Comments by "Rick74" (@rick7424) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1. Even when taking the Sino-Soviet split into account, why would you give military technology to a significant potential rival?
    97
  2. Yeah, it's so bad. None of them even know how air warfare works, yet they still think they have the knowledge to comment on the topic.
    96
  3. Its an analysis, not a news headline
    24
  4. This comment section is filled with angry rants and extraordinary claims lacking any evidence.
    22
  5. "Tankies are losing their heads knowing that America is better than them." See, I can do that too.
    21
  6. Do not engage the trolls in the comment section. Report them and move on.
    21
  7. Nice try Dimitri.
    20
  8. Which does not even account for the Russian education and corruption
    19
  9. Binkov has a serious troll isue in the comments, from Bitcoin bots to Kremlin trolls.
    18
  10. Source: trust me bro
    15
  11. You're the agressor.
    14
  12. The Bradley destroyed scores of T-72s during the Gulf War. Its combat record speaks for itself. Why was that T-90 doing there by itself?
    13
  13. Is this a fever dream?
    12
  14. How come Binkov's comment sections is in a terrible condition when compared to Perun and Sandboxx?
    12
  15. You keep leaving troll comments on every video Russian.
    12
  16. This community has become incredibly toxic and Binkov does not care about his bot problem at all.
    11
  17.  @heksogen4788  You are the type of troll I was describing.
    11
  18. These comment sections are especially toxic.
    11
  19. It is always fun to see people get their panties twisted over a video about hypotheticals. Especially when ones assertions are rediculous.
    10
  20. Dude, we both follow Perun. By that logic were both Western propagandists.
    9
  21. Yes imagine launching and air campaign, suffer losses and then confine your aircraft to lobbing missiles from inside Russia. Oh wait, that has already happened
    9
  22. Did you storm the Capitol?
    9
  23. Prove it
    9
  24. Racism? I saw one guy talk about "savages" but he refered to marines in general. Where is this racism you claim to have seen?
    8
  25. You are strangely excited about China starting a war. That is abnormal.
    8
  26. ?
    8
  27. You were one to always state that certain claims have not been substantiated, yet you take Russian specs at face value. Your struict thesis is correct, but you assume the weapons listed exists with those capabilities.
    8
  28. These comments sound like a playground fight. Are all of them still in highschool? No citation, assumption built on top of assumption etc.
    8
  29. "I don't have any arguments and will just throw a tantrum"
    7
  30. Pretty sure China in 1950 is not comparable to China in 2022, but your point about little experience is accurate and relevant
    7
  31. He is not Russian. He is from Croatia.
    7
  32. Boogus?! HAHAHA! Good one mate.
    7
  33. "Your wars" Does that accent sound American? He is not American.
    6
  34. ​ @sahilsingh6782  Not everyone you don't like is Pakistani.
    6
  35. That is because the US refuses to sell the F-35 to Gulf states, not because they don't want them.
    6
  36. Binkov is not from the US. Your argument is invalid.
    6
  37. We all saw what they did in Bucha.
    6
  38. Oh look, a Chinese imperialist.
    6
  39. Imagine unironically quoting RT.
    6
  40. What Ukrainian reports? He cited his sources
    6
  41. He is no friend of Putin.
    6
  42. They know.
    5
  43. You do not understand how predictions work, do you?
    5
  44. This is beneath contempt. I too have sufficient problems with some of binkov's videos, but to make up these charges is McCarthyism.
    5
  45. You lost 1,700 tanks Dmitri...
    5
  46. You told a guy defending Taiwanese independence that you hope his "little rant made him happy". You are not civil.
    5
  47. China stated they won't supply arms to any sude involved in this conflict. Though I do take such statements with a "wait and see"-attitude
    5
  48. You actually think this is some ad hoc guilt-based decision?!
    5
  49. This is plain wrong.
    4
  50. You have no idea what the BRICS are, do you? It is neither a military nor political organisation. Not to mention the BRICS were created after the Cold War. That's why it incldues Russia, not the USSR.
    4
  51. Just to give a perspective: US defence spending to counter threats like Russia usually costs $100-150 billion, yet now it can spent much less to reduce Russian military capabilities for at least a decade to come. See: "It’s Costing Peanuts for the US to Defeat Russia" by Timothy Ash for more
    4
  52.  @ssww3  ???
    4
  53. You do realise your nation would not survive a nuclear war either, right?
    4
  54. This is the overlord tank. I am big.
    4
  55. No u.
    4
  56. Gotta love the culture war frames of bots. Try harder next time. They/them army > was/were army
    4
  57. Troll.
    4
  58. Found the Chinese imperialist.
    4
  59. He ignored the sparrow missiles
    4
  60.  @AvroBellow  I see a bunch of Warsaw Pact fans complain that he has a Western bias. Watch his video on the F-35 vs the SU-35. Alot of angry Russians.
    4
  61. Nope. It cannot even role of the production line en masse.
    4
  62. Did you storm the Capitol?
    4
  63. That is not even true. He shows multiple European nations have mediocre air forces.
    4
  64. Why, because Putin tells you so?
    4
  65. ​ @BertoxolusThePuzzled  That is blatantly incorect.
    4
  66. All evidence to the contrary
    4
  67. Oh boy, you must be new.
    4
  68. Your belittling tone prevents anyone from taking you seriously.
    4
  69.  @elvinnunez919  It was a team effort, but the USSR did most of the heavy lifting in terms of the fighting.
    4
  70. Incoherent.
    4
  71. ​ @sirmingusdewiv8325  No argumentation, just angry rants.
    4
  72. ​ @akramkarim3780  Laughable claims without a shred of evidence.
