Youtube comments of Comm0ut (@Comm0ut).

  1. 1100
  2. 195
  3. 131
  4. 126
  5. 118
  6. 112
  7. 84
  8. 84
  9. 80
  10. 79
  11. 77
  12. 76
  13. 75
  14. 63
  15. 61
  16. 59
  17. 59
  18. 57
  19. 57
  20. 55
  21. 52
  22. 52
  23. 52
  24. 51
  25. 48
  26. 48
  27. 45
  28. 44
  29. 38
  30. 36
  31. 36
  32. 34
  33. 33
  34. 32
  35. 31
  36. 31
  37. 30
  38. 29
  39. 29
  40. 29
  41. 28
  42. 27
  43. 26
  44. 25
  45. 25
  46. 24
  47. 23
  48. 23
  49. 23
  50. 23
  51. 23
  52. 22
  53. 22
  54. 22
  55. 21
  56. 21
  57. 21
  58. 20
  59. 20
  60. 20
  61. 19
  62. 19
  63. 18
  64. 18
  65. 17
  66. 17
  67. 17
  68. 17
  69. 17
  70. 17
  71. 17
  72. 16
  73. 16
  74. 16
  75. 16
  76. 16
  77. 16
  78. 16
  79. 16
  80. 15
  81. 15
  82. 15
  83. 15
  84. 15
  85. 15
  86. 15
  87. 15
  88. 14
  89. 14
  90. 14
  91. 14
  92. 14
  93. 14
  94. 13
  95. 13
  96. 13
  97. 13
  98. 13
  99. 13
  100. Know and understand as Kurdish leadership know and understand that the absolute strategic necessity (because geography matters) of Turkish support to contain Russia as it did previous versions of its historic enemy means any relationship with the Kurds MUST be transactional. The permanent problem with the Middle East is the locals cannot get along and everywhere Kurds want to claim is also claimed by others. The prospective Kurdish state would be landlocked by local stakeholders who also want the land. Europe is the center of secular democracy which itself is a European invention native to no other cultures and which required a breathtaking amount of bloodshed over centuries to get the weak and constantly contested hold it has today. Alliance with Europe is mandatory for US economic and strategic global advantage. This reality is unalterable for all practical purposes and to defend Europe requires Turkish cooperation. The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few especially when there is zero practical way to attain the needs of the few even if the needs of the many were compromised. Reality is not always nice. Nothing can be done as the Middle East is run by its peoples and they basically hate each other for reasons which don't belong in this thread and cannot ever change for the better. All civilization can do is contain the barbarians who will enjoy their traditional amusements and will NEVER care what anyone else thinks of that. Russia is the existential enemy of European civilization which the Soviet Union invested its entire society in defeating. Fortunately it failed but a respawn must be prevented by NATO unity including Turkish support because Russia has always been a threat to Turkey and its interests. The Kurdish issue like the rest of the Middle East is hopeless and the Middle East does not belong to NATO. It does belong to the locals for good or ill. It should be left to them except when absolutely strategically necessary and rustic US political culture ensures everything we attempt there will backfire and by a Pyrrhic victory at best (Iraq is probably not even that). OTHO Ukraine is a European nation (Turkey is not excepting a few percent of its land) which is threatened like the rest of eastern Europe by the NeoSoviet resurgence Putin so desperately wants. There is every strategic, tactical, social, cultural and political reason for Europe (traitors excepted) to unite against the permanent Russian menace. As in the early Cold War (which never ended, merely changing) necessity requires secondary considerations be set aside. Without the survival of a strong, united Europe there will be little hope for global democracy over time and even less for the Kurds whose transactional relationships at least bought them time to consolidate.
    12
  101. 12
  102. 12
  103. 12
  104. 12
  105. 12
  106. 12
  107. 12
  108. 12
  109. 12
  110. 12
  111. 12
  112. 12
  113. 11
  114. 11
  115. 11
  116. 11
  117. 11
  118. 11
  119. 11
  120. 11
  121. 10
  122. 10
  123. 10
  124. 10
  125. 10
  126. 10
  127. 10
  128. 10
  129. 10
  130. 10
  131. 10
  132. 10
  133. 10
  134. 10
  135. 9
  136. 9
  137. 9
  138. 9
  139. 9
  140. 9
  141. 9
  142. 9
  143. 9
  144. 9
  145. 9
  146. 9
  147. 9
  148. 9
  149. 9
  150. 9
  151. 9
  152. 9
  153. 9
  154. 9
  155. 9
  156. 9
  157. So what? Japan started the war and refused to surrender unconditionally. Anything conditional is not unconditional. I'll gently remind modern weebs that Japan began the war, genocided China and slaughtered its way across Asia. Ask Chinese about Unit 731. Japan under Hirohito was monstrous and fortunate to have lost so few in a war Hirohito chose to start. The new cult of Japan-worship ignores everything Japan did under Hirohito, not least because the US allowed most Japanese war criminals to get away with murder because Japan was required to contain Maoist China. Read about Nanking, Manila, Burma, india etc before weebishly praising Japan for starting the war and being sorry they lost. Mark Felton is internationally respected, so here is his account of Imperial Japanese Army chowing down on Indian prisoners: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63R2aBqwsPg Unit 731 in China: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1odMnxoKKWc Getting captured didn't work out well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zfWmO9BJaOA Nanjing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pA-q68ReSY4 Manila: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRHBbhJ1KMg and https://niemanreports.org/articles/an-orgy-of-mass-murder-in-a-new-book-james-m-scott-nf-07-investigates-world-war-ii-atrocities-in-the-philippines/ ANZAC prisoners: https://anzacportal.dva.gov.au/wars-and-missions/burma-thailand-railway-and-hellfire-pass-1942-1943/enemy/treatment-prisoners Japan still pays tribute to its sadists at Yasukuni shrine though their former victim countries are not thrilled. Modern Japan (other than those who pretend these things never happened) of course considerably different, but what MADE modern Japan different was just punishment followed by a very benevolent Occupation under General MacArthur that reshaped its society. However "face" is everything so revisionist are working hard including constant shilling on Youtube where most viewers are completely ignorant. Japanese atrocities against Koreans long predate WWII: https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2021/10/25/un-remembering-the-massacre-how-japans-history-wars-are-challenging-research-integrity-domestically-and-abroad/ http://www.cgs.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp/download/cgs03_01_yamada There is much, much more.
    9
  158. 9
  159. 9
  160. 9
  161. 9
  162. 9
  163. 9
  164. 9
  165. 8
  166. 8
  167. 8
  168. 8
  169. 8
  170. 8
  171. 8
  172. 8
  173. 8
  174. 8
  175. 8
  176. 8
  177. 8
  178. 8
  179. 8
  180. 8
  181. 8
  182. 8
  183. 8
  184. 8
  185. 8
  186. 8
  187. 8
  188. 8
  189. 8
  190. 8
  191. 8
  192. 8
  193. 8
  194. 8
  195. 8
  196. 8
  197. 8
  198. 8
  199. 8
  200. 8
  201. 8
  202. 7
  203. 7
  204. 7
  205. 7
  206. Everything in the US is by the choice (inaction is a choice) of the American people. The American people relentlessly elect incompetent, venal and corrupt politicians who then do exactly what any sober observer expects they would. The beauty of democracy is voters get exactly what they vote for. Democracy requires a genuinely educated electorate (said education need not be confused with formal schooling, but most people are not autodidacts) because people who know nothing of a subject cannot evaluate subject matter expertise. The American people chose both directly and indirectly every aspect of their government. The results demonstrate democracy doesn't scale well. It's fine for small communities but the US is too large and complex to be run by ordinary minds. The public's savage, proud ignorance forces EVERYONE seeking office to pander to that ignorance and to compromise in order to get funding without which they cannot run a competitive race. The American people are too lazy to have much concept of civic duty, while at the same time feeling entitled to competent government by people who do without any effort on their part. This is a nation which thanks veterans "for their service" while refusing to learn foreign policy and confusing supporting "the troops" for supporting every strategically indefensible constabulary war they're sold by the hacks they elect. The people relentlessly reinforce the system they snivel about, unable to realize democracy means they did it to themselves at the ballot box.
    7
  207. 7
  208. 7
  209. 7
  210. 7
  211. 7
  212. 7
  213. 7
  214. 7
  215. 7
  216. 7
  217. 7
  218. 7
  219. 7
  220. 7
  221. 7
  222. 7
  223. 7
  224. 7
  225. 7
  226. 7
  227. 7
  228. 7
  229. 7
  230. 7
  231. 7
  232. 7
  233. 7
  234. 7
  235. 7
  236. 7
  237. 7
  238. 7
  239. 7
  240. 7
  241. 7
  242. 7
  243. 7
  244. 7
  245. 7
  246. 7
  247. 7
  248. 7
  249. 7
  250. 6
  251. 6
  252. 6
  253. 6
  254. 6
  255. 6
  256. 6
  257. 6
  258. 6
  259. 6
  260. 6
  261. 6
  262. 6
  263. 6
  264. 6
  265. 6
  266. 6
  267. 6
  268. 6
  269. 6
  270. 6
  271. 6
  272. 6
  273. 6
  274. 6
  275. 6
  276. 6
  277. 6
  278. 6
  279. 6
  280. 6
  281. 6
  282. 6
  283. 6
  284. 6
  285. 6
  286. 6
  287. 6
  288. 6
  289. 6
  290. 6
  291. 6
  292. 6
  293. 6
  294. 6
  295. 6
  296. 6
  297. 6
  298. 6
  299. 6
  300. 5
  301. 5
  302. 5
  303. 5
  304. 5
  305. 5
  306. 5
  307. 5
  308. 5
  309. 5
  310. 5
  311. 5
  312. 5
  313. 5
  314. Just a continuation of the old Soviet efforts under another flag, and a very old strategy. Since only very old people know anything about the first part of the Cold War because firstly we lived it and second it's not pop culture entertainment it's easy for Putinist shills to believe pro-Putinist assertions especially those affirming their existing ideology. Defunding Russian Federation efforts by reducing their local military footprints is an affordable tactic for Ukraine. I find the proud Russian responses so detached from reality quite refreshing because they're just like the early Cold War. They conveniently disremember how containment worked out the first time against a vastly larger and wealthier USSR + Warsaw Pact whose residents know what Russian rule is like by experience so they aid Ukraine today. Russia is interesting in that Muscovite rule doesn't improve the lives or economic status of the conquered but the opposite (which is why Ukrainians fight for self-determination). Russian supporters today cannot imagine why (now much more prosperous) eastern Europe doesn't miss being drained of resources or having its economies managed by a hostile occupier who had to build a physical wall to keep people from fleeing to the West and shot those who didn't move quickly or stealthily enough. I served in West Germany on the free side of the Berlin Wall (and quite enjoyed it, Germans in the 1980s were delightful hosts) so no speculation needed. Watching the USSR implode due to inability to run its economy and subsequent consensual evaporation of the Warsaw Pact alliance was quite satisfying. The same corruption gutted Russian Federation military sustainment and saved Ukraine, and Kremlin purging of Russian military reformers ensured incompetent battlefield performance including the disastrous failure to seize Kiev in the first days of the war. I don't fixate on casualties however since Russian military losses have no home front impact that matters being mostly from non-Muscovite regions whose losses strengthen Kremlin advantage over them. Westerners should remember Moscow is the center of gravity and non-Muscovite losses are a feature in Kremlin planning not a bug, removing fighting age males who might otherwise pose a threat like Chechen rebels once did before Kadyrov pragmatically sold out. Putin's dollar store desert storm failing to capture it's smaller neighbor will go on a while, but like Afghans wearing out the British, Russians and Americans (Afghans are a tough lot) time is on Ukraine's side. I never expected to see Finland join NATO or Sweden even consider it, or for lazy Europe to rearm after mistakenly gutting its forces when it hallucinated the eternal eastern threat was no more. Containment took from 1945 to ~1992 and the cultural basis for conflict is permanent.
    5
  315. 5
  316. 5
  317. 5
  318. 5
  319. 5
  320. 5
  321. 5
  322. 5
  323. 5
  324. 5
  325. 5
  326. 5
  327. 5
  328. 5
  329. 5
  330. 5
  331. 5
  332. 5
  333. 5
  334. 5
  335. 5
  336. 5
  337. 5
  338. 5
  339. 5
  340. 5
  341. 5
  342. 5
  343. 5
  344. 5
  345. 5
  346. 5
  347. 5
  348. 5
  349. 5
  350. 5
  351. 5
  352. 5
  353. 5
  354. 5
  355. 5
  356. 5
  357. 5
  358. 5
  359. 5
  360. 5
  361. 5
  362. 5
  363. 5
  364. 5
  365. 5
  366. 4
  367. 4
  368. 4
  369. 4
  370. 4
  371. 4
  372. 4
  373. 4
  374. 4
  375. 4
  376. 4
  377. 4
  378. 4
  379. 4
  380. 4
  381. 4
  382. 4
  383. 4
  384. 4
  385. 4
  386. 4
  387. 4
  388. 4
  389. 4
  390. 4
  391. 4
  392. 4
  393. 4
  394. 4
  395. 4
  396. 4
  397. 4
  398. 4
  399. 4
  400. 4
  401. 4
  402. 4
  403. 4
  404. 4
  405. 4
  406. 4
  407. 4
  408. 4
  409. 4
  410. 4
  411. 4
  412. 4
  413. 4
  414. 4
  415. 4
  416. 4
  417. 4
  418. 4
  419. 4
  420. 4
  421. 4
  422. 4
  423. 4
  424. 4
  425. 4
  426. 4
  427. 4
  428. 4
  429. 4
  430. 4
  431. 4
  432. 4
  433. 4
  434. 4
  435. 4
  436. 4
  437. 4
  438. 4
  439.  @arvypolanco  What is your conception of conscripts vs. professional maintainers and for how many years did you maintain combat aircraft? Not hatin', just curious to get other perspectives. "Conscript" does not mean less trained but inherently means less experienced. Any fighter can be maintained by conscripts (WWII airframes were far more labor intensive and engine work for example as or more complicated at field level) but optimal combat sortie generation benefits from professionals as a rule because their experience (maintenance is a perishable skill) does not require refresher training and working daily on the same airframes with the same people greatly facilitates speed and efficiency. For example US fighter units have troops with more time on training exercises and deployments than modern conscripts have in total service. Sweden doesn't need that level of experience for its deterrence missions making the Swedish model sufficient for flying safe missions to deter the Russian threat. Horses for courses. It would be a waste of money and humans for Sweden to damage its economy by over-militarization. (My background is avionics on Phantom and Bronco, F-16 engine troop and crew chief with Red X/IPI signoff orders on all systems, run qualified and the rest of the usual stuff. Time in CONUS, USAFE, Korea, Incirlik, KSA and Al Dhafra during Desert Shield/Storm. All huge fun I'd recommend to any young person including women as my wife was also a skilled CH-3. OV-10 and A-10 crew chief.)
