Comments by "night mark" (@nightmark2120) on "The German Economic Collapse Is Worse Than We Think | @visualeconomiken" video.

@coliv2 Another bot, the video your commenting on literally showed you gas prices in now similar before the war and sanctions.
20
They trusted russia got dependent on LNG at the same time shutting down nuclear energy. And at the same time trusting china will be their growth
14
OMG yes I was going to say the exact same thing. Good to another zeihanite out there. Have you watched the podcast in the channel @MarcFriedrich with Peter. The entire comment section is literally bashing on how stupid his take is. I keep comment after 1 year what do you think nobody will reply lol.
9
To many russian bots today on gas the video literally showed gas prices are the same before the war and sanctions.
8
@coliv2 good that means you don't understand then. They make money from a loss because of subsidies for example production cost is $ 15 000 they sell it at $ 12 000 that a loss of of $ 3 000 but the for each car sold they receive from the government $ 4 000 that means they still profit $ 1 000. That doesn't count transport cost to export or any import fees also "reimbursed" (subsidize) by the government.
6
Russian bots are everywhere in this comment section lol
5
@coliv2 I ask the germans why they destroyed the arab pipelines or didn't diversified their lng at the same time shut down their nuclear power. When even the chinese doesn't do it. Why tax car makers in germany and chinese cars are subsidized? And again literally in the video showed that gas prices are same before the war and sanction then if it's wrong tell that to this channel.
4
@TWE_2000 At the same closed / destroyed their nuclear energy. And gas prices now in Germany is similar before the war. literally showed in the video the original commenter is a bot for russia.
4
@instanoodles Then tell me which part he is wrong in demographics, supply chain, geographic advantages and disadvantages or debt. Please elaborate.
4
@coliv2 LOL not even close the battery supply is completely subsidies then the manufacturer sells it a loss because they get paid to sell able to still make profit. Transportation to export is also subsidies.
3
@oceanwave4502 Merkel is absolutely wrong having a good relationship with russia. even the chinese and indians dont have a dependency on one supplier not even on russia.
3
@oceanwave4502 hey russian bot been a while here's you're 100 ruble = 0.1 cent dollar.
2
@YouReadMyName That only reinforces the comment I made. Why do you think india and brazil increased their tariffs and eu too. it's so uncompetitive everyone is blocking that also includes japan and korea. pretty much anyone who want to keep a car manufacturing in their country.
2
@aarionsievo Not only that the price of gas is not similar to the price before the war and sanctions.
2
@ЮрийКастро-м5в If you literally watched the video you bot. The price of gas is now similar before the war and sanctions. And again if you look at it's car export the US is bigger than china export 2 or 3 times. Which is again literally showed in the video.
2
@julioalmeida4645 Peter assessment it be great for the US because it reindustrialized the US again.
2
@YouReadMyName you're so dumb that also in forces my comment in the beginning. Country literally does everything to undercut everybody else. Why do you think even india an brazil also increased their own tariffs.
1
@dowhatisaynotwhatido.4145 hit the nail on the head.
1
@YouReadMyName LOL no US almost started a trade war against them forced them to float their currency check Lighthizer on that. Again the most critical part is the subsidies. The most expensive part of producing EV is battery is paid to produce it by the state, all imports paid to others countries paid by the government, when selling EV at a loss also paid by the government just like my previous comment. Again this is not just the "west" saying it's not fair this also india and brazil putting tariff on chinese ev.
1
@YouReadMyName LOL no US almost started a trade war against them forced them to float their currency check Lighthizer on that. Again the most critical part is the subsidies.
1
The most expensive part of producing EV is battery is paid to produce it by the state, all imports paid to others countries paid by the government, when selling EV at a loss also paid by the government just like my previous comment. Again this is not just the "west" saying it's not fair this also india and brazil putting tariff on chinese ev.
1
@YouReadMyName LOL if you can't see that subsidies lower the cost manufacturing to able to sell cheap plus the biggest PLUS a company can sell their product at a loss and still be profitable because of their government then theirs no point. And yes it only helps the chinese companies selling product to the rest of the world if their currency is artificially lower.
1
@coliv2 russian bots are everywhere again literally the video shows that gas prices are the same before the war and sanctions. Germans should never trusted the russians even the chinese don't do it. They should have diversified at the same not destroy their nuclear power plants.
1
@coliv2 bots are everywhere again literally the video shows that gas prices are the same before the war and sanctions
1
@aarionsievo No from the very beginning early strategic decisions made by germany broke it's country. They could buy gas from russia but they should have diversify supplier like china or india; if china doesn't trust the russians then germany shouldn't either but they made themselves dependent. At the same time shutting down nuclear power plants in 2011 then even after 2014 they should have seen the writing on the wall but instead double down on russian gas opening another pipeline becoming even more dependent. One strategic blunder after another.
1
@aarionsievo This doesn't change the fact that germany on every strategic decision was wrong. Not only they didn't diversify from gas in take they became dependent on russia double down at russia even after 2014 invasion. At the same time closing nuclear power plant in 2011 this is the reason why the "market" is broken. Even if you're able to find 9/10 energy supply that 1/10 price will dictate the rest of the 9/10. Debate or not the consequences of trusting russia and whatever reason why closing down nuclear power plant is apparent definitely the wrong choice. even china doesn't rely on russia they're well diversified.
