbycan especially since Turkey has started to spread its influence in Turkic countries?
    3
  22.  @BrutusAlbion  India is multi-ethnic and multi-cultural. Works just fine. (Barring Kashmir).
    3
  23.  @BrutusAlbion  Brits played divide and rule. And Muslims were afraid of Hindu rashtra sentiment rising amongst Hindus just in the aftermath of world war 1. Look up RSS and how it was influenced by Nazi Germany. That same RSS is ruling India today and life is tough for Indian minorities. At least, now, Muslims of sub-continent/Indian plate have two millitaries to defend themselves and one of those millitaries has 165 nukes.
    3
  24.  @itsblitz4437  Throwing them off high mountains. Haven't you heard story of Lut?
    3
  25.  @gorantomic7150  Jerusalem - for about 1350 years. Compare that to crusaders ransacking Jerusalem and killing everyone. Compare Muslim conquest of Constantinople and Crusaders' attack of Constantinople as well. European Christians have killed 10 times more people than any Islamic emirate in last 1400 years. Go ask any credible historian. Good luck.
    2
  26.  @nosheizer1294  There was peace under Ottomans. There was rivalry between Ottomans and Safavids but that's about it.
    2
  27.  @LeOssiTrollterrible  Noam Chomsky is king.
    2
  28.  @vorynrosethorn903  Exceptions don't prove a rule.
    2
  29.  @anon2427  KSA and UAE are Middle Eastern countries, dummy.
    2
  30.  @LancesArmorStriking  Dagestanis aren't Russians either. Nice try. Even if KSA was pushing for Jihad in Dagestan, what is your problem?
    2
  31.  @TheDosaKing  'India could have kept Lahore but chose to give it back.' You are just as dummy as that Pakistani guy. India was on outskirts of Lahore not inside Lahore. India couldn't even manage to cross BRB canal. And Pakistan was in alliance with West at that time. India couldn't just choose to curb stomp Pakistan into dark ages even if it wanted to since Pakistan ultimately pushed India back from both outskirts of Sialkot and Lahore. India had a pretty decent chance of doing this in 1971 since Pakistan was completely demoralized. But one phone call from Richard Nixon forced Indira Gandhi to push for peace.
    2
  32.  @vivekaugustine9583  What are we good at? Proxy wars. Ask Americans, Russians and Indians.
    2
  33.  @BrutusAlbion  Wrong. There is no state sponsored oppression of Hindus in Pakistan. Illitrate people do it and they are punished. (Not exactly punished unfortunately since Pakistan's judicial system sucks). You have absolutely no idea about Afghanistan. I would suggest you don't open your mouth before obtaining at least some basic knowledge. Ashraf Ghani was also a Pashtun. And yes. USA did its best to disrupt peace in the region but failed.
    2
  34.  @here_we_go_again2571  I don't know. Maybe because of ethnic differences? Where would you fit 250 million Indian Muslims in Pakistan and Bangladesh? Low IQ comment didn't even deserve a response but I replied anyway.
    2
  35.  @sreekr  Bengal voted for independence. I know. That is how Bangladesh (former East Pakistan) was formed. There are loads of Bihari migrants in Pakistan and Bangladesh. (Biharis were pro-Pakistan in 1971 saga). Don't know about UP and Madras. Don't care. And go learn about election results in 1937-38 elections and 1945-46 elections. Consult neutral sources. Muslim league started getting response from Muslims in 1940s. Go learn why. You have loads of homework to do.
    2
  36.  @anon2427  Nope they don't. They actually kept peace in both Balkans and Middle East. Underrated for sure.
    1
  37.  @anon2427  Ottomans didn't force their language or culture on other people either. Pretty based and tolerant.
    1
  38.  @icysaracen3054  What a dumb take!
    1
  39.  @randomdegenerate3841  Read my other comments.
    1
  40.  @vivekaugustine9583  Both 1948 and 1965 were stalemates. India schooled Pakistan in 1971. Pakistan didn't fully commit itself in 1999. 4 generals planned all that saga and not even PM was aware of it.