    4
  440. 4
  441. 4
  442. 4
  443. 4
  444. 4
  445. 4
  446. 4
  447. 4
  448. 4
  449. 4
  450. 4
  451. 4
  452. 4
  453. 4
  454. 4
  455. 4
  456. 4
  457. 4
  458. 4
  459. 4
  460. 4
  461. 4
  462. 4
  463. 4
  464. 4
  465. 4
  466. 4
  467. 4
  468. 4
  469. 4
  470. 4
  471. 4
  472. 4
  473. 4
  474. 4
  475. 4
  476. 4
  477. 4
  478. 4
  479. 4
  480. 4
  481. 4
  482. 3
  483. 3
  484. 3
  485. 3
  486. 3
  487. 3
  488. 3
  489. 3
  490. 3
  491. 3
  492. 3
  493. 3
  494. 3
  495. 3
  496. 3
  497. 3
  498. 3
  499. 3
  500. 3
  501. 3
  502. 3
  503. 3
  504. 3
  505. 3
  506. 3
  507. 3
  508. 3
  509. 3
  510. 3
  511. 3
  512. 3
  513. 3
  514. 3
  515. 3
  516. 3
  517. 3
  518. 3
  519. 3
  520. 3
  521. 3
  522. 3
  523. 3
  524. 3
  525. 3
  526. 3
  527. 3
  528. 3
  529. 3
  530. 3
  531. 3
  532. 3
  533. 3
  534. 3
  535. 3
  536. 3
  537. 3
  538. 3
  539. 3
  540. 3
  541. 3
  542. 3
  543. 3
  544. 3
  545. 3
  546. 3
  547. 3
  548. 3
  549. 3
  550. 3
  551. 3
  552. 3
  553. 3
  554. 3
  555. 3
  556. 3
  557. 3
  558. 3
  559. 3
  560. 3
  561. 3
  562. 3
  563. 3
  564. 3
  565. 3
  566. 3
  567. 3
  568. 3
  569. 3
  570. 3
  571. 3
  572. 3
  573. 3
  574. 3
  575. 3
  576. 3
  577. 3
  578. 3
  579. 3
  580. 3
  581. 3
  582. 3
  583. 3
  584. 3
  585. 3
  586. 3
  587. 3
  588. 3
  589. 3
  590. 3
  591. 3
  592. Even worse was the utterly fookin' stoopid design choice to use a hydraulic kickoff switch in the first place! Ford then made a second foreseeable mistake instead of changing the design to a brake pedal-actuated mechanical switch. That switch used a diaphragm membrane of Kapton which was found to be dangerously faulty because it becomes brittle but on top of that Ford ran an "always hot" wire to the switch so when the Kapton failed it shorted the constantly hot wire! When caught early it just burned the engine compartment (a burned circle in the hood above that switch is the telltale but only when the fire is rapidly put out. Typically it destroys the cab at minimum but owners have lost garages and homes because the fluid can ignite when the owner is elsewhere thanks to the always-hot switch. That idiocy totaled many trucks which were never reported as switch-related fires but I've seen them in salvage yards where the shop I worked for sourced parts. I like my Fords but I don't use cruise anyway so I disconnected them (I do not consider their fix sufficiently reliable because it's a mitigation not complete failure proofing. Ignition switch fires were also common going back before the cruise switch fires. Other makes of course have their issues but the public should never forget profit renders humans blind and stupid, especially if they themselves are technically illiterate which is the case with most non-technicians. Replacing Kapton is now a very big business but only on aircraft. Since assertions without supporting facts are worthless, here ya go! "https://www.autosafety.org/ford-cruise-control-deactivation-switch-recalls-and-history/ Ford Cruise Control Deactivation Switch Fires On April 25, 1996, Ford Motor Company recalled 7.9 million vehicles for defective ignition switches that could short circuit and start fires in parked vehicles with the engine off because the switch circuit was hot or powered at all times. In a virtual replay on October 9, 2009, Ford Motor Company announced the last of its six recalls for defective Cruise Control Deactivation Switches that suffered from the same failure mode as the earlier ignition switch – an electrical switch in a continually powered, non-fused circuit. (In both cases, the suspect switch was made by Texas Instruments.) This latest recall in the series brought the total number of vehicles involved to 14.9 million. The switches, which run continuously even when the vehicle is not in operation, are prone to fail over time and cause electrical fires. One side of the switch is electrical and the other side is flammable hydraulic fluid, a combination conducive to fire. Fires in these vehicles have caused numerous house and garage fires, and resulted in deaths in several states.    Ford had knowledge of the cruise control switch defect for many years before 2009. The first recall related to these switches (99V-124) was announced by Ford on May 13, 1999, pursuant to NHTSA investigations PE98-055, upgraded to EA99-006. Ford agreed to recall 263,000 1992-93 Lincoln Town Cars built from November 4, 1991, through November 30, 1992, and the 1992-93 Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis built from February 5, 1992, through November 30, 1992. More than 100 complaints were identified by Ford and NHTSA during the 1998-99 investigations, yet Ford continued to use the same switches in vehicles though model year 2004 vehicles. "   Kapton is used on many aircraft and IMO should be the subject of more than one class action suit. (I'm a retired fighter fixer working avionics then engines then crew chief) and wrenched cars/trucks/motorcycles/machinery since the late 1970s. I encourage any curious gearhead to read more about recalls and why they happen. My switches are unplugged at the master cylinder and will remain that way. "https://www.interconnect-wiring.com/blog/aircraft-kaptontm-insulated-wire/ Which aircraft have Kapton™ insulated wire? First line fighter aircraft, as well as patrol, ASW, attack, transport, and helicopter aircraft are all subject to wiring problems because they possess Kapton™ insulated wire. Some aircraft involved on the military side include F-16, F-14, F-15, F-18, F-4, S-3, E-2C, P-3, EA-6, SH/UH-60, AH-64, and AH-1 models. Some examples on the commercial side include A310, A320, A330, A340, B727, B737, B747-400, B757, B767, DC-10, MD-8x, MD-11, L-1011, G-II, G-III, HS125-700, 212, 214, S-61, S-70B, S-76. Now, why is this important? It was discovered that the older the Kapton™ wiring gets, the more brittle and vulnerable the insulation becomes. Cracking and embrittlement of Kapton™ wiring harness insulation is widespread and has caused short circuits in key aircraft systems. For these reasons Kapton™ wiring is being phased out of use in many new aircraft types. Unfortunately, countless aircraft are flying today with cracks in the insulation of wiring harnesses down to the metallic conductors, and are only replaced when the problem occurs as a result of this dangerous situation. The only really safe solution to the dangers posed by the use of Kapton™ is the replacement of ALL older aircraft with new ones not utilizing Kapton™ wiring."
    3
  593. 3
  594. 3
  595. 3
  596. 3
  597. 3
  598. 3
  599. 3
  600. 3
  601. 3
  602. 3
  603. 3
  604. 3
  605. 3
  606. 3
  607. 3
  608. 3
  609. 3
  610. 3
  611. 3
  612. 3
  613. 3
  614. 3
  615. 3
  616. 3
  617. 3
  618. 3
  619. 3
  620. 3
  621. 3
  622. 3
  623. 3
  624. 3
  625. 3
  626. 3
  627. 3
  628. 3
  629. 3
  630. 3
  631. 3
  632. 3
  633. 3
  634. 3
  635. 3
  636. 3
  637. 3
  638. 3
  639. 3
  640. 3
  641. 3
  642. 3
  643. 3
  644. 3
  645. 3
  646. 3
  647. 3
  648. 3
  649. 3
  650. 3
  651. 3
  652. 3
  653. 3
  654. 3
  655. 3
  656. 3
  657. 3
  658. 3
  659. 3
  660. 3
  661. 3
  662. 3
  663. 3
  664. 3
  665. 3
  666. 3
  667. 3
  668. 3
  669. 3
  670. 3
  671. 3
  672. 3
  673. 3
  674. 3
  675. 3
  676. 3
  677. 3
  678. 3
  679. 3
  680. 3
  681. 3
  682. 3
  683. 3
  684. 3
  685. 3
  686. 3
  687. 3
  688. 3
  689. 3
  690. 3
  691. 3
  692. 3
  693. 3
  694. 3
  695. 3
  696. 3
  697. 3
  698. 3
  699. 3
  700. 3
  701. 3
  702. 3
  703. 3
  704. 3
  705. 3
  706. 3
  707. 3
  708. 3
  709. 3
  710. 3
  711. 3
  712. 3
  713. 3
  714. 3
  715. 3
  716. 3
  717. 3
  718. 3
  719. 3
  720. 3
  721. 3
  722. 3
  723. 3
  724. 3
  725. 3
  726. 3
  727. 3
  728. 3
  729. 3
  730. 3
  731. 3
  732. 3
  733. 3
  734. 3
  735. 3
  736. 3
  737. 3
  738. 3
  739. 3
  740. 2
  741. 2
  742. 2
  743. 2
  744. 2
  745. 2
  746. 2
  747. 2
  748. 2
  749. 2
  750. 2
  751. 2
  752. Viet Nam was fundamentally an act of Lyndon Baines Johnson's political vanity. While cunning he was a typical ignorant hick of the lowest order who got tens of thousands of American Soldiers, Sailors, Marines, Airmen, Coast Guardsmen, and civilian support personnel killed, maimed, PTSDed and otherwise damaged and was still forced into not running for a second term. This is now forgotten because the public have no interest in facts, they just want to fap to delicious drama. When the last competent veterans with SEA experience departed government service the US promptly repeated a similar strategic mistake by invading a country to kill one key enemy terrorist. Baiting the US into A-stan was the worst damage any post-SEA opponent inflicted on the US yet no careers were harmed. (In contrast Israeli revenge for Munich and other terrorist attacks up close, personal, professional and precise. The US needs a proper Mossad-equivalent but refuses to build one.) Not conent with one fvckup, Rumsfeld and friends (who wanted to invade Iraq in the first place instead of A-stan) doubled down invading Iraq which denied US A-stan forces those assets. Of course we supported utterly corrupt client governments in all three cases. Nothing was learned and the US will do it again in another ~three decades. I was alive when Americans imagined our public and leaders would learn from Viet Nam, enlisted later and served in Desert Storm which was the one war we got right by not invading Iraq. (No one could bomb the US out of being Christian yet the US imagines it can bomb others out of their religion which is far better designed for the long war.). Nothing has been learned from A-stan or Iraq either. All the public see is ANA equipment which our worthless clients lost to the real nationalists. The public do not care about why the US relentlessly repeats strategic mistakes because our primary education system does not teach military concepts citizens must understand to advocate intelligent policy. The American public do not care about their civic duty to be informed so they thank us vets for our service out of just enough guilt for regret but not enough guilt to do THEIR duty at the ballot box.
    2
  753. 2
  754. 2
  755. 2
  756. 2
  757. 2
  758. 2
  759. 2
  760. 2
  761. 2
  762. 2
  763. 2
  764. Today "thank you for your service" REALLY means "I have no idea what you do but feel slightly guilty for ignoring my civic duty in a democratic Republic to advocate for intelligent foreign and military policy I will never care enough to understand so I conflate supporting strategically counterproductive misfought constabulary operations with supporting the troops". The PUBLIC are NEGLECTING their civic duty to demand a professional, effective, ethical armed force because it's easier to feel their ignorant lazy feelings than engage the SAME PEOPLE THEY VOTE FOR to reform the armed services. The voters elect leadership and bear responsibility for that leadership. The Army has never been the service of choice if you want a career unless you know nothing about the Army (or score a tasty Guard or Reserve deal, there are many ways to serve). Even in WWII the Army Air Force got the higher IQ recruits by choice of senior leadership. I was born to a WWII ETO Army infantry vet father and grew up when the workforce was full of WWII/Korea/SEA vets. Not one of those men suggested anything other than the Air Force though they were proud to serve and this was LONG before modern woke nonsense. (It was however when the draft era armed forces required the rather large brig and jail system which no longer exists and goes ignored online because it's not a sexy part of armed forces history!) If recruiting were perceived as a real problem then Uncle Sugar would be defecating money to fix it instead of waiting it out. Money really does fix recruiting and retention but ya can't do it for pocket change. Anyone capable of being an effective Soldier, Sailor, Marine, Airman, Coast Guardsman etc can easily get a variety of good jobs if they make the effort. Military compensation is the price spectators pay to delegate war. That said all these eras are cyclic including varieties of "woke". Ask really old SNCO veterans (over seventy or eighty) about verbal quotas on promotion boards long before the personal computer era when it was easy to do anything on the down low. This isn't the first Hollow Force era either but the same realities that keep the armed service population young ensure they're nearly obvlivious to what came before them unless it's on a promotion test.
    2
  765. 2
  766. 2
  767. 2
  768. 2
  769. 2
  770. 2
  771. 2
  772. 2
  773. 2
  774. 2
  775. 2
  776. 2
  777. 2
  778. 2
  779. 2
  780. 2
  781. 2
  782. 2
  783. 2
  784. 2
  785. 2
  786. 2
  787. 2
  788. 2
  789. 2
  790. 2
  791. 2
  792. 2
  793. 2
  794. 2
  795. 2
  796. 2
  797. 2
  798. 2
  799. 2
  800. 2
  801. 2
  802. 2
  803. 2
  804. 2
  805. 2
  806. 2
  807. 2
  808. 2
  809. 2
  810. 2
  811. 2
  812. 2
  813. 2
  814. 2
  815. 2
  816. 2
  817. 2
  818. 2
  819. 2
  820. 2
  821. 2
  822. 2
  823. 2
  824. 2
  825. 2
  826. 2
  827. That bloody disaster was the product of UTTER SENIOR UNIFORMED LEADERSHIP FAILURE for which no careers were harmed. No US armor support. just pathetic HMMWV utility trucks (fortunately our clients had AFV to help with the rescue). The AC-130s were sent home. Helicopters are delicate and easily shot down when they get in ground fire range (see Ukraine for current examples) so they were. The lessons learned reports are far from flattering. The great personal courage of the US forces mitigated a disaster made by their own leadership but no careers were affected. Senior officers who knew better refused to buck their superiors and men they were responsible for died. From the linked Air Command and Staff College research paper: "But what about the military leadership in Somalia? Why did they simply take no for an answer? The military leadership should have shown enough nerve to hammer the point home with General Powell, and if this still did not produce results, then they should have terminated the hunt for Aidid until they were able to receive the armor they so desperately needed. If TFR would have had tanks, even with the ambush, they would have gone in, knocked over the mud huts, put a steel cable around the tail of Super 61, and pulled the thing out." A previous MH-53 kill meant they knew the risks, but did less than nothing. Light trucks and urban combat mix badly. The "gun truck" lessons of Southeast Asia were forgotten until well into the Iraq occupation when civilian armor kits were needed then fielded because the Army and USMC previously made zero effort in that respect so G.I.s were forced to fab "hillbilly armor" for their vehicles. Worse, accountability was never a serious issue (nor has it been in other constabulary disasters since) because the US social climate is one of blind worship of our armed forces. (Veterans usually excepted having sustained direct personal experience of the good and the bad.) CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON THE DEFEAT OF TASK FORCE RANGER by Major Clifford Day will be of interest to professional readers. It's under fifty pages so others may give it a go: https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB63/doc10.pdf More informed military professional commentary from the excellent Small Wars Journal: https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/somalia-20-years-later-%E2%80%93-lessons-learned-re-learned-and-forgotten "Lessons Forgotten Strategy formulation. As a nation, no operational or tactical events are powerful enough to overcome a lack of comprehensive strategy for a situation, nation, or region. As the U.S. deployed into Somalia in 1992, not enough strategists put thought into "...and then what?" There was little talk of the Horn of Africa as a whole, but only of ameliorating the famine in Somalia itself and making those images of starvation go away. This lack of a regional approach is sometimes seen today, as in Syria, Egypt, Afghanistan, and in other areas where "fixing" a singular nation is clearly not the total answer. An end-state with a realistic transition into the future must be designed from the start." Since Mogadishu military leadership failures have cost many more American lives. The heroism and bravery of US forces is not honored by ignoring military leadership failures which get my brothers and sisters killed, maimed, TBIed, PTSD, poisoned (burn pit health hazards were ignored for decades), diseased (like Gulf War Syndrome, which I luckily missed but others in my squadron did not) and whatever new afflictions have yet to be uncovered. The American public need to understand that "thank you for your service" while a nice warm fuzzy is no substitute for the civic duty to press our legislators and Presidents to wage wiser foreign policy including military reform. (Reformers exist but tend not to make general officer rank.)
    2
  828. 2
  829. 2
  830. 2
  831. 2
  832. 2
  833. 2
  834. 2
  835. 2
  836. 2
  837. 2
  838. 2
  839. 2
  840. 2
  841. 2
  842. 2
  843. 2
  844. 2
  845. 2
  846. 2
  847. 2
  848. 2
  849. No because Russian culture is not at all like German culture and cultural differences are real. Germany was invaded and the Third Reich destroyed. Russia cannot be invaded and cannot be governed by outsiders because it has nukes and because of its vast geography. That means ONLY existing internal power blocs will contend for future power. They've over a century of snuffing their competition since 1917. Unlike Germany which had a unified culture with strongly held preference for hard work and community service, Russia has been the proverbial bucket of crabs since Bolshevist purges made everyone a potential threat, often lethal. Western secular democracy is a EUROPEAN cultural outcome, not a Russian one (Russia barely overlaps some of Europe). Russia has no democratic culture or traditions, merely replacing tyrants with other tyrants from Tsar to Bolshevik to Stalinist all the way to Putinist today. All economic aid would be stolen by the same people or their successors. Any Western involvement will be the focus of opposition so the West should (THIS TIME) stay out. "Shock therapy" was a disaster because the oligarchs looted the entire USSR. Germans had a previous taste of electoral freedom in the brief Weimar Republic, were defeated by democracies, and were freed after a benign, protective Occupation (which resulted in many marriages and great goodwill in general). OTOH Russia is eternally savage with the Muscovites sending poor Boyars, Tatars and other minorities to die for the Kremlin as did the Soviets and Tsars before them. There is no mutual goodwill in Russia and it shows. That is no basis for recovery. There are no reliable institutions of law, media or anything else, not even those the state values.
    2
  850. 2
  851. 2
  852. 2
  853. 2
  854. 2
  855. 2
  856. 2
  857. 2
  858. 2
  859. 2
  860. 2
  861. 2
  862. 2
  863. 2
  864. 2
  865. 2
  866. 2
  867. 2
  868. 2
  869. 2
  870. 2
  871. 2
  872. 2
  873. 2
  874. 2
  875. 2
  876. 2
  877. 2
  878. 2
  879. 2
  880. 2
  881. 2
  882. Career Viper fixer here who disagrees on the operational end of maintenance and support. Running foreign students through USAF tech school courses has been done since before the Air Force was a separate service. Any farm kid (those still exist in eastern Europe) can make a fine jet mech due to tactile familiarity with machinery. It's easy to retrain troops who worked on older birds (every senior maintainer in the early Viper maintenance community worked something else beforehand, I came off Phantom and Bronco) which required more mechanical adjustments and had complex, primitive avionics and comms. Before the USAF kept maintainers mostly on one airframe the diversity of experience IMO made better technicians. Any car mechanic can make a jet mech and many are both. I could teach a rock to work on one and all Ukraine needs is the equivalent of DEPLOYED US squadrons with the rest left inside NATO for safety. For example engine and avionics back shops could sublocate to Poland and be supported easily via existing NATO units and other resources. POL is old news for any armed force and quite easy to learn. Any fuel truck with an SPR hose can fuel one and connecting those is simple plumbing. POL for hydraulic oil and lubricants. is a simple task of ordering the correct NSN then having it shipped through the usual channels (Fedex, DHL and UPS make the DOD world go round). Fuel is ordinary tanker truck logistics not requiring military tankers so long as a pump etc is available at the receiving end. While the OVERALL feat of supporting an F-16 squadron is enormous like any fighter unit, the PIECES of that puzzle are refined over many decades and not difficult for any individual to perform which is of course the point. Most of those pieces can be managed from far, far away as the US does on deployments. Ukraine doesn't have to reinvent every wheel and perform every task. They do need to get good at a select few but tens of thousands of other humans did so easily with far less motivation. Today we have Zoom and other comms so a factory tech rep or maintainer from another air force can if desired talk a Ukrainian through troubleshooting including tricks and kinks not covered in job guides. Technical Order automation means any number of copies are instantly available (and no hapless airman has to A-page paper manuals).
