Comments by "Emanon" (@Emanon...) on "Unpacked" channel.

Yeah, that's bullshit. No one is 100% unless they've lived in a totally isolated community I'm betting the company was Jewish owned as they have a tendency to mix and match whatever they find and call it "Jewish markers"... Redo the test, but this time with a company that actually cares about the results.
14
Israel is also a failed state. It's primary purpose was to be a safe land for Jews. But because of Israel's own "policies", no where is less safe for Jews than Israel .
3
* Yes, you did. * In 1948 with illegal annexation of land and ethnic cleansing of Palestinian inhabitants and post 1967 with illegal settlements. In 1918 Jews were about 3-5% of the population. Their descendants are the only Jews who have a right to call Palestine their homeland. The rest of you have nothing to do with known genetic clusters related to the Levant - that's why Israel has banned commercial genetic testing. It's pathetic the amount of lies you have to tell yourselves...
2
Genetically related. Sure. We're all genetically related. Try testing the original inhabitants of Palestine and compare it to Western settler Jews. Except you can't. Commercial genetic testing is outlawed in "Voldemort". Even the notion of certain middle eastern markers being exclusively "Jewish" is fallacious as intermingling of many Semitic peoples freely happened before the classical age and during the islamic ages. And no matter what it still doesn't mean that you have the right to a piece of land your ancestors left 2000 years ago.
2
What food is that? And what part of it was just nicked from the local population... Much like other things are stolen or appropriated...
2
@NettiYahoo Wow. The league of Nations, huh. Did that include all the colonies? The billions of people historically disenfranchised and oppressed Or just the colonial countries with a dominant Askenazi Zionist influence? If Israel doesn't even recognize the resolutions of the UN, the body that established Israel, what legitimacy do you think you have when you refer to obscure historical decisions that didn't represent humans equally? The average European or American Jews right to Israel is morally, ethically and legally illegitimate. These people have no relation to the region whatsoever. Does "Sneider, Kushner, Bernstein or Kudlow" even sound remotely related to the Middle East to you? Or is it more correct to say that these names have a long history in Europe and no association with the Levant?
1
@vangielee1403 I replied several times, but my comment kept getting deleted. He's cherry picking a single reference from 1922. After the British announced the Balfour declaration. Go figure.
1
@NettiYahoo Oh wow the entire league of nations , huh!? Like India? Nigeria? Indonesia? Give me a break. Half the world was still colonised and under western domination at the time. It's not a legitimate decision, especially when the very people living there were never asked. Secondly, why was the league of Nations dismantled, if you seem to think it was such a great institution? Thirdly, Even the UN in 1947 didn't represent the majority of nations or people at the time. But let's say it did. Why does Israel not listen and follow any of the resolutions laid out by the UN? You know, your almighty creator? Fact is, Israel has never been legitimate. It's a colonial state bent on genocide and displacement, with the full support of the West because of the tragedy of WW2. If the West truly believed that Jews should be safe, they wouldn't have given them a plot of land among 13 nations that refused the partition plan. Eg. Russian and American Jews whose descendants haven't lived in the Middle East for at least centuries, if not millenia, simply have no association or heritage that ties them to the region except history. And that's not a basis for nationhood.
1