    1
  41.  @vivekaugustine9583   'wIdEr aRaB wOrLd' Nobody gives a shit about Arab world. You are completely irrelevant and Arab countries produce more extremists than Pakistan ever will. And what do you know about Afghanistan-Pakistan tensions? Geo-strategic gains lol. Afghanistan doesn't accept Durand line as a legitimate border while the whole world does. Afghanistan started proxy wars in the region when it started backing separatist elements in KPK. Afghan leaders made coups against different factions in government and invited USSR to sort out the mess. USSR had played a major role in secession of Bangladesh. Considering all that, Pakistan should have just allowed itself to get sandwiched between USSR occupied Afghanistan and India. Lmfao. And Kashmir is unfinished business between Pakistan and India since partition. Majority of Kashmir population (about 70%) is Muslim and pro-Pakistan. India is occupying this region against the will of the people. Pakistan isn't going to just sit back and let India change demography in the region. We don't fear anyone unlike Arabs who let Israel change demographics of occupied Palestine. Pakistan gets owned by India which is 6 times larger than Pakistan and has 7 times more people has 10 times more GDP. Imagine attacking Israel all at once and getting your asses handed back to you multiple times. Pakistanis could never relate. Ottomans had you under control and there was peace. Now you are getting frocked by Persians (Syria, Lebanon, Yemen and Iraq), Turks (Libya and Syria), Russia (Syria and Libya) and NATO (whole Middle East lmfao). Sunni Arabs and Shia Arabs can't even tolerate each other. Who is a stain on the Islamic world by the way? Pakistan? Ohyh sure. (I'm assuming you're an Arab).
    1
  42. Exceptions don't prove the rule. Low IQ people point out exceptions to invalidate a rule.
    1
  43.  @vivekaugustine9583  Non-sense. First of all, there was no genocide. Secondly, young Turks displaced Armenians because Armenians - backed by Russians - were killing Turks and Kurds in Ottoman territory. Secondly, Arabs revolted against Turkish nationalists a.k.a. young Turks. Except North Africa which became independent in midway of 19th century barring independent kingdom of Morocco, there were hardly any revolts against Ottoman authority. Bedouins in modern day KSA revolted by making tekfir on Ottomans and established state of Diriyah. But they were dealt with by Ottomans and Egyptians. And Salafism is one the main reasons behind all this terror and disruption of peace in the Middle East. Guess Turkey dodged a bullet there.
    1
  44.  @vivekaugustine9583  70% of the population is Muslim. Except Jammu, all of Kashmir is pro-Pakistan. This includes AJK and Kashmir valley in Indian occupied Kashmir. Gilgit Baltistan is also pro-Pakistan. And I refuse to believe that any such exodus happened. India itself pushed these people out of valleh to create a narrative. India has 900k armed personnel in Kashmir. Why doesn't it rehabilitate those pundits since India has pretty much suppressed the rebellion? India will never achieve its true potential if it doesn't solve Kashmir issue. Even if Pakistan goes down, Pakistan will take India with it. Pakistan might as well fire Shaheen III at Israel since you Arabs can't do anything yourselves.
    1
  45.  @vivekaugustine9583  You are a troll lmfao. Pakistani Sunnis and Shias do get along. Even at the peak of civil war and terrorism in Pakistan, majority of Shias were pretty safe and they weren't exclusively targeted. Hazaras have been targeted frequently in Balochistan and that is deplorable. And not a single Muslim scholar in the world considers Ahmediya Muslims. You are speaking the language of Indian establishment lmfao.
    1
  46.  @vivekaugustine9583  Shias are one of the most influential people in Pakistan. Half of Pakistan's current cabinet is Shia.
    1
  47.  @vivekaugustine9583  Palestine doesn't have Orthodox Christians. Nice try. And Gorkhas are legit badass.
    1
  48.  @TheDosaKing  Pakistan got even with both US and USSR in Afghanistan. India has the upper hand till now but we'll see.
    1
  49.  @mirzahamzabaig5667  FSA was free Syrian army rebels created to oust Assad.
    1
  50.  @sreekr  Wrong again. West Pakistan's Hindu minority has increased since 1947. East Pakistan's (now Bangladesh) Hindu minority has decreased significantly for plethora of reasons. The most important one being Hindus leaving for India for better economic opportunities. East Pakistan suffered from West Pakistan because Pakistan, at that time, was hardcore capitalist. After creation of Bangladesh, it took years for it to stand on its feet. And now, Bangladesh has surpassed both Pakistan and India in terms of income per capita.