    2
  883. 2
  884. 2
  885. 2
  886. 2
  887. 2
  888. 2
  889. 2
  890. 2
  891. 2
  892. 2
  893. 2
  894. 2
  895. 2
  896. 2
  897. 2
  898. 2
  899. 2
  900. 2
  901. 2
  902. 2
  903. 2
  904. 2
  905. 2
  906. 2
  907. 2
  908. 2
  909. 2
  910. 2
  911. 2
  912. 2
  913. 2
  914. 2
  915. 2
  916. 2
  917. 2
  918. 2
  919. 2
  920. 2
  921. 2
  922. 2
  923. 2
  924. 2
  925. 2
  926. 2
  927. 2
  928. 2
  929. 2
  930. 2
  931. 2
  932. 2
  933. 2
  934. 2
  935. 2
  936. 2
  937. 2
  938. 2
  939. 2
  940. 2
  941. 2
  942. 2
  943. 2
  944. 2
  945. 2
  946. 2
  947. 2
  948. 2
  949. 2
  950. 2
  951. 2
  952. 2
  953. 2
  954. 2
  955. 2
  956. 2
  957. 2
  958. 2
  959. 2
  960. 2
  961. 2
  962. 2
  963. 2
  964. 2
  965. 2
  966. 2
  967. 2
  968. 2
  969. 2
  970. 2
  971. 2
  972. 2
  973. 2
  974. 2
  975. 2
  976. 2
  977. 2
  978. 2
  979. 2
  980. 2
  981. 2
  982. 2
  983. 2
  984. 2
  985. 2
  986. 2
  987. 2
  988. 2
  989. 2
  990. 2
  991. 2
  992. 2
  993. 2
  994. Most of the replies are pabulum spouted because they make the responder feel good. The real answer should be doing whatever WORKS MOST EFFECTIVELY. The "bad guys" don't lose because they're "bad" and often win. The "good guys" lose frequently, not least because they are naive. There is no coldly pragmatic reason for petty violence, but when it is time to destroy rather than preserve one should destroy. The Allies did not beat the Axis by conventional ethics DURING the war, they beat them by putting them to the sword and in the case of Japan, by nuking to underline our sincerity. If Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved net one Allied life they were worth it because enemy life has no intrinsic worth. Hippie sentiment does not beat the enemy to their knees. Victory was SECURED by ethical occupation which is different. Bomber Harris etc did give the former Third Reich an appetite for peace as Curtis LeMay's fire raids gently reminded the Sons of Heaven that actions have consequences, but their salutary POST-war effects were not why those campaigns were waged. Ethical post-victory behaviours, the "good cop" to the wars "bad cop" DO secure victory against SOME (modern nation state with something to lose hence incentive to comply!) opponents. Opponents are objects to be manipulated int he most effective way possible. Different cultures require different methods. Wars are not fought for moral but strategic reasons. They are MARKETED as moral crusades (which also makes withdrawal politically difficult thus prolonging them because crusades and sunk cost fallacies are emotionally compelling to the simpleton masses) because the public can't understand anything else or different. In the case of Gaza there is no way to conquer that defended fortress/city without destroying it. That was understood in previous wars so cities were destroyed and that was that. If you cannot destroy the city then you cannot defeat the enemy therein. Vast tunnel networks require destruction of the surface to get at the tunnels. I defy anyone to pose a different viable, non-fantasy strategy.
    2
  995. 2
  996. 2
  997. 2
  998. 2
  999. 2
  1000. 2
  1001. 2
  1002. 2
  1003. 2
  1004. 2
  1005. 2
  1006. 2
  1007. 2
  1008. 2
  1009. 2
  1010. 2
  1011. 2
  1012. 2
  1013. 2
  1014. 2
  1015. 2
  1016. 2
  1017. 2
  1018. 2
  1019. 2
  1020. 2
  1021. 2
  1022. 2
  1023. 2
  1024. 2
  1025. 2
  1026. 2
  1027. 2
  1028. 2
  1029. 2
  1030. 2
  1031. 2
  1032. 2
  1033. 2
  1034. 2
  1035. 2
  1036. 2
  1037. 2
  1038. 2
  1039. 2
  1040. 2
  1041. 2
  1042. 2
  1043. 2
  1044. 2
  1045. 2
  1046. 2
  1047. Re: Training Ukraine on "complex" equipment. Training is complex for the providing agency but far less so for the trainer or trainee. Maintenance fears are almost always exaggerated and field maintenance of for example electronics involves troubleshooting of line replaceable units, not (emergencies excepted) opening up gray boxes and doing board level repair. Task and Purpose would benefit from finding a grizzled old tank technician (retired military contractor preferred or someone else with thousands of hours experience to assist an episode on how AFV and wheeled vehicles REALLY are (no clickbait outside the title, no excitment, just info from someone genuinely skilled. NO OFFICERS, technicians only not their supervisors. While mechanical systems impress those who do not work on them as next to magic, most of any TM or other pub is necessary reference material rather than steps of an actual task.. Military training is designed to turn rather average people (and Ukraine would logically send their most adept and quick learners) into effective maintainers in months. Modern AFV are very like aircraft without wings and the same companies make their electronics, sensors etc. A turbine is a turbine on a helo or a tank (and those are replaced with the assembled power pack in the field which is quick) and designed with rapid maintenance and repair in mind (though engineers do fuck up). I fixed Vipers for a living, trained many others in my turn, and training can and does turn anyone off the block and not completely retarded into a useful troop very quickly. The main drawback of ground vehicle maintenance is unlike aircraft they get the shit beaten out of them and the field working conditions are nasty with heavy filthy greasy parts, but that's not a tech issue. That's a don't be a little b1tch issue. Wrenching almost anything is fun or don't be a technician. I expect Ukraine sends volunteers first and people with prior experience on mechanical systems take naturally to working more modern stuff. Ukrainian enthusiasm is obvious and THAT is what makes a technician.
    2
  1048. 2
  1049. 2
  1050. 2
  1051. 2
  1052. 2
  1053. 2
  1054. 2
  1055. 2
  1056. 2
  1057. 2
  1058. 2
  1059. 2
  1060. 2
  1061. Much of the southeast IS cheap but the vast majority of people are ignorant (ignorance in 2024 is a choice) so they cluster in formerly desirable areas thus ruining them. Humans are basically lemmings by choice but we can do better. It's really quite easy to not live in vulnerable locations by doing the most basic homework so I did before buying my homes. Mountains are pretty but as we see with Helene have many disadvantages notably fast moving water (which is what carved out those areas in the first place) and too many logistics issues which can make finding work difficult. Appalachia is poor for the same reasons it's purty so I don't live there. Flood plains have no advantages except for farming so I don't live in one. Coastal areas are hurricane bait and vulnerable to storm surge so I don't live in one. I live well inland and can drive to visit the ocean at much less expense. Useful locations inland are often easily affordable because the lemmings don't live there. Areas not far from transportation arteries are often affordable, quiet and have affordable land. A wise choice is buy land zoned agricultural so you have more personal freedom to build and do what you prefer. Neighbors are mostly useless but farmers tend to be competent people who don't bother others. Buying land in a very slow or no growth area is wise because that makes eventual retirement affordable. My property taxes are under a grand per year, overhead is dirt cheap and money I'm not forced to spend for nothing means more discretionary income. I planned decades in advance by learning what not to do from other peoples mistakes. I'm far from rich but retired at 47 since my military pension goes a long way in the right location. My alarm clock is a rooster and life is good. Anyone with a bit of determination can do likewise but fortunately for me and millions of others who live inland, they don't.
    2
  1062. 2
  1063. 2
  1064. 2
  1065. 2
  1066. 2
  1067. 2
  1068. 2
  1069. 2
  1070. 2
  1071. 2
  1072. 2
  1073. 2
  1074. 2
  1075. 2
  1076. 2
  1077. 2
  1078. 2
  1079. 2
  1080. 2
  1081. 2
  1082. 2
  1083. 2
  1084. 2
  1085. 2
  1086. 2
  1087. 2
  1088. 2
  1089. 2
  1090. 2
  1091. 2
  1092. 2
  1093. 2
  1094. 2
  1095. 2
  1096. 2
  1097. 2
  1098. 2
  1099. 2
  1100. 2
  1101. 2
  1102. 2
  1103. 2
  1104. 2
  1105. 2
  1106. 2
  1107. 2
  1108. 2
  1109. 2
  1110. 2
  1111. 2
  1112. 2
  1113. 2
  1114. 2
  1115. 2
  1116. 2
  1117. 2
  1118. 2
  1119. 2
  1120. 2
  1121. People are INDIVIDUALS, not slaves to the clickbait idea of "generations" (which are BTW an imaginary but popular concept). If you believe you are helpless you'll stay that way. If you follow the herd that's a sucker bet because the masses anywhere are not educated, clueful or wise. If what you do isn't working, stop doing it. If where you are isn't working, leave before any self-inflicted traps like marrying young ruin your life. Have zero useless hobbies or interests and use your time to learn constantly. Do a variety of things because there is no general answer for everyone. Discard all fashionable social beliefs but keep pretending to believe them because hypocrisy is required to usefully manage idiots. (If you still lack a healthy contempt for humanity, embrace realism!) Do learn DIY skills which are a financial effectiveness multiplier that improves as you go. Anyone can as I'm nothing special. The more you do for yourself the less labor you burn money on. Learned helplessness is deadly but it's also a choice. Study every vehicle you own or want to, including bicycles, e-bikes etc. Volunteer at Habitat for Humanity or other local org so you can learn while human networking. The more positive smart people you learn from the better. Do not live in a city. That's just prison with extra steps. Most humans are lemmings which ruins their odds by competing with a large pool of job seekers whose jobs are easily outsourced or destroyed by automation. Copy success, coldly. Embrace drastic self-change.
    2
  1122. 2
  1123. 2
  1124. 2
  1125. 2
  1126. 2
  1127. 2
  1128. 2
  1129. 2
  1130. 2
  1131. 2
  1132. 2
  1133. 2
  1134. 2
  1135. 2
  1136. 2
  1137. 2
  1138. 2
  1139. 2
  1140. 2
  1141. 2
  1142. 2
  1143. 2
  1144. 2
  1145. 2
  1146. 2
  1147. 2
  1148. 2
  1149. 2
  1150. 2
  1151. 2
  1152. 2
  1153. 2
  1154. 2
  1155. 2
  1156. 2
  1157. 2
  1158. 2
  1159. 2
  1160. 2
  1161. 2
  1162. 2
  1163. 2
  1164. 2
  1165. 2
  1166. 2
  1167. 2
  1168. 2
  1169. 2
  1170. 2
  1171. 2
  1172. 2
  1173. 2
  1174. 2
  1175. 2
  1176. 2
  1177. 2
  1178. 2
  1179. 2
  1180. 2
  1181. 2
  1182. 2
  1183. 2
  1184. 2
  1185. 2
  1186. Reagan Republicans have mostly died of old age or have one foot in the grave and the other on a banana peel. The MAGA GOP reflect understandable rage at the (predictable by anyone sober) utter indifference of Reagan and all other Republicans to the white working class. (Affirming the credulous works for both parties as the public crave affirmation but savagely resent political literacy.) Reaganites sanctified Ronnie because he was a great communicator but his real record was not just the (magnificent) military buildup and restoration of US power after the post-Nam Hollow Force era. The MAGA Republicans were preceded by the Dixiecrats who fled Lyndon Johnson's betrayal of white southern Democrats when he signed various civil rights legislation (not just the Civil Rights Act). Thinking the Reagan or any WASP (only extremely old people like me remember them) Republican gave a rats posterior about working class whites was of course a desperately naive mistake but no one ever accused the general public of being intelligent. The (accurate) perception of betrayal was reinforced by the completely bipartisan NAFTA and other actions gutting the US working class for the benefit of the wealthy as usual. The fall of the US steel and automotive industries are examples of complete establishment failure and deliberate betrayal of the American worker. The MAGA era coincided with the final implosion of the US education system and EXTREME right wing contrarianism driven by GOP/NeoConservative constabulary foreign wars waged with zero strategic (the only kind that matters to adults) justification in A-stan and Iraq. The betrayal of GOP voter trust by NeoCons whose lineage began before and was very much part of Reagan Republican policy (example, arming Iranian Jihadists in return for support of the Contras to route around both parties Congressional objections) combined with geopolitical illiteracy (like forgetting why the Cold War with Russian and China was necessary to save Western civilization) to produce the legitimately enraged but rusticly clueless (even American urbanites are rustic ignorants) MAGA movement. The GOP is too hypocritical, corrupt and intellectually weak (not that the the US ever had an intellectual class which it confuses with liberalism) to fight off the MAGA takeover its decades of anti-worker policies invited, very much including cooperating with Democrats to flood the US with cheap immigrant labor and destroy the (original) Christian American majority forever. The Great Replacement is very old and very bipartisan. None of the above reflects any preference for Democrats who have been Leftist pawns since the 1960s thanks to USSR subversion so effective it took on life of its own, but dissecting them is off-topic here. For purposes of understanding the US view of the Ukraine conflict some perspective is in order. The generations who lived the conflict with the USSR are elderly or dead in the US. Our education system is garbage by choice, very much the fault of local school boards only interested in preparing students for college at the lowest cost. Modern attention spans are conditioned by phones with many Americans not owning personal computers and most of those utterly indifferent to history or (real) politics. Influencers rule. Passion rules. Ignoranc rules and all the above are unopposed. Whole generations of Americans right, left and center ONLY percieve "politics as football" and because they bitterly resent studying issues separately instead adopt a "team ball" approach so they don't have to think. Remember the typical American reads (therefore thinks) at 8th grade level and even more horrifying is not ashamed to be ignorant. (It was not always thus...) They do not know things can be different because when your education has no depth you only live in the moment crafted by someone else's media in order to play on your passions. Because they are intellectually unable to question "their" football team Americans passionately embrace their party and regard dissent of ANY kind as haram. Polarization really reflects irreversible intellectual laziness. While Russian atrocities have some impact the MAGA types so want affirmation they worship former KGB officer Putin because their opponents (everyone else) oppose him. It really is that simple. All anyone wanting their support need do is pretend to be "tradcon" (like the Russian FSB puppet Orthodox Church) and they will be greeted legs akimbo. The weak, soft gutless remaining anti-MAGA GOP don't stand for anything but re-election which is why the only thing getting them any votes is Democrat incompetence. The general public are rightly enraged by Democrats enforcing de-facto open borders to gain more future voters. They want to punish the White House and blocking Ukraine aid is the only way to do that. Remember American Democrats are basically a "socialist internationale" who want to demolish US border control in order to make what Jean Raspail feared global reality. While they support Ukraine that's because they resent Putinist tyranny. Russia is no longer "socialist" so Democrats don't need it any more. US support for Ukraine will probably continue but Ukrainian leadership should have an internal discussion of how to engage US politicians and public the only way that matters, by AFFIRMATION. Reminding Americans Russia helped kill and maim nearly every US military and civilian war casualty since WWII is not out of place because the American public have forgotten that. The US right is so contrarian (angry people are easy to manipulate) that what was the fringe is now mainstream. Europe will have to work as a team and get good during the decline of US democracy, social and even military competence. (We make terrific equipment but do study why our culture loses wars by choosing badly. The subject is beyond the depth of our public debates.)
    2
  1187. 2
  1188. 2
  1189. 2
  1190. 2
  1191. 2
  1192. 2
  1193. 2
  1194. 2
  1195. 2
  1196. 2
  1197. 2
  1198. 2
  1199. 2
  1200. 2
  1201. 2
  1202. 2
  1203. 2
  1204. 2
  1205. 2
  1206. 2
  1207. 2
  1208. 2
  1209. 2
  1210. 2
  1211. 2
  1212. 2
  1213. 2
  1214. 2
  1215. 2
  1216. 2
  1217. 2
  1218. 2
  1219. 2
  1220. 2
  1221. 2
  1222. 2
  1223. 2
  1224.  @SSfighter909  It is and if you choose an older but sound body (sheet metal condition and lack of rust is more important to long truck life than current drivetrain condition) and either have a competent local (like my machinist who builds race engines with the timing slips and photos to prove it) shop overhaul it or buy a crate engine a good used truck can go decades more. I own nothing newer than 2000 and all mine are high mileage bought used. My Silverado as expected needed an overhaul on the 4L60E gearbox (good design, shit execution which is easily corrected during overhaul. My 1997 F150 needed a gearbox long ago and my 2000 F150 (which supposedly had the hydro-lock fix but that didn't save it) needed an engine so I swapped in a used one. No way I drop big money on vehicles. I buy clean southern trucks running or otherwise and sort them out at leisure. I only pay a few grand tops for trucks so I don't need credit, and doing my own wrenching (which saved me absurd money since I began with my first vehicle in the 1970s) gives me control and lets me take my time which most shops (I've wrenched commercially too) are under pressure not to do. The best hobby one can have is vehicle mechanics and all the young people working on late models prove it's doable. Gender matters not either (my wife was a USAF helo and fixed wing crew chief) and learning on an older truck while you have something else to drive is a great way to build experience. Even if you make mistakes (everyone does, it's part of learning) those cost less too. Paying off my homes early because I refuse to buy new vehicles is why I could now buy (most) modern garbage barges for cash which not being stupid I refuse to do because I'd rightly feel dirty. If you want decent truck (and SUV) years, early LS-engined Silverado and relatives and similar Fords (research on forums not just Youtube) are good machines. I own more than one of both (including a free F150 from a friend I helped with his Harley, which are also dead easy to keep running long after the original owner is dust. I'm crippled but that didn't stop me since learning basic rigging and lifting means I can move or lift whatever I like. So can anyone else.