    4
  73. ​ @ozymandiasultor9480  NATO has a bigger arms industry than Russia
    4
  74.  @Leny1777  Why has the battle for Bakhmut lasted longer than the battle of Stalingrad? Can't you even take one town?
    4
  75.  @detroittrickster3327  That's absolutely not how China works. Your racist comment is disgusting.
    4
  76. Least schizo Chinese bot
    4
  77.  Martin_Speaks  Excuse you? Promoting scams harms the viewers and undermines one's credibility. Your defence is rediculous.
    4
  78. Its tradition and a brand.
    4
  79.  @joea5222  The /s is an indication of sarcasm. He is making fun of the fact that Russia claism to be acting in the interests of the Ukrainian people while actively trying to kill them.
    4
  80. Americans call it the House of Representatives, but it is the American parliament.
    3
  81. *Femboy With its wooden screws.
    3
  82. Sure buddy. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_anti-war_protests_in_Russia
    3
  83. Yes and no. Seperate branches though technically the marines were placed under the navy.
    3
  84. Obvious troll is obvious.
    3
  85. NEVER!
    3
  86. This truelly is something conjured up by a highschooler who has no idea about the hours of training, organisation of units, doctrine or logistics. I am not ehre to defend of these nations, I am just calling this nonsense. What is this tierlist even based on? You have no theory, no methodology, no research, just empty claims.
    3
  87. Considering the fate of T-72s, T-80s and T-90s, I disagree.
    3
  88.  @ВикторБасенков-о7ж  No they don't.
    3
  89. What do you think the "multirole" in "multirole planes" stands for?
    3
  90. Like the Moskva?
    3
  91. ​ @asahearts1  The US is planning on increasing its artillery shell output by 500% by 2025. So that last statement is not true.
    3
  92. No sources and alot of profanity.
    3
  93. 1. He isn't American. 2. The US has a larger air force than Russia. 3. Russia cannot achieve air superiority in Ukraine.
    3
  94. ​ @TheGrace020  Yes it is. $85 million for a Grippen E and around $70 million for an F-35A
    3
  95.  @nextlaunch1  There are no coherent arguments that can be used to justiy their opinions. It is much easier to just use fallacies or emojis.
    3
  96. How is your Crimean Air base doing?
    3
  97. ​ @李大人-m7p No source, bot name and using Chinese while YouTube is blocked in China...
    3
  98. Found the Russian paid troll
    3
  99. ​ @feiwang5306  Didn't your country ban youtube because they are afraid people might get Western ideas?
    3
  100. Did Crowder tell you that?
    3
  101. "Hello my fellow Western citizens."
    3
  102. Russia invaded Ukraine
    3
  103.  @PISEc412  Claims made without evidence can be refuted without evidence )))
    3
  104.  @PISEc412  Again, you commit the burden of proof fallacy.
    3
  105. If you wish to change their names to Russian, go try and take them Vladimir.
    3
  106.  @MATTNMEMPHIS  The F-35 can dogfight
    3
  107. ​ @Tealice1  Yes, the sexy Ukrainian special leotard force. There quite famous.
    3
  108. You have a bias to the Warsaw Pact.
    3
  109. Binkov does not make propaganda, though he is not an expert.
    3
  110. I believe you mean "Waffen". Waffles ould be nice too though.
    3
  111. But nobody is ordering them for the future either.
    3
  112.  @hamzatariq5073  As there are in every war where people were mobilized. Your anecdotal "proof" is no evidence of large scale discontent.
    3
  113. Prove it.
    3
  114. "Yes, big by modern standards" You got the point then.
    3
  115. And who are you?
    3
  116. "Soon, shortly, presently, in the near future, before long" etc. This line gets old real quick.
    3
  117. They primarily used them to shoot down missiles. Russian jets barely operate in Ukraine.
    3
  118. Bingo! I've got a full Bingo card. I got "Europe will freeze", "the Russian spirit will triumph", "these retreats are just tactical withdrawels and gestures of goodwill" and now I finally have " Ukraine will run out of manpower"
    3
  119. "Even"
    3
  120. He did. We won't bow down to your telling of history and instead recognize when a border is disputed
    3
  121.  @thomass1891  Your understanding of war economics is rediculously basic. How on earth do you think Russia today is comparable to the USSR in 1941, a country that had over ten million reservists?
    3
  122. Didn't Trump get impeached for withholding aid from Ukraine in an attempt to blackmail them?
    3
  123. Wtf? No.
    3
  124. *period Also no, statements require arguments that support them.
    3
  125. Whenever I hear anything abou India versus Pakistan, the claims made are never supported by any evidence.
    2
  126. Pretty sure AWACS weren't supporting Ukraine in the opening days and aren't even operating over Ukraine.
    2
  127. Russian trolls have been saying this for 2.5 years.
    2
  128. ​ @Hzhh91  It is the copypasting and zero interactions with the content that makes them look like bots.
    2
  129. It is combat proven alright. It just does not have a stellar record.
    2
  130.  Martin_Speaks  It is not his job to promote scams.
    2
  131. *a UAV You pronounce the capital letter U as "You" and therefore don't use "an". On the opposite end of the spectrum you will find words like "hour". Since you don't pronounce the "h" you write "an hour".
    2
  132.  @gaborrajnai6213  Many buzzwords, little substance.
    2
  133. ​ @jamesmandahl444 Russia does not have many Flankers with their most modern radar.
    2
  134.  ☠ ᒪ𝕠𝓖𝐚𝐧  Binkov is not Russian.
    2
  135.  @comrade_commissar3794  Considering Russian incompetence I doubt that.
