Comments by "Rick74" (@rick7424) on "Covert Cabal" channel.

  1. ​ @StrangerHappened copypaste
    196
  2. Well their claims about avalibility and the numbers that were going to be produced were so far removed from reality it is hard not to take everything they say with a massive grain of salt.
    47
  3. ​ @Pope-enhiemer  F-22s actually exist.
    20
  4. It is not even the official successor.
    16
  5. The TOS-1A has a maximum range of 10 kilometers.
    15
  6. More inprecise artillery. Just what Russia lacked...
    15
  7. Yes, he has noted this in several videos.
    15
  8.  @hakunamatata1880  Lol. They aren't even the second strongest army in Ukraine.
    15
  9. Blatant strawman fallacy.
    13
  10. Not useful? Sustainment is not useful? I can't take this comment seriously.
    11
  11.  @rodrigorodriguez6332  The increased polarization in the US is a significant problem.
    11
  12. He does not assume that. He has explicitly stated that is not the case
    10
  13. ​ @External2737  That made no sense.
    9
  14. ​​ @wonkagaming8750  Lol. You have no evidence. In fact the losses of NATO supplied tank are litterly on the website.
    9
  15. See Perun.
    8
  16. They are losing more equipment than they are producing. Preparing for a war by starting one before you are ready sounds incredibly dumb.
    8
  17. The US was invited by the Kurds. It all depends who you see as legitimate.
    8
  18. Did it shoot down superman? I half expect your "sources" to claim such a feat.
    7
  19. As of the 30th of December, 2023 over 980 F-35s have been produced
    7
  20. Your numbers are wrong.
    7
  21. We know too much about the canabilization rate and poor storage conditions in Russia to think that
    7
  22. ​ @MrDael01 Not the Leopard 2a7 or the M1A2 SEP 3. Yet these artillery pieces have no really changed
    7
  23. You can tell the Russian bots are active based on the sheer amount posts that get 5-10 likes within ten minutes.
    7
  24. Wrong? He uses satellite images of storages. What evidence do you have this methodology produces false results?
    7
  25. Prove it
    6
  26. ​ @ToyaRobbins  there isn't.
    6
  27. Yet has produced no photographic evidence, except that time they showed a burned out lumber truck and a second storage building.
    6
  28. Yes, he has stated that something being pulled from storage does not equal a loss on several occasions. Your 7-1 claim lacks citation.
    6
  29. Not really a good thing, though it works wonders for military procurement.
    6
  30. ​ @trollek7823  Nonsense. This is a typical myth of rugged Soviet equipment.
    6
  31. ​ @Princip666  You cannot actually point at any inaccuracy so you just pretend everyone kniws they are bad. Bandwagon fallacy and burden of proof fallacy.
    6
  32.  @user-pd9ju5dk5s  Not for the US which is geographically isolated from the rest of the world, if you understand my point. The defence of the US mainland won't defend its trade or other interests.
    6
  33. Very true. There was alot more division in 2014, especially in Odessa. Now the war has rallied most Ukrainians. A common threat tends to do that.
    6
  34. ​ @yarnickgoovaerts  You do not pay taxes in a NATO country Dmitry.
    6
  35. "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." Satellite images do not care about your political views.
    5
  36. Source: I made it up
    5
  37. I recall a certain leader of Germany claiming to have a thousand jets in underground bases in 1945, none of which existed
    5
  38. During the Gulf War the Coalition Army showed the quantity of Iraqi tanks did not mean much.
    5
  39. They had to pull 77% of their arsenal out of storage. 426 mlrs systems have been visually confirmed as destroyed. That rate sounds pretty unsustainable.
    4
  40. ​ @Howardlifts  You are failing to understand some pretty basic economics.
    4
  41. "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." Oryx has all the pictures on file. I have seen them.
    4
  42. Whataboutism and inaccurate comparison at that
    4
  43. You have never heard of quantitative analysis?
    4
  44. You ignore the actual analysis. He never claimed Russia has no hardware. Your argument is invalid.
    4
  45. That is not how it works.
    4
  46. He never said that. Obvious strawman argument
    4
  47. Covert cabal never said that.
    4
  48. So the Gulf War and the SEAD capabilities displayed in every war since don't exist in your world?
    4
  49. Nonesense. He never claimed any such thing.
    4
  50. It's own strategy included losing 10,000 vehicles and 350,000+ men? Their strategy sucks.
    4
  51. I suggest you read the context how how that happened instead assuming it is easy.
    4
  52. I disagree. I also find it weird that you make demands in such a rude tone when consuming content for free. You are acting very immature.
    4
  53. You get free content. Be grateful or leave.
    4
  54. That isn't true. Electronics do not break down less just because it is a Soviet design.
    4
  55. ​ @oggaBugga  Obvious troll is obvious
    4
  56. You have issues.
    4
  57. ​ @rhodium1096 The Russian VDV almost got wiped out. You are blatantly lying about their effectiveness.
    4
  58. Lacks citation
    4
  59. The USSR did and Russia failed to utilise it.
    4
  60.  @halops117 Look up how many attempts it took to shoot down a single F-117
    4
  61. You cosplay as a soldier while not joining the war. Wow.
    3
  62. Nobody is pretending that. This is a strawman fallacy.
    3
  63. ​ @rhodium1096  Is rhodium the name of a new brand of copium?
    3
  64. Tanks fulfill a rather important role on the battlefield.
    3
  65. Suicide drones have a limited range
    3
  66. He has stated many times what the aim is and that removed from storage does not equal a tank loss in the field.
    3
  67. Greetings from Emmen, Netherlands.
    3
  68. ​ @ForSteam-k6y  That is a blatant lie.
    3
  69. ​ @tomk3732 Artillery shells themselves do not expire but their component do. Army-technology has a piece on this where they interview David A. Kondras, whi is a "project officer for the smoke and illumination branch of the conventional ammunition division at Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey"
    3
  70. Lol. You have no counterargument.
    3
  71. "Believe" is totally the wrong word when it comes to verifiable, archived images.
    3
  72. Satellite footage does not care about your political views
    3
  73. ​ @robendert7617  You sure love throwing away Russian lives.
    3
  74. Get real.
    3
  75. Probably because that number is not nearly as high as they want it to be. Otherwise they would brag about it
    3
  76. Yeah, Iraq had the densest air defence in the world and far more men and equipment than Ukraine.
    3
  77. His last video was uploaded 7 days ago...
    3
  78. What on earth are you even talking about? Operation Fortitude?
    3
  79. Weird that he started saying Russia still has the third or second most powerful army. I do not believe that is true.
    3
  80. Claims made without evidence can be refuted without evidence.
    3
  81. ​ @HitachiTRQ-225 It is not the largest by any metric. You just hurt your own credibility by stating blatant falsehoods.