    2
  1225. 2
  1226. 2
  1227. 2
  1228. 2
  1229. 2
  1230. 2
  1231. 2
  1232. 2
  1233. 2
  1234. 2
  1235. 2
  1236. I don't see anything of technical interest in this video. What's next, complaining they're not wearing reflective belts?? Kinda looks like space filler (you don't have to post filler if there's nothing of useful quality available!) with little point and the best "content" is from the former armored crews in the comments. Dress and appearance as pointed out elsewhere is secondary to physical mobility and comfort. WWII tank crews didn't wear simple coveralls without reason. Tanks are basically "heavy equipment with boomsticks" and looking after them means getting dirty. Better to destroy a bunch of old civilian gear and save at least one decent uniform back at barracks. I'm not an AFV mechanic (I fixed fighters in service and all sorts of other systems before and after) but mechanics have the LEAST reason to give a shit what we look like because we're getting an oil/hydraulic juice/grease/coolant bath anyway. (I missed woodland BDUs because they hid stains better.) Wrenching is like sex, if you're serious it's gonna get messy and those guys have work to do. Kvetching about uniforms is for inspections not war. BTW "Parts exchanges" are referred to as "cannibalization" and vital to ANY fleet maintenance from first line combat aircraft to civilian taxi fleets. Cann management is an art because it can get out of control easily but done right it maximizes available systems. Kudos to the Ukrainian mechs (all of them, from trucks to aircraft and civil engineering too) because they have to know not just the formal fixes but all the (often very creative) work involved in BDR (Battle Damage Repair) with whatever materials are handy whether they're official parts or not. They have to be quick, skilled and turn out reasonably reliable work with expedient materials and that takes someone who really knows their shit. BDR is fun though and I encourage anyone who can take a formal course while in service to do so.
    2
  1237. 2
  1238. 2
  1239. 2
  1240. 2
  1241. 2
  1242. 2
  1243. 2
  1244. 2
  1245. 2
  1246. 2
  1247. 2
  1248. Many Dialarcs (and Lincoln Idealarcs) remain in commercial/industrial use. Most reasons for going inverter involve mobility not cost. BTW Dialarc, Idealarc and even monsters like my 340 AB/P will run off a 50A source but not maxed out. The old machines cost less used than a replacement inverter board. Used machines are cheap enough to have both. Also worth noting if you already have a stout RPC (rotary phase converter) they will run transformer machines. (Shop Floor Talk fora have some useful threads). I have an RPC to run three phase machine tools and air compressors. In your manual (Miller and Lincoln have them for free download so get one for everything) info on breaker size etc for various three phase connections shows why that's worth considering. When I built my shop I had a new service placed on a pole with a breaker panel so powering large machinery is NBD (and getting power before shop makes building the shop much easier and more convenient). If you want to run big rods or weld aluminum at high amps appropriate transformer machines are worth having. My old Miller will output 500 amps and the arc is delightful. It was 250 bucks because the seller saw a "three phase" sticker on a box mounted to it. I knew I could run it single phase because I download manuals BEFORE buying. It's the size of a fridge and weighs about 1300 lbs but those downsides only matter when moving it. Tip: A Tommy Gate can be "assisted" by a couple of ag jacks when (not grossly) overloaded for the popoff valve. It's easy to accumulate used industrial welders with some looking. I have lighter machines too because covering all bases pays off.
    2
  1249. 2
  1250. 2
  1251. 2
  1252. 2
  1253. 2
  1254. 2
  1255. 2
  1256. 2
  1257. 2
  1258. 2
  1259. 2
  1260. 2
  1261. 2
  1262. 2
  1263. 2
  1264. 2
  1265. 2
  1266. 2
  1267. 2
  1268. 2
  1269. 2
  1270. 2
  1271. 2
  1272. 2
  1273. 2
  1274. 2
  1275. 2
  1276. 2
  1277. 2
  1278. 2
  1279. 2
  1280. 2
  1281. 2
  1282. 2
  1283. 2
  1284. 2
  1285. 2
  1286. 2
  1287. 2
  1288. 2
  1289. 2
  1290. 2
  1291. 2
  1292. 2
  1293. 2
  1294. 2
  1295. 2
  1296. 2
  1297. 2
  1298. 2
  1299. 2
  1300. 2
  1301. 2
  1302. 2
  1303. 2
  1304. 2
  1305. 2
  1306. 2
  1307. 2
  1308. 2
  1309. 2
  1310. 2
  1311. 2
  1312. 2
  1313. 2
  1314. 2
  1315. 2
  1316. 2
  1317. 2
  1318. 2
  1319. 2
  1320. 2
  1321. 2
  1322. 2
  1323. 2
  1324. 2
  1325. 2
  1326. 2
  1327. 2
  1328. 2
  1329. 2
  1330. 2
  1331. 2
  1332. 2
  1333. 2
  1334. 2
  1335. 2
  1336. 2
  1337. 2
  1338. 2
  1339. 2
  1340. 2
  1341. 2
  1342. 2
  1343. 2
  1344. 2
  1345. 2
  1346. 2
  1347. 2
  1348. 2
  1349. 2
  1350. 2
  1351. 2
  1352. 2
  1353. 2
  1354. 2
  1355. 2
  1356. 2
  1357. 2
  1358. 2
  1359. 2
  1360. 2
  1361. 2
  1362. 2
  1363. 2
  1364. 2
  1365. 2
  1366. 2
  1367. 2
  1368. 2
  1369. 2
  1370. 2
  1371. 2
  1372. 2
  1373. 2
  1374. 2
  1375. 2
  1376. 2
  1377. 2
  1378. 2
  1379. 2
  1380. 2
  1381. 2
  1382. 2
  1383. 2
  1384. 2
  1385. 2
  1386. 2
  1387. 2
  1388. 2
  1389. 2
  1390. 2
  1391. 2
  1392. 2
  1393. 2
  1394. 2
  1395. 2
  1396. 2
  1397. 2
  1398. 2
  1399. 2
  1400. 2
  1401. 2
  1402. 2
  1403. 2
  1404. Russia has never been different and can never be different. The only way to delay the next and future wars is inflict as much damage on the Russian armed forces and economy as practical while reinforcing NATO against what must be acknowledged as an enemy society not a society with an enemy government. The anti-Bolsheviks who warned of Russian subversion were not mistaken. Russia is not a European culture, it is an existential cultural enemy of Europe which murdered millions of eastern Europeans over centuries from Finland south the the eastern Med. Russia is an enemy society not a society with a temporary enemy government (though the silly clueless have difficulty understanding that uncomfortable reality). Russia is enemy to secular democracy and European civilization. It is a successful subversion machine first infesting the Left and today infesting the contrarian right, both groups having ignorance as common ground. Putin never shot a single Ukrainian. Ordinary Russians delightedly butchered Buchans and other innocents for sport. The precedent of the Holomodor and Russian actions in the Baltics, Finland and Poland (Katyn is famous but not isolated). The few decent Russians never win because culturally authentic Russians murder or exile them. Putin is merely a symptom of Russian culture. His replacement will be at least as noxious because they will be installed by the same internal power centers. Russian nukes may require pretending his replacement isn't Stalin v3.0 but that should be understood as pragmatic hypocrisy, the necessary basis for diplomacy. Military conquest is the only Russian national identity which is why casualties don't matter (with some Muscovite exceptions) to the Kremlin . Racist Kremlin policies expend helpless poor rural minorities like Buryats first (though some are noticing the trick). Using convicts was perfect because it liquidates those the Kremlin prefers dead with zero social regret. Russia has lost expendable hardware and expendable Russians. Many, many more casualties and decisive economic damage might get their attention but they've fought long wars before.
    2
  1405. 2
  1406. 2
  1407. 2
  1408. 2
  1409. 2
  1410. 2
  1411. 2
  1412. 2
  1413. 2
  1414. 2
  1415. 2
  1416. 2
  1417. 2
  1418. 2
  1419. 2
  1420. 2
  1421. 2
  1422. 2
  1423. 2
  1424. 1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430. 1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435. 1
  1436. 1
  1437. 1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. 1
  1442. 1
  1443. 1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. Americans too young for the early Cold War tend not to understand Putin is NOT a tradcon saviour of the white race, he's an unrepentant Soviet fanboy who like his ultranationalist buddy Gulin wants to finish off the West. They never took interest in more than celebrities, jock sniffing, and celebrity jock sniffing nor care why they should. (Readers here should remember you're a sub-microscopic minority!) Cold War v1.0 in 2023 is more distant than the WWII was during the Viet Nam war. Foreign affairs hasn't interested the American people since the failure in Viet Nam which was largely due to public indifference letting fools mismanage that war. Our public are to blame for our failed wars because they don't care what our military is used for. ("Thank you for your service" really means "I have zero fucking idea what you do and don't feel quite guilty enough to remedy that indifference. Here's your discount!") Russian subversion is responsible for the anti-2A wacko Left the anti-Ukrainian US right hate. Now the Kremlin (doing the one thing Russia is historically competent at) are working the equally vulnerable ignorant rustic populist Right. The problem in both cases is the US primary education system died in the 1960s and was neglected in favor of nothing but minimal training to get often useless degrees. The kind of education required to produce genuinely engaged, informed voters suited to running their birthright secular democracy is mostly gone and it's not coming back because the ideal of an educated (not to be confused with holding a certificate of completion!) citizen is deader than a pickled herring. Once that ideal of the Founders (educated men when education was a hobby of the Enlightenment rich, ideal for producing that kind of inquisitive mind) died the Republic will continue to very slowly deteriorate, like the Roman Empire but with geographic insulation. Most US readers won't understand what i just wrote which is a tragedy. It's time for Europe to pick up the torch it dropped long ago and Ukraine is the spark it needed. Democracy is a fundamentally European, not American, idea which is why Americans are tired of it today. The Founders borrowed it but US culture has changed and most Americans haven't the slightest idea what the Enlightenment was about. When they quote the Founders it is mimicry without understanding invoke in quest of power. At least we're collectively rich and have great geography... ... I like your financial analysis even better than your military insights. More of these please. You're good at it.
    1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458. 1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. 1
  1462. 1
  1463. 1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. 1
  1467. 1
  1468. 1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. 1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. Since when are there enough Marines for all those islands and what are they expected to accomplish on them? Chinese reach has no need to extend into the Pacific because they're not Imperial Japan. The US manning irrelevant islands just invites destruction of pickets (Wake Island in WWII was never considered defensible by War Plan Orange which won that war) and their resupply vessels. US trade with the CCP more than pays for their entire armed forces but no one has the balls to end it. Americans pay for every ChiCom weapon system and every soldier, sailor, airman and marine equivalent if they have such. Why are we defending parasites like Taiwan in the first place except for the chip fabs the US failed to build on our own soil at much lower cost than defending a nation which invests a tiny portion of GDP on its own defense? If Taiwan, Japan and SK want to contain the CCP they need to build nuclear weapons ASAP and stop pretending the US will commit nuclear suicide to save them. We can barely keep our Navy functioning due to incompetence (LCS, failure to build logistics ships and especially oilers) and barely have a Merchant Marine. Opposed beach assaults are a capability we must have to force enemy to invest in defeating them, but they're still suicidal and no vehicle that floats can carry serious armor. Amphibious vehicles are really for constabulary operation missions not peer combat. Vehicles are cool and fun but the best of them gets scattered by cheap AT mines, drones, arty, and of course ATGW.
    1
  1502. 1
  1503. 1
  1504. 1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. 1
  1510. 1
  1511. 1
  1512. 1
  1513. 1
  1514. 1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. 1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1
  1526. "Doesn't work" if you do it wrong. The old ways are proven longer than either of us have drawn breath, they're simple and only require determination and self-discipline. One option set hasn't changed in decades but it generally ignored because civilians are so out of touch with military reality. If you can pass a physical and aren't otherwise disqualified you can easily retire (young) exactly like I and hundreds of thousands of others did and do: Enlist (wisely choosing the Air Force) then do at least 20 but preferably several more for the pay bumps.. Buy land with a modest house well before retirement so BAH will help pay for it. If you get orders, rent it out (wisely). Retire and your retirement check covers at least your mortgage for life (if you bought wisely) and your probable disability by that age (because age destroys everyone without mercy) can cover all utilities, taxes and maintenance at minimum. Your and your family medical care are covered and if you do the same smart medical care consumer choices civilians do works fine since nearly all Tricare for Life care will be civilian-provided. Retirement is everything and total dead-eyed ruthless focus can get you there because I am far from special. If you have a degree become an officer and lead an even better life. It's a structured environment so unless someone is amazingly unlucky or foolish failure is unlikely. Other options to vest a government retirement (no other is as reliable) include LEO, Merchant Marine, Post Office and general government gigs. The Federal workforce is aging out leaving many openings. All the above is practical for far more Americans than take advantage of it. Many immigrant G.I.s become citizens (I always enjoyed working with immigrants motivated enough to serve and never had a problem from a single one in my 26 years) so if you need to do that it's an option. Retirement doesn't require getting rich, it requires RELIABLE steady money and health care.
    1
  1527. 1
  1528. 1
  1529. 1
  1530. 1
  1531. 1
  1532. 1
  1533. 1
  1534. 1
  1535. 1
  1536. 1
  1537. 1
  1538. 1
  1539. 1
  1540. 1
  1541. 1
  1542. Ukraine is better off the more Russians die and the more demographic damage is done on the home front because the conflict is existential and permanent. An premature peace just risks losing the inevitable next war. Russia is not merely a country with a temporary bad government, it's an enemy culture to European civilization as every surviving citizen of victim countries knows well. This war should not be seen as somehow "resolvable" but only capable of brief remission. Russia cannot want anything but eventual reconquest of the Warsaw Pact as a minimum. Russian imperialism defines Russian identity. Killing and enslaving eastern Europeans is the totality of Russian identity from Tsarist times to present day. That cannot change but Russian demographics can reduce its ability to wage war and the fewer Russians the better. Voluntary non-repopulation is a Russian choice to be situationally encouraged. Bosnian Serbs and Croats had something to lose but Russia does not. Russian casualties do not matter unless they reach millions. Dead convicts are a feature not a bug. Dead rurals from groups Muscovites dislike are a feature not a bug. Russia is not the West, and the homeopathically few decent Russians either escape or are destroyed by the majority. That has never been different because it cannot ever be different. Americans should remember Russia is partially responsible for nearly every US casualty since WWII and for a fair number during WWII (like letting the Luftwaffe shwack US bombers at Poltava). Americans should remember Russia is responsible for the ENTIRE anti-Western Left it birthed then supported. Putin is not some tradcon fighting "globohomo", he's a NeoSoviet wanting to respawn the USSR with nearly unanimous Russian civilian support. Many Russian nationalists are far more radical than he is. Curtis LeMay was right. Muscovy delenda est.
    1
  1543. 1
  1544. 1
  1545. 1
  1546. 1
  1547. 1
  1548. 1
  1549. 1
  1550. 1
  1551. 1
  1552. 1
  1553. 1
  1554. 1
  1555. 1
  1556. 1
  1557. 1
  1558. 1
  1559. 1
  1560. 1
  1561. 1
  1562. 1
  1563. 1
  1564. 1
  1565. 1
  1566. 1
  1567. 1
  1568. 1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571. 1
  1572. 1
  1573. 1
  1574. 1
  1575. 1
  1576. 1
  1577. 1
  1578. 1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582. 1
  1583. 1
  1584. 1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. 1
  1594. 1
  1595. 1
  1596. 1
  1597. 1
  1598. 1
  1599. 1
  1600. 1
  1601. 1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. 1
  1607. 1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1
  1612. 1
  1613. 1
  1614. 1
  1615. 1
  1616. 1
  1617. 1
  1618. 1
  1619. 1
  1620. 1
  1621. 1
  1622. 1
  1623. 1
  1624. 1
  1625. 1
  1626. 1
  1627. 1
  1628. 1
  1629. 1
  1630. 1
  1631. 1
  1632. 1
  1633. 1
  1634. 1
  1635. 1
  1636. 1
  1637. 1
  1638. 1
  1639. 1
  1640. 1
  1641. 1
  1642. 1
  1643. 1
  1644. 1
  1645. 1
  1646. 1
  1647. 1
  1648. 1
  1649. 1
  1650. 1
  1651. 1
  1652. 1
  1653. 1
  1654. 1
  1655. 1
  1656. 1
  1657. 1
  1658. 1
  1659. 1
  1660. 1
  1661. 1
  1662. 1
  1663. 1
  1664. 1
  1665. 1
  1666. 1
  1667. 1
  1668. 1
  1669. 1
  1670. 1
  1671. 1
  1672. 1
  1673. 1
  1674. 1
  1675. 1
  1676. 1
  1677. 1
  1678. 1
  1679. 1
  1680. 1
  1681. 1
  1682. 1
  1683. 1
  1684. 1
  1685. 1
  1686. 1
  1687. 1
  1688. 1
  1689. 1
  1690. 1
  1691. 1
  1692. 1
  1693. 1
  1694. 1
  1695. 1
  1696. 1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. 1
  1700. 1
  1701. 1
  1702. 1
  1703. 1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. 1
  1707. 1
  1708. 1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. 1
  1712. 1
  1713. Most people are unwilling to study unconventional options then follow the herd off a cliff. The world is unkind to slow learners. I planned my life to not live in a city because cities are intrinsically bad choices (very bad when the economy tanks). I did not buy where silly people want to live. I bought a cheap small old house in flyover country but not too far from the coast and economic activity and made sure to buy land zone agricultural and get over five acres for the zoning benefits. I do not make my property look pretty on the outside because that's a net major tax hit and I bought it to live in not impress chuckleheads. Is the coast too expensive? Don't live there! Condos are almost always a ripoff and if you don't own the entire structure you live in and the land it's on, you don't really own anything so don't live there. Urban and suburban development prices too high? Don't live there. I don't live there and I am not at all special. Net result? Paid off mortgage, tiny property taxes and very low overhead with all the room I want (I can shoot on my property as do my neighbors without bothering a soul) for anything I want like shop buildings, vehicles, livestock (I keep chickens which are very low effort) etc. Learn the old ways of taking care of yourself. I don't need new vehicles but have plenty of reliable rides because I chose to learn to wrench. So can anyone (my wife was a helicopter mech). I buy used then keep them for over twenty years in most cases, some much longer. Pay once, cry once, no problem. Learn DIY! It's fun, you save absurd money and get instant response. Whatever you screw up at first is cheap education. I don't call plumbers, roofers, electricians or arborists. (I removed all trees capable of falling on my structures because they overgrow very expensively. Too many homeowners fail to look up.) Have zero useless hobbies or interests. There is plenty of fun to be had. I'm poor by US standards clearing under 70K/year as a disabled vet but I still do all my own work just a lot slower and carefully paced. So can you. Young people in my area do the same thing. I've taught many at the local community college. Not everyone is helpless.
