Comments by "Rick74" (@rick7424) on "Definitive List of Russia's Armored Fighting Vehicles in Storage" video.

  1. ​ @ForSteam-k6y  That is a blatant lie.
    3
  2.  @america7082  You do not understand the difference between owned and funded.
    3
  3. And a poor tank will not be able to generate nearly close to the same amount of offensive capability.
    2
  4. You are correct. He should have said "The US, other NATO members and other countries..."
    2
  5.  @madkoala2130  Imagine performing so badly that NATO has lost zero soldiers after 2.5 years of combat.
    2
  6. No?
    2
  7. They cannot match their losses.
    2
  8. "Many sources" is not citation. That would not have passed in high school.
    2
  9. Well you're the expert on spreading dusinformation. ​ @OGPatriot03 
    1
  10. Russia is not the USSR nor does it have anything close to its industrial capability.
    1
  11.  @right584  Makes random assertion Is called out on making up stuff Uses burden of proof fallacy Get real.
    1
  12. ​ @AddieHilton He mentions the garages and that a vehicle being removed from storage not equating a loss on the battlefield. You clearly have no interest of analysing the topic or arguing in good faith. You did not even watch the video by the look of it.
    1
  13. Lol. You have no counterargument to sattelite imagery.
    1
  14.  @bigdog8008  I suggest you google the word "obtuse".
    1
  15.  @StrangerHappened  you have left these comments on every video on this channel without ever presenting a counterargument.
    1
  16. So you have no counterargument other than "wait and see"?
    1
  17.  @silverstar2579  If you still do not know we use Oryx you have not been watching these videos.
    1
  18. *interesting You are in the minority. This is a military analysis channel. The Russian war against Ukraine affects millions.
    1
  19.  @Chosen_Ash  Dollars? Did the US take over the Russian economy?
    1
  20.  @Princip666  Perun has done this so you are clearly lying.
    1
  21.  @danielmlinar4892  It is funny. If your claim about Russian tank batallions being just as good as pre-war it would make them look even worse. They cannot do anything significant on the front even with double the number of tanks. The planners of the invasion must have been extremely incompetent.
    1
  22. Real historians use actual quantitative methods, kid.
    1
  23.  @igormatrosov-m8b  That never happened.
    1
  24.  @Corvin2696  Oryx. That is the source, as stated many times across various videos on this channel.
    1
  25.  @Corvin2696  Rand and IISS have never supported the claim Russia has 30,000 main battle tanks.
    1
  26. Yeah, it means it is based on all available data as of the making of the video.
    1
  27. Perun has looked at the trends of vehicle losses for both Ukraine and Russia.
    1
  28.  @SC4RRiGAN  You ignore the video. You clearly have no intention of arguing in good faith.
    1
  29.  @silverstar2579  How did the US perform during the Gulf War and in Iraq in 2003? It clearly outperforms Russia in conventional warfare.
    1
  30. How is life at Glasvet?
    1
  31. I doubt you read the comments.
    1
  32. You must not be familiar with quantitative analysis if you think this is what it looks like when someone is "making a game" out of it.
    1