1
@ЮрийКастро-м5в If you literally watched the video you bot. The price of gas is now similar before the war and sanctions. And again if you look at it's car export the US is bigger than china export 2 or 3 times. Which is again literally showed in the video. Germanies biggest strategic mistake is trusting the russians and chinese. Germany should have never been dependent on russian lng, destroyed arabian pipeline and nuclear reactors. They should have diversified not even the chinese rely on russia. They trusted the chinese to trade fairly while they tax heavy industries in germany producing car the chinese subsidize their own making chinese companies sell at a loss but still be profitable. There you go you bot.
1
@ЮрийКастро-м5в Germanies biggest strategic mistake is trusting the russians and chinese. Germany should have never been dependent on russian lng, destroyed arabian pipeline and nuclear reactors. They should have diversified not even the chinese rely on russia.
1
@ЮрийКастро-м5в They trusted the chinese to trade fairly while they tax heavy industries in germany producing car the chinese subsidize their own making chinese companies sell at a loss but still be profitable. There you go you bot.
1
@ЮрийКастро-м5в Germanies biggest strategic mistake is trusting the russians and chinese. Germany should have never been dependent on russian lng, destroyed arabian pipeline and nuclear reactors. They should have diversified not even the chinese rely on russia.
1
Germanies biggest strategic mistake is trusting the russians and chinese. Germany should have never been dependent on russian lng, destroyed arabian pipeline and nuclear reactors. They should have diversified not even the chinese rely on russia.
1
@ЮрийКастро-м5в Germany should have never been dependent on russian lng, destroyed arabian pipeline and nuclear reactors. They should have diversified not even the chinese rely on russia.
1
@univeropa3363 lol people like you still exist that decision is not US or Russia but the Ukrainians they literally showing which side they want. consequences bs fully busted myth literally Finland and Sweden joined NATO.
1
@univeropa3363 that decision is not US or Russia but the Ukrainians they literally showing which side they want. consequences bs fully busted myth literally Finland and Sweden joined nato.
1
@univeropa3363 that decision is not on us or russia but on Ukraine they showed the russians which side they want. consequences bs myth busted when finland and sweden joined.
1
that decision is not on us or russia but on Ukraine they showed the russians which side they want. consequences bs myth busted when finland and sweden joined.
1
@krimokrimov6050 yah trusting the russians and making them dependent on one supplier even the chinese or indians don't do it.
1
@krimokrimov6050 yes trusting the russian having one supplier you dependent on.
1
@tourist3311 If them saying they want cheap russian gas hurt germany they yes. germany is hurt because they trusted russia in the first place when china don't even do that. they could diversified their gas suppliers but they didn't doubled down even after 2014 invasion crimea. at the same time closing down nuclear power plants that makes them even more energy not just gas but energy dependent on russia and people say it's because they don't russian gas anymore they definitely deserve to called a bot.
1
@donaldkinsey5245 US economy barely trades with rest of the world as Peter has said and 2/3 of that trade is within NAFTA and half of that 1/3 is US exporting energy. So the US is not dependent to the rest of the world.
1
@donaldkinsey5245 to quote Peter: "We are going to 9 to 15 inflation annually for a minimum of 5 yrs ... if we pull it off we will have supply chains that are at home that employ people on this continent that serve people on this continent the supply chains are simpler with fewer steps that are cleaner you lose less energy are more highly skilled are more efficient and will largely immune to international shocks and we will exit that transition period with the strongest economy that Mexico, Canada and the United States have ever seen and we will have five year of the fastest growth in the history of all three countries"
1
@donaldkinsey5245 You need to watch him more then literally free on youtube. The rest of the world yes but for other countries or areas like North America, South east asia, france, turkey it would be good to them. the rest is bad.
1
@donaldkinsey5245 Yes again watch more of him in youtube and I didn't study economics. He especially those low value work called mexico, columbia and south east asia and india. Those countries are getting rich we "sell" to them much easier than in china. He really discussed these things in his video man.
1
@donaldkinsey5245 Yes the model is gone which is again he said on podcast and other presentations. That countries or areas like North America, south east asia, france, turkey, india and argentina will have advantages or positive and others countries or areas won't.
1
@donaldkinsey5245 I didn't not only did I quote him every end of his podcast and presentation said that it will be great for NA especially America but also South East Asia, India, France, Turkey and Argentina. Peter again has said their will be winners and losers. Rather loss it will just move. Just watch every end of his video literally said this again and again almost word for word.
1
@donaldkinsey5245 Yes the world not those countries he literally points out that will benefit from a deglobalized world. And yes he points out the Iphone and as calles BMW beamers are "not going to last and you should buy one now". I'm not saying that the world will not be hurt but I'm quite literally commenting he literally says that countries like America will benefit immensely and South East Asia, Canada, Mexico, France, Turkey and Argentina. He literally says it at the end of every podcast interview or presentations he has. This is not me rephrasing his words he literally says this. That's what I don't get from you.
1
Anyone can explain degrowth?
1
@WilliamBrwn why?
1
@guydreamr LOL, I think you got him that.
1