    1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717. 1
  1718. 1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. 1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724. 1
  1725. 1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. 1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734. 1
  1735. 1
  1736. 1
  1737. 1
  1738. 1
  1739. 1
  1740. 1
  1741. 1
  1742. 1
  1743. 1
  1744. 1
  1745. 1
  1746. 1
  1747. 1
  1748. 1
  1749. 1
  1750. 1
  1751. 1
  1752. 1
  1753. 1
  1754. 1
  1755. 1
  1756. 1
  1757. 1
  1758. 1
  1759. 1
  1760. 1
  1761. 1
  1762. 1
  1763. 1
  1764. 1
  1765. 1
  1766. 1
  1767. 1
  1768. 1
  1769. 1
  1770. 1
  1771. 1
  1772. 1
  1773. 1
  1774. Israeli reliance on technology rather than picketing the border with defensible FOBs having ample tube arty ready to interdict anyone approaching the fence was a horrendous mistake and utterly inexcusable. Barriers exist to slow enemy advances so you can kill them. They're worthless undefended. Ever, ever standing down on a holiday is negligent when you are at PERMANENT low-level war. Bottom line is no one was ready to respond instantly due to lack of permanent alert forces in depth. Even old arty is ample against infantry but not if it's in storage.We'll see whose careers suffer when the lessons learned report comes out. Israel can never have effective defense in depth without armed citizens because the army will be elsewhere. Thinking like stereotypical soft urbanites is wrong because it neglects civic duty. When your people are at permanent existential war to be pacifist (or worse, just lazy) is degenerate. Every fit adult Israeli Jew should have training and a personal battle rifle with several hundred rounds as a basic home loadout. Israel is a rich nation and the wealthiest should be assessed a national self-defense tax to arm the people. There will never be peace so prepare for war. M113 note, the Israelis seem never to have upgraded the armor which was a mistake (like the entire APC concept from the start since tracked mobility it then used out of necessity to go where wheels cannot then the effectively unarmored vehicle is promptly disabled or destroyed). Other users did upgrade their armor notably Turkey whose rebuilds don't retain much but the hull.
    1
  1775. 1
  1776. 1
  1777. 1
  1778. 1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. 1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. 1
  1793. 1
  1794. 1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1
  1799. 1
  1800. 1
  1801. 1
  1802. 1
  1803. 1
  1804. 1
  1805. 1
  1806. 1
  1807. 1
  1808. 1
  1809. 1
  1810. 1
  1811. 1
  1812. 1
  1813. 1
  1814. 1
  1815. 1
  1816. 1
  1817. 1
  1818. 1
  1819. 1
  1820. 1
  1821. 1
  1822. 1
  1823. 1
  1824. 1
  1825. 1
  1826. 1
  1827. 1
  1828. 1
  1829. 1
  1830. 1
  1831. 1
  1832. 1
  1833. 1
  1834. 1
  1835. 1
  1836. 1
  1837. Financiers cannot ruin your life unless YOU enable that by making unwise choices. I met people who did fine during the Great Depression and listened to them. I would never for example get an adjustable rate mortgage. It's too late for old people but younger ones may benefit from my simple and VERY common example. I haven't felt a recession since 1981. Enlist or commission. Serve at least 20 years preferably in a specialty with many future employment options (preferably USAF or now the Space Force). If the .mil world is out get a government job then cling on like grim death until you vest retirement. A vested retirement is worth killing for. Some can manage it in good unions (IBEW, pipe welders etc). Others may choose the Merchant Marine. Look for gigs your peers do not since most people follow the herd off a cliff. Live BELOW your means all the time with no exceptions and become highly self-sufficient (I do all my home and vehicle repair and upkeep, anyone can and my wife is proof). Buy cheap property away from cities (cities are bad, don't live there) then pay it off while renovating it yourself. Don't buy a McMansion, buy the house you intend to retire in. Big homes don't really make your life better, they just add upkeep burden and higher property taxes. Don't buy new cars. Do focus ruthlessly on getting the most reliable and easy to maintain vehicle(s) that suit your use case. Don't buy new furniture (most of it's junk) except perhaps a good ergonomic office chair. Don't buy a new house. Do buy as much property as you can manage preferably in a SLOWLY growing area that's still zoned agricultural so you have freedom. (I can target practice or hunt on my own land, wrench what I like, keep backyard chickens etc.) Do learn to do nearly everything most people pay others to do for them. They're ordinary humans like you are. None of the above is exotic or difficult. A lot of it's fun and done right your only debt will be a modest mortgage. You don't need to live on the coast or in a big city or anywhere with high overhead. Let the suckers do that. I'm far from rich but retired at 47 and half my income is discretionary because I don't waste it on trifles yet have plenty of toys. Most people are silly and unfocused. Don't be most people. Hang out with people smarter than you are at what you want to learn. Have no useless or low-competence friends because failure really is contageous. If you live in a bad area scrape it off and LEAVE so you don't get taken down by toxic peers. Pick a skill that pays you to travel then go see the world or at least more of the US. Staying in one place is limiting.
    1
  1838. 1
  1839. 1
  1840. 1
  1841. 1
  1842. 1
  1843. 1
  1844. 1
  1845. 1
  1846. 1
  1847. 1
  1848. 1
  1849. 1
  1850. Reproduction has always been competitive because nature is competitive and there are obviously always going to be losers in the game. There are billions of humans and that means many, many millions so defective the world is better off if they do NOT defile others with their presence and they do not reproduce. There are more than sufficient mental and other defectives. It not being polite to voice that truth does not change that truth. AI doesn't (infotainment outfits like CNN only care about views and clickbait) threaten "a generation" of men. It doesn't threaten anyone except those offended by someone being differently happy. "Stop liking what I don't like" is a typical emotion among the silly which are most humans. AI and other placebos can make users feel better about themselves while reducing their interaction with a world which does not need them. Everyone is better if they're satisfied by fantasy so what is the downside? The world does not benefit by their reproduction as it's already grotesquely crowded. The promise of AI is pleasure without drawbacks and if it did not deliver it would not sell. Nothing of value is lost and customers gain whatever consolation they get. The purpose of what we call relationships is obtaining FEEDBACK (tactile, verbal, it's all feedback) which AI can easily provide and at which it will only get better. OTOH the unfulfilled desire for something they can never have (keep it real) torments its victims. If you're ugly, stupid, mentally defective, poor, or combinations thereof you will never be desirable and often actively repellent! Why can this not be openly discussed instead of pretending everyone has a shot? I don't have those problems but that was pure luck from genetics to economic background. (A child does not make its circumstances.) The professor is also lucky because his intelligence is a matter of luck. The lucky should not confuse ourselves with the norm! Let them have their harmless fun and as technology improves the norm may change from constant craving for other people which has endless negative social consequences including violence against women by incels. They should have bots to keep them happy and from inflicting themselves on the unwilling. Bring on the AI! The truthpill is the so-called Matrix can be better than anything some people could ever have in meatspace.
    1
  1851. 1
  1852. 1
  1853. 1
  1854. 1
  1855. 1
  1856. 1
  1857. 1
  1858. 1
  1859. 1
  1860. 1
  1861. 1
  1862. 1
  1863. 1
  1864. 1
  1865. 1
  1866. 1
  1867. 1
  1868. 1
  1869. 1
  1870. 1
  1871. 1
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. 1
  1878. 1
  1879. 1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. 1
  1885. 1
  1886. 1
  1887. 1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. 1
  1894. 1
  1895. 1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898. 1
  1899. 1
  1900. 1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. 1
  1907. 1
  1908. 1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1
  1912. 1
  1913. 1
  1914. 1
  1915. 1
  1916. 1
  1917. 1
  1918. 1
  1919. 1
  1920. 1
  1921. 1
  1922. 1
  1923. 1
  1924. 1
  1925. 1
  1926. 1
  1927. 1
  1928. 1
  1929. 1
  1930. 1
  1931. 1
  1932. 1
  1933. 1
  1934. 1
  1935. 1
  1936. 1
  1937. 1
  1938. 1
  1939. 1
  1940. 1
  1941. 1
  1942. 1
  1943. 1
  1944. 1
  1945. 1
  1946. 1
  1947. 1
  1948. 1
  1949. 1
  1950. 1
  1951. 1
  1952. 1
  1953. 1
  1954. 1
  1955. 1
  1956. 1
  1957. 1
  1958. 1
  1959. 1
  1960. 1
  1961. 1
  1962. 1
  1963. 1
  1964. 1
  1965. 1
  1966. 1
  1967. 1
  1968. 1
  1969. 1
  1970. 1
  1971. 1
  1972. 1
  1973. 1
  1974. 1
  1975. 1
  1976. There are really four Harley subcultures. One is the straitlaced men with money (which is why HD sold special Shrine models) who are the touring market. Another is blue collar bikers who were never patch holders and wanted a machine they could service anywhere (including the human mutual support network old motorcycles made necessary before the internet) . They bought the Super Glides and Low Riders which copied what the same people did to used big twins to shed weight, bulk and maintenance obstacles. The fewest by far are the (real) 1%ers who are famous but too small to influence sales volume. The key one is the independent mechanic/manufacturing/restoration subculture including speed and repair parts makers like S&S, Baker, Ultima, Paughco etc. If the other subcultures die the last will remain because it's self-contained and doesn't care what Milwaukee thinks. As models fade from factory support most vehicles become more difficult to support but HDs become easier. One can build a stronger, faster, and more specialized to owner preference hotrod Twin Cam, Evo, Shovelhead, Panhead, Knucklehead without using a single HD nut, bolt or washer. HD engineering through the classic and most of the Twin Cam era is simple but intentionally so by fierce customer demand. The sound basics are frequently undermined by product cheapening since the Twin Cam era but TCs are still easy to work on though I don't care enough to add one to my fleet. Their 1936-1999 basic engine design was engineered for simplicity of manufacture on manual machine tools which makes aftermarket parts far less expensive than otherwise. The impact of that choice cannot be overestimated but few besides mechanics think to notice. What made HDs successful over time was their durable, easily rebuildable crankshafts which along with their vertically split crankcases, individual removable single cylinders and heads made it possible to overhaul an engine to what they call "zero time" in aviation. It made it easy to cannibalize the many useful parts from any worn out or blown engine. That's why my Panhead had '48 and a '58 cylinder heads and was easy to turn into an ~84" cubic inch stroker to keep up with modern traffic using a recent set of cylinders and a stroker crank. Do THAT with any other bike that ancient. That 1936 basicdesign was so reliable the Timken output shaft bearing was downgraded by the "new HD" to a roller when they went to semi-automated assembly for Twin Cam. (Now the same bearing is an expensive upgrade!) While the non-unit big twin primary and final drive sprocket arrangement has been obsolete since the smaller K Model introduced right-side drive (carried on by Sportsters through the Evo) in 1952, it also confines damage to three separate areas, the engine, the primary drive, and the transmission/final drive. That engineering choice makes Harleys like two-wheeled Legos. It's why my Panhead has a 1990s five speed Softail gearbox and excellent electric starter connected by an aftermarket belt drive. The ability to mix components and parts from 1936 to 2000 is unmatched (Royal Enfields older models being the closest). HDs were practical to ride for many decades which is why there are far more 1950s Harleys than there are Triumphs or Nortons. The unique aftermarket support and ease of overhaul mean classic HDs easily last generations like my '48 "Panhead Of Theseus". 😁 The vintage HD culture will remain just like the vintage Britbike, Indian, Japanese and other cultures none of which need the modern companies bearing their name. I won't miss the Wokely-Pervertson company should it come to grief, but I'll laugh at them.
    1
  1977. 1
  1978. 1
  1979. 1
  1980. 1
  1981. 1
  1982. 1
  1983. 1
  1984. 1
  1985. 1
  1986. 1
  1987. 1
  1988. 1
  1989. 1
  1990. 1
  1991. 1
  1992. 1
  1993. 1
  1994. 1
  1995. 1
  1996. 1
  1997. 1
  1998. 1
  1999. 1
  2000. 1
  2001. 1
  2002. 1
  2003. 1
  2004. 1
  2005. 1
  2006. 1
  2007. 1
  2008. 1
  2009. 1
  2010. 1
  2011. 1
  2012. 1
  2013. 1
  2014. 1
  2015. 1
  2016. 1
  2017. 1
  2018. 1
  2019. 1
  2020. 1
  2021. 1
  2022. 1
  2023. 1
  2024. 1
  2025. 1
  2026. 1
  2027. 1
  2028. 1
  2029. 1
  2030. 1
  2031. 1
  2032. 1
  2033. 1
  2034. 1
  2035. 1
  2036. 1
  2037. 1
  2038. 1
  2039. 1
  2040. 1
  2041. 1
  2042. 1
  2043. 1
  2044. 1
  2045. 1
  2046. No one is going to get the crazies to take their meds without returning to the expensive carceral mental institutions some of whose methods may well be illegal. Drunks don't want to get better and neither do junkies. The only homeless people who can be helped are the ones with self-discipline. The US is not Finland. Our poor people are illiterate, frequently savage and are mostly at the end of a life their own adult choices ruined. Can More Perfect Union address that part or is only an oppression narrative acceptable? As for housing the poor do not make good or safe company which is why anyone with a choice moves far away from them. There are indeed SOME victims but many more did it to themselves. I've met my share. I used to think like a stereotypical progressive then I moved around the US and got a more detailed, up close look at reality. A major part of the problem is the poor wanting to live in expensive cities in the first place. Aid should require relocation to affordable areas, not maintain people where they should not want to live. If they were smart and wise and mentally competent they would not be poor so their desires should be disregarded by their charitable benefactors. No possible good can result from keeping financially dependent people where they will never be able to advance. Cities are bad and living in cities is bad (unless you are rich) so wanting to live in cities is wrong, period full stop. House the hopeless elsewhere so they are not concentrated in housing which (because they live there) goes the way of failed public housing projects. As long as poor people are in cities they will remain poor. Put them where they fit in.
    1
  2047. 1
  2048. 1
  2049. 1
  2050. 1
  2051. 1
  2052. 1
  2053. 1
  2054. 1
  2055. 1
  2056. 1
  2057. 1
  2058. 1
  2059. 1
  2060. 1
  2061. 1
  2062. 1
  2063. 1
  2064. 1
  2065. 1
  2066. 1
  2067. 1
  2068. 1
  2069. 1
  2070. 1
  2071. 1
  2072. 1
  2073. 1
  2074. 1
  2075. 1
  2076. 1
  2077. 1
  2078. 1
  2079. 1
  2080. 1
  2081. 1
  2082. 1
  2083. 1
  2084. 1
  2085. 1
  2086. 1
  2087. 1
  2088. 1
  2089. 1
  2090. 1
  2091. 1
  2092. 1
  2093. 1
  2094. 1
  2095. 1
  2096. 1
  2097. 1
  2098. 1
  2099. 1
  2100. 1
  2101. 1
  2102. 1
  2103. 1
  2104. 1
  2105. As a retired career fighter fixer it's my professional duty to point out nearly all military equipment is EASY to work on after ordinary tech school (which is easily compressed when students are not busied with extraneous tasks) and easy to learn to work on. Those most impressed don't do it for a living. I strongly suspect reporters who never spun a wrench in their lives love saying 'logistics" to sound sophisticated. The opinions of people with zero personal experience working on advanced military systems are pretty much worthless, like an illiterate doing book reviews. You can and any competent armed force does take kids out of Basic and in a few months have them properly repairing and using anything from avionics to radars to engines and more. (I was comm/nav on Phantom and Bronco, then crosstrained to F-16 engines to escape Moody AFB then merged to crew chief so this is not speculation.) Turbines are simple to work on especially compared to horribly complex tank diesel power packs with their many cylinders, valves, injectors etc. Heavy equipment is also rather simple and sophisticated electronics are generally swapped out in the field then sent back for repair. FedEx and DHL really are strategic assets. All the processes including PMCS and BDR are comprehensible to mechanics previously used to old systems which often require more actual tuning and adjustment than new systems. (This is also true for fighters, F-16s being easy to learn and far easier to work on than older fighters whose high manning demands contributed to their retirement.) It's also appropriate to point out existing supply chains do not somehow have to be duplicated from scratch rather then merely extended as in supporting any other deployed operation. Ukraine doesn't need to duplicate Anniston, it needs truck freight to get parts to and from NATO facilities in Europe thence to appropriate facilities and systems exist to make that so easy it's boring. Ask and good Supply troops. Training foreign students is also old news (the British Operation Orbital is a story yet to be told) and running students through US tech schools is easy as could be. If Ukraine supplies motivated smart students that will not be difficult. There are plenty of former US tankers etc who would jump at the chance to provide tech support as there are many fighter fixers (and Supply and Ops Airmen etc) who would lend a hand.
