Comments by "David Getling" (@DavidGetling) on "Immunologist debates whether a natural immunity or vaccine will best prevent COVID-19" video.

  1. The "super protected" comment is not correct. The massive Israeli study found that there was "no statistically significant benefit in vaccinating those with natural immunity". Even more importantly, the study found that natural immunity is 13 times as effective as vaccine induced immunity, and much longer lasting: possibly for life. It's not just the US government that is trying to bury this study, and the reason is obvious. Right at the start of this pandemic governments were given the advice subsequently published in the Great Barrington Declaration. This advice clearly stated that lockdowns would not work and would cause immense collateral damage. The advice of many eminent experts was to just isolate the most vulnerable until natural herd immunity developed. The Israeli study, and others, shows that the advice in the GBD would have worked spectacularly well. So now politicians are really desperate to make sure people never realise that their insane lockdowns were unnecessary.
    2