Comments by "Shalanaya" (@Shalanaya) on "David Pakman Show" channel.

  1. 3
  2. 3
  3. 2
  4.  @itsagoal182  None of it is true, ALL of it was debunked. Cass is a psychopath who has been paid to lie. Cass review was proven to be a paid propaganda that threw out vast majority of studies that proven how extremely important it is that kids born in the opposite sex get on cross sex hormones before puberty mutilates their healthy body. Forcing these children into the wrong puberty IS a child abuse because it is equal to forcing them into the wrong hormones. Being non-trans is not a default! Stay away from kids. Parents always had a consent for any kind of medicine for their kids, no government shoud ever intervene to a medical healthcare that has been consistently saving kids' lives. SInce the implementation of Cass review in UK, we got 7 kids taking their own life for being denied gender affirming care! This is a fact that republicans wanted to bury who push anti-trans agenda designed to spread lies and misinformation, because they need to have control over the bodies, this is where is the hidden connetionto fascism, because this is what they have done. It is an act of authoritarianism and tyranny. Tavistock clinic itself was used by republicans for the purpose of gaining support from brainwashed supporters. Gender theapy needs improvement, but also it needs to prevent kids from entering the puberty they should never ever experience, period. Cross-sex hormonal therapy is a holistic approach that tackles the entire body for the purpose of aligning the mind and body in harmony. No psychological therapy has ever helped for trans children since the 1970's, it led to disasters, because nothing can be treated psychologically what is at its core a physiological issue, NOT psychological! The more chioldren transition the more healthy they are going to be, the more people wait and push them against their will into puberty they can not consent to, the more damage to their psyche and body is being done. Gender affirming care is a life-saving medical necessity for people of any age, the decision not to provide even puberty blockers isn't "waiting to make a decision until they're older". The hormones are gonna happen. You're just making a decision for them, and one that is statistically likely to be harmful. It is never, ever anyone’s decision to transition but theirs, If someone thinks cis kids should be allowed autonomy over abortions and blood transfusions but trans kids shouldn’t be allowed to transition, then they need to fix their heart. Kids should be given time to think" - this is literally what puberty blockers are for. People who argue this in bad faith are actually saying "kids should be forced to go through the the puberty of their AGAB". This is exactly the same as forcing cis children to transition."Let kids be kids" implies that "kids" are hetero or non-trans by default, and that being trans is some sin of intrusive thought. Why are they being told to be cishetero before they get to decide for themselves. Obviously there's no discussion about banning puberty blockers for children having precocious puberty so THEY get a chance to be kids. Puberty turns youths into adults, “blocking” puberty in adults is like giving contraception to people in their second trimester or checking for traffic after you’ve already been hit by the car.
    2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. It is not a coincidence that through reseach we have found that the majority of Trump suppertors possess accentuated narcissistic traits and live out of integrity and alignment with themselves as a result of their own invlidation of individual freedoms. One hint: any support for any leader that wants to establish two gender system acts from a fragmented two dimensional perspective, and as by default acting against the freedom of an individual, because binary system itself has been established a long time ago as a homogenizing model to push humans into a machine-like state of serviture and slavery. You would be well aware of this if you understood these power dynamics and how it works. Voting for Trump reflects the unconsicous need for authoritarianism to take power away from people as much as possible, it is a vote that stems from negative beliefs and fear that are exploited the same like it was exploited in German people by Nazi Parrty willing to save them. It is an act of giving power away, literally. The issue is that people do not realize this on a conscious level. If Trump supporters realized this about themselves they would be horrified about what they are actually supporting beyond their awareness. And I am speaking as someone who did vote for Trump twice, thats why I am sharing it. I had to go through massive healing since then to wake up to who I used to be. I can only pray people like you too. Project 2025 that relies on a republican candidate wiining is designed to usher in a theocracy as seen in a film like Escape Fromk LA. No free speech, no cussing, it is a gateway towards transhumanism, because it is radically designed to take the agency away from people over their own body, which is symbolzed by the end of Roe and Wade and healthcare and personal identity for trans people to exist on their own terms. It is an attack on the self actualization and self realization of an individual on a profound spiritual level, which has been instigated by their propaganda to protect children, which has already been done by Hitler by using children as an emotional weapon against Jews and Liberalism at the time, this has been well documented.