    2
  136. And are these "tanks" in the room with us right now?
    2
  137.  @BenVaserlan  And? Did the 2008 recession lead to the downfall of civilization? You are making wild speculative claims about the impact of inflation without backing.
    2
  138. For someone so into guns you sure don't like protecting people or upholding rights.
    2
  139.  @heksogen4788  You mean solid snake who took up arms against the Patriots who controlled the US? It is also a video game. Chill
    2
  140. ​ @aimgorge  Such as?
    2
  141.  @arzireece  We don't care.
    2
  142.  @octaslash2621  You can't even make a coherent argument that does not rely on fallacies. Your ad hominem is such blatant nonsense.
    2
  143. So you support the war criminals and wars of agression, yet you think you are still on the good side of history?
    2
  144. ​​ @joemama1691  Calling for wars again, saying how this will happen? How sad.
    2
  145.  @bigbirdearnest6752  HAHA! The S-400 failed to stop Ukrainian missiles.
    2
  146. So?
    2
  147. That's because many analists severely overestimated Russian capabilities prior to the war. Binkov is not pro-Russia.
    2
  148. Doubtful
    2
  149. If you think war is not also about expanding influence and national prestige than you have to go back to IR theory 101
    2
  150. ​ @JA-pn4ji  Then why can't you produce a functional 5th generation fighter IR gain control of Ukrainian air space?
    2
  151.  @gaborrajnai6213  You are not a military professional
    2
  152. Most of these comments do not understand the concept of a supporting argument.
    2
  153. Yes, clearly bullets are obsolete by having been around for 500+ years /s
    2
  154.  @Vain-nf3il  France has the most succesful military record in world history
    2
  155.  @J_X999  So you deny the right of selfdetermination? I have no respect for you.
    2
  156. None of that aid arrived in meaningful quantity before Ukraine had checked the Russian advance towards Kyiv.​ @johnxina3709 
    2
  157.  @MGZetta  I litterly only stated Binkov ignored it in the video and made no other claims about me liking the sparrow. You guys are delusional.
    2
  158. Javelin's aren't used against aircraft... that would be the stinger
    2
  159. Russia is still considered a part of Europe despite its actions. We can however say they do not belong to "our Europe".
    2
  160. ​ @Ranyick  Europe as a name came about as a political construct. It is as geographical as it is political.
    2
  161. How?
    2
  162. ​ @ZeroFilms-d4n Obvious bot is obvious
    2
  163. Gamble?
    2
  164. Don't you mean 1989?
    2
  165. No. The Russians suffered morale issues, command issues, equipment and logistical issues, had no clear idea of their objectives and were not prepared to fight an army. In all likelihood the Kremlin believed Ukraine would not put up much of a fight. They were wrong.
    2
  166. "You can jam stealth" You can jam sensors. You can't jam stealth. What? Nothing you just said made sense.
    2
  167. You would have preffered nuclear annihilation? That is what would have happened if the COld War turned hot.
    2
  168. "Modern" You don't understand logistics.
    2
  169. *Abrams
    2
  170.  @Azdal  He litterly posted a satalite image on twitter of an Iranian site that revealed the level of detail of the cameras on US satalites. That info was in fact classified. The Pentagon always degrades the image.
    2
  171. That is a poor assumption based more on stereotypes rather than analysis
    2
  172. ​ @Azrael1st  The irony is palpable.
    2
  173. I'll believe it when I see it.
    2
  174. Some rightfully pointed out he ignored sparrow missiles as a factor.
    2
  175.  @freezoneproject567  Kremlin troll
    2
  176. Russian bot.
    2
  177.  @rainboworiental9521  Whataboutism.
    2
  178.  @everlastzyt5895  It is still a dictatorship. Don't mitigate it.
    2
  179. It is weird that when there has been no strategic Russian victory in six months, and yet you claim they can never lose. The real question is whether they have the political will and economic base to sustain this war. That knife cuts both ways of course, but you make so many bold claims without adressing the real issue. Falacious arguments.
    2
  180. ​ @johnbaker4246  Defensive realism, basic normative theory.
    2
  181. HAHA! It couldn't stop Ukrainian missiles.
    2
  182. ​ @ametos  Nobody needs a bloody source on the fact that Turkey has not sanctioned Russia. One google search and not living under a rock would have told you that.
    2
  183. South Vietnam was a dictatorship with little civil support. Taiwan is one of the advanced and democratic nations in all of Asia.
    2
  184. ???
    2
  185. ​ @aliwalil4160  Weren't you the guy who suggested modern wars only end with the conquest of one party's capital lol
    2
  186. Sure buddy.
    2
  187. See how trolls use Republican buzzwords to attack people?
    2
  188. This number is an average. China maintains a great number of legacy aircraft.
    2
  189.  @AlexanderTch  Copium is a dangerous drug.
    2
  190. Wrong. BVR.
    2
  191.  @pilotmanpaul  I do not want personal attacks and incivility. Your assumption is part of the problem.
    2
  192. Source: I made it up.
    2
  193. Russia has 570 T-90's...
    2
  194. The Su-57 is not stealthy as has been discussed extensively. It is no equivalent to the F-35.
    2
  195. No that is a real uniform from the sock puppets time in the army. Because that makes sense.
    2
  196. The overall fleet is mediocre due to the high number of J-7s JH-7s and J-8s still in service.
    2
  197.  @kniga5179  *proof The UN litterly has written an extensive report on how Russian war crimes are systemic.
    2
  198. Is this supposed logistical force in the room with us right now?
    2
  199.  @Cba409  Your arguments lack substance. "Logistical concerns are minimum" don't explain the slow place and abandones vehicles. You are subscribed to RT and Crowder. I see you prefer propaganda over a debate.