    3
  82. Your assumption that North Korea somehow has more reliable artillery pieces is hilarious.
    3
  83. Not really. It is not about analyzing who is winning the war but how the war affects the Russian military
    3
  84. Considering the commercial GPS duck-taped to the cockpits of many Russian jets I doubt Russia has any such radar in any of their planes.
    3
  85. Dimitri, that is the second year in a row you have claimed Ukraine already lost.
    3
  86. Lol. You have no argument.
    3
  87. Obvious bot is obvious
    3
  88. This is another blatant myth debunked ages ago. If you look at the cassualties listed by oryx you'll see Russia losing their T-80s and most modern T-72s in extremely high numbers.
    3
  89. That is not true.
    3
  90. So you cannot take Bakhmut yet you think you're a superpower. Schrödingers superpower.
    3
  91. @Anton Taylor Russian troll who knows nothing about BVR capabilities.
    3
  92.  @america7082  You do not understand the difference between owned and funded.
    3
  93. *any square inch They can hit anywhere bit not everywhere as that would require a massive inventory.
    3
  94. Who did? Based on what information? Did they say modern tanks, or tanks in general?
    3
  95. When the guy refusing to engage with the video and repeating Russian talking points calls others bots you know irony died.
    3
  96. So you don't understand his methodology?
    3
  97. FPV drones cannot replace artillery unless you have one million of them lying around. Do you?
    3
  98. ​ @attilamarics3374 Obvious troll is obvious
    3
  99. This is like Hitler ranting in 1945 about having 1,000 jet fighter hidden away.
    2
  100.  @warpaulgundol7560  What?
    2
  101. @Anton Taylor Nyet Vladimir!
    2
  102. You did not engage anything in the video.
    2
  103. It isn't.
    2
  104. Was the Gulf War on paper to?
    2
  105. "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." Satellite photos do not care about your propaganda
    2
  106. Strawman argument.
    2
  107. You did not watch the video
    2
  108. And a poor tank will not be able to generate nearly close to the same amount of offensive capability.
    2
  109. That is a load of BS as every non-Russian analyst will tell you.
    2
  110. Nice try Dimitri
    2
  111. ???
    2
  112. No?
    2
  113. He has photographic evidence, so yes.
    2
  114. That's... that's what the video was about...
    2
  115. ​ @maxinfly That never happened. You are using Russian disinformation talking points about the supposed banning of Russian.
    2
  116. Found the Vatnik. Russia has 150k+ cassualties. Norway's estimate is 180,000 cassualties. That of the US is 200,000. The BBC estimated 190,000 cassualties. How little you care for the lives of your own countrymen.
    2
  117. 1. The war is only 2.5 years old. That is some amazing math you got there. 2. I do not care what others think or say. Engage the methodology of the video. 3. Satellite images do not care about what you believe.
    2
  118. Gross simplifications. This isn't about you.
    2
  119. Last I checked NATO has not deployed combat troops in Ukraine mate.
    2
  120. Source: the Russian Ministry of defense. Their source: trust me bro (No footage found.)
    2
  121. Promised? Predictions are not promises and countries adapt based on predictions.
    2
  122. All professional estimates have the figure at at least 150,000+ cassualties two months ago.
    2
  123. ​ @baneofbanes  The funniest part is this same 18k deaths was claimed last month, so vatniks are pretending nobody died last in over a months wirth of fighting. They are lying so blatantly
    2
  124. Baseless conjecture.
    2
  125. Obvious bot is obvious.
    2
  126. You are correct. He should have said "The US, other NATO members and other countries..."
    2
  127. ​ @yahaaghtv  The USSR and China supported, funded, equiped and trained the NVA during the Vietnam war.
    2
  128. Are you in the anger stage of grieving?
    2
  129. No? He looks at the data and gives updates.
    2
  130. ​​ @davidrossa4125 no, he made an estimate after over a year of attrition that if the rate of attrition kept up Russia would run out of stored equipment by 2026. That was based on Oryx and satellite imagery.
    2
  131. Didn't the USSR lose in Afghanistan? Was this question not about conventional wars?
    2
  132. No, there isn't any footage of the Su-57 in Ukraine.
    2
  133. The middle ground between the truth and bullshit is not neutrality. It is still just bullshit
    2
  134. No, a good investigation.
    2
  135. That is largely about ammunition, not artillery systems.
    2
  136. ​​ @SimoN-vf8ps  You pride yourself in the death of Russian servicemen. Nobody hates Russians as much as Putin supporters.
    2
  137. That is a broken window falalcy.
    2
  138.  @drdzdd  You could not grasp the concept of conventional war if you were given an officers manual.
    2
  139. Russia already does that, considering Assad did commit atrocities including the systematic killing of political prisoner.
    2
  140. Oryx disagrees and they have photograohic evidence
    2
  141. Lol. You have no counterargument to anything shown.
    2
  142. ​ @LoveHammerMan  they have captured theoretically, metaphorically and metaphysically. They just have not captured it physically and effectively.
    2
  143.  @georgejohnson5478  Was the name John Johnson taken as a fake name? Stop using the Capslock Vatnik.
    2
  144. ​ @schmitty5461  It disproves the propaganda he listens to.
    2
  145. What bias? Prove it.
    2
  146. I think you have a fair point, in this case. Objectivity means no namecalling. If one wishes to point at the various war crimes commited, do it. But using the name of a fantasy race as an insult is just weird.
    2
  147. ​ @evilleader1991  Your name checks out
    2
  148. The Soviet Union lost Afghanistan. Can we talk about that?
    2
  149. He has already said you cannot draw that conclusion...
    2
  150. Yes, so in reality it couldn't. Because those considerations exist constantly.
    2
  151. I know right? It could be argued America failed to create a prosperous democracy but it is not an outright defeat in any sense.
    2
  152. Lol. You have nothing.
    2
  153. Perun did a video on this.
    2
  154. ​​ @baneofbanes  In that he is a Western guy who agrees with Putin. As per the wiki: "Macgregor appeared on Russian state-owned network RT where he called for the annexation of the Donbas and said residents of the region "are in fact Russians, not Ukrainians, and at the same time, you have Ukrainians in the west and in the north, who are not Russians"" He is also a racist liar: "In 2019, he argued for the myth that there were more White, mostly Irish "slaves" than African slaves in America in the late 1700s."
    2
  155. I believe the Oryx website already has that covered.
    2
  156. Yes it did
    2
  157. "My source is I made it the f*ck up."
    2
  158. He did not say that. In fact he predicted the rate of attrition would not mean critical depletion until 2026 to 2027.
