Comments by "Sammy B" (@sammyb1651) on "The way it ALL ENDS: the five endgames that all women face" video.

2 important codicils: 1. Irrespective of where you are in the totem pole, she's still always going to be looking for "better" anyway, so just don't wife it. 2. If you are top 1% 5% (whatever), she's STILL only looking for the FANTASY of the top 1% man. Not the reality. HER fantasy. Ie theres a very good chance she'll want to divorce you anyway and just retain the resource element of your status. Women petition to divorce high value men every day of the week. So ONCE AGAIN, just don't wife it.
149
Enjoy the numbers game if it's in your favour! Have at it! It'd be silly not to! Won't help you when it comes to relationships however. Women aren't looking to date a HVM. They're looking to date their fantasy idea of a HVM. Not the reality. However good you look, it won't stop them projecting their own fantasy onto you. He's better looking, richer and more charming than you and he has zero expectations of her. And it won't stop them rinsing you when you inevitably fail to live up to that. If Tom Brady can't make it work (and he can't) then you'll be extremely lucky to do so.
35
I get it bro. But don't feel hatred. That really is wasted energy. Look at it like this instead...what they want is illusory. You'll get passed over for "higher value" men, sure. But they don't actually want that top tier man they overlook you for. They want their FANTASY version of that top tier man. Not the reality. Their fantasy. Their fantasy version is what they project onto the real person. He's better looking than him, more charismatic than him, richer than him and (most crucially of all) he has NO expectations of her. When the HVM inevitably fails to live up to that completely unrealistic standard, he gets canned too. Losing his possessions in the process. If Tom Brady can't make it work (and he can't) then theres nothing to feel envious about. You're not missing out. Women petition to divorce high value men every day of the week. Contempt and disgust probably has some utility as a response. It certainly mitigates against catching unnecessary "feels". Try to regulate it as best you can though so it serves you rather than controls you.
26
@loxtuf Thats a great suggestion. They can be a lot of fun to chat to provided none of her myriad needs are deemed to be contingent upon your performance. In other words don't wife them. The dynamic (and her personality) changes wholesale once she's projecting her hopes of "happiness" onto you.
4
@beowulf_of_wall_st Nicely formulated!
4
@abecochran4251 Did you honestly just say you were "really charismatic?" Unironically? Jeez! You must be REALLY charismatic!! Lol.
2
They don't care. Literally. And that should tell you all you need to know.
2
I'd say women ignore it tbh. In the main. So it's red pill at best. Ultimately no solutions are offered because it's insoluble. In that sense it's indistinguishable from any other red pill content. It's just a novel formulation of already well established principles.
1
@ballen0360 This is why it's all a bit academic really. However it's laid out by YouTube "experts" and whichever novel analogies are employed to illustrate a point. Nature's gonna nature. I don't have an issue with it anymore. I accept women are the way they are just as I accept men are the way we are. Tom Brady probably is the exemplar, as you say. I simply take the view don't be dumb enough to give them marriage. Give them the freedom of their hypergamy by denying any form of commitment that comes with legal penalties. And if you are hell bent on achieving HVM status (as if thats any kind of panacea-it isn't), do it solely for your own edification. That much is vital because it's only going to make you even more of a mark.
1
@bazookacat8421 Appreciated bro!
1
@pro5702 I used 'codicil' because it has the power to revoke an offending part of the original formulation. I want men to understand marriage (or more specifically divorce) is a terrible option whether women can be reached by Orion's formulation or not. For the avoidance of doubt, I'm deliberately trying to put the point more strongly than a mere corollary.
1