    2
  200. No.
    2
  201. Why on earth would China side with the USSR?
    2
  202. ​Obvious troll is obvious​ @pandaprince5349 
    2
  203. ​ @JWPanimation  The F-35A is cheaper and has its datalink.
    2
  204. Ivan, that is the 900th time you have said Russia is going to win 'any day now'.
    2
  205. The F-35 is absolutely an all weather system.
    2
  206. The intend is terror and the destruction of critical infrastructure including the supply of power and gas before winter. But yes, this does not in any way help capitulate a nation that is willing to fight. It did not work in WWII and it did not work in the Iran-Iraq war.
    2
  207. Russia never held air dominance.
    2
  208. Look at all the self-proclaimed experts in the comment section. Most of them don't seem to understand that claims made without evidence can be refuted without evidence.
    1
  209.  @scalemodelofmycar  You couldn't even read a scientific paper if your life depended on it
    1
  210. Since Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine less than one year ago, Congress has approved more than $113 billion of aid and military assistance to support the Ukrainian government and allied nations.
    1
  211. ​ @po69tato  Russia has not been able to take Bakhmut in 8 months
    1
  212. Nope.
    1
  213. No.
    1
  214.  @queadquead5327  Yeah and then a simgle Russian soldier will take over New York armed only with a knife, right?
    1
  215. Oryx has the images that confirm 60 Ka-52 losses, 13 Mi-28 losses, 10 Mi-35M losses and 7 Mi-24 losses of several variants. Those are 90 attack helicopter losses for the Russian Federation.
    1
  216. ​ @TheCraitor  RT is not an open source nor.
    1
  217. Do you think these F-16s have not been upgraded since the 1970s?
    1
  218. ​ @jawarakf Russian talking points.
    1
  219. You can tell how valuable these weapons are based on the amount of effort Russia puts into using trolls to dissuade the West from sending these weapons.
    1
  220. No. -William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act III, Scene I, line 96.
    1
  221. Lol! How is the war going Boris? When are you signing up?
    1
  222. *Armata's, T-90s and T-72s.
    1
  223. What?
    1
  224.  @PISEc412  No.
    1
  225. ​ @aimgorge  What world do you live in? We have the Red Flag data.
    1
  226.  @CloneDAnon  The s-400 couldn't even stop Ukrainian missiles. So much for your super system Vladimir.
    1
  227. Too many HOI4 mods.
    1
  228.  @syrphilipgulmatico5352  "I don't care who wins" You sraight up lack values.
    1
  229. Well, the airframe does not matter much if you ack the mdoern sensors and pilots with training. Sandbox did a great video on the state of the Russian air force, as did Binkov.
    1
  230. Do the racism and homophobia make up for something?
    1
  231. Zid is a subscriber of RussiaToday, another RUssian pro war channel, "Facts matter" with Roman Balmakov and other various other extremist and conspiracy channels.
    1
  232. "We". You did not do anything. Your government did while you slept in your own bed.
    1
  233. He isn't American lol.
    1
  234. Weird how other channels like that of Perun do not nearly have this big of a problem​ @May-gr8bp 
    1
  235. Proof it.
    1
  236. They could not shoot down ballistic missiles in Ukraine.
    1
  237.  @Kalashnikov413  haha! Javelin goes brrr.
    1
  238.  @comrade_commissar3794  You are subscribed to a channel litterly called "Stand with Russia" which has the burning of an LGBTQ+ flag as its PFP. You are trolling or an imperialist.
    1
  239. Sure I want to bet, seeing as they cannot achieve air superiority over their neighbour.
    1
  240. None of that information you claim to have is known to the public.
    1
  241.  @antibuzzer4982  Troll.
    1
  242.  @militavia-air-defense-aircraft  Well, you have to station the F-35 on paved airfields, which lowers the number of airbases available and increases the risk that an airfield stationing F-35s might be attacked by a missile strike.
    1
  243.  @militavia-air-defense-aircraft  Useless? Perun made an excellent video on why the Gripen would be the best plane, militarily speaking, for Ukraine. I do not like the hype around the Gripen, but your comment is a bit insulting.
    1
  244. ??? You have no idea how effective it is on the F-35.
    1
  245. ​ @foundones Which you clearly misinterpreted. Or you're just purposefully lying about it.
    1
  246. ​ @generalkayoss7347  You want to fight an assymetrical war in uneven terrain with tanks? Man, you have no clue what the concept of "doctrine" or "tactic" refers to.
    1
  247. ​ @LordLegato  Do you visit Freedom House, the UN and Transparency International for those figures or did Tucker Carlson tell you that?
    1
  248. ​ @aitorbleda8267  What? Kherson and Zaporizhzhia do not have any waterways to the north. Nobody needs bridges in those areas.
    1
  249. ​The guy is all over lying about Russian losses. He is a vatnik.  @MrJC1 
    1
  250. Then you were clearly incompetent to invade when you did.
    1
  251. No. Just no. Do you think you can find and lock unto the enemy with those Fox-3's if you can't see them?
    1
  252. How does it feel to have your Su-35's shot down over Ukraine?
    1
  253.  @m3c4nyku43  Glorifying warfare.
    1
  254. ​ @taylorthomas2089 No, the correction is good. He specifically said "now has", which is false.
    1
  255. Bruh.
    1
  256. Proof it.
    1
  257. Different war, different planes. Irrelevant.
    1
  258.  @BenVaserlan  And?