    1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16.  @MarkSmithhhh  Yes we did, some of us have done a research on it and we have found the majority of these suppertors possess accentuated narcissistic traits and live out of integrity and alignment with themselves as a result of their own invlidation of individual freedoms. One hint: any support for any leader that wants to establish two gender system acts from a fragmented two dimensional perspective, and as by default acting against the freedom of an individual, because binary system itself has been established a long time ago as a homogenizing model to push humans into a machine-like state of serviture and slavery. You would be well aware of this if you understood these power dynamics and how it works. Voting for Trump reflects the unconsicous need for authoritarianism to take power away from people as much as possible, it is a vote that stems from negative beliefs and fear that are exploited the same like it was exploited in German people by Nazi Parrty willing to save them. It is an act of giving power away, literally. The issue is that people do not realize this on a conscious level. If Trump supporters realized this about themselves they would be horrified about what they are actually supporting beyond their awareness. And I am speaking as someone who did vote for Trump twice, thats why I am sharing it. I had to go through massive healing since then to wake up to who I used to be. I can only pray people like you too. Project 2025 that relies on a republican candidate wiining is designed to usher in a theocracy as seen in a film like Escape Fromk LA. No free speech, no cussing, it is a gateway towards transhumanism, because it is radically designed to take the agency away from people over their own body, which is symbolzed by the end of Roe and Wade and healthcare and personal identity for trans people to exist on their own terms. It is an attack on the self actualization and self realization of an individual on a profound spiritual level, which has been instigated by their propaganda to protect children, which has already been done by Hitler by using children as an emotional weapon against Jews and Liberalism at the time, this has been well documented.
    1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22.  @duarteleonardo8352  Trans women do NOT have the male physiology, and that is the point, it has been called sex change for 100 years for a good reason, because sex has never been binary, but a huge diversity. UN report that 900 females lost medals to transgender women once again points out the harm of the BINARY sex segregation that is used for divide and conquer, this is not solved by banning trans people from sport, but in changing the categorizations in sport. Plenty of females match the physiology of trans women, while plenty of them don't, because sex has always been a diversity. Of course that taller and stronger women will have an advantage, because sport is not a level playing field, but it provides healthy challenges. UN has warned that blanket prohibitions on the grounds of nationality or of all female transgender persons, and intrusive practices for women athletes with sex variations, are against current human rights standards. Quote: “Decisions that prevent women from competing that are grounded on assumptions of who a woman is or how she should behave, must immediately be revised." MYTH: The participation of trans athletes hurts cis women. FACT: Including trans athletes will benefit everyone. Many who oppose the inclusion of trans athletes erroneously claim that allowing trans athletes to compete will harm cisgender women. This divide and conquer tactic gets it exactly wrong. Excluding women who are trans hurts all women. It invites gender policing that could subject any woman to invasive tests or accusations of being “too masculine” or “too good” at their sport to be a “real” woman. In Idaho, the ACLU represents two young women, one trans and one cis, both of whom are hurt by the law that was passed targeting trans athletes. Further, this myth reinforces stereotypes that women are weak and in need of protection. Politicians have used the “protection” trope time and time again, including in 2016 when they tried banning trans people from public restrooms by creating the debunked “bathroom predator” myth. The real motive is never about protection — it’s about excluding trans people from yet another public space. The arena of sports is no different. On the other hand, including trans athletes will promote values of non-discrimination and inclusion among all student athletes. As longtime coach and sports policy expert Helen Carroll explains, efforts to exclude subsets of girls from sports, “can undermine team unity and also encourage divisiveness by policing who is ‘really’ a girl.” Dr. Mary Fry adds that youth derive the most benefits from athletics when they are exposed to caring environments where teammates are supported by each other and by coaches. Banning some girls from athletics because they are transgender undermines this cohesion and compromises the wide-ranging benefits that youth get from sports. MYTH: Trans athletes’ physiological characteristics provide an unfair advantage over cis athletes. FACT: Trans athletes do not have an unfair advantage in sports. Women and girls who are trans face discrimination and violence that makes it difficult to even stay in school. According to the U.S. Trans Survey, 22 percent of trans women who were perceived as trans in school were harassed so badly they had to leave school because of it. Another 10 percent were kicked out of school. The idea that women and girls have an advantage because they are trans ignores the actual conditions of their lives. Trans athletes vary in athletic ability just like cisgender athletes. “One high jumper could be taller and have longer legs than another, but the other could have perfect form, and then do better,” explains Andraya Yearwood, a student track athlete and ACLU client. “One sprinter could have parents who spend so much money on personal training for their child, which in turn, would cause that child to run faster," she adds. In Connecticut, where cisgender girl runners have tried to block Andraya from participating in the sport she loves, the very same cis girls who have claimed that trans athletes have an “unfair” advantage have consistently performed as well as or better than transgender competitors.