    1
  2106. 1
  2107. 1
  2108. 1
  2109. 1
  2110. 1
  2111. 1
  2112. 1
  2113. 1
  2114. 1
  2115. 1
  2116. 1
  2117. 1
  2118. 1
  2119. 1
  2120. 1
  2121. 1
  2122. 1
  2123. 1
  2124. 1
  2125. 1
  2126. 1
  2127. 1
  2128. 1
  2129. 1
  2130. 1
  2131. 1
  2132. 1
  2133. 1
  2134. 1
  2135. 1
  2136. 1
  2137. 1
  2138. 1
  2139. 1
  2140. 1
  2141. 1
  2142. 1
  2143. 1
  2144. 1
  2145. 1
  2146. 1
  2147. 1
  2148. 1
  2149. 1
  2150. 1
  2151. 1
  2152. 1
  2153. 1
  2154. 1
  2155. 1
  2156. 1
  2157. 1
  2158. 1
  2159. 1
  2160. 1
  2161. 1
  2162. 1
  2163. 1
  2164. 1
  2165. 1
  2166. 1
  2167. 1
  2168. 1
  2169. 1
  2170. 1
  2171. 1
  2172. 1
  2173. 1
  2174. 1
  2175. 1
  2176. 1
  2177. 1
  2178. 1
  2179. 1
  2180. 1
  2181. 1
  2182. 1
  2183. 1
  2184. 1
  2185. 1
  2186. 1
  2187. 1
  2188. 1
  2189. 1
  2190. 1
  2191. 1
  2192. 1
  2193. 1
  2194. 1
  2195. 1
  2196. 1
  2197. 1
  2198. 1
  2199. 1
  2200. 1
  2201. 1
  2202. 1
  2203. 1
  2204. 1
  2205. 1
  2206. 1
  2207. 1
  2208. 1
  2209. 1
  2210. 1
  2211. 1
  2212. 1
  2213. 1
  2214. 1
  2215. 1
  2216. 1
  2217. 1
  2218. 1
  2219. 1
  2220. 1
  2221. 1
  2222. 1
  2223. 1
  2224. 1
  2225. 1
  2226. 1
  2227. 1
  2228. 1
  2229. 1
  2230. 1
  2231. 1
  2232. 1
  2233. 1
  2234. 1
  2235. 1
  2236. 1
  2237. 1
  2238. 1
  2239. 1
  2240. 1
  2241. 1
  2242. 1
  2243. 1
  2244. 1
  2245. 1
  2246. 1
  2247. 1
  2248. 1
  2249. 1
  2250. 1
  2251. 1
  2252. 1
  2253. 1
  2254. 1
  2255. 1
  2256. 1
  2257. 1
  2258. 1
  2259. 1
  2260. 1
  2261. 1
  2262. 1
  2263. 1
  2264. 1
  2265. 1
  2266. 1
  2267. 1
  2268. 1
  2269. 1
  2270. 1
  2271. 1
  2272. 1
  2273. 1
  2274. 1
  2275. 1
  2276. 1
  2277. 1
  2278. 1
  2279. 1
  2280. 1
  2281. 1
  2282. 1
  2283. 1
  2284. 1
  2285. 1
  2286. 1
  2287. 1
  2288. 1
  2289. 1
  2290. 1
  2291. 1
  2292. 1
  2293. 1
  2294. 1
  2295. 1
  2296. 1
  2297. 1
  2298. 1
  2299. 1
  2300. 1
  2301. 1
  2302. 1
  2303. 1
  2304. 1
  2305. 1
  2306. 1
  2307. 1
  2308. 1
  2309. 1
  2310. 1
  2311. 1
  2312. 1
  2313. 1
  2314. 1
  2315. 1
  2316. 1
  2317. 1
  2318. 1
  2319. 1
  2320. 1
  2321. 1
  2322. 1
  2323. 1
  2324. 1
  2325. 1
  2326. APCS should not exist because no army is capable of using them correctly today because they're a fundamentally obsolete idea from the atomic battlefield concept. Every tracked vehicle needs heavy armor, cannon etc to kill drones, APS and full ability to self-defend or it will die on the modern ATGW saturated battlefield. M113 could easily be uparmored to Bradley standards but getting rid of them ends temptation to misuse them which is otherwise proven absolutely inevitable. The size used to be handy but the West can easily airlift much more capable tanks and APCs. Israel and anyone else like Turkey and other global users can and do upgrade M113 and other fossils many of which suit their primitive conditions. Two-stroke diesels and hydromechanical truck transmissions are simple as it gets, but the US is rich enough not to need simplicity more than capability. Wheeled trucks are faster on roads to which modern war is effectively bound as in Ukraine where mud easily immobilizes tracked AFV such that they may as well be trucks since the loss will cost less. ATGW rendered passive armor obsolete and potential opponents will have quantity overmatch (I'm looking at China since Russia is screwed by its own choices). No tracked fighting vehicle lighter than Bradley or Namer makes sense rendering APCs pointless. M113 remains in service thanks to Army incompetence at fielding new fighting vehicles. This war is a glorious chance to dump all obsolete Western equipment just in time for decades of war which will finally (somewhat) empower the few reformers big Army hasn't sidelined into academia where they're entertaining at most. BTW they don't cost more to scrap than sell, they sell as scrap via Govliquidation after being demilled which is nothing since they carry no weapons not effortless to remove. They're so cheap M113 are used for artificial reefs. The US is congenitally unable to either use it wisely or upgrade it so the troops don't hate it so it may as well be rid of the thing. (Apparently reliability is an issue but the thing has basically a medium duty truck engine and gearbox so I suspect indifferent maintenance practices. I've worked on an A2 for a contractor and that model is literally simpler than most modern automobiles. M113 is obsolete for air assault because outside constabulary operations air assault in peer conflict is begging to get MANPADed to oblivion. The "cult of Airborne" is great for morale but like contested beach assaults few want to reenact Arnhem or Hostomel. Airborne leadership never seriously wanted tracks or it would have them since Airborne dominance of the Army is nearly complete and leadership prefer wheeled trucks (and despise tankers, the jokes are bantz at low lever but serious at leadership tier).
    1
  2327. 1
  2328. 1
  2329. 1
  2330. 1
  2331. 1
  2332. 1
  2333. 1
  2334. 1
  2335. 1
  2336. 1
  2337. 1
  2338. 1
  2339. 1
  2340. 1
  2341. 1
  2342. 1
  2343. 1
  2344. 1
  2345. 1
  2346. 1
  2347. 1
  2348. 1
  2349. 1
  2350. 1
  2351. 1
  2352. 1
  2353. 1
  2354. 1
  2355. 1
  2356. 1
  2357. 1
  2358. 1
  2359. 1
  2360. 1
  2361. 1
  2362. 1
  2363. 1
  2364. 1
  2365. 1
  2366. 1
  2367. 1
  2368. 1
  2369. The US Navy demonstrates decades of gross institutional incompetence that would not have been tolerated during say the early Cold War. GAO should place agents in all the armed forces since they proved they cannot be trusted to police themselves or to tell the truth unless cornered. The end of military ethics, heavily corroded during GWOT, is a senior leadership failure of monumental proportions that leadership can never afford to admit for personal career reasons. (The USAF teaches about Billy Mitchell because he tubed his career unrequited, not as an example to inspire other potential martyrs.) The American public permit this because they're mostly (Sal being a noble outlier!) indifferent to civic duty. The American public need to grow up and stop worshiping the military and trusting the armed forces to be competent because ALL humans require TEAM oversight. Public neglect costs lives in war. Veterans do not hallucinate the sun shines out our posteriors and no one else should either. Modular ships can at best only do one thing at a time and the other modules do NOTHING in port. That this idea was not instantly scorned is degenerate. No one will suffer a career hit for such obvious idiocy. The Navy gets away with no oversight because like the rest of DoD no competent civilians OUTSIDE THE SYSTEM exist to ride herd on them. Failure is inexcusable but one is punished because the US armed forces are a self-licking ice cream cone. They failed in A-stan (and lied about it for two decades). They generated a Pyrrhic victory in Iraq. They cannot manage AFV or Naval procurement and aren't very good at aircraft. This is because there is no cost to those in charge for screwing the proverbial pooch.
    1
  2370. 1
  2371. 1
  2372. 1
  2373. 1
  2374. 1
  2375. 1
  2376. 1
  2377. 1
  2378. 1
  2379. 1
  2380. 1
  2381. 1
  2382. 1
  2383. 1
  2384. 1
  2385. 1
  2386. 1
  2387. 1
  2388. 1
  2389. 1
  2390. 1
  2391. 1
  2392. 1
  2393. 1
  2394. 1
  2395. 1
  2396. 1
  2397. 1
  2398. 1
  2399. 1
  2400. 1
  2401. 1
  2402. 1
  2403. 1
  2404. 1
  2405. 1
  2406. 1
  2407. 1
  2408. 1
  2409. 1
  2410. 1
  2411. 1
  2412. 1
  2413. 1
  2414. 1
  2415. 1
  2416. 1
  2417. 1
  2418. 1
  2419. 1
  2420. 1
  2421. 1
  2422. 1
  2423. 1
  2424. 1
  2425. 1
  2426. 1
  2427. 1
  2428. 1
  2429. 1
  2430. 1
  2431. 1
  2432. 1
  2433. 1
  2434. 1
  2435. 1
  2436. 1
  2437. 1
  2438. 1
  2439. 1
  2440. 1
  2441. 1
  2442. 1
  2443. 1
  2444. 1
  2445. 1
  2446. 1
  2447. 1
  2448. 1
  2449. 1
  2450. 1
  2451. 1
  2452. 1
  2453. 1
  2454. 1
  2455. 1
  2456. 1
  2457. 1
  2458. 1
  2459. 1
  2460. 1
  2461. 1
  2462. 1
  2463. 1
  2464. 1
  2465. 1
  2466. 1
  2467. 1
  2468. 1
  2469. 1
  2470. 1
  2471. 1
  2472. 1
  2473. 1
  2474. 1
  2475. 1
  2476. 1
  2477. 1
  2478. 1
  2479. 1
  2480. 1
  2481. 1
  2482. 1
  2483. 1
  2484. 1
  2485. 1
  2486. 1
  2487. 1
  2488. 1
  2489. 1
  2490. 1
  2491. 1
  2492. 1
  2493. 1
  2494. 1
  2495. 1
  2496. 1
  2497. 1
  2498. 1
  2499. 1
  2500. 1
  2501. 1
  2502. 1
  2503. 1
  2504. 1
  2505. 1
  2506. 1
  2507. The casualties are modest by nation-state war standards meaning both sides can fight for decades at this rate (assuming they manage equipment and logistics and their economies don't break down too far). It's horrible surviva necessity for Ukraine but Russians don't value human life as demonstrated by their entire history of unremitting slaughter, genocide and tyrannical abuse of Eastern Europeans (besides snuffing each other with gusto, which is so admired the few decent Russians pointing out Stalin's crimes are considered traitors by the majority). Taking the high end 43K Russian KIA of unwanted groups are not a big deal nor are the more expensive wounded who can be neglected in the traditional manner like the Chechnya vets and Afghantsi before them. (Amusing they get what they deserve for invading Ukraine but by Russian neglect!) Russians reasonably want their prison population to die so Wagner KIW/WIA are freebies with no (locally felt) moral cost to Russia. The other pragmatic Kremlin move is sending gullible classes to die first. Russia has about 21 million males aged 19-49 and no problem using much older cannon fodder. There's no shortage of bullet sponges and Putin will fight to the last Tatar and Buryat (Kadyrov means far lighter Chechen losses, his support of Putin was a genuinely smart play). The Kremlin could conscript convicts who don't volunteer so it's a surprise they've not figured that out yet. The laudable impact on Russian demographics from KIA/WIA is a bonus for civilization. They're no better than Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge or ISIS/Daesh's beheaders so the more pushing dandelions the better. The West should flood Ukraine with weapons to fend off the Asiatic hordes in behalf of freedom and pragmatic self-interest then after the war goes into remission the EU should have a Marshall Plan to build Ukraine as a bulwark against the next Russian assault. Russia cannot reform as genuine Russians inevitably murder or exile their reformers. Russia in any conceivable form cannot be other than enemy to Europe so no one should delude themselves otherwise. History demonstrates this and civilization paid for that reality with millions dead.
    1
  2508. 1
  2509. 1
  2510. 1
  2511. 1
  2512. 1
  2513. 1
  2514. 1
  2515. 1
  2516. 1
  2517. 1
  2518. 1
  2519. 1
  2520. 1
  2521. 1
  2522. 1
  2523. 1
  2524. 1
  2525. 1
  2526. 1
  2527. 1
  2528. White rural Americans are voluntarily and eagerly manipulated by affirmation. (k)lansmen, preachers and other demagogues know exactly how to play locals like a fiddle simply be ACCEPTING THEIR CONDITIONS OF ENGAGEMENT. You don't stay poor (be ye rural or urbanite) for generations unless your culture is toxic and self-destructive. You don't stay poor for generations by making good choices. For example when your local geography makes economic diversification impractical wise people relocate as my parents did. The US was built by immigrants (voluntary, indentured and chattel slavery varieties included) but many of their descendants refuse to relocate a few hundred miles to improve their lot. This is also noted among many African-Americans who rarely escape their home towns, which should be no surprise since the poor have more in common than otherwise. Both blame externalities and fail to own their choices. This will not change because fierce rustic pride prohibits introspection and genuine curiousity about the world. (Other impoverished subcultures cultures which live in a self-inflicted regenerative feedback loop in urban areas are similarly and often much more self-destructive.) The Democratic party lost rural areas after Lyndon Baines Johnson (an unsung civil rights hero more remembered for his idiotic misunderstanding of Southeast Asian culture and nationalism that buried the US in Viet Nam) abandoned the Dixiecrats in pursuit of national influence over time. Failure to maintain racism (Strom Thurmond didn't switch parties casually...) was seen as betrayal so those voters and their politicians fled to the GOP except for a tiny few remaining holdouts like Senator Manchin. The hard urbanite Left Democratic tent of 2024 is not suited to the rustic market and should give up the fool's errand of engaging it. Like the Coalition effort in Afghanistan, the locals cannot want what they're selling in meaningful numbers and like other fundamentalists are predisposed to attacking those who challenge their way of thinking. They're too angry and proud of it to ever be rational, and not culturally wired for anything but conformity. Better to ignore them since the cultural differences (and general tone-deafness among the urbanite Democrat base to anyone they don't identify with) and seek votes elsewhere. BLUF is they don't want to question their worldview, they demand to be agreed with and there is nothing at all to be done about that. Like Russian rustic ultranationalists they've no potential for intellectual growth. That should never be discussed by those seeking their votes. MAGA works because it perfectly affirms their self-image, and that self-image is their economic doom. No possible Democrat policy or leader (there will never be another Huey Long who was a creature of his era) can win them over and effort wasted on that futile pursuit will garner more votes elsewhere. Of course Democrats in their self-righteousness are equally but differently tone-deaf and wiser to preach to/affirm their existing, natural base. A millstone round the neck of the Democratic party is old white lefties who don't know when to get out of the way because they imagine themselves indispensible. Dems are better off working to control coastal, cosmopolitan areas and leaving flyover country to the locals who will remain fine with that social distancing. Enemies should not share dirt.