    1
  259. Then why didn't it do that in the 90's? Stop making imaginary enemies so you can rally your population.
    1
  260. That is not how hacking works.
    1
  261. ​ @Goorood "hellhole" Ah yes, how very objective.
    1
  262.  @shenghan9385  I smell copium.
    1
  263.  @TheZachary86  Says the guy supporting war crimes
    1
  264. ​ @tedarcher9120 ... you did not read what Sweden has said about a possible transfer, have you?
    1
  265. You can always rely on an Indian to stand up for Russia. That is a bad thing by the way. @mihirshetye4624 
    1
  266. I know right? They don't even know what stealth, multirole, bvr or cross radar section mean. They talk about dogfights all the time like it is the default. And even then they state so myths.
    1
  267. It is true that they have deliberately targeted civilians. https://www.bellingcat.com/news/mena/2016/11/09/fact-checking-russias-claim-didnt-bomb-another-hospital-syria/
    1
  268. Out of all military channels this has one of the worst comment sections
    1
  269.  @murumariesattigit9783  The ground war of the Gulf War lasted 5 days.
    1
  270. Purchasing power matters.
    1
  271.  @ricardoabraham4016  That litterly has nothing to do with his point. "using it again" implies they stopped. Seeing as tge US is the only one with F-15EX's, "they" must refer to the US.
    1
  272. What did you study?
    1
  273. "My source is I made it up"
    1
  274. ​ @biodidu25  "I don't need sources, they would not support my argument"
    1
  275. ​ @biodidu25  To get a little bit more seriously, I hate your bandwagon fallacy.
    1
  276. Analysis is always possible.​@Justsomeguyyuyu
    1
  277. How old are you?
    1
  278. Your S-400 couldn't intercept a slow drone Vladimir.
    1
  279.  @Zones33  1. Russia often lies about capabilities. 2. Having a hypersonic missile does not change MAD.
    1
  280. ​ @armandoragusaucy96z.71  ??? So in case of war you have no idea what to do against an opponent with superior bvr technology?
    1
  281.  @armandoragusaucy96z.71  That implies first comment of yours implies your country is able to strike first. I do not know how to tell you this, but countries tend not to leave their planes on the ground for you to destroy. Having no ability to deal wth any contingency, like the German offensive in the Ardennes in 1944, is not strategy. It is a jump into the deep.
    1
  282. This video has over 400,000 views.
    1
  283. Stop watching Russian propaganda.
    1
  284. Disinformation. The Syrian opposition held Aleppo. NOT ISIS. Russia also purposely targeted civilians. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Syrian_hospital_bombing_campaign https://www.bellingcat.com/news/mena/2016/11/09/fact-checking-russias-claim-didnt-bomb-another-hospital-syria/
    1
  285. Are you seriously comapring planes without the proper sensors to the SU-35's?
    1
  286.  @MrSkoresh  Your government claims Ukrainians are satanic nazis with biological weapons targeting Russia. You're delusional.
    1
  287. Yeah. Because its in the future. That's how time works.
    1
  288. What do you base that on?
    1
  289. Bruh
    1
  290. When has it "lost 5% of its land" in the last six months?
    1
  291.  @johnking6624  They can BVR fight them. https://aviatia.net/f-35-lightning-ii-vs-mig-35/
    1
  292. As if they aren't operating NATO equipment right now.
    1
  293. ​ @Jugement  You pretend like you are winning a debate by using an ad hominem all the while your comments are not relevant to the question asked.
    1
  294. The F-16 Viper.
    1
  295. You are contradicting your own government. Of to the Gulag or a high building with windows ​ @flareamv5503 
    1
  296. ​ @Vain-nf3il It came to them in a dream.
    1
  297. You severely underestimate stealth. You seem to have no understanding of BVR or Cross Radar Section.
    1
  298.  @theamazingempiricist  If American divisions were deployed in Ukraine you'd all be dead by now, Vladimir.
    1
  299. I suppose he means that its large amount missiles allow it to support other planes better.
    1
  300. No?
    1
  301. The F-14 was very expensive to maintain and fly. The F-18 was more economical.
    1
  302. No? What?
    1
  303. Hilarious. Displacement is no indication of performance. Maintainance, technology, training, doctrine and intelligence are.
    1
  304. "Get a life" is such a pathetic response to an analysis.
    1
  305. Simpler? Where is your citation?
    1
  306. *Abrams If you're going to be wrong, at least spell the name right to pretend to know what you're talking about.
    1
  307. Human rights give freedom.
    1
  308. ​ @alexlazar4738  You have shown no statistical studies to support anything you claimed.
    1
  309. Binkov truelly has one of the most toxic audiences. This is in part a leftover from the time he did versus videos, which attracted too many nationalists.
    1
  310. Found the antisemite.
    1
  311. ​ @_____Z_____ As opposed to someone with a Z as a profile name?
    1
  312. AESA is pretty advanced but not enough is known about Chinese radar to make such an in depth analysis. It is true though that China maintains many legacy aircraft.
    1
  313. Meh.
    1
  314. So you have nothing to refute his arguments and you're really proud of your antisemitism.
    1
  315. Why?
    1
  316. ... you actually only care about aesthetics when it comes to military equipment?!
    1
  317. Based on this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurora_(aircraft)
    1
  318.  @off_grid_javelin  Watching Russian units disintigrate
    1
  319.  @off_grid_javelin  Why has the battle for Bakhmut lasted longer than the battle of Stalingrad? Why aren't you winning Vladimir?
    1
  320. Sure buddy.
    1
  321. Poor grammar and no argumentation except a tu quoque fallacy.
    1
  322. ​ @MrLaptopus  Found the nazi.