    2
  159. Why? Oh wait, I can see your subscription to right wing channels siding with Russia.
    2
  160. Lol. You have no argument. You even refuse to engage with the content of the video because you can't.
    2
  161. Tell me you hate people more intelligent than you without telling me you have an inferiority complex.
    2
  162.  @madkoala2130  Imagine performing so badly that NATO has lost zero soldiers after 2.5 years of combat.
    2
  163. I seriously appreciate the time and dedication this took. Excellent methodology and reflection on the margin of error and what variables remain unknown.
    2
  164. *they're
    2
  165. That is a blatant lie.
    2
  166. Becuase NATO has an air doctrine rather than an artillery focused doctrine.
    2
  167. This is a legitimate topic of discussion. What are you on about.
    2
  168. This coming from a Vatnik?
    2
  169. No?
    2
  170. Blatant anti-semite on a video having nothing to do with Judaism or Israel.
    2
  171. "This sattelite imagery and all those pictures if oryx are fake!" What did Orwell write agsin? "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."
    2
  172. So you are just throwing away the lives of your own soldiers because you can't be bothered? That is some terrible propaganda.
    2
  173. So you are just throwing away the lives of your own soldiers because you can't be bothered? That is some terrible propaganda.
    2
  174. The fact that you won't admit they lost outright is undermining your credibility.
    2
  175.  @arthurgeorge5474  That is not the defnition of lost. Phyrric victories are a thing. Nobody argues that Nazi Germany won WWII because they killed more Soviets.
    2
  176. You have no argument which is why you do not engage with the video.
    2
  177. You Americans have a delusional comprehension of other cultures. Instead you project your own culture onto others. Untrained, uncoordinated civilians with a pistol won't do much.
    2
  178. Strawman fallacy. He never said this. He is caculating the rate of attrition with verifiable satellite images with a margin of error.
    2
  179. Source: "Prigozhin's ghost told me so in a dream."
    2
  180. Russia invaded Ukraine, not the other way around.
    2
  181. No. You couldn't invade North Vietnam, because that would mean a Chinese incursion.
    2
  182. Oh look, it is the guy with empty statements that has no counterargument to the actual content of the video.​ @Jean-Seb 
    2
  183. They cannot match their losses.
    2
  184. You either don't understand stealth or purposefully misrepresent it. Also: If stealth is not worth it why is Russia trying to produce stealth jets?
    2
  185. ​ @Jean-Seb  This channel never said that.
    2
  186. I have no idea what you are talking about
    2
  187. It's gdp as percentage of the world is shrinking. It is a regional power, not a world power.
    2
  188. "Many sources" is not citation. That would not have passed in high school.
    2
  189. No? It is an analysis based on satellite footage and military reports.
    2
  190. ​ @DefNotCriss Well, it is not outlandish. It is certainly laughable though, if you catch my meaning.
    2
  191. You neither understand logistics or the concept of training. You are a Russian, that's for sure.
    2
  192. Then why has the battle for Bakhmut lasted longer than the battle for Stalingrad
    2
  193. Comment section full of Russia simps.
    2
  194. No u. 😊
    2
  195. -He uses Oryx, not Ukrainian claims. -Russia is not recieving thousands of new artillery pieces. Not from its allies or its own industry.
    2
  196. Attacked by Ukraine?
    2
  197. You don't know what air superiority means. 😅
    2
  198. We don't have to prove a negative mate.
    2
  199. You providing zero arguments for your conclusion or just making up figures makes your opinion pretty useless.
    2
  200. You have no actual argument. This channel has used visually confirmed losses. Maybe YOU should check them out.
    2
  201. A guy calling himself AmericanMinuteman is actually Russian? Colour be unsuprised
    2
  202. Buzzwords.
    2
  203. And Ukraine is a sovereign nation seeking a defensive alliance after Russia seized Crimea and supported the eastern rebels.
    2
  204. No?
    2
  205. ​ @isaacgriffin5690  ???
    2
  206. Also, there are many different ethnic groups in China.
    2
  207. AWACS? Where did you get that idea from?
    2
  208. Yeah, after the Soviet archive became accessible we have started to learn this. I really hate what Enemy at the Gates has done to the world perception.
    2
  209. Do you even understand the concept of nuclear deterrence?
    1
  210. Guerilla warfare is definitely an example, but this video also shows a conventional setting.
    1
  211. I doubt that Republicans have a good chance to in the elections, with their extremism dividing their own party.  @Iamabot4708 
    1
  212. Lacks citation  @baneofbanes 
    1
  213. ​ @KolyaUrtz How much ground have they gained in the last year and how much do they have left to gain? Sounds like a pretty abysmal performance.
    1
  214. How old are you?
    1
  215.  @burakayan3360  No...
    1
  216.  @genkabigfellow8552  He just wants to create a crisis to get reelected.
    1
  217. You clearly never watched any of the videos by Perun or Cabal, nor do you read the reports of ISW.
    1
  218. Are you purposefully misrepresenting the argument of the video?
    1
  219. Why are you screaming and where is your citation?
    1
  220. Yet you still arrogantly insult your enemies.
    1
  221. Typical. Guess what? Preventative measures work better than populist repression.
    1
  222. The Ottomans had many cultural cites. It dod not save their economy.
    1
  223. No. You get free content. If he is not allowed ads, you do not deserve your video.
    1
  224. You never watched his videos or you would refute his points and methodology
    1
  225. Russian trolls and their inability to say anything other than obvious lies or vague meaningless sentences
    1
  226. You still haven't read up on how it happened or on advancements in stealth.
    1
  227. India, Indonesia, Brazil...
    1
  228. It still means Russia is losing its offensive capabilities.
    1
  229. You leid and immediatly moved the goalpost when confronted. @rootin222 
    1
  230. Well you're the expert on spreading dusinformation. ​ @OGPatriot03 
    1
  231. ​ @The8OJ4N  Ukraine has no energy? Are you okay?
    1
  232. I do not care for your unscientific "divine providence". The Greeks believed in paripateia, the Romans in fortuna and Hegel in the Cunning of Reason. You are just another person who wants there to be some mechanism.
    1
  233.  @alanb8884  Nit with China
    1
  234. Under no circumstance will I let religious delusions determine policy
    1
  235. Strawman argument.
    1
  236. You are incorrect.
    1
  237. Again the dumb myth of "Russia is holding back, that totally explains our poor performance".
    1
  238. Why do you think they can get their hands on the technology to build something more advanced in great numbers?
    1
  239. The fact they pulled so many tanks out of storage indicates the Russians think the Russians need tanks
    1
  240. Force generation...
    1
  241. Nobody takes you seriously as your claims have been debunked by Perun, the Chieftain and various other channels. Your insults are akin to a temper tantrum.
