Comments by "Comm0ut" (@Comm0ut) on "Who benefits more from a long war in Ukraine?" video.

  1. Preventing a NeoSoviet respawn attempt with a bonus of (for a change from idiotic futile constabulary operations attempting to inflict secular democracy on permanently unwilling hosts) fighting for real secular democracy while spending couch money is a fantastic bargain. The idea the Cold War ever ended is as delusional as the idea Russia somehow became tradcon (Lenin's shrine and much more argue otherwise). Russia is the permanent Asiatic enemy of European civilization and secular democracy worldwide. It is desperately important to delude contrarian dimwits to believe otherwise, and simple people are easy to manipulate by affirmation. Russia is guilty of spawning the entire global Left (the real Left). Russia helped inflict nearly every US and NATO military casualty since WWII. Russian history is literally nothing but savage attacks on Europe of which it is not culturally part. This war is necessary, strategically wise, and dirt cheap especially compared to GWoT futile nonsense to which ignorants compare it. Russia will not fall, but its empire can further shrink and because the Kremlin is a violent toxic master it alienated every nation and people it invaded. Ask anwhere from Finland south if in doubt.
    6
  2. Bolshevik drivel. Russia brutalized all Eastern Europe from Finland south. Feel free to ask any surviving victims why the Warsaw Pact evaporated.
    3
  3. There was nothing honorable about Russian policy and Western concepts like honor is not a concern to Russians even when dealing with each other. Russia is NOT EUROPEAN in culture nor was it ever.
    3
  4. Oh really? Did a long containment benefit the (now gone) Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact? You shills are working hard lately.
    2
  5. WHAT? How did you miss out on WWII? The Soviet Union got vastly more. So did the Iraqi government and failed constabulary mission in A-stan (a vastly different war).
    2
  6. Ask Ukrainians why they don't want Russian masters instead of spouting memes.
    2
  7. America easily afforded containing Russia once already. I was stationed in West Germany at the time. The risk in the US is really not a matter of money since those opposing the war do NOT oppose the rest of the armed forces budget. It's very much a contrarian pissfight waged by clueless rustics who know nothing of history but would toss a toddler into a wood chipper to annoy their political opponents. If the Democratic party came out for Jesus much of the GOP would turn Satanist overnight. They're not capable of understanding the global Left they fear is a Soviet creation and that Russia is the reverse of tradcon Lenin's shrine is not maintained by accident nor is Soviet imagery and the WWII death cult.
    2
  8. Ukraine has nothing to do with that. Since history is not your strong suit I suggest asking Ukrainians online why they do not want Russian masters.
    2
  9. How do you fail to know about Ukrainian history? Your post reeks of either disinfo or ignorance. Ask real Ukrainians online why they object to Russian masters. This is not about corruption, it's about survival. Your post is a "false equivalence".
    1
  10. Why are you pro-Soviet?
    1
  11. What are ye on about? The Soviet Union had occupied Ukraine since the Russian civil war. Russia had starved it into submission in the 1930s but still had to fight partisans for years after WWII. Soviet forces completely controlled Ukraine in 1955.
    1
  12. Helicopters aren't what you think they are, and you type in all caps, the sign of a tech illterate.
    1
  13. Why should a weak Russia not lose to the same containment that broke the USSR?
    1