General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
David Getling
ZOE
comments
Comments by "David Getling" (@DavidGetling) on "Had COVID? 1 in 5 won't get antibodies" video.
Short of putting ministers on the rack, they will never admit how good natural immunity is, because of the implications. Right at the start of the pandemic the REAL experts told governments that lockdowns would not work, but just cause untold damage. They were advised to just isolate the most vulnerable until natural herd immunity developed. This same advice was published months later, for all to see, in the Great Barrington Declaration. The incredibly low IFR, less than 0.3%, and rock solid natural immunity shows that the advice in the GBD was spot on. But does anyone really expect sleazy ministers to admit that their insane lockdowns were wrong. No matter what the cost, they are determined to con everyone into believing that vaccines have saved them, and that lockdowns were necessary until they were available. This is a monstrous lie!
7
@barbaraneville5036 The honest and decent scientists and doctors, who are not in their governments' pockets will tell you the truth, but sadly they are few and far between.
7
@ks-hg5vo Another good question is how these 1 in 5 recovered without making antibodies. The simple answer to both these and similar questions is that government and their lapdog scientists are LYING!
3
OK. first we need to look at that 65%. This completely contradicts the facts. Both the massive Cleveland and Israeli studies clearly demonstrated that natural immunity was vastly better than vaccination. So if 65% is correct then it means vaccination is nearly useless. But what's much more likely is that 65% comes from one of the much smaller and highly disreputable studies that governments prefer to quote: while pretending that the Cleveland and Israeli ones don't exist. Now let's demolish this 1 in 5 fabrication. Firstly in the above mentioned studies previous infection was taken as a proxy for natural immunity. If only 80% developed antibodies then the findings of these studies would not have vastly favoured natural immunity. Then we need to ask the question about how those 1 in 5 recovered if they never had antibodies, because without them there is nothing to remove the virus from the body. Perhaps the clue here is the phrase "one in five tested". These 1 in 5 probably never developed covid-19: in other words false positive PCR tests. It's also incredibly important to understand that in the longer term it is the memory B and T cells that are the most important factor. These are what give those of us who have had measles life long immunity from getting it again, NOT antibodies. Having constantly high antibodies is very, very bad. As many doctors have remarked if instead of memory B and T cells antibodies remained high then our blood would be as thick as molasses: think heart attacks, strokes and gangrene. Of course often the simplest explanation turns out to be the correct one. That is, governments are still lying through their teeth and doing all they can to frighten people into getting vaccinated and complying with restrictions.
1
@christopherrobinson7541 Sorry snowflake, but saying the truth is false (even in capital letters) doesn't make it so.
1