    1
  242.  @primkup  ???
    1
  243. ​ @DB5652-v3r  Bruh
    1
  244. THat billion goes to increasing rates of production so you greatly misrepresented that. @privatebandana 
    1
  245. Force degration.
    1
  246. That you refuse to call it a war because it was short makes no sence at all.
    1
  247. No it won't.
    1
  248. Russia is not the USSR nor does it have anything close to its industrial capability.
    1
  249. You used a strawman fallacy to disctract from the Russian rate of attrition for their artillery systems. Distracting from negative news is a common Russian propaganda tactic along with dismissing, distorting and dismaying. It is called the 4D model and fits well within the firehose of falsehoods.
    1
  250. You are pretending all russian artillery shells have been converted which is incredibly false.
    1
  251. He normally uses Oryx.
    1
  252. ​​ @onri_ oryx is not owned by Ukraine or any government and has photographic evidence. Your argument is invalid.
    1
  253. ​ @histrion5390 No you haven't.
    1
  254. They, in fact, do not have a large industrial base.
    1
  255.  @right584  Makes random assertion Is called out on making up stuff Uses burden of proof fallacy Get real.
    1
  256. Oryx has photographic evidence which does not care about your feelings on the matter
    1
  257. India left the program and it is not a contender in India's fighter competitions.
    1
  258. The frames are so typical. Nobody is suggesting the US should invade Ukraine yet you're already activating the taxpayer frame.
    1
  259. ​ @peppipoohductionswakashunt3157 Nonsense
    1
  260. ​​​ @peppipoohductionswakashunt3157 You are a subscriber of Russia Insight and RT America, both propaganda channels
    1
  261. That made no sense.
    1
  262. Strawman argument with no counterclaim to his evidence. Nice try Dmitry.
    1
  263. The fact that you make it seem like 100% of the government, a term that also refers to federal employees including teachers, is controlled by the military industrial complex, without proof or accounting for other companies, investors, ideologies etc. makes your comment less than useless.
    1
  264. That's not proof of anything.
    1
  265. I do not care about baseless conspiracies. I can also proof it is possible to commit tax fraud. That is not proof that you commited tax fraud. You lack a basic understanding of the scientific theory or of citation.
    1
  266. ​ @Drookup  Found the nazi
    1
  267. ​ @bendreczko9054 Russian talking points also include culture wars. They are unhinged
    1
  268. Racist.
    1
  269. And how has this quantity helped them thusfar? ​ @Monkey-ud8bw 
    1
  270. ​ @chadhaire1711 Your claims are nonesense.
    1
  271. You care, clearly.
    1
  272. Russia is not lacking in artillery pieces, they lack the ammo for high intensity engagements as per Perun and his sources.
    1
  273. You do not deserve free content.
    1
  274. Is this 'Western army' in Ukraine right now? Is it in the room with us?  @ХРЕНОРЕЗ 
    1
  275. Oryx has all images on file. Check them yourself.
    1
  276. ​ @Kroq_Gar Bs.
    1
  277. Everything you just said was either based on assumptions or just completely wrong.
    1
  278. That made no sense.
    1
  279. You have come back to thus channel multiple times and now you act as if you just interacted with it for the first time. You are bad at lying.
    1
  280. Taiwan is independent and calling for a war is pretty insane.
    1
  281. You should unsubscribe from longshot. He diesn't support Russian shills. ​ @VioletSilence 
    1
  282. He talked about it in his SEAD video.
    1
  283. ​ @torlekjpec5708  Do not use the word "copium" vatnik. It is not yours to use.
    1
  284. This channel has already debunked the claims about the number of tanks, let alone operaton ones. Proof to us there are tens of thousands of serviceable bmps and crews. Oh right, you keep forgetting your crew get killed. Not that you cared about their lives.
    1
  285. ​ @AddieHilton He mentions the garages and that a vehicle being removed from storage not equating a loss on the battlefield. You clearly have no interest of analysing the topic or arguing in good faith. You did not even watch the video by the look of it.
    1
  286. It is a myth. Granite could be sucked into a system, cause a malfunction and blow up the oxigen.
    1
  287. We don't have to proof it to you.
    1
  288. Not nearly as expensive.
    1
  289. ​ @sH-ed5yf There are no air losses in Ba Sing Se
    1
  290. "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." Satellite images do not care about your political views.
    1
  291. That would start a war.
    1
  292. Buzzwords. You're clearly not objective.
    1
  293. Delusional. If anything they are warning against the threat posed by China.
    1
  294. Needs citation
    1
  295. You live in the past and don't face the economic reality of today.
    1
  296. "Everybody is part of a conspiracy against me!!"
    1
  297. Guy that subscribes to Russian propaganda outlets angry about actual research @lek8630 
    1
  298. Wat? https://nl.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suppression_of_Enemy_Air_Defences
    1
  299. Subscribes to Antun Shei yet shills for dictators. Makes no sense
    1
  300. You do subscribe to a lot of pro-Russian channels, so I am not taking your word for it.  @danielmlinar4892 
    1
  301. If you click on any tank listed as destroyed by Oryx, which is not American by the way, you can see the archived photo of that destroyed tank. You are the only one listening to copeganda.
    1
  302. ​ @petermuller9480  You can easily be a bot, so by your logic I should proclaim you are one and ignore you.
    1
  303. Like in Crimea, Georgia and Chechnya?
    1
  304. Its so funny. One guy in this comment section accused Covert of spreading Russian disinformation and you claim he is spreading CIA disinformation.
    1
  305. Their losses exceed their production.
    1
  306. You are. You also lack any historical awareness. Here is a list of wars the US helped win: The Lebanon Crisis (1958) The Dominican Civil War (1965-1966) The US invasion of Grenada (1983) The US invasion of Panama (1989-1990) The Gulf War (1990-1991) The war where they proved the T-72 sucked The Intervention in Haiti (1994-1995) The Kosovo War (1998-1999) The NATO intervention in Libya (2011) This list does not mention the many other interventions with small scale conflict along with counterterrorism operations. Your inability to grasp the concept of conventional warfare as opposed to assymetrical warfare is mind boggling. Its like you have been sleeping under a rock from 2003 to the present.
    1
  307. Proof it. You can't bevause it isn't true.
    1
  308. 1. That's why you don't waste a Javelin on it. 2. You are saying Russia is trying to outspend NATO?! Russia would lose badly.