    1
  323. No country in history has always been heroic by modern standards.
    1
  324. They had to get more launchers, not more missiles
    1
  325. That "ВОЙНА Z" channel you're subscribed to, which is clearly a Russian pro-war channel, is not.
    1
  326. And there it is. Your favorite buzzword. "Liberals". You have no understanding of SOuth Korean politics or military capabilities. You list no sources and revert back to simplistic black and white stereotypes.
    1
  327. Considering you follow Forum for Democracy you're still waiting for the war against the lizard people. What do you have against Argonians anyway?
    1
  328. He isn't American. Lol. Get better arguments next time.
    1
  329. I can make up figures too.
    1
  330. Nothing is quite as hateful as Russian love and Southern hospitality.
    1
  331.  @filmandfirearms  Mass production actually drives down cost like it is doing with the F-35. $78 million is cheaper than the Su-35. You can get a better jet that is also cheaper.
    1
  332.  @td9302  And?
    1
  333.  @springbloom5940  What a great way to bring down the debate.
    1
  334.  @Fauzanarief-n7i  ???
    1
  335. Why would I imagine an very unlikely scenario?
    1
  336. No? What gave you that impression?
    1
  337. This coming from the guy subscribed to conspiracy channels.
    1
  338. Where did you get your degree?
    1
  339. ???
    1
  340. This is what a hindishgy bias looks like.
    1
  341. Neither of the two wants an invasion that would lead to an occupation. Invasion means a hostile populace.
    1
  342. He did not. The US did, as it has been doing for decades.
    1
  343.  @looinrims  They were beaten ina ground war, due to their lack of sensors.
    1
  344. Found the Nazi
    1
  345. It wasn't introduced until 2001
    1
  346.  @leexingha  No
    1
  347. By the overwhelming amount of evidence? He has explained it. If you can't refute his arguments, then he has nothing more to prove to you.
    1
  348. Lol. Sarcasm, right?
    1
  349. Explain how they will win first.
    1
  350. Where is your rebutal?
    1
  351.  @Alrold  Launched from an aircraft? It's Buk capable.
    1
  352. But they want to. Crucial difference.
    1
  353.  @cancelaway  Russia has relied on a WWII style use of artillery.
    1
  354. What
    1
  355. Those are divisible into squadron sizes... Did you just list numbers that would add up to 100?
    1
  356. I am atheist and support Ukraine. I will never condone this type of idiotic discrimination.
    1
  357. Prove it.
    1
  358.  @ArmaDino22  Not in the long term.
    1
  359.  @ArmaDino22  The conformation bias is strong with you.
    1
  360. Why?
    1
  361. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Ukrainian_War https://www.bellingcat.com/news/2015/11/04/fact-checking-russias-claim-that-it-didnt-bomb-a-hospital-in-syria/ No...
    1
  362. ???
    1
  363.  @Knight_Kin  Russia is withdrawing from Kherson.
    1
  364. Then there is no problem and you should come over...
    1
  365.  @jeremypintsize7606  Why does the F-35 beat the competition in air force excercises and in every procurement competition?
    1
  366.  @JoseRodriguez-eu5ez  That's rediculous
    1
  367. What?
    1
  368. Cassually incites genocide
    1
  369. Well... back from the brake I guess. Seriously, I hope the team can catch a brake before Russia does aother stupid thing.
    1
  370. He covered those before. Plus, if it comes to that, techniquely China would have successfully invaded.
    1
  371. "The facts are anti-Russian"
    1
  372. There are no invincible armies.
    1
  373.  @MashedApplePie  Found the Nazi
    1
  374. Source: Trust me bro.
    1
  375.  @husted5488  "I am neutral" Then why are you posting accusations with no proof?
    1
  376. ​ @zej8777  You only do yourself a disservice with your rhetoric mate.
    1
  377.  @vepraksoldat2963  Cope. You have sustained 200,000+ cassualties in Ukraine. You subscribe to multile Russian propaganda channels.
    1
  378. You've subscribed to RT. We all know who you support.
    1
  379. Hardly silent.
    1
  380.  @peterwu811  No, Binkov covers hypotheticals all the time. That is the point. Figure out what wouldcrealistically happen if A happens.
    1
  381. Bruh.
    1
  382. Obvious bot is obvious.
    1
  383. Unbelievable. You still think the technology and industries are the same.
    1
  384.  @ArmaDino22  Hey, its the Russian troll back in action
    1
  385. Your comment is incoherent.
    1
  386. Laughs in Gulf War
    1
  387. "Who needs statistics when you can just make up whatever you want?"
    1
  388. ​ @iammauriceclemmons  They have optics. What will Russia do to escelate? Murder children? Oh wait, they are already doing that.
    1
  389. Why are you shouting?
    1
  390. No u.
    1
  391. ​ @ilikedota5  You don't even know what landlease means. The USSR got very few landleased bazookas.
    1
  392. "Waaah. The international community is defending a sovereign and internationally recognised nation from my imperialistic invasion. Waaah!"
    1
  393. ​ @cuberrt  "the entire population" Who needs statistics when you can make up whatever you like.
    1
  394. Why?
    1
  395. It is always funny to see the incoherent nonsense from propagandists.
    1
  396. LOL. When you know nothing about the topic and don't like the outcome, just resort to ad hominems.
    1
  397.  @swedhgemoni8092  Russia lies about capabilities
    1
  398. Fallacy.
    1
  399. Look who's talking.
    1
  400. ​ @YaMomsOyster  Like the USSR did during WWII?
    1
  401. No. Let us all avoid those cans of worms.
    1
  402.  @boyeewoods  Stop spamming your nonesense irrelevant to what the iriginal comment was talking about. Hijacking comments is dumb.