    1
  23.  @LetsGetReal-o1p  Trans women ARE women! When we speak for women, we speak for both trans and cis women. MYTH: The participation of trans athletes hurts cis women. FACT: Including trans athletes will benefit everyone. Many who oppose the inclusion of trans athletes erroneously claim that allowing trans athletes to compete will harm cisgender women. This divide and conquer tactic gets it exactly wrong. Excluding women who are trans hurts all women. It invites gender policing that could subject any woman to invasive tests or accusations of being “too masculine” or “too good” at their sport to be a “real” woman. In Idaho, the ACLU represents two young women, one trans and one cis, both of whom are hurt by the law that was passed targeting trans athletes. Further, this myth reinforces stereotypes that women are weak and in need of protection. Politicians have used the “protection” trope time and time again, including in 2016 when they tried banning trans people from public restrooms by creating the debunked “bathroom predator” myth. The real motive is never about protection — it’s about excluding trans people from yet another public space. The arena of sports is no different. On the other hand, including trans athletes will promote values of non-discrimination and inclusion among all student athletes. As longtime coach and sports policy expert Helen Carroll explains, efforts to exclude subsets of girls from sports, “can undermine team unity and also encourage divisiveness by policing who is ‘really’ a girl.” Dr. Mary Fry adds that youth derive the most benefits from athletics when they are exposed to caring environments where teammates are supported by each other and by coaches. Banning some girls from athletics because they are transgender undermines this cohesion and compromises the wide-ranging benefits that youth get from sports. MYTH: Trans athletes’ physiological characteristics provide an unfair advantage over cis athletes. FACT: Trans athletes do not have an unfair advantage in sports. Women and girls who are trans face discrimination and violence that makes it difficult to even stay in school. According to the U.S. Trans Survey, 22 percent of trans women who were perceived as trans in school were harassed so badly they had to leave school because of it. Another 10 percent were kicked out of school. The idea that women and girls have an advantage because they are trans ignores the actual conditions of their lives. Trans athletes vary in athletic ability just like cisgender athletes. “One high jumper could be taller and have longer legs than another, but the other could have perfect form, and then do better,” explains Andraya Yearwood, a student track athlete and ACLU client. “One sprinter could have parents who spend so much money on personal training for their child, which in turn, would cause that child to run faster," she adds. In Connecticut, where cisgender girl runners have tried to block Andraya from participating in the sport she loves, the very same cis girls who have claimed that trans athletes have an “unfair” advantage have consistently performed as well as or better than transgender competitors.