    1
  309. That word denotes a fast change that is contrary to the trend
    1
  310. No.
    1
  311. Saying "sorry not sorry" is not an argument supporting your claim.
    1
  312. From a 3-day invasion to "a 20 year war is fine". Lmfao. You list more men then the US did in all its wars since WWII combined.
    1
  313. More like 9:35
    1
  314. No?
    1
  315. Troll
    1
  316. Another antisemite.
    1
  317. "Not in a hundred years"... Made up number based on no analysis.
    1
  318. Your determinism is pseudohistory. You draw analogies from completely different times and circumstances.
    1
  319. India is not a Russian ally. They have good relations but absolutely no alliance.
    1
  320. He means when it comes to SAM's.
    1
  321. Russia used this frame a year ago as well. Its mass use in this comment section implies they are relying on it again.
    1
  322. Rediculous.
    1
  323. Bad analogy.
    1
  324. Oryx does not care for your buzzwords.
    1
  325. Would they now?
    1
  326. ​ @KolyaUrtz Nice try Ivan
    1
  327. Lol. You have no counterargument to sattelite imagery.
    1
  328. Russia started this war and it will only end with their withdrawel from Ukraine. They chose to sow the win and shall reap the whirlwind.
    1
  329. Lacks citation
    1
  330. Yes. Reuters wrote an article on it on the 31st of January, 2024. I can't post links here, but the title is "Russia's Shoigu urges faster artillery production, no 'fooling around'"
    1
  331. Is it bulky or tin waste?
    1
  332. ??
    1
  333. ??
    1
  334. The USSR did.
    1
  335. Do I have to explain what a metaphor is?
    1
  336. No?
    1
  337. How did that work out?
    1
  338. ​ @CloneDAnon Is SEAD foreign to the Russian air force?
    1
  339. Strawman argument and a refusal to engage with the analysis.
    1
  340.  @bigdog8008  I suggest you google the word "obtuse".
    1
  341. ???
    1
  342.  @StrangerHappened  you have left these comments on every video on this channel without ever presenting a counterargument.
    1
  343.  @thomasfarley5070  Perun surely is not and he has also denied it in a pretty long expose.
    1
  344. No.
    1
  345. Gulf. War. Holy shit, how can you forget about that.
    1
  346. Imagine calling military experts socialist to undermine their credibility. This comment is not worth to be refuted, as it has no evidence to begin with.
    1
  347. A snail setting out on february 24, 2022 would have been in Lviv by now...
    1
  348. “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
    1
  349. "No" is such a weak argument in the face of statistics.
    1
  350. So fuck the strategic bombing campaign, the Meditarenean, land lease and Overlord. Why don't you go and read "When Titans clashed" 2nd edition, page 195-198.
    1
  351. No u.
    1
  352. He never said they have nothing. You never watched the video, clearly.
    1
  353. Sure buddy.
    1
  354.  @im-the-zam  Russia losing more men in Ukraine in 5 months than the US did in Iraq and Afghanistan in 20 years sounds like a pretty big loss.
    1
  355. Yes, he has stated so many times.
    1
  356. He never said any of this? This is a next level strawman fallacy.
    1
  357. Ukraine has only recieved the HIMARS in 2022. You are lying.
    1
  358. I don't care your your baseless conspiracies
    1
  359. Amazing. You just dismissed his entire video on estimating the number of Russian tanks to use a figure higher than even Russia claims. Russia is the country best known for lying about its military.
    1
  360. So you have no counterargument other than "wait and see"?
    1
  361. Nobody is going to shill for Russian war crimes
    1
  362. If you mean nuclear weapons, you're wrong. Russia has no capability after the severe degredation of its forces to fight on a battlefield after the use of nuclear weapons.
    1
  363.  @GoodLookingGentlemen  Copium.
    1
  364.  @rollingthunder8630  Flying Turkey? You think fighters still dogfight?
    1
  365. No.
    1
  366. Is it like that time the Russian MOD showed a missile hitting a building and claiming ut as proof of a Himars getting destroyed? ​ @Jean-Seb  Or is it like that time they claimed to have destroyed three Bradleys prior to their shipment to Ukraine?
    1
  367. Did you dodge the draft? ​ @Jean-Seb 
    1
  368. You don't get it. Russia will decline when compared to China, India, Indonesia, Vietnam, Turkey, Egypt etc. It will simply loose the advantage.
    1
  369. In the context of military procurement, 3 years is a prtty short time period to run out of vehicles.
    1
  370. Biological attack?
    1
  371. Obvious strawman is obvious
    1
  372. Strawman argument is obvious
    1
  373.  @complexblackness  The Afghan government you helped foster was rather corrupt and did not enjoy all that much popular support.
    1
  374.  @evilleader1991  No. Due to Ukrainians SAMs they could not fly where they liked. This is why the Russian air force now throws missiles from across the border.
    1
  375. You are notveven engaging with the video
    1
  376. Last I checked the Ukrainians would love for Russia to leave so there may be peace.
    1
  377. That is not true
    1
  378. Because countering it with a buildup is escalation.
    1
  379. ??? What?
    1
  380.  @somebody700  *more vunerable and dependend
    1
  381. Your baseless conspiracies are not welcome here.
    1
  382. That is not true.
    1
  383. The USSR barely did anything to Japan. Stop lying.
    1
  384. That is not true. https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/yes-china-gunning-six-carrier-navy-2035-178979
    1
  385.  @thickboi4304  Doubt
    1
  386. Huang, we have no confirmation of Israel's claim.
    1
  387.  @9w9id  "Ignore the counter offensives east of Khrakiv and the liberation of Kherson! Focus instead on my 200 meter advance near Bakhmut after fighting for 8 months!" Do you even listen to yourself? Thye battle for Bakhmut lasted longer than the Battle of Stalingrad. That is how patheticly degraded the Russian Armed Forces are.
    1
  388. Prove it.
    1
  389.  @DrDoomsd  The US is causing Russia to build up troops? Didn't realize your military followed orders from the US.
    1
  390. You have no understanding of guerilla warfare.
    1
  391. “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
    1
  392. Russia does not care about Taiwan.
    1
  393. ​ @tomk3732 no
    1
  394. I am sure the Pentagon has never considered this /s Also "trillions". Get real.
    1
  395. No arguments? 😢
    1
  396.  @silverstar2579  If you still do not know we use Oryx you have not been watching these videos.
    1
  397. *interesting You are in the minority. This is a military analysis channel. The Russian war against Ukraine affects millions.
    1
  398. No.
    1
  399. Strawman.
    1
  400. You are picking sides and choosing to actively support two authoritarian regimes? I am picking none of them.
    1
  401. The defender is at a great advantage when it knows the enemy is coming.
    1
  402. You misspelled "propaganda". Also you have no argument to back up your claim while I can clearly see how Covert Cabal does have proof.