    1
  403. Found the antisemite.
    1
  404. Delusional.
    1
  405. ​ @steveiliev8912  73 Eastings. Look it up.
    1
  406. God, I hate how the Americans come here to spread their conspiracies.
    1
  407. Yet those thousands of tanks are more numerous than what Germany had when it invaded Poland in 1939.
    1
  408. Wages are waaaay lower though. Therefore the designing and production of weapons is cheaper, as is the avarage soldier.
    1
  409. How will China have the logistical capabilities of maintaining the hundres of thousands of troops neccesary?
    1
  410.  @anarchyorslavery1616  You are litterly subscribed to RussiaToday.
    1
  411. It is called education.
    1
  412. ​ @chadgaming8071  Korea also owns F-16s, F-15s and F-35s. Pakistan also owns some Chinese MiG-21 variants along with Mirage Vs
    1
  413. Do you mean more F-15E's? Because otherwise you just told me you want to eat soop with a fork.
    1
  414. One term: BVR (beyond visial range). The MiG-21 won't know what hit him.
    1
  415. You don't understand what stealth means. Stealth is not invisibility. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stealth_aircraft
    1
  416. Facts don't care about your preferred outcome.
    1
  417.  @hamzatariq5073  Are these "most people" in the room with us now? Again, where is your citation?
    1
  418.  @515coldfire  Genocide was commited in Yugoslavia. Russia did not descend into civil war.
    1
  419. Your wrong hyperbolic assertion ignores the Kharkiv offensive.
    1
  420. How?
    1
  421. Did you get your information from the same place where you learned English?
    1
  422.  @rayzas4885  You make alot of claims with no evidence
    1
  423. Wat
    1
  424. Russian tank turrets fly better than the Russian air force
    1
  425. "What is this SAM and Manpad you speak off?"
    1
  426. Prove it.
    1
  427.  @psycho8927  I don't think the Ukrainians are you going to listen to that demand.
    1
  428.  @psycho8927  I care more about IR theory dealing with the here and now then an outdated theory from a man who died in 1948. Heck, Morgenthau's work is more recent than the one you cited.
    1
  429. No. You also have no clue about their roles if you compare an F-15 with an F-35.
    1
  430.  @anguswaterhouse9255  Praise the Aim-260!
    1
  431. Based on?
    1
  432. What bridges? North to Kherson and Zaporizhzhia you will find no waterways. Have you ever looked at a map, mr. armchair general?
    1
  433. Ammo? With what logistics?
    1
  434. Ukrainian intel has nothing to do with the Russian inability to hit a target.
    1
  435. Aged like milk.
    1
  436. The F-15 weighs 68,000 pounds (30,600 kg)
    1
  437. Russia throws away the lives of its citizens.
    1
  438.  @chance1113  He can totally make this video while mentioning the credibility of the claims. In fact, he usually does exactly that.
    1
  439. "Let's ignore the politics of today and pretend we are still living in 1937. Otherwise my argument makes no sense." But it is not 1937.
    1
  440. You have no counterargument and instead just call it propaganda so you don't have to engage with his points.
    1
  441. ​ @johnsullivan8673  Did this information come to you in a dream?
    1
  442. Ukraine did not recieve much equipment until after the opening weeks of the war, nor could it implement new systems on the fly.  @MostlyPennyCat 
    1
  443. That is very entitled of you.
    1
  444.  @sirbluebeetle2875  Now THAT is copium.
    1
  445. Least fascist Putin supporter
    1
  446. ​ @2sqnbandit379 It is a funny statement seeing as how more Russian aircraft got shot down over the last weeks. Must have been friendly fire /s
    1
  447.  @ozymandiasultor9480  Not even American.
    1
  448.  @ozymandiasultor9480  Your talk is cheap. Oryx's figures tell a different story. Liveuamaps shows you still haven't taken Bakhmut.
    1
  449. Reuters wrote an in depth article about the scenarios of a conflict between China and Taiwan. It is called T-Day: The Battle for Taiwan
    1
  450. Did you storm the Capitol?
    1
  451. Can't even take Bakhmut
    1
  452.  @Thoreaue  Six have been delivered. All Mig-21s have been retired.
    1
  453.  @daviddebroux4708  Yes, and claims made without evidence can be refuted without evidence. We don't know, nor are we quallified to speculate.
    1
  454.  @qualitydro9579  Confirmed by whom? The Russians? THe same Russians who still claim those aboard the Moskva are MIA instead of KIA?
    1
  455. ​ @Pepe-dq2ib  There are no F-35s in Ukraine.
    1
  456.  @JFF-Wild The duration is irrelevant
    1
  457. Same with the T-90.
    1
  458. ​ @johnstannard8366  This will be a convential battlefield, not a guerilla war in urban areas.
    1
  459.  @teddyd.5074  He understands the definition of the word citation.
    1
  460. ​ @Swager825  So you're professional military is that incompetent?
    1
  461.  @freezoneproject567  Cope
    1
  462. That is such a lie... the F-35 program has been continuing and has nothing to do with his administration other than a continuation. "Retired aircraft were in better condition then the ones flying." What?! Hello? Where is your source.
    1
  463. ​ @evilfingersNo1 You don't know how to argue, lol.
    1
  464. Can't even take control over the Ukrainian air space
    1
  465. *Netherlands Gast...
    1
  466.  @icecold9511  Citation.
    1
  467. ​ obvioustroll.yetyoustillgo1634  *you're
    1
  468. Blatant victim blaming.
    1
  469. Refuses to overspend? Russia spends a larger percentage of it's gdp on defence than the US. I have no clue what you're talking about.
