Comments by "SK ONTHEROAD" (@skontheroad2666) on "Larry King Left His Wife of 22 Years Out of His Will" video.

  1. Not already divorced. Separated--hadn't been finalized yet.
    7
  2. NO ONE was "entitled" to anything. It was HIS money to do with what he wanted to. Without knowing anything about their interpersonal relationships, no one has a right to claim, or even speculate, who is more deserving or who should get what from the estate. Not to mention that the estate still has to be assessed. And not just the house, but, as they mentioned, all of its contents. Apart from a divorce proceeding that was going on (who is going to pay those attorneys??), and however contentious that was, there had to be someone who had beef with the will situation as a phone call to Inside Edition, that then shows a clip, which happens to show off the expensive items and memorabilia that is already worth more than $2Mil, is not only opening Pandora's Box, it tips the hand of whomever made the call and started this mess to begin with! 🤔
    6
  3. Yes... WAS... Because he died. Otherwise they were just separated.
    6
  4.  @aliceshaw8265  Not to be mean, but why does every man use the same line? And the math doesn't even add up--Two took everything and the third got half? Half of nothing? What was even left??? (You don't have to answer that--it was rhetorical).
    4
  5.  @kathykb8123  Exactly. And he was married enough times that he clearly had something going for him.
    4
  6.  @decnijfkris3706  THANK YOU!! Why does no one get that?? And anyone who says differently is clearly too young to recall what Leona Helmsley did with her fortune!
    2
  7.  @decnijfkris3706  And that scrap of paper won't even hold up in court. Annoying that everyone now thinks you can write scribble on a piece of TP and that overrides a legal will.
    2
  8. Yes... WAS... Because he died. Otherwise they were just separated.
    2
  9. Not nice!! He was old and dying!
    1
  10.  @J_Braz_  Because it is dated from October.
    1
  11.  AYouTube User  Depends on how long they were married. Common-law marriage in CA is not automatic from minute one.
    1
  12. Is that like being "a little pregnant?"
    1
  13.  @metchac  They were married for 22 years. This clip is 2:20. But you guys have it all figured out! It is no wonder that everyone in this country is so misinformed all the time (I blame the media, but everyone being so gullible all the time does not help!)
    1
  14.  @metchac  And as you continue to prove my point... we have an entire generation who listens to a 2 min clip and then spends hours arguing with random people--aggressive strangers, who call other strangers names online for no reason--when they didn't even hear the details of the clip. And FYI--this is not news. It is entertainment.
    1
  15. It was dated Oct. He only had 3 kids at the time.
    1
  16. Atleast he didn't marry them at the same time! Lol
    1
  17. It was dated Oct. They were only separated. And they had been married for 22 years. Even by CA law, she is entitled to something.
    1