Comments by "David Getling" (@DavidGetling) on "Had COVID? 1 in 5 won't get antibodies" video.

  1. 7
  2. 7
  3. 3
  4. OK. first we need to look at that 65%. This completely contradicts the facts. Both the massive Cleveland and Israeli studies clearly demonstrated that natural immunity was vastly better than vaccination. So if 65% is correct then it means vaccination is nearly useless. But what's much more likely is that 65% comes from one of the much smaller and highly disreputable studies that governments prefer to quote: while pretending that the Cleveland and Israeli ones don't exist. Now let's demolish this 1 in 5 fabrication. Firstly in the above mentioned studies previous infection was taken as a proxy for natural immunity. If only 80% developed antibodies then the findings of these studies would not have vastly favoured natural immunity. Then we need to ask the question about how those 1 in 5 recovered if they never had antibodies, because without them there is nothing to remove the virus from the body. Perhaps the clue here is the phrase "one in five tested". These 1 in 5 probably never developed covid-19: in other words false positive PCR tests. It's also incredibly important to understand that in the longer term it is the memory B and T cells that are the most important factor. These are what give those of us who have had measles life long immunity from getting it again, NOT antibodies. Having constantly high antibodies is very, very bad. As many doctors have remarked if instead of memory B and T cells antibodies remained high then our blood would be as thick as molasses: think heart attacks, strokes and gangrene. Of course often the simplest explanation turns out to be the correct one. That is, governments are still lying through their teeth and doing all they can to frighten people into getting vaccinated and complying with restrictions.
    1
  5. 1