    1
  24.  @nathalie_desrosiers  Thety care about trans women in cis women sports, because it is used for divide and conquer. Trans women do NOT have the male physiology, and that is the point, it has been called sex change for 100 years for a good reason, because sex has never been binary, but a huge diversity. UN report that 900 females lost medals to transgender women once again points out the harm of the BINARY sex segregation that is used for divide and conquer, this is not solved by banning trans people from sport, but in changing the categorizations in sport. Plenty of females match the physiology of trans women, while plenty of them don't, because sex has always been a diversity. Of course that taller and stronger women will have an advantage, because sport is not a level playing field, but it provides healthy challenges. UN has warned that blanket prohibitions on the grounds of nationality or of all female transgender persons, and intrusive practices for women athletes with sex variations, are against current human rights standards. Quote: “Decisions that prevent women from competing that are grounded on assumptions of who a woman is or how she should behave, must immediately be revised." MYTH: The participation of trans athletes hurts cis women. FACT: Including trans athletes will benefit everyone. Many who oppose the inclusion of trans athletes erroneously claim that allowing trans athletes to compete will harm cisgender women. This divide and conquer tactic gets it exactly wrong. Excluding women who are trans hurts all women. It invites gender policing that could subject any woman to invasive tests or accusations of being “too masculine” or “too good” at their sport to be a “real” woman. In Idaho, the ACLU represents two young women, one trans and one cis, both of whom are hurt by the law that was passed targeting trans athletes. Further, this myth reinforces stereotypes that women are weak and in need of protection. Politicians have used the “protection” trope time and time again, including in 2016 when they tried banning trans people from public restrooms by creating the debunked “bathroom predator” myth. The real motive is never about protection — it’s about excluding trans people from yet another public space. The arena of sports is no different. On the other hand, including trans athletes will promote values of non-discrimination and inclusion among all student athletes. As longtime coach and sports policy expert Helen Carroll explains, efforts to exclude subsets of girls from sports, “can undermine team unity and also encourage divisiveness by policing who is ‘really’ a girl.” Dr. Mary Fry adds that youth derive the most benefits from athletics when they are exposed to caring environments where teammates are supported by each other and by coaches. Banning some girls from athletics because they are transgender undermines this cohesion and compromises the wide-ranging benefits that youth get from sports. MYTH: Trans athletes’ physiological characteristics provide an unfair advantage over cis athletes. FACT: Trans athletes do not have an unfair advantage in sports. Women and girls who are trans face discrimination and violence that makes it difficult to even stay in school. According to the U.S. Trans Survey, 22 percent of trans women who were perceived as trans in school were harassed so badly they had to leave school because of it. Another 10 percent were kicked out of school. The idea that women and girls have an advantage because they are trans ignores the actual conditions of their lives. Trans athletes vary in athletic ability just like cisgender athletes. “One high jumper could be taller and have longer legs than another, but the other could have perfect form, and then do better,” explains Andraya Yearwood, a student track athlete and ACLU client. “One sprinter could have parents who spend so much money on personal training for their child, which in turn, would cause that child to run faster," she adds. In Connecticut, where cisgender girl runners have tried to block Andraya from participating in the sport she loves, the very same cis girls who have claimed that trans athletes have an “unfair” advantage have consistently performed as well as or better than transgender competitors.
    1
  25. 1
  26.  @billstretch9187  Trans women need to be protected in a female sport category as if our lives depended on it, because it does, it is related to the oppression of humaniy, binary segregation of sex was used for the purpose of authoritarian takeover of nations throughout the history, trans people inclusion in all areas of lives is a ticket to people's freedoms that should be taken bloody seriously, people in the UN know what they are talking about why their inclusion is important. So much so that it is the sport that needs to change more than banning of the entire group of people based on their condition, either people value the individual or the belief system. People like you are a major part of the problem, whether you realize it or not, if not THE problem. It is what gave birth to totalitarianism, it exploits the ignorance and fears of people like you. Life is a chaos, those who resist this are only used to usher in an authoritarianism at odds with mother nature. Chaos has its own order, and it is not binary, this is why the sport and evertyhing around us needs to change with regards to binary segregation, categorizations, and perception, binary view of life is fragmented that conditions narcissistic psyche within our society. If people knew the truth they would be blown away of what this is about! Only robots can operate through binary, humans exist within the elemental law of 3 as in proton, electron, neutron, not binary. Sex has always been a diversity, this is the main reason why the groundbreaking study released just this year has proven that trans women themselves are at disadvantage to cis females as well. That is how complex sex is.