    1
  470. Hahahaha! You serious?
    1
  471. It litterly says at the buttom of the thumbnail "avionics, weapons, specs analysed".
    1
  472. Just because it is not known what political considerations the West is making let alone what IR theory is behind it does not mean they are not living in the real world.
    1
  473. ​ @thantzweaung9080  No it isn't. Binkov is Croatian.
    1
  474.  @pilotmanpaul  Atun-Shei's comment section is largely more civilized than this and he made videos debunking lost cause myths perpetuated in that comment section.
    1
  475. Haha! The Abrams in the Gulf war vs T-90 in Ukraine. Hilarious.
    1
  476. Oryx!
    1
  477. ??? He is not American.
    1
  478. That is not how logistics work.
    1
  479. ​ @noticing33  The UN, the ISW, liveuamap, Al Jazeera, Deutsche Welle, Reuters, every NATO general that shows up when they hold an interview about this conflict every six seconds... Take your pick.
    1
  480. ​ @T1227trx  Look up the battle of 73 Eastings
    1
  481. Struggling? What are you talking about?
    1
  482. What?
    1
  483. @Walter White It is quite the assumption to think they are in favour of China and watch propaganda.
    1
  484. Wikipedia does not say that at all.
    1
  485. In the air, quality is far more significant than quantity.
    1
  486. ???
    1
  487. Ad hominems aren't counter arguments.
    1
  488. You can't even spell words from your own language.
    1
  489. You need to maintain a target lock on the F-35. Also if it has already fired a missile before you have even spotted it, you have bigger problems to worry about.
    1
  490. You want a nuclear war?
    1
  491. Yes, but this is just about comparing their systems.
    1
  492. I hope this guy got conscripted. If you want to win the war that badly, go fight it yourself. You'll fail.
    1
  493. ​ @Reinhard_Erlik  Oryx mate. Photographic evidence does not care about your ideology
    1
  494. No such weapon exists.
    1
  495. Except for the whole "jet" part.
    1
  496. So it is informative and shows you the many facets of air power... that makes it a good video. I get that the title is rather clickbaity but still.
    1
  497. No.
    1
  498. He knows that.
    1
  499. I still see not citation. Just more mud throwing as always.
    1
  500. It is doctrine, not some weird inherent thing about ethnicity or nationality.
    1
  501. It was not an understatement based on the political power loss and lacklustre military capabilities.
    1
  502. Could you eleborate?
    1
  503. If you are talking about the Swedish air force specifically, it should be noted Sweden primarily operates the JAS 39C and D variant as of 2024. It has ordered 90 E variants of which 3 have been delivered.
    1
  504.  @antoniocanata2150  The severe ignorance of this comment and its conspirital nature will always make me laugh and facepalm. Who cares about evidence if you can just find some other people to agree with you. You guys are like a cult.
    1
  505. That is quite possibly the most rediculous thing I have ever heard.
    1
  506.  @chaosXP3RT  That yes.
    1
  507. You lost me with your first line. I suppose you can give me a full ideational account of the several factions and groups fighting in this war? No? Then there is nothing simple about it.
    1
  508. We don't have time for your culture wars.
    1
  509. If you want free content without ads you are in the wrong place. You are not entitled to his work.
    1
  510. ​ @JL-tm3rc  You seem to have missed the shortfall in Russia's use of artillery and the loss of ammunition dumps.
    1
  511. Russia has deployed 75% of its combat forces to Ukraine and can't win.
    1
  512. No u.
    1
  513.  @felixgutierrez993  Trump was impeached for withholding aid for Ukraine to get dirt on his political opponent. Nothing you said corresponds with anything any IR theorist has said.
    1
  514. Ukrainian pilots have been training on the F-16 for over a year...
    1
  515. Proof it.
    1
  516.  @frenzalrhomb6919  whataboutism whataboutism whataboutism
    1
  517. Reality often is.
    1
  518. No u.
    1
  519. ​ @jakemocci3953  "Our" Doubt
    1
  520. Where did Kherson go? Where did 1600 of your tanks go?
    1
  521. How does it feel to have your Su-35's shot down over Ukraine?
    1
  522. ​ @sender5804  They in fact do not.
    1
  523. He is not even American.
    1
  524. No.
    1
  525. Prove to us they cannot handle it.
    1
  526. Did you know bullets can kill infantry? Better get rid of bullet proof vests. Clearly they don't matter /s
    1
  527. It is important to note purchasing power. Wages are lower in Russia.
    1
  528. A lot better than the comment section.
    1
  529. The SU-35 can carry the R77 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-77
    1
  530. Sure buddy.
    1
  531. Found the anti-semite
    1
  532. How about I do anyway?
    1
  533.  @engineeringvision9507  You have a point, but you should not ignore regime identification and values.
    1
  534. ​ @Knight7562  You don't know anything about the Gulf war.
    1
  535. ​ @Nick-wh4jt  War crimes?
    1
  536. I do not recall operation begration being made possible by drugs. Conclusion, it must have been more than just drugs.
    1
  537. ​ @jensboettiger5286  Really? I don't see it.
    1
  538. ​ @carterjones8126  Do you know what M1A2 SEP 3 stands for?
    1
  539. ​​ @User9r682  ??? And he just goes along with going to prison? Stop it with the wild conjecture please.
    1
  540. Sweden primarily operates the JAS 39C and D variant as of 2024. It has ordered 90 E variants of which 3 have been delivered.
    1
  541.  @leonardhaggstrom8541  Russia is retreating from Kherson.
    1
  542. That is no true at all.
    1
  543. Found the war criminal guys
    1