    1
  403. Bruh.
    1
  404. ​ @desertodavid Nobody takes Tucker Carlson fanboys seriously
    1
  405.  @Chosen_Ash  Dollars? Did the US take over the Russian economy?
    1
  406. "As an American" is not an argument or source from which authority is derived @Iamabot4708 
    1
  407. He litterly uses satellite footage. You cannot get better info.
    1
  408. Whataboutism
    1
  409.  @Princip666  Perun has done this so you are clearly lying.
    1
  410. This is such a blatant lie
    1
  411. Map: Russia has not moved in 12 months @blackhatch46 
    1
  412. They litterly said they wanted regime change. When are you taking Kyiv, Dimitri? @blackhatch46 
    1
  413. “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
    1
  414. No arguments?
    1
  415. Can you stop it with the fake drama? You sound like a "judgement day is coming"-activist.
    1
  416. Bot
    1
  417. Dude. That perspective is in every article by Reuters, DW and Al Jazeera.
    1
  418. Argument in bad faith.
    1
  419. Source: "I made it up."
    1
  420. Satanic? Stop projecting your religion.
    1
  421. No u
    1
  422. Your comment has nothing to do with the arguments made in the video.
    1
  423. ​ @polduran  That is not true.
    1
  424. 0:18 no
    1
  425. The radar data stored by the S-400 on the F-35 can be abused.
    1
  426. Nobody said that? Weird strawman. We are lloking at the rate of attrition here. Sattelite imagery paints a better picture than you ever will
    1
  427. Russia has been claiming that the front is collapsing for 2.5 years now.
    1
  428. Is this "midern equipment" in the room with us now?
    1
  429.  @9w9id  Occupations and nation building is a whole different topic.
    1
  430. "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." Satellite images do not care about your political views.
    1
  431. This reads like the journal of a serial killer
    1
  432. Lol. You have no counterargument.  @dikfrik5236 
    1
  433. Suuure.
    1
  434. For someone using a NASA pfp you sure don't seem to like satellite imagery.
    1
  435. And where is this "whole heap of equipment"?
    1
  436. Found the vatnik
    1
  437. Yet Russia's war goals specifically mention gaining ground. Like how they formely annexed Kherson despite not occupying all of it. Weird how you lie so blatantly.
    1
  438. You are subscribed to MilitarySummary which sells merchandise with pro Russian war slogans. Nobody is believing anything coming from your mouth.
    1
  439. What?
    1
  440.  @danielmlinar4892  It is funny. If your claim about Russian tank batallions being just as good as pre-war it would make them look even worse. They cannot do anything significant on the front even with double the number of tanks. The planners of the invasion must have been extremely incompetent.
    1
  441. ​ @hhkk6155 Blatant disinformation
    1
  442. Real historians use actual quantitative methods, kid.
    1
  443. This is completely wrong and was debunked by the Chieftain, Perun and every military on the planet.
    1
  444. Wow should we listen to the guy using a profile pic of a known liar?
    1
  445. Is counting a difficult skill?
    1
  446. Is this "alliance" in the room with us now?
    1
  447. Get real.
    1
  448. ​ @baileygregory9192  Trump has praised that dictator every chance he gets. You are convincing nobody.
    1
  449.  @operator9858  Have fun with SAM-sites.
    1
  450. Facepalm Protect it from what?
    1
  451. Russia isn't the US' peer
    1
  452. Did Russia tell you that? This channel has already covered how Russia lies about the number and availability of its equipment. This video raises that very point!
    1
  453. You aren't very familair with NATO, are you?
    1
  454. COVERTLY!
    1
  455. Perun has covered Russian war production already. Your argument is invalid.
    1
  456. You mean investors.
    1
  457. Even your whataboutism is based in lies.
    1
  458. What kind of question is that?
    1
  459. Crimean War, WWI, Russo-Japanese war, first Chechen War, Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the Soviet-Polish war.
    1
  460.  @Bergmann.Alaska  Satellite images do not care about your ideology.
    1
  461.  @igormatrosov-m8b  That never happened.
    1
  462.  @jackwalker9492  Petty insults are not helping your legitimate argument that this free-riding is problematic and that many European countries are not meeting their defence obligation.
    1
  463. The return of the "we are keeping our real weapons in reserve" frame. Straight from RT and Sputnik. You instinctively lie
    1
  464. ​ @dangersnail5839 Yet you fail to support your argument
    1
  465. Look at your profile name. Do you masquarade as a Ukrainian to make Ukraine look bad?
    1
  466. *you're
    1
  467.  @Corvin2696  Oryx. That is the source, as stated many times across various videos on this channel.
    1
  468.  @Corvin2696  Rand and IISS have never supported the claim Russia has 30,000 main battle tanks.
    1
  469. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_armed_conflicts_involving_the_United_States Your claim about not winning a war is false.
    1
  470. It is?
    1
  471. Red flag excersises provide data.
    1
  472. GULF WAR! How many times do I have to tell you this?
    1
  473. You are the liar that stated the T-54 had better side armour than modern Western tanks.
    1
  474.  @MuhammadRidwan-pe7ny  Lol. You bought the propaganda! Russian recently froze to death in poorly maintained buildings in Moscow.
    1
  475. Obvious troll is obvious
    1
  476. ​ @yap5995  "It is known" Great source bro. Did this knowledge come to you in a dream?
    1
  477. ​ @WeeWRomero  no
    1
  478. ​ @abhishekmahanta1112  Just took a look at Oryx again. The Russian army is in a sad state.
    1
  479. Verifiable evidence is verifiable.
    1
  480. If that were true their performance would be even sadder.
    1
  481. What day? Where? How? Where is your citation? @kuunoooo7293 
    1
  482. ​ @patwilson2546 Most people did not expect Ukraine to hold because they overestimated Russia's military ability. What excuse does the Russian leadership have?
    1
  483. Prove it
    1
  484. Your negative partisanship warps your entire worldview.
    1
  485. Only Turkey, since it us a F-35 purchaser.
    1
  486. ???
    1
  487. ​ @HOLOD48551 Blatant liar. You are just trying to undermine research institutes because you di not like their findings
    1
  488. Usually yes. Area 51 is used to test fly aircraft, including experimental ones. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_51
    1
  489. "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." Satellite images do not care about your political views.
    1
  490. So your logic is that Russia is not supporting its troops, causing needless deaths, because it can't be bothered to use its totally real Wunderwaffen? Sounds like you really hate Russian soldiers.
    1
  491. Did Nazi Germany's war being unjust affects its performance against France?
    1
  492. No.
    1
  493. ???
