Comments by "SK ONTHEROAD" (@skontheroad2666) on "Inside Edition" channel.

  1. This is so sad. For my entire life, I had that same "tummy bulge" and always wanted to get rid of it (and no, I have never had a transplant of any kind to blame). It took years for me to realize that I simply had an extremely tiny waist, so by definition, it seemed that my tummy was bulging. 30 years and 5 pregnancies later, I tell my 3 girls, whenever they go on about their body or their weight--You will always wish every single day, that you and the body you had last year, last month or even last week. So don't worry about yesterday and cherish and enjoy what you have today because you look great and things only get worse with age, so don't sweat it! (I am brutally honest with my kids). I definitely wish I had the body I had when I was 20 and stressing about it. And while it is practically physically impossible to get back, I CAN help my kids appreciate what they have and not let them waste energy on something unattainable. Such as a tummy that protudes slightly from a Scarlett O'Hara sized waist that people envy on a daily basis. Focus on what God gave you and highlight your good features. And remember that self confidence is the best feature of all!
    163
  2. I watched all the hours of all the days of the ACB hearings. I saw no indication of her wanting to take away anyone's "basic human rights." In fact quite the opposite, which she was very clear about.
    11
  3. Not already divorced. Separated--hadn't been finalized yet.
    7
  4. NO ONE was "entitled" to anything. It was HIS money to do with what he wanted to. Without knowing anything about their interpersonal relationships, no one has a right to claim, or even speculate, who is more deserving or who should get what from the estate. Not to mention that the estate still has to be assessed. And not just the house, but, as they mentioned, all of its contents. Apart from a divorce proceeding that was going on (who is going to pay those attorneys??), and however contentious that was, there had to be someone who had beef with the will situation as a phone call to Inside Edition, that then shows a clip, which happens to show off the expensive items and memorabilia that is already worth more than $2Mil, is not only opening Pandora's Box, it tips the hand of whomever made the call and started this mess to begin with! 🤔
    6
  5. Yes... WAS... Because he died. Otherwise they were just separated.
    6
  6. Is she going to pay back the Healthcare system for the burden she placed on it in the middle of a public health crisis? Cedars made the gift shop into a Covid room last month! But they show a picture of her waltzing out after her (free) Covid test to her free procedure?? She better put that $20K in a college fund and hope one of her FIVE kids ends up smarter than her!
    4
  7.  @aliceshaw8265  Not to be mean, but why does every man use the same line? And the math doesn't even add up--Two took everything and the third got half? Half of nothing? What was even left??? (You don't have to answer that--it was rhetorical).
    4
  8. Did you ever find out if Gerber is now accepting applications from kids with disabilities?
    4
  9.  @kathykb8123  Exactly. And he was married enough times that he clearly had something going for him.
    4
  10.  @user-qq4tj8gm8b  Downs syndrome is not a disability. It is a genetic birth defect defined as an extra 21st chromosome that occurs before conception. It is not something that occurs while developing. In the womb or otherwise. Downs syndrome can cause disabilities such as autism, however many kids with Downs syndrome lead very full lives. One can test before pregnancy to see how high the percentage of risk there is that a baby will be born with this, or other, genetic defects, before pregnancy.
    4
  11.  @whotelakecity2001  You have a HUGE chip on your shoulder. If you spent more time applying yourself to better your circumstances and less time on YT making angry, misdirected comments to strangers, you would be a much happier person all around. And I mean that in all seriousness. Challenge yourself--try spending 1 hour a day doing something to better yourself and others instead of hanging out here for 3 months, and see how things will change for you and those around you for the better.
    3
  12.  @edyness2407  She purchased the product at some point. She knew what it was for. AND it has a warning label. BEYOND stupid!
    3
  13. She IS indeed, Amazing Amy!!
    2
  14.  @swanee9599  100%. And now, 3 days after you posted that comment, and have heard each Senator ask ACB a different iteration of the same question, and watched how she has not flinched once, how do you feel?