    1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31.  @LetsGetReal-o1p  There have never been just two sexes, and that is a fact consistently supprted by science. Again, it is ideological rooted in a two dimensional mind-set that is blind to reality. Just like some women are taller than some men, some are men in their biological gender identity reflected by neurological pathways. Gametes, chromosoems are neither binary, they have been proven to be extremely diverse. People need some time to educate themselves about this and how life works in general. Your idea of biological sex is literally a la la land that has nothing to do with reality, but delusion. When trans people transition into the opposite sex, it is understood in diverse ways, just like there is not just day and night, there is dawn and twilight. This is why hormonal levels vary amongst women as well, this is why trans people transition into an IDEA of the opposite sex, but scientifically speaking there are no two sexes as such, because biological sex is literally a bimodal diversity with two high end peaks on both sides that can be embodied in diverse and multi-dimensional ways, this is why barbies, art, images are gendered as male or female as well, because they are part of the elemental nature just like biological sex, but humans exist in the elemental law of 3 - proton, electron, neutron, and sex is reflected by the same elemental law, this is why within science the brain is regarded as the largest sex organ of the body itself, and that alone can determine whether someone is male or female, because male and femaole has always been subjective and relational, not objective! In other words, sex is dimorphic in multidimensinal ways where two sides switch sides in multiple diverse ways, this is why women are born without the womb, this is why men are born with a vagina, and we call them intersex, and trans people are born intersex, because their bioological sex does not match the one they were assigned with regards to their neurology alone, we know this already since 1995. Their brain fires to the external stimuli as the sex of the opposite sex, after the autonopsy their key parts of the brain were found to match the opposite sex despire their sexual orientation, their number of neurons also match the opposite sex, their bone densitity is also matchintg the opposite sex before they take any cross-sex hormones, etc, etc...
    1
  32.  @Steelmage99  OMG you were soooo close to getting it by wanting to change categories in sport until you said there needs to be a female category. "Biological men" or "Biological women" isn't scientific, it doesn't match the reality of the science. It's scaremongering rhetoric intentionally designed by the misogynists in power to spark infighting amongst women. Sport has never been a level playing field. If trans women were a threat to female sport, they'd have been dominating women's categories for the decades they've been allowed to compete, but they aren't. Instead what is actually happening is increased restrictions of women's categories excluding more and more women. The categories aren't designed to make sports fair, they're designed to compartmentalise and exclude women. Designed BY MEN for that explicit purpose. But here we are, debating which type of woman "counts". When women attack women at the behest of men, the patriarchy wins. It invites it through this treatment of each other. Inclusion equals sacrifice for the purpose of change within the system. Do you understand that Female category has been unfair to other females that did not match in their physiology, especially intersex women? Biological sex has NEVER been binary, it was artificially forced into it for medical and cultural reasons, it is what scientits call a cultural gendering of sex, which is not rooted in science whatsoever. In other words, sport needs to be changed by categorizing bodies based on their similarity, NOT labels as male or female!!!! Otherwise we are perpetuating the harm to women. There are plenty of trans women whose physiology matches female one, this is why when we get rid of male and female categories, all we have is bodies, so that some females will be competing with some men whose physiology matches. All that we would be doing is reducing diversity within the sport so that more atheletes would have less challenges, less difficulties to win, in other words, make the sport safer, more homogenous. Now you can feel in my tone what it suggests, yes totalitarianism... now you can see where this trajectory leads, and why banning trans women from female sport comes from Trump's authoritarian fascistic agenda. Sport has never been a level playing field, diversity is what makes us human and free. But I still hold onto the view that sex should get rid of male and female labels and focus on diversity of bodies and create categories based on the unique phenotypes of the body, that creates rich opportunities and creative combinations in categoirizations. There was a time when males and females competed together, and the only reason women were forced to create their own category, because men were furious that women were beating them, this little history seems to be ignored by some people, they're free to research it for thmselves, its all true.
    1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1