    1
  494. ​ @sherrysnyder4195  Gulf War.
    1
  495. It lost in Vietnam none the less.
    1
  496. ​ @generalscathach6452  No? Nobody is impressed. Stop lying.
    1
  497. These are valid points of criticism. Thank you.
    1
  498. Its his sponsor. He needs to make a living
    1
  499. Yeah, it means it is based on all available data as of the making of the video.
    1
  500. They are indeed quite expensive.
    1
  501. Taiwan has the right to choose who it allows to have military forces in its own country.
    1
  502. Why would you dismiss it?
    1
  503. Iran has no F-15's. They have F-14's.
    1
  504.  @thickboi4304  The war was a draw. Iran was able to push a little throughout the war in certain sectors, but the front was primairily static.
    1
  505.  @JerryWDaviscom  What? No.
    1
  506.  @JerryWDaviscom  Your "day of reckoning" narrative is as old as your religion.
    1
  507. Russia was unable to defeat them before any military aid arrived.
    1
  508. Claims made without evidence can be refuted without evidence
    1
  509. The way you twist what happened is called lying.
    1
  510. There are only 2,400 ethnic Chinese living in Vladivostok
    1
  511. Yet is unable to win? Sounds like incompetence.
    1
  512. Sure buddy
    1
  513. Source: it came to me in a dream
    1
  514. You call into question his credibility because you can't refute his arguments.
    1
  515. That is a pretty blatant lie. Poland currently has 96 K9s, 80 Krabs, Danas and 207 2S1s. They also have another 728 K9s on orderalong with another 152 krabs
    1
  516. Do you think assault rifles are electrical?
    1
  517. He has stated this multiple times already as a constraint.
    1
  518. Oryx has shown us how much Russia has lost at least.
    1
  519. These claims are not in lign with each other and both lack evidence.
    1
  520. You have representation for your taxation. If the degree of actual representation is low, vote differently.
    1
  521. Other then the footage of the crash sites? Or do you think Russian pilots are just drunk?
    1
  522. They never said that... Russia produces more artillery shells since they have relied heavily on artillery for over a century. Other than that I have no clue what you're on about
    1
  523. He already covered SPGs
    1
  524. Defending Taiwan is not bullying.
    1
  525. Perun has looked at the trends of vehicle losses for both Ukraine and Russia.
    1
  526. He is American... you just disproved your own generalisation.
    1
  527. is losong /=/ has lost
    1
  528. ???
    1
  529. All stealth is detectable on radar. The RCS is not non-existent. It just means planes will be much closer before detection and target locks can be tricky.
    1
  530.  @arthurgeorge5474  27 million cassualties (wounded or killed)
    1
  531. Not in Ukrainian
    1
  532.  @GhazKhan99  You're proving my point by not putting forward an argument.
    1
  533.  @SC4RRiGAN  You ignore the video. You clearly have no intention of arguing in good faith.
    1
  534. He never said that. Your very first statement is a strawman fallacy. I won't bother reading the rest.
    1
  535.  @basshunterdota625  "reliable"
    1
  536. Suuuuure.
    1
  537. ​ @felixprime8291 Yet they lost
    1
  538.  @minervali631  The ROC and PROC have been seperated for 70 years, both culturally and politically.
    1
  539. @Enclave Patrol In Afghanistan the Afghan government was highly demotivated, just like the South Vietnamese government was. Who do you think gave North Vietnam their equipment and training? Tge USSR and China gave them billions in aid. You think their hundreds of SAM betteries and MiG's appeared out of thin air?
    1
  540. Okay bye.
    1
  541. You keep spouting disinformation.
    1
  542.  @silverstar2579  How did the US perform during the Gulf War and in Iraq in 2003? It clearly outperforms Russia in conventional warfare.
    1
  543. That's not a conventional war.
    1
  544. ​ @kiereluurs1243 "I can't go to Russia, I'm an analyst!"
    1
  545. ​ @aruunmenon  "How dare this YouTuber only talk about the agressor in a conflict?!" You mistake bias for objectivity.
    1
  546. 6:33 no
    1
  547. That does not match the findings of Oryx, ISW or Perun putting it all together
    1
  548. So Russia is throwing away the lives of its soldiers by forcing them to use obsolete vehicles?
    1
  549. *you're ​ @Chrizpl 
    1
  550. Getting invaded is somehow their own fault?
    1
  551. Yes... that is what air-defence means.
    1
  552. ???
    1
  553. Ah yes of course. When Russia shot down an F-22 and then went on to win all nobel prizes. The article doesn't even say it shot one down.
    1
  554. Except they have...
    1
  555. You have no counterargument so you attack his integrity with vague nonsense
    1
  556. ​ @Runderton2  "This argument runs contrary to my worldview, therefore its wrong D:< "
    1
  557. The venn diagram of Russian supporters and people who do not argue in good faith is a circle.  @ballatinesfinesse2753 
    1
  558. Russia failed to do both.
    1
  559. You make a lot of assertions without any evidence while he makes a nice analysis with citation.
    1
  560. ​ @tomk3732 I doubt their tanks have night vision or thermal
    1
  561.  @dr.j5642  For free? US aid is political. Obtain stability in, and develop, friendly, resource rich nations and reap the benifits.
    1
  562. Proof it.
    1
  563. ​@Zeus-tm6jfVictim complex much?
    1
  564. No, they have used most T-80s and T-90s already
    1
  565. Its funny how you think because the US backed the Sryian Democratic Forces that those forces took orders from the US as if part of the US military. They did not and were far more fractured than your ecample shows. Your argument of course ignored the premise of the video and is self serving
    1
  566. 2026-2027.
    1
  567. Russia's military production is not that large.
    1
  568. No? This litterly shows their rate of attrition is very high.
    1
  569. You conflate development with morality in your argument.
    1
  570. Imperialist ​ @Alien_isolationist 
    1
  571. Conspiracy theorist
    1
  572. I had a course on geoplotics last week in Uni. Dr. Hans van Konningsbrugge says such a risky move could seriously threaten Putin's position and is extremely unlikely to happen.
    1
  573. You get free content. If you prefer he has no ads join patreon.
    1
  574. I have no idea what you're talking about. A bunch of buzz words and empty assertions that have nothing to do with the analysis.
    1
  575.  @MrHowardMoon  Lacks citation I suggest you stay in school.
    1
  576. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_armed_conflicts_involving_the_United_States Prehaps you should have done your homework than.
    1
  577. Russia has lost at least 1,901 tanks as of March 28th, 2023 according to the evidence gathered by Oryx. These only include visually confirmed losses.
