Comments by "Rick74" (@rick7424) on "Russia's Remaining Towed Artillery - Approaching Crisis Point" video.

  1. ​ @MrDael01 Not the Leopard 2a7 or the M1A2 SEP 3. Yet these artillery pieces have no really changed
    7
  2. You cosplay as a soldier while not joining the war. Wow.
    3
  3. Nobody is pretending that. This is a strawman fallacy.
    3
  4. Suicide drones have a limited range
    3
  5. Not really. It is not about analyzing who is winning the war but how the war affects the Russian military
    3
  6. When the guy refusing to engage with the video and repeating Russian talking points calls others bots you know irony died.
    3
  7. FPV drones cannot replace artillery unless you have one million of them lying around. Do you?
    3
  8. "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." Satellite photos do not care about your propaganda
    2
  9. You did not watch the video
    2
  10. He has photographic evidence, so yes.
    2
  11. 1. The war is only 2.5 years old. That is some amazing math you got there. 2. I do not care what others think or say. Engage the methodology of the video. 3. Satellite images do not care about what you believe.
    2
  12. Obvious bot is obvious.
    2
  13. No? He looks at the data and gives updates.
    2
  14. ​​ @davidrossa4125 no, he made an estimate after over a year of attrition that if the rate of attrition kept up Russia would run out of stored equipment by 2026. That was based on Oryx and satellite imagery.
    2
  15. That is largely about ammunition, not artillery systems.
    2
  16. That is a broken window falalcy.
    2
  17. Oryx disagrees and they have photograohic evidence
    2
  18. Lol. You have no argument. You even refuse to engage with the content of the video because you can't.
    2
  19. You have no argument which is why you do not engage with the video.
    2
  20. Russia invaded Ukraine, not the other way around.
    2
  21. No? It is an analysis based on satellite footage and military reports.
    2
  22. -He uses Oryx, not Ukrainian claims. -Russia is not recieving thousands of new artillery pieces. Not from its allies or its own industry.
    2
  23. You clearly never watched any of the videos by Perun or Cabal, nor do you read the reports of ISW.
    1
  24. You never watched his videos or you would refute his points and methodology
    1
  25. Strawman argument.
    1
  26. You are pretending all russian artillery shells have been converted which is incredibly false.
    1
  27. He normally uses Oryx.
    1
  28. Oryx has photographic evidence which does not care about your feelings on the matter
    1
  29. You do not deserve free content.
    1
  30. "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." Satellite images do not care about your political views.
    1
  31. Their losses exceed their production.
    1
  32. He never said they have nothing. You never watched the video, clearly.
    1
  33. You are notveven engaging with the video
    1
  34. Russia has been claiming that the front is collapsing for 2.5 years now.
    1
  35. "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." Satellite images do not care about your political views.
    1
  36. Perun has covered Russian war production already. Your argument is invalid.
    1
  37. "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." Satellite images do not care about your political views.
    1
  38. That is a pretty blatant lie. Poland currently has 96 K9s, 80 Krabs, Danas and 207 2S1s. They also have another 728 K9s on orderalong with another 152 krabs
    1
  39. He already covered SPGs
    1
  40.  @Ghazoo99  You're proving my point by not putting forward an argument.
    1
  41. He never said that. Your very first statement is a strawman fallacy. I won't bother reading the rest.
    1
  42. ​ @aruunmenon  "How dare this YouTuber only talk about the agressor in a conflict?!" You mistake bias for objectivity.
    1
  43. 2026-2027.
    1
  44. Russia's military production is not that large.
    1
  45. I have no idea what you're talking about. A bunch of buzz words and empty assertions that have nothing to do with the analysis.
    1
  46.  @MrHowardMoon  Lacks citation I suggest you stay in school.
    1
  47. Do you not understand his methodology or what?
    1
  48. Mr. Victim complex here with a Republic symbol from Star Wars while backing the Empire.
    1
  49. Obvious strawman argument is obvious.
    1
  50. You are claiming Russia has infinite artillery pieces. That is hilarious.
    1
  51. Perun does that.
    1
  52. You have no argument so you don't engage with the contents of the video.
    1
  53. ​ @DementiaJoeGottaGo  Your profile name reveals you're just a troll.
    1
  54.  @vladimirvojtaml  Clearly you have no actual counterargument to actual satellite footage.
    1
  55. Just because somebody else claimed something rediculous does not invalidate the video or even constitute an argument against it.
    1