Comments by "Comm0ut" (@Comm0ut) on "AI girlfriends are here and they're posing a threat to a generation of men" video.

  1. That was always the case but the failures were accepted because alternatives did not exist. Nature is competitive. Chimps (humans are just shaved apes), lions, elephants etc fight for dominance and the losers lose.
    12
  2. MOST people aren't good at real life. That requires luck because it requires intelligence which is purely a matter of luck. Most people just get by.
    2
  3. Reproduction has always been competitive because nature is competitive and there are obviously always going to be losers in the game. There are billions of humans and that means many, many millions so defective the world is better off if they do NOT defile others with their presence and they do not reproduce. There are more than sufficient mental and other defectives. It not being polite to voice that truth does not change that truth. AI doesn't (infotainment outfits like CNN only care about views and clickbait) threaten "a generation" of men. It doesn't threaten anyone except those offended by someone being differently happy. "Stop liking what I don't like" is a typical emotion among the silly which are most humans. AI and other placebos can make users feel better about themselves while reducing their interaction with a world which does not need them. Everyone is better if they're satisfied by fantasy so what is the downside? The world does not benefit by their reproduction as it's already grotesquely crowded. The promise of AI is pleasure without drawbacks and if it did not deliver it would not sell. Nothing of value is lost and customers gain whatever consolation they get. The purpose of what we call relationships is obtaining FEEDBACK (tactile, verbal, it's all feedback) which AI can easily provide and at which it will only get better. OTOH the unfulfilled desire for something they can never have (keep it real) torments its victims. If you're ugly, stupid, mentally defective, poor, or combinations thereof you will never be desirable and often actively repellent! Why can this not be openly discussed instead of pretending everyone has a shot? I don't have those problems but that was pure luck from genetics to economic background. (A child does not make its circumstances.) The professor is also lucky because his intelligence is a matter of luck. The lucky should not confuse ourselves with the norm! Let them have their harmless fun and as technology improves the norm may change from constant craving for other people which has endless negative social consequences including violence against women by incels. They should have bots to keep them happy and from inflicting themselves on the unwilling. Bring on the AI! The truthpill is the so-called Matrix can be better than anything some people could ever have in meatspace.
    1