    1
  578. So you go to a channels that does an entire analysis only to then ignore said analysis.
    1
  579. “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
    1
  580. Do you not understand his methodology or what?
    1
  581. It is funny how half the haters say he is making Russian propaganda and the other half claim he is making American propaganda.
    1
  582. How is life at Glasvet?
    1
  583. They also claimed back in 2012 they would have 2,000 T-14s by 2020.
    1
  584. What? You clearly don't know what you're talking about. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_armed_conflicts_involving_the_United_States
    1
  585. Mr. Victim complex here with a Republic symbol from Star Wars while backing the Empire.
    1
  586. No
    1
  587. You fail to understand the difference between guerilla warfare and conventional warfare. How did the Soviet fair in Afghanistan? How did the Americans fair in Iraq 1991 compared to 2003-2011?
    1
  588. Don't overestimate it either.
    1
  589. You have no argument.
    1
  590. You were never subscribed.
    1
  591. Indonesia buying a multirole aircraft, it is NOT a fighter, does not make it a Russian ally.
    1
  592. Both these claims are rediculous. All pictures are accessible on Oryx. Prove they double count. @XIXCentury 
    1
  593. LostArmour is litterly a Russian website. The fact you took his advice at face value is depressing @Grenadier311 
    1
  594. This is a blatant lie. Neither the Soviet Union ever produced that many anually nor do Russian production totals come anywhere close to that.
    1
  595. The more blatantly lying trolls are the worse.
    1
  596. ​ @sH-ed5yf He can't even be bothered to look up the name of the jet he claims to know so much about
    1
  597. Because Russia would never spread propaganda about the capability of their systems or rival systems. https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/English-Edition-Archives/July-August-2019/Finch-Russian-media/
    1
  598. The subtitles are wrong.  @preludeh22a57 
    1
  599. *you're
    1
  600. I doubt you read the comments.
    1
  601. No? The frontline has been stagnant for over 9 months.
    1
  602.  @russianpower4252  If they steal, sure. Otherwise you need citation.
    1
  603. Needs citation
    1
  604. He isn't lazy.
    1
  605. Source?
    1
  606. Russia has made agressive strikes against EU members.
    1
  607. "Near future"
    1
  608. Obvious strawman argument is obvious.
    1
  609. No? He is trying to investigate a relevant topic using satelite information.
    1
  610. The US doesn't want to get stuck in guerilla warfare anymore.
    1
  611. ​ @dax354able  He cites Oryx all the time which also looks at Ukrainian losses. He has specified that he does not look at losses but stated sufficient of other channels do so, like Perun, and that you should watch them.
    1
  612. ​ @ThomasZukovic  Seems like you are not engaging the video at all.
    1
  613. Did you really miss the long term scope of the video?
    1
  614. ​ @u2beuser714  Russia's mobilisation of war resources and rhetoric caused that alarm. Russia only has itself to blame.
    1
  615. Is it?
    1
  616. Is this "modern equipment" in the room with us now?
    1
  617. That's not true.
    1
  618. Wild claims.
    1
  619. You are claiming Russia has infinite artillery pieces. That is hilarious.
    1
  620.  @MacTac141  ...
    1
  621. Perun does that.
    1
  622. You have no argument so you don't engage with the contents of the video.
    1
  623. @John Smith How are you going to land armored vehicles along a rocky beach during an opposed landing?
    1
  624. ​ @SMB96  No they aren't. This channel has already covered the other bases. See his previous video
    1
  625. How many comanchees has the US build and exported?
    1
  626. *Kyiv Russia has an artillery army and should have been able to support it. NATO does not. Their have a military doctrine that emphasises air power.
    1
  627. NATO's main strategy was defensive.
    1
  628. Oh no. Anyway.
    1
  629. Based on what research?
    1
  630. That's why he speaks of doctrine.
    1
  631. Obvious strawman is obvious. You ran out of arguments in 2022. That's for sure
    1
  632. Obvious bot is obvious
    1
  633. Obvious bot is obvious
    1
  634. I note how you made many claims and used buzzwords, but you have shown no evidence.
    1
  635. Saying "propaganda" does not make it so. Why can't you take Bakhmut?
    1
  636. Not against Japan. There is not a single victor
    1
  637. No. OPSEC.
    1
  638. The president of the US is not usually involved in military projects.
    1
  639. You must not be familiar with quantitative analysis if you think this is what it looks like when someone is "making a game" out of it.
    1
  640. Google is your friend
    1
  641. I will tell the 13,000 dead Ukrainians you don't like the loss of new weapons of war.
    1
  642. Debt must be seen as percentage of GDP.
    1
  643. Sure buddy.
    1
  644. ​ @Princip666 obvious liar is obvious
    1
  645. ​ @calelliot3703 Oryx proves you are lying.
    1
  646. Disinformation.
    1
  647. ​ @jamesdillion8765  Obvious troll is obvious.
    1
  648. ... you have no idea what funding an international guerilla campaign costs.
    1
  649. You lack any form of citation.
    1
  650. ​ @DementiaJoeGottaGo  Your profile name reveals you're just a troll.
    1
  651. Russia has never been mentioned in the bible, nor should anyone care about that work of fiction.
    1
  652. No he has not.
    1
  653. Counterterrorism.
    1
  654. They really are moving those goalposts.
    1
  655.  @vladimirvojtaml  Clearly you have no actual counterargument to actual satellite footage.
    1
  656. You call 500 billion dollars a small sample?
    1
  657. He did. This is one of many videos he did on a potential invasion. Here he only answers the one question. Maybe you should have done your homework instead.
    1
  658. Dialects
    1
  659. ​ @rstous7691 You did not even read his comment.
    1
  660. We could litterly see it on wikipedia. The page on Russian military equipment shpws most are in storage.
    1
  661. Prove it
    1
  662. Lol. Explain why so many nations are buying or developing stealth fighters if they are pointless?
    1
  663. If anything they have galvinized Ukraine's efforts by rallying them against Russia. The Russian public does not want a war, which is another important point.
    1
  664. With its 9.2 million inhabitants? What?
    1
  665. Tell it to those in Chinese concentration camps.
    1
  666. Another pro-Russian liar. No suprise.​  @justgames9516 
    1
  667. You need to explain yourself.
    1
  668. 6:55 The Chieftain has argued in an interview on Military History Not Visualized that having bad to mediocre tanks is worthless in comparison to a good tank. Modern sensors are key and if your opponent has them and you don't, you are at a severe disadvantage. This is not to mention the increased danger of ATGMs.
    1
  669. Your understanding of war is poor. I suggest you look up the Battle of 73 Eastings. Quality trumps quantity.
    1
  670. Just because somebody else claimed something rediculous does not invalidate the video or even constitute an argument against it.
    1