Comments by "Emanon" (@Emanon...) on "Anders Puck Nielsen"
channel.
-
46
-
32
-
11
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mariaf.6601 None whatsoever.
But neither is there for Russia being the culprit. All investigations have been halted, not ended naturally, they've been halted.
APN did a great video based on gaming theory of why it could and should be Russia. But remember that he's a NATO intelligence officer from Denmark, my country. We're not exactly objective in this matter, and a military person is directly prohibited from sharing all of his research, intel and knowledge.
Now to the "Qui Bono" aspect:
1) You wean Europe off Russian gas.
2) You hurt the Russian economy by preventing them from exporting the gas (no sizeable alternative routes for the gas to go).
3) Europe instead relies on US imported LNG at about three times the rate.
4) The US energy sector finds a stable, huge market for their gas exports.
5) By painting it as a Russian False Flag, you increase fear of further Russian sabotage and bring Europe closer under the US umbrella: More money for NATO = More money for US weapons manufacturers.
And possibly
6) You tank European economic development with the vastly increased energy and military expenditures, especially Germany's, thus making Europe as a whole more reliant on the US in the future.
There are literally no reasons why this should be Russian sabotage and not an American operation. But again, it's only based on "Qui Bono" and the history of the US to use lies to galvanise their allies into action (Iraq 2003).
I want Europe to be able to stand on its own. Not for us to be naive lapdogs for whatever crazy person they should choose to elect next.
But it's probably too late for that this time around...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This is a BS talking point. Of course its possible, but it's unlikely. Politicians love this because it means distracting from domestic issues. APN probably likes this too because it means increased military funding and research budgets.
Objectively speaking, the US has increasingly been provoking and maligning Russia, China and Iran the last decade. These countries are by no means "innocent", but they haven't conducted destabilising wars and used increasingly belligerent language as the US have the past decades (!).
Diplomacy, as we say in Denmark, "is a town in Russia" - meaning they don't even consider it as an option in the US anymore.
Ukraine is what it is sadly, but likely wouldn't have happened if NATO didn't announce their plans of expansion for Georgia and Ukraine.
NATO expansion that was absolutely unnecessary solely from the viewpoint of a westerner.
Not that it excuses Russian aggression in any way, but we were warned by Russia, more than once, that this would be the consequence.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1