    1
  51.  @sreekr  1. Not all Muslims voted for partition. Only North Western, Western, South Western and Eastern ones did. India still has more Muslims than Pakistan and Bangladesh and they aren't hostile to India. 2. Deomgraphic changes happened in both sides of Punjab. It is classified as the biggest migration in history. Both Sikhs and Muslims killed each other mercilessly despite both being Punjabis. And guess what? Jinnah wasn't in favor of dividing Punjab. Sikhs got fooled by Nehru and Gandhi and now they regret it.
    1
  52.  @sreekr  'Illegal Muslims from Bangladesh.' Well yeah. You shouldn't have instigated Bengalis against Punjabis and Pashtuns. If you destabilize a region, you should face consequences. The reason Pakistan hosts 3 million Afghan refugees and doesn't complain.
    1
  53.  @here_we_go_again2571  Much better response. And I agree.
    1
  54.  @sreekr  Wrong again. Cite neutral sources for the claims you made or STFU. Islamization in Pakistan started in 1970s and 1980s. Before that, Pakistan was fairly liberal. Pakistan was in Western bloc ffs.
    1
  55.  @sreekr  Pakistan was created for the minorities of sub-continent since there was threat of a far right Hindutva. Jinnah wanted Pakistan to be secular. Go watch his earliest speeches right after creation of Pakistan. Had Punjab not been divided and non-Muslims were in large numbers, Pakistan wouldn't have taken the route of Islamism - not least under Jinnah but unfortunately he passed away and millitary developed a stronghold. If you make a country for minorities, and the only support you get is from a single minority i.e. Muslims, it is obvious you wouid try to justify the creation of this state and use the only thing that would give your new-formed country an identity. Pakistan was fairly liberal in 50s and 60s. No religious institution or individual of any sort had any power. Islamization started in 70s and Pakistan became a theocratic state in 80s along with Iran and KSA. Imagine having the audacity to teach history of Pakistan to a Pakistani. And China is communist in polity/governance. It is capitalist in terms of economy with strict state regulations in place. My comment about Pakistan being in Western bloc was out of place and unnecessary. Go through Stephen P. Cohen's works post independence. He is the most intelligent insight on Indo-Pak affairs after 1947.
    1
  56.  @sreekr  State itself gave power to so called Jihadist groups lmfao. That happened after the fall of Dhaka and Pakistan's continued insecurity against rising communist influence in Pakistan's Western provinces. Before 1970s, the only Islamic thing you find in Pakistan is objective resolution passed in 1949. Even that was thrown in the backseat in constitutions of both 1956 and 1962.
    1
  57.  @cowboydoggo6168  Agreed.
    1
  58.  @TomorrowWeLive  Nope. It is a universal religion.
    1
  59.  @fasoooli2751  You tagged the wrong person dude. When did I say otherwise? I'm a Muslim myself.
    1
  60.  @step3293  You don't want me to get pissed off. Trust me. XD
    1
  61.  @hydrohasspoken6227  Low IQ response.
    1
  62.  @Bella-zf9ey  Islam is a pagan religion? Ahahhahahahhahahha
    1
  63.  @Hadesfirst  Doesn't matter. Whatever US asks, EU nations do. USA, at the moment, is West. Europe followed USA into Middle East like robots. Only France had guts to say no but that no didn't last long.
    1
  64.  @LevisH21  You're right and wrong at the same time. It depends on a common cause. Multi culturalism works in India somehow. It also works, to a lesser extent, in USA. As long as there is no domination of one ethnicity over the other and people of different ethnicities have similiar lifestyle/earning, multiculturalism can exist. Otherwise, there are plenty of breakaways in history. Secession of Bangladesh from Pakistan being the most overlooked one.
    1
  65.  @Hadesfirst  You don't even know what West is. Lmfao. European people are commonly referred to as West. Greeks, Romans, Byzantines (though called Eastern Romans and hence the distinction between West and Russia + Eastern Europe), Italians, Spanish, Portugese, French, Germans and North America constitute West. Australia and New Zealand are also considered West. Go study Western civilization. At the moment, USA is the strongest Western country. NATO has Turkey in it but EU refuses to accept Turkey in the bloc. Turkey is not considered West.
    1
  66.  @Hadesfirst  They have. Exploitation of third world in the name of freedom and democracy is their agenda.
    1