    2
  15.  @RobG93G  YES!!! Exactly!
    2
  16.  @babyteano1977  They did! $20K. Cheapest ad bill they ever received!
    2
  17.  @decnijfkris3706  THANK YOU!! Why does no one get that?? And anyone who says differently is clearly too young to recall what Leona Helmsley did with her fortune!
    2
  18.  @decnijfkris3706  And that scrap of paper won't even hold up in court. Annoying that everyone now thinks you can write scribble on a piece of TP and that overrides a legal will.
    2
  19.  @whotelakecity2001  That is a disgusting thing to say.
    2
  20.  @tkammon2211  Excellent answer! And she works now in government and is paid very little. And she is about to sign on for a lifetime of getting paid even less! That alone shows a deep commitment. Especially when you have 7 kids you have to worry about raising. I have 4 and between college and making weddings, I lose sleep over how we will get thru this. Especially these days!
    2
  21.  @Grace-zv4xq  You want to be stupid, do it on your dime!
    2
  22.  @VenuscianHoney  So am I! I can still read a warning label! She is just DUMB!
    2
  23.  @edyness2407  I am trying to find out who the other $3K went to?? Does anyone know that part yet? This story just gets worse everytime I hear more about it.
    2
  24. Yes... WAS... Because he died. Otherwise they were just separated.
    2
  25. Not nice!! He was old and dying!
    1
  26. It was hysterical. And I am sure Kelly Anne loved it! Who doesn't love free PR??
    1
  27. Just curious--which views of hers that she has stated do you oppose?
    1
  28.  @J_Braz_  Because it is dated from October.
    1
  29.  AYouTube User  Depends on how long they were married. Common-law marriage in CA is not automatic from minute one.
    1
  30. Is that like being "a little pregnant?"
    1
  31.  @metchac  They were married for 22 years. This clip is 2:20. But you guys have it all figured out! It is no wonder that everyone in this country is so misinformed all the time (I blame the media, but everyone being so gullible all the time does not help!)
    1
  32.  @metchac  And as you continue to prove my point... we have an entire generation who listens to a 2 min clip and then spends hours arguing with random people--aggressive strangers, who call other strangers names online for no reason--when they didn't even hear the details of the clip. And FYI--this is not news. It is entertainment.
    1
  33.  @souluti0n  She works in government. She is paid a pittance. And is about to earn a lot less!
    1
  34. LMFAO!!! This is sooo funny!
    1
  35.  @EphesianRose  I think you need to re-watch the entire, unedited clip.
    1
  36.  @jazpurgarcia831  Tokens? You mean HER CHILDREN??? Please ask your kids what they would think if you called them tokens and see what they say.
    1
  37. It was dated Oct. He only had 3 kids at the time.
    1
  38. The owner of the house is suing the city for doing his job and protecting his home? Unfortunately, this would have happened before BLM as well. Just an opportunity to make a quick buck (and they had a crappy attorney--he should have made everyone sign an NDA for, at the very least, the settlement amount. And they didn't get that much money!).
    1
  39. It was NYC to Syracuse? It is an hour long flight!
    1
  40. What is the worst part of this story--why didn't Ms. Jackson refuse the seat?? I am sure the woman previously in 1A, who took a photo, was not quiet about it. She should have refused the seat. That she legally should not have even accepted from United! It is considered a gift.
    1
  41. Oh....but there is! There is also a rule that says that they apparently can't work anywhere at all!
    1
  42.  @DJWeiWei  She is absolutely doing the job that they hired her for. And whatever she did online, she did prior to her gig at the WH. Yet they hired her anyway. If they did not perform their due diligence, that is on them. And it certainly doesn't make those who find the current administration in the wrong for letting her go only after they found out that they should have looked into her background more closely before they hired her, a Karen! Huh?
    1
  43. Atleast he didn't marry them at the same time! Lol
    1
  44. It was dated Oct. They were only separated. And they had been married for 22 years. Even by CA law, she is entitled to something.
    1