Comments by "Ghastly_Grinner" (@Ghastly_Grinner) on "NATO Chief Backs 'More Heavy Weapons' For Ukraine As Zelensky Admits 'Painful Losses' Against Russia" video.

  1. NATO doesn't have the number of weapons Ukraine needs they will need at least 3 thousand artillery pieces and tens of millions of rounds of ammunition to even begin to start holding the Russian military up then an ever increasing stream of weapons and shells to push Russia back
    9
  2. Oh the Pentagon says Russia has no hopes of taking all of Ukraine... the same pentagon who said Kabul will not fall to the Taliban then 2 days later it fell to the taliban one day people will learn the Pentagon has never won a war since 1945
    5
  3.   rightspot025  That's precious but even if the US stupidly decided to hand over every last artillery piece we have in every active duty unit to ukraine Ukraine would still need 2 thousand Pieces the west doesnt have the military it had in the 80s everything has been down sized including the wests ability to produce arms for a conflict
    2
  4.   rightspot025  LMFAO your fantasies are too precious little guy
    2