    1
  2529. 1
  2530. 1
  2531. 1
  2532. 1
  2533. 1
  2534. 1
  2535. 1
  2536. 1
  2537. 1
  2538. 1
  2539. 1
  2540. 1
  2541. 1
  2542. 1
  2543. 1
  2544. 1
  2545. 1
  2546. 1
  2547. 1
  2548. 1
  2549. 1
  2550. 1
  2551. 1
  2552. 1
  2553. 1
  2554. 1
  2555. 1
  2556. 1
  2557. 1
  2558. 1
  2559. 1
  2560. 1
  2561. 1
  2562. 1
  2563. 1
  2564. 1
  2565. 1
  2566. 1
  2567. 1
  2568. 1
  2569. 1
  2570. 1
  2571. 1
  2572. 1
  2573. 1
  2574. 1
  2575. 1
  2576. 1
  2577. 1
  2578. 1
  2579. 1
  2580. 1
  2581. 1
  2582. 1
  2583. 1
  2584. 1
  2585. 1
  2586. 1
  2587. 1
  2588. 1
  2589. 1
  2590. 1
  2591. 1
  2592. 1
  2593. 1
  2594. 1
  2595. 1
  2596. 1
  2597. 1
  2598. 1
  2599. 1
  2600. 1
  2601. 1
  2602. 1
  2603. 1
  2604. 1
  2605. 1
  2606. 1
  2607. 1
  2608. 1
  2609. 1
  2610. 1
  2611. 1
  2612. 1
  2613. 1
  2614. 1
  2615. 1
  2616. 1
  2617. 1
  2618. 1
  2619. 1
  2620. 1
  2621. 1
  2622. 1
  2623. 1
  2624. 1
  2625. 1
  2626. 1
  2627. 1
  2628. 1
  2629. 1
  2630. 1
  2631. 1
  2632. 1
  2633. 1
  2634. 1
  2635. 1
  2636. 1
  2637. 1
  2638. 1
  2639. 1
  2640. 1
  2641. 1
  2642. 1
  2643. As a mechanic and technician (jet fighters on down) since the 1970s I could not agree more. The PUBLIC by their ADULT CHOICE to be tech-illiterate ensured this would happen, but intelligence is rare and technical aptitude even less common. Since there is no helping the ignorant masses best to help yourselves with a pragmatic buying strategy including never buying new vehicles unless you are wealthy (it's generally an awful financial choice, I paid off my home(s) instead), never beta-testing (I wait three or four years for a model to prove itself at others expense) and studying what professional line mechanics say about their experience maintaining fleet vehicles. After several years salvages will be populated with organ donors lowering repair costs. If I wanted to know something about Apple products I would defer to Louis Rossmann because his professional technical immersion ensures he knows his shit. I treat other systems likewise. By the time a vehicle reaches marketplace maturity the repairable sort will be well understood and the less-repairable easily excluded. Ubiquity ensures SOME vehicles, typically those in commercial fleet use, WILL be repairable due to professional customer demand. I do not wait until one vehicle needs heavy maintenance to replace it since that interferes with opportunistic purchase. Done right this is surprisingly cheap, not expensive. If you can work on computers you can learn to work on vehicles. Many do both and I'm not special. For example when one truck hydrolocked I had a ready spare debugged, tagged it and drove on. That let me replace the failed engine cheap because there was no time pressure. Anyone can do this (my wife was a helicopter mechanic and my mum worked on the PBY Catalina flying boat line in WWII) so I encourage everyone curious to give it a go. You can do anything if you bring determination. When I eventually get a BEV to play with I'll buy it needing work then learn the system. Remember your first dumpster-dive computer build and how much that taught you? Perhaps your first lawn mower repair? Learning is big fun and the more ya learn the better it gets.
    1
  2644. 1
  2645. 1
  2646. 1
  2647. 1
  2648. 1
  2649. 1
  2650. 1
  2651. 1
  2652. 1
  2653. 1
  2654. 1
  2655. 1
  2656. 1
  2657. 1
  2658. 1
  2659. 1
  2660. 1
  2661. 1
  2662. 1
  2663. 1
  2664. 1
  2665. 1
  2666. 1
  2667. 1
  2668. 1
  2669. 1
  2670. 1
  2671. 1
  2672. 1
  2673. 1
  2674. 1
  2675. 1
  2676. 1
  2677. 1
  2678. 1
  2679. 1
  2680. 1
  2681. 1
  2682. 1
  2683. 1
  2684. 1
  2685. 1
  2686. 1
  2687. 1
  2688. 1
  2689. 1
  2690. 1
  2691. 1
  2692. 1
  2693. 1
  2694. 1
  2695. 1
  2696. 1
  2697. 1
  2698. 1
  2699. 1
  2700. 1
  2701. 1
  2702. 1
  2703. Unless a legal way (for example buying current Russian residents out) is found to socially decontaminate the territory for any adjacent country to absorb it would entail adopting a permanent fifth column ensconced there since 1945. The Russian empire would lose it's collective mind over giving up that particular conquest so better to wear it down long before a separate Kaliningrad is brought up. The money to reintegrate it would be more wisely spent acquiring tactical nuclear weapons which defensive deterrent (done CCP style being sufficient to deter war but not for a counterforce or complete countervalue strike is the only way to contain Russia when it inevitably rearms to credibly threaten eastern Europe again. Moderns who didn't live through the earlier innings of the Cold War tend to think of Russia as any other society but with evil leaders, rather than the historic fact of it being utterly unable to produce, support then elevate anyone decent to power. (Exiling, imprisoning and exterminating its intelligentsia since Tsarist times is the natural way to control such a vast, socially diverse empire so that's standard procedure dating long before the grandparents of anyone reading this was born.) Putin's replacement may be much more dangerous but as with Putin, naive, craven, desperate Western (q)uislings motivated by avarice will hallucinate that the next fellow is really a nice fellow. The permanent appeasement reflexes of Western Europe wax and wane but never end. Norway/Sweden/Finland/the Baltics and of course Ukraine CURRENTLY have a realistic understanding of Russia's desire to reconstruct the old Warsaw Pact but once personal experience is gone the next generations (anywhere, for example the US which was once an anti-Soviet stalwart) often greet the Kremlin with legs akimbo. Only credible, PERMANENT standing military forces sufficient to slow enemy advance along with very large PROPERLY EQUIPPED and TRAINED reserves coupled with sufficient nukes to decapitate Russia if it strikes first can be truly effective deterrents. Nukes have kept the peace since 1945 (sadly, Curtis LeMay wasn't allowed to solve the Soviet problem before they got nukes) and are the only way to deter serious enemies. Note Ukraine gave up its nukes because it fvcked up and trusted Washington. The moral is never rely on allies to save one's bacon.
    1
  2704. 1
  2705. 1
  2706. 1
  2707. 1
  2708. 1
  2709. 1
  2710. 1
  2711. 1
  2712. 1
  2713. 1
  2714. 1
  2715. 1
  2716. 1
  2717. 1
  2718. 1
  2719. 1
  2720. 1
  2721. 1
  2722. 1
  2723. 1
  2724. 1
  2725. 1
  2726. 1
  2727. 1
  2728. 1
  2729. 1
  2730. 1
  2731. 1
  2732. 1
  2733. 1
  2734. 1
  2735. 1
  2736. 1
  2737. 1
  2738. 1
  2739. 1
  2740. 1
  2741. 1
  2742. 1
  2743. 1
  2744. 1
  2745. 1
  2746. 1
  2747. 1
  2748. 1
  2749. 1
  2750. 1
  2751. 1
  2752. 1
  2753. 1
  2754. 1
  2755. 1
  2756. 1
  2757. 1
  2758. 1
  2759. 1
  2760. 1
  2761. 1
  2762. 1
  2763. 1
  2764. 1
  2765. 1
  2766. 1
  2767. 1
  2768. 1
  2769. 1
  2770. 1
  2771. 1
  2772. 1
  2773. 1
  2774. 1
  2775. 1
  2776. 1
  2777. 1
  2778. 1
  2779. 1
  2780. 1
  2781. 1
  2782. 1
  2783. 1
  2784. 1
  2785. 1
  2786. 1
  2787. 1
  2788. 1
  2789. 1
  2790. 1
  2791. 1
  2792. 1
  2793. 1
  2794. 1
  2795. 1
  2796. 1
  2797. 1
  2798. 1
  2799. 1
  2800. 1
  2801. 1
  2802. 1
  2803. 1
  2804. 1
  2805. 1
  2806. 1
  2807. 1
  2808. 1
  2809. Trade disruptions would have the effect of tariffs without a trade war. Most US imports are trifles, not survival needs.. The "world" doesn't matter unless the US also benefits or the "world" can build their own damn navies. Infinite un-reciprocated charity should be questioned. If a few non-US flagged vessels registered in Bungholistan get captured or sunk the real owners can pay to sort it out including paying for security. It's only money. BTW most US oil trade is DISCRETIONARY which means IRL it is of no great benefit to our economy. We can pump more oil domestically while investing further in alternate energy if Persian Gulf oil is interrupted. It's not 1973 any more and Americans build BEVs just fine. I would like to see more Gulf instability to help coerce US and European industries off the petroleum teat because the oil exporting countries of the Persian Gulf don't deserve the money of free peoples. The only reason they get our money is (in the case of the US) logistics convenience for the oil companies and (in the case of Europe) failure to develop their own oil, gas and nuclear (though France does nukes better than anyone else not being ignorant Luddites) energy. Nothing else will do the job and the alternative is permanent slavish craven US and EU dependence on their Gulf cultural enemies. We've seen the EU can detach from Russia and the next tyrannies to defund are KSA and Iran. Sending money to Wahabis in KSA etc and Jihadists in Tehran is a function of greed not need. We pay them to oppress their own citizens while funding their wars.
    1
  2810. 1
  2811. 1
  2812. 1
  2813. 1
  2814. 1
  2815. 1
  2816. 1
  2817. 1
  2818. 1
  2819. 1
  2820. 1
  2821. 1
  2822. 1
  2823. 1
  2824. 1
  2825. 1
  2826. 1
  2827. 1
  2828. 1
  2829. 1
  2830. 1
  2831. 1
  2832. 1
  2833. 1
  2834. 1
  2835. 1
  2836. 1
  2837. "Mechanics" are not going to suffer so please abandon that innocent, well intentioned but mistaken idea. Remember in the US mechanics usually own all our tools and equipment so the barriers to starting your own shop are modest outside very expensive areas. Many of us have better motorcycle workshops at home than most dealers. No mechanic worth their salt doesn't have more than a lifetime of employment AND side work could finish. Good mechanics never starve and we can work on anything because we understand theory of operation. If you can wrench bikes you can (and MANY mechanics do) move into industry, aviation etc and make more money. I did and I'm far from special. There are many videos of car guys (fewer with bikes as there are fewer powersports industry techs) quitting that part of the industry for much greener pastures. I'm a multibrand car and bike mech with decades in aviation as my primary careers so this is not speculation. Insulting your core demographic is nothing new to HD as senior bikers remember quite well from the "flip the patch" era. Real bikers do not need (want is not need) anything the new company makes. Street bikes in the US are TOYs, not transportation (the exceptions prove the rule and know who you are) and toy buyers are already receding from motorcycling. Why buy product from a company which supports .pdf files, gr00ming and gender surgery upon children too young to make informed consent? I don't want the new HD to get better, I prefer it go bankrupt as the aftermarket already amply support every Harley ever made. There will always be plenty of used rides and parts to assemble new ones. Real bikers spin our own wrenches. Remember the REASON the old motorcycle culture existed (and remains strong in niche areas like hot rodding, chopping, drag racing etc) is mechanical mutual support. Commodification, especially marketing to posers, ended most of that culture which today mostly exists among vintage riders. If HD crumples the massive US aftermarket (all small businesses BTW) can easily supply every part in stock or upgraded form which is why you can build a better "big twin" without a single Milwaukee nut, bolt or washer. HD as a company should be excommunicated to show the American people really can punish their woke oppressors. A new generation of younger riders (especially in chopperdom) are building their own rides and discovering there is far more to bikerdom than riding an appliance.
    1
  2838. 1
  2839. 1
  2840. 1
  2841. 1
  2842. 1
  2843. 1
  2844. 1
  2845. 1
  2846. 1
  2847. 1
  2848. 1
  2849. 1
  2850. 1
  2851. 1
  2852. 1
  2853. 1
  2854. 1
  2855. 1
  2856. 1
  2857. 1
  2858. 1
  2859. 1
  2860. 1
  2861. 1
  2862. 1
  2863. 1
  2864. 1
  2865. 1
  2866. 1
  2867. 1
  2868. 1
  2869. 1
  2870. 1
  2871. 1
  2872. 1
  2873. 1
  2874. 1
  2875. 1
  2876. 1
  2877. 1
  2878. 1
  2879. 1
  2880. 1
  2881. 1
  2882. 1
  2883. 1
  2884. 1
  2885. 1
  2886. 1
  2887. 1
  2888. 1
  2889. 1
  2890. 1
  2891. 1
  2892. 1
  2893. 1
  2894. 1
  2895. 1
  2896. 1
  2897. 1
  2898. 1
  2899. 1
  2900. 1
  2901. 1
  2902. 1
  2903. 1
  2904. 1
  2905. 1
  2906. 1
  2907. 1
  2908. 1
  2909. 1
  2910. 1
  2911. 1
  2912. 1
  2913. 1
  2914. 1
  2915. 1
  2916. 1
  2917. 1
  2918. 1
  2919. 1
  2920. 1
  2921. 1
  2922. 1
  2923. 1
  2924. 1
  2925. 1
  2926. 1
  2927. 1
  2928. Coverups, waste and corruption and gross strategic policy mistakes exist because military reform is an alien issue for the American public. Civilians don't care about America's wars enough to know what good policy looks like so they produce and elect leaders who don't know what right looks like. AT ALL. They're too ignorant to value intelligence, too slack to value morality, and really just want to be humored and affirmed instead of thinking. In a democracy voters are responsible for how their armed forces are used and managed. "Thank you for your service" translates as "I have no idea what's going on but feel just enough shame to express, but not enough to learn a fucking thing let alone annoy my Congresscritters about US constabulary wars". Many Americans are so ignorant they believe the Taliban did 9/11 rather than Al Qaeda let alone how DC trapped the US into "nation building" which was obviously foredoomed to anyone not retarded. They don't know IS-K bombed Kabul airport killing Taliban who were guarding the place. They don't care even slightly because that involves thinking. The AMERICAN PUBLIC are responsible for how this country is run and COLLECTIVE INACTION IS A CHOICE. The public will never change so if you choose a military career (I'd gleefully do my USAF career again) I suggest ignoring what that public thinks then doing your own THOROUGH homework. Nothing was learned from Viet Nam though almost everyone was sure those lessons would last. Even worse, the American public do not care about details because they just want to feel the correct feelings and be part of the herd. Nothing has been learned from Afghanistan. Read that as many times as it takes to sink in. Modern "politics" ensures the war is only seen as a party bitchfight. That's one reason no one had the balls to leave until Trump committed then Biden followed through. That war was no more "winnable" than bombing the Southern US into not being Christian. The American public regularly betrays young American men and women who still trust our leaders. They feel no shame for it because they blame everyone but themselves. Democracy requires a clueful voting base, not a waterfall of retards. The American public's indifference is why military reform is not an important issue in elections. If you care, get educated and make a difference. Our troops at the tip of the spear live or die by what America does back home.
    1
  2929. 1
  2930. 1
  2931. 1
  2932. 1
  2933. 1
  2934. 1
  2935. 1
  2936. 1
  2937. 1
  2938. 1
  2939. 1
  2940. 1
  2941. 1
  2942. 1
  2943. 1
  2944. 1
  2945. 1
  2946. 1
  2947. 1
  2948. 1
  2949. 1
  2950. 1
  2951. 1
  2952. 1
  2953. 1
  2954. 1
  2955. 1
  2956. 1
  2957. 1
  2958. 1
  2959. 1
  2960. 1
  2961. 1
  2962. 1
  2963. 1
  2964. 1
  2965. 1
  2966. 1
  2967. 1
  2968. 1
  2969. 1
  2970. 1
  2971. 1
  2972. 1
  2973. 1
  2974. 1
  2975. 1
  2976. 1
  2977. 1
  2978. 1
  2979. 1
  2980. 1
  2981. 1
  2982. 1
  2983. 1
  2984. 1
  2985. 1
  2986. 1
  2987. 1
  2988. 1
  2989. 1
  2990. 1
  2991. 1
  2992. 1
  2993. 1
  2994. 1
  2995. 1
  2996. 1
  2997. 1
  2998. 1
  2999. 1
  3000. 1
  3001. 1
  3002. 1
  3003. 1
  3004. 1
  3005. 1
  3006. 1
  3007. 1
  3008. 1
  3009. 1
  3010. 1
  3011. 1
  3012. 1
  3013. 1
  3014. 1
  3015. 1
  3016. 1
  3017. 1
  3018. 1
  3019. 1
  3020. 1
  3021. 1
  3022. 1
  3023. 1
  3024. 1
  3025. 1
  3026. 1
  3027. 1
  3028. 1
  3029. 1
  3030. 1
  3031. 1
  3032. 1
  3033. 1
  3034. 1
  3035. 1
  3036. 1
  3037. 1
  3038. 1
  3039. 1
  3040. 1
  3041. 1
  3042. 1
  3043. 1
  3044. 1
  3045. 1
  3046. 1
  3047. 1
  3048. 1
  3049. 1
  3050. 1
  3051. That a mere rifle will make a difference against cartels (who are part of the system therefore will eventually obtain them by inducting enough of their government-employed users) is an incredibly childish idea that's terminally USian. The battle of competing systems is not a war of technology in the first place so technology will neither win nor lose it. The cartels are enriched by the US War On Some Drugs whose illegal and legal empires ensure the US policies which keep drug trade profitable are seen as moral obligation with zero regard to actual effectiveness about which the American public and government never genuinely cared. The US is not in it to win because we're morally obliged to ineffective emotionally satisfying methods. it's an ideological jihad which is why progress doesn't happen. The US public are incapable of understanding WOSD destabilizes the Americas driving the emigration so many imagine barrier methods will interdict. The average person was always clueless and resents that being pointed out because ego gets in the way of self-development. US law enforcement empires are self-licking ice cream cones once established and effectively make policy. There is every economic reason for Mexico to develop a domestic weapons industry and that is the key reason for building a distinctive local weapon to challenge its engineers and manufacturing sector. Good for them! Light infantry weapons systems are needed to maintain some level of control over a vast nation with barely governable geography and dissenting stakeholders (indigenos for example) who are not cartels. Drones are another useful field since a conventional air force for peer combat is not necessary but C4ISR is critical. Light wheeled armored vehicles are easy to fabricate locally at low labor cost using commercial truck drivetrains with no loss of effectiveness (see the original "MRAP" ancestors of South Africa for what works against IEDs and MG fire). Mortars and grenade launchers are easy to manufacture too. Mexican industry could easily do as well or better than for example Venezuela and that gives good jobs to their workforce.
