Comments by "Rick74" (@rick7424) on "How Many Artillery Does Russia Have - Feb 2024 Storage Bases" video.

  1. No, a good investigation.
    2
  2. That is a blatant lie.
    2
  3. Becuase NATO has an air doctrine rather than an artillery focused doctrine.
    2
  4. Strawman fallacy. He never said this. He is caculating the rate of attrition with verifiable satellite images with a margin of error.
    2
  5. Source: "Prigozhin's ghost told me so in a dream."
    2
  6. Lacks citation  @baneofbanes 
    1
  7. You leid and immediatly moved the goalpost when confronted. @rootin222 
    1
  8. THat billion goes to increasing rates of production so you greatly misrepresented that. @privatebandana 
    1
  9. You used a strawman fallacy to disctract from the Russian rate of attrition for their artillery systems. Distracting from negative news is a common Russian propaganda tactic along with dismissing, distorting and dismaying. It is called the 4D model and fits well within the firehose of falsehoods.
    1
  10. You have come back to thus channel multiple times and now you act as if you just interacted with it for the first time. You are bad at lying.
    1
  11. You do subscribe to a lot of pro-Russian channels, so I am not taking your word for it.  @danielmlinar4892 
    1
  12. Yes. Reuters wrote an article on it on the 31st of January, 2024. I can't post links here, but the title is "Russia's Shoigu urges faster artillery production, no 'fooling around'"
    1
  13. “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
    1
  14. He never said any of this? This is a next level strawman fallacy.
    1
  15. “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
    1
  16. “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
    1
  17. Nobody said that? Weird strawman. We are lloking at the rate of attrition here. Sattelite imagery paints a better picture than you ever will
    1
  18. Lol. You have no counterargument.  @dikfrik5236 
    1
  19. *you're
    1
  20. No? This litterly shows their rate of attrition is very high.
    1
  21. “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
    1
  22. No? He is trying to investigate a relevant topic using satelite information.
    1
  23. No. OPSEC.
    1