Comments by "Emanon" (@Emanon...) on "How is UKRAINE winning the WAR? - VisualPolitik EN" video.

  1. I'll support you because it's the right thing to do. But I have to admit that there is a tænker load of hypocrisy in Ukraine when you so avidly support Israel in their illegal occupation, whilst expect everyone to be 100% on board with you because you're in almost the same situation now as the Palestinians have been for 50+ years. Slava Ukraina, Slava Palestine, Slava to all victims of oppression and aggression
    4
  2. Ukraine hasn't taken responsibility for the Kerch bridge bombing, which would indicate that they're not actually responsible. So 1) It's a Russian false flag akin to Nord-Stream? Not likely because of the hit to prestige, the timing (Putin's B-Day) and the strategic cost. 2) A third party? Who benefits? Not Russia. Not Ukraine if it results in further mobilization and escalation. But it would definitely pressure the Russians to either escalate thus expending manpower and treasure, or de-escalate and seek a settled solution because of status quo or Ukrainian progress. So in real-politik terms, a positive result either way for a third actor aiming to quell the conflict or at least make the cost very dear for Russia. Conclusion: Who has the resources, experience and connections? The answer is pretty clear to me: The US (or possibly, but less likely, another powerful actor) is responsible for the attack on the Kerch Bridge. I have seen very few analyses or reports that have even suggested this, which makes me even more suspicious to be honest.
    2