    1
  3052. 1
  3053. 1
  3054. 1
  3055. 1
  3056. 1
  3057. 1
  3058. 1
  3059. 1
  3060. 1
  3061. 1
  3062. 1
  3063. 1
  3064. 1
  3065. 1
  3066. 1
  3067. 1
  3068. 1
  3069. 1
  3070. 1
  3071. 1
  3072. 1
  3073. 1
  3074. 1
  3075. 1
  3076. 1
  3077. 1
  3078. 1
  3079. 1
  3080. 1
  3081. 1
  3082. 1
  3083. 1
  3084. 1
  3085. 1
  3086. 1
  3087. 1
  3088. 1
  3089. 1
  3090. 1
  3091. 1
  3092. 1
  3093. 1
  3094. 1
  3095. 1
  3096. 1
  3097. 1
  3098. 1
  3099. 1
  3100. 1
  3101. 1
  3102. 1
  3103. 1
  3104. 1
  3105. 1
  3106. 1
  3107. 1
  3108. 1
  3109. 1
  3110. 1
  3111. 1
  3112. 1
  3113. 1
  3114. 1
  3115. 1
  3116. 1
  3117. 1
  3118. 1
  3119. 1
  3120. 1
  3121. 1
  3122. 1
  3123. 1
  3124. 1
  3125. 1
  3126. 1
  3127. 1
  3128. 1
  3129. 1
  3130. I love these sky is falling clickbait titles. YOU may never retire but that asserted conclusion presumes someone who mindlessly follows the herd (most people). OTOH other humans retire every day and many live surprisingly well on very low incomes and I am one of many millions. The way forward includes doing some things you may not WANT to do but life doesn't care what you want and money makes freedom usable. Consider many Americans manage to own property and live decently on Social Security, for example my disabled ex-mechanicbro who bought a cheap ugly lot (that's also large and wooded) then placed a cheap used trailer about 20 years ago. He cleared and upgraded slowly and today lives in a very nice large pole building constructed over his trailer. (They're called roofovers in some regions). He had that spray insulated and his electric bill is well below 100 bucks a month. First step is the once traditional now often ignored route of getting into a government career because only government careers vest a reliable pension and medical benefits. Unions CAN provide those but they need to be strong ones like IBEW, Pipeliners Local 798 etc. Wise humans plan methodically and start early. It's quite practical to choose a law enforcement, USPS, local or Federal agency, Merchant Marine, or armed forces career then stick to it until you vest retirement then if desired work more years for the pay bumps. Steady moderate compensation then the deferred compensation in retirement allows the public to buy government services "on credit" they pay for them later with deferred compensation which is your retirement if you work for them. The armed forces (choose wisely without passion, for passion makes young humans foolish) have many satisfying careers if you do your homework then choose wisely. Most of any modern military is supporting functions from medical to equipment support, civil engineering etc. You can most certainly fully retire if you stay long enough and refuse to go into debt. I retired at 47 and like many of my buds am debt-free. Don't live in cities. The cost of living is excessive, taxes high, property unaffordable because the rest of the herd is chasing the same things after getting the same degrees after uncritically following other lemmings off a cliff. Do find a semi-rural location with SLOW, predictable economic growth. Growth is not your friend on a low or fixed income. Low overhead is. Ideal is five acres plus in an are zoned agricultural so you have maximum personal freedom. (If I want another garage or shop, I build it.) The fewer neighbors you have the fewer to bother you or abscond with your property. Avoid walkable neighborhoods because that filters pedestrian thieves. The US is enormous so that's not hard to do. Do locate in useful range of but not next to predictably solid economic anchors like logistics centers, seaports (100+ mile range is fine) or large military bases wildly unlikely to close (even if you've nothing to do with the military the economic footprint is key). Geography matters. I avoid hurricanes (and high taxes) by living inland. I can visit the coast without living on it. I would never buy in a flood plain, downstream from any dam etc. There's no reason to. Do choose to become a competent DIYer and to have only productive hobbies since your time and energy are valuable. Labor rates are so inflated you can save absurd money working on what you own. It's a major economic force multiplier. Anyone can (my wife did most of our interior renovation). Choose to be capable and persistent which is more valuable than intelligence.
    1
  3131. 1
  3132. 1
  3133. 1
  3134. 1
  3135. 1
  3136. It won't matter on my machines because any such installs will never directly contact the internet or be on a PC/hdd/USB I never use for anything important. Disk space is dirt cheap so when I want Windows I fire up a suitably isolated (or not depending on use case) VM residing on my Linux main PCs. Anyone who cares can solve the problem in multiple ways and more will be available as Windows users who are stuck with it for specific software that won't run on other OS develop workarounds. This stuff is easy to learn and useful to know but most people prefer worthless entertainment instead of getting smarter every day. Gamers can just use their gaming Windows install as a toy and run another OS for online shopping etc which is also trivially easy given minimal effort. I do NOT recommend dual booting on bare metal and haven't bothered since 1999 when I figured out using a hard drive swap rack on my desktop was much more convenient. Ways to separate multiple OS on one box include: Multiple hard drives (and cutting power to the one you aren't using via an inline switch setup bought or self-assembled). Running the least secure OS in a virtual machine, which has advantages over bare metal including having a "clean install" saved as a snapshot so you can have a fresh OS quick as rebooting the VM (not the PC itself). Running Windows for gaming only (so security doesn't matter) by using it as a host OS then booting your "secure" OS from a live image using Ventoy and an external hdd (need not be a slow USB flash drive). Live Linuxes are free to try of course and you can try each image in a VM instead of writing to a USB or hdd. Live OS booted from external media are terrific for rescuing your data when your machine will not boot or crashes too early for data rescue. Any recent Ubuntu (if you're an experienced Linuxer you don't need this post so no distrowars please, save those for infants of all ages)/Xubuntu (for the more familiar interface) etc live image will do. A Windows To Go install to external media. There are other free tools besides the original MSFT like Aomei Partition Assistant. Search Youtube for the most current videos. BTW you can and I have made a Windows To Go install on a main hdd so if that PC breaks I can toss the drive into another or boot it externally using a cheap bootable USB adapter. None of this is exotic and the many text articles and forum threads cover details not suited to videos. Experiment and have some fun! It doesn't cost a dime unless you write live CD/DVD etc media which an XP user would do anyway.
    1
  3137. 1
  3138. Voters CHOSE this at the ballot box. Zero sympathy here and I found the ideal personal solution during the last time NYC had a bad urban cycle forty two years ago. I moved away from the metro area. The problem is the PUBLIC. Muggers etc happen to be part of that public and always have been through previous inevitable natural urban declines and rebounds. When the public are no better than animals they deserve a police state. Smart people have no desire to live in NYC unless they are seriously wealthy. Just leave! Feels great and you can afford to retire on land you own, almost impossible for the weak who pathetically cling to living in a city that was never good and frequently much, much worse. Cities are bad, kids. No one has to live in one so I don't. Urban taxes are bad, so I don't live there and don't pay them. Urban land prices mean no home ownership. That's bad so I don't live there and own my home and several comfy acres with no annoying neighbors. Urban traffic is bad, so I don't live there and haven't had to parallel park in over forty years. Urban pollution is bad, so I don't live there and it doesn't much affect me. Urban survival overhead costs are terrible, so I don't live there and don't pay them. Urban crowding is bad and being trapped with other people like rats in a cage is horrible, so I don't live there trapped with people useless to me. Urban space is so rare I could never afford to build my workshops etc for personal enjoyment if I lived there, so I don't, See a pattern? If you know urban history NYC was never good, just differently bad. Urban hives cannot be made good, so leave them for people too silly to figure that out. The only reason people cling to where wise humans do not is fear of change. You have a lifetime not to live in a city or urban area, but the sooner you figure that out the better your life and especially personal economy will be. Democratic voters decide NYCs fate. They deserve what their unwisdom gets them but they are not entitled to me living in the metro area to support their nonsense with my tax money. Crime can never be stopped for good. So believing is irrational because most humans are idiot savages on a good day. However you can FLEE and leave bad areas so they are not your problem. Staying is like buying Titanic tickets knowing it's going bowling for icebergs.
    1
  3139. 1
  3140. 1
  3141. 1
  3142. 1
  3143. 1
  3144. 1
  3145. 1
  3146. 1
  3147. 1
  3148. 1
  3149. 1
  3150. 1
  3151. 1
  3152. 1
  3153. 1
  3154. 1
  3155. 1
  3156. If Kurdistan seriously join Russia that solves a military and political problem for NATO. Geographic reality requires Turkish participation in NATO, period full stop. If Kurdistan make the strategic mistake of aligning with Russia that removes any reason for Europe (Turkey etc are not European except for a tiny percentage of Turkey) to be concerned about Kurdistan. Reality is harsh sometimes. The Kurdish relationship was transactional because it was always, always obvious that a prospective Kurdistan had to be carved by force from land claimed by other locals. US involvement meant taking sides against every other country that land would have to be carved from by force. How much is sentimental attachment worth? There is no strategic NATO interest in weakening defense of Europe for anyone in the Middle East. Read that as many times as necessary. Russia remains the existential threat to secular democracy. China remains a threat in the Pacific. Compared to that the small fry are expendable not by choice but by necessity which destroys choice. Most people alive in 2023 don't remember the early Cold War or internalize why that situation must be resisted including containing the Russian enemy. Ukraine was the wakeup call NATO needed and that struggle is far more important than anything else in the region. Note on WWII bomber losses: The 8th Air Force lost more KIA than the entire Marine Corps during WWII. Forcing the Luftwaffe into the air to destroy it and diverting German flak and other assets from ground combat had a terrible price.
    1
  3157. 1
  3158. 1
  3159. 1
  3160. 1
  3161. 1
  3162. 1
  3163. 1
  3164. 1
  3165. 1
  3166. 1
  3167. 1
  3168. 1
  3169. 1
  3170. 1
  3171. 1
  3172. 1
  3173. 1
  3174. 1
  3175. 1
  3176. 1
  3177. 1
  3178. 1
  3179. 1
  3180. 1
  3181. 1
  3182. 1
  3183. 1
  3184. 1
  3185. 1
  3186. 1
  3187. 1
  3188. 1
  3189. 1
  3190. 1
  3191. 1
  3192. 1
  3193. 1
  3194. 1
  3195. 1
  3196. 1
  3197. 1
  3198. 1
  3199. 1
  3200. 1
  3201. 1
  3202. I bear personal witness to a much older, demonstrated truth of the early Cold War. Containment took decades but economic measures combined with Soviet and Warsaw Pact economic incompetence are why they NO LONGER EXIST and most of the former Warsaw Pact are free to choose their allies. Sanctions were a successful part of the containment strategy, now forgotten or of course not learned by younger people. That does in no way justify MISTAKEN or BIGOTED sanctions, but the Russian state is a war machine which must be denied as many resources as practical. Also note that trade with the West continued throughout the Cold War to include vast US grain sales to the Soviet Union. Sanctions are messy and being collateral damage sucks, but pointing out egregious examples is good because it may motivate positive change. Do not however forget the enormous Russian record of oppression and murder in MODERN EUROPE. The Soviet era is well in living memory. Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Finland, Poland, the Baltics etc suffered immensely under RUSSIAN rule and it's fortunate there is any empathy remaining. Russians today are merely inconvenienced. It bears reminding that since 1917 the entirety of Russian history has been ongoing actions of real genocide and oppression of its neighbors, older conquests like Chechnya etc. That's real and many of the perpetrators are alive and well. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-45168062 "Czech filmmaker Filip Remunda has revisited the events of that summer in a new documentary, Occupation 1968, that features films by five directors from the five ex-Warsaw Pact countries that took part in "Operation Danube". "This is the first time ever we've been able to show the occupation from the perspective of the occupiers," he said. "What really surprised me was that one of the Russian soldiers, now a general, told me he still believes it was the most successful military operation in history," Remunda told the BBC. "He also believed that he was here because of the counter-revolution, that we had basements full of weapons, that an American division had penetrated Czechoslovakia and a Russian division had kicked them out. They believed that was the moment that they'd prevented the outbreak of the Third World War." "This is the perspective of generals of the Russian military. Fifty years on, and they are still thinking according to this old Soviet pattern," he went on."
    1
  3203. 1
  3204. 1
  3205. 1
  3206. 1
  3207. 1
  3208. 1
  3209. 1
  3210. 1
  3211. Immigrants (America where I live was built by them and earlier generations UNDERSTOOD THEIR OBLIGATION TO ASSIMILATE) need to remember they are FLEEING THEIR OWN SHITTY CULTURE. Were it any good they'd stay home. That cannot be hammered home enough no matter who it offends (taking offense is really a calculated childish tantrum). My ancestors promptly assimilated when the got off the boat and promptly contributed to the culture which rescued them from pogroms, poverty, and persecution. So can everyone else. A nation does not belong to the world. A nation belongs to its people in the way a house belongs to the homeowner (freedom is unusable without property rights). Immigrants should be selected not for need but for the value they personally add to a society. Were I to emigrate I'd promptly volunteer for my new home's armed forces or similar job defending my new people. I would RECUSE myself from acting against the will of those whose birthright that nation is. That said, hyper-liberal societies tend to hold (as if it were an obligation which it is certainly not) desperately naive ideas that everyone is interchangeable and actively RESENT the idea that local culture is what makes a country, and that culture is people. For example Russia invades its neighbors over centuries and only elevates tyrants to power because Russian culture demands this. That cannot be changed by thoughts and prayers. Africa is what it is because it's ruled by Africans making African choices. Colonials didn't teach the locals infibulation or animism.
    1
  3212. 1
  3213. 1
  3214. 1
  3215. 1
  3216. 1
  3217. 1
  3218. 1
  3219. 1
  3220. 1
  3221. 1
  3222. 1
  3223. 1
  3224. 1
  3225. 1
  3226. 1
  3227. 1
  3228. 1
  3229. 1
  3230. 1
  3231. 1
  3232. 1
  3233. 1
  3234. 1
  3235. 1
  3236. 1
  3237. 1
  3238. 1
  3239. 1
  3240. 1
  3241. 1
  3242. 1
  3243. 1
  3244. 1
  3245. 1
  3246. 1
  3247. 1
  3248. 1
  3249. 1
  3250. 1
  3251. 1
  3252. 1
  3253. 1
  3254. 1
  3255. 1
  3256. 1
  3257. 1
  3258. 1
  3259. 1
  3260. 1
  3261. 1
  3262. 1
  3263. 1
  3264. 1
  3265. 1
  3266. 1
  3267. 1
  3268. 1
  3269. 1
  3270. 1
  3271. 1
  3272. 1
  3273. 1
  3274. 1
  3275. 1
  3276. 1
  3277. 1
  3278. 1
  3279. 1
  3280. 1
  3281. 1
  3282. 1
  3283. 1
  3284. 1
  3285. 1
  3286. 1
  3287. 1
  3288. 1
  3289. 1
  3290. 1
  3291. 1
  3292. 1
  3293. 1
  3294. 1
  3295. 1
  3296. 1
  3297. 1
  3298. 1
  3299. 1
  3300. 1
  3301. 1
  3302. 1
  3303. 1
  3304. 1
  3305. 1
  3306. 1
  3307. 1
  3308. 1
  3309. 1
  3310. 1
  3311. 1
  3312. 1
  3313. 1
  3314. 1
  3315. 1
  3316. 1
  3317. 1
  3318. 1
  3319. 1
  3320. 1
  3321. 1
  3322. 1
  3323. 1
  3324. 1
  3325. 1
  3326. 1
  3327. 1
  3328. 1
  3329. 1
  3330. 1
  3331. 1
  3332. 1
  3333. 1
  3334. 1
  3335. 1
  3336. 1
  3337. 1
  3338. 1
  3339. 1
  3340. 1
  3341. 1
  3342. Russians are not like Westerners, the homeopathically few decent ones being exceptions who prove the rule, usually before being Gulag'ed or shot by the rest.. They're not just overwhelmed with propaganda since the 1917 revolution, they desperately want to believe it because war is the ONLY Russian identity. Russia has never produced and is incapable of producing a decent society for its peoples. Racism ensures minority Buryats and others die first while the Muscovite power base of every Russian government suffers least. That means the war barely affects those who matter politically. Russia never had a social reformation nor made progress towards one because it's culturally incapable of making the European idea of secular democracy work. Secular democracy no more fits Russia than Afghanistan or Saudi Arabia despite the yowlings of its evangelists. Ordinary Russians gleefully genocided Ukrainians in the Holomodor and they're happily at it again including deportations of children. Putin does not personally pull a single trigger. Ordinary Russians destroyed the people of Bucha. The few Russians who resist always lose and while the tiny Russian Legion are immensely brave they've not a snowball's chance in hell of taking power. They're in the same position White Russians were during the Russian civil war while being far fewer. Hopeful naive modern Westerners didn't live through the early Cold War or their attitudes to the enemy would be far different. The Soviet Union fell over economic issues not "lack of freedom" or minor military losses less in total than many single WWII battles. The losses in Afghanistan were a pinprick however dramatic they looked on (Western) news. Likewise Chechnya was easily shrugged off and its unfortunate veterans mostly forgotten. Russian use of Wagner was brilliant because it makes the casualties appear