Comments by "Rick74" (@rick7424) on "Can Su-35 survive against the stealthy F-35?" video.

  1. *period Also no, statements require arguments that support them.
    3
  2. "You can jam stealth" You can jam sensors. You can't jam stealth. What? Nothing you just said made sense.
    2
  3. Wrong. BVR.
    2
  4. What?
    1
  5. I know right? They don't even know what stealth, multirole, bvr or cross radar section mean. They talk about dogfights all the time like it is the default. And even then they state so myths.
    1
  6. Are you seriously comapring planes without the proper sensors to the SU-35's?
    1
  7. So you have nothing to refute his arguments and you're really proud of your antisemitism.
    1
  8. Why?
    1
  9. He isn't American. Lol. Get better arguments next time.
    1
  10. Why would I imagine an very unlikely scenario?
    1
  11. By the overwhelming amount of evidence? He has explained it. If you can't refute his arguments, then he has nothing more to prove to you.
    1
  12. LOL. When you know nothing about the topic and don't like the outcome, just resort to ad hominems.
    1
  13. One term: BVR (beyond visial range). The MiG-21 won't know what hit him.
    1
  14. You don't understand what stealth means. Stealth is not invisibility. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stealth_aircraft
    1
  15. Did you get your information from the same place where you learned English?
    1
  16. Based on?
    1
  17. What?
    1
  18. You need to maintain a target lock on the F-35. Also if it has already fired a missile before you have even spotted it, you have bigger problems to worry about.
    1
  19. Yes, but this is just about comparing their systems.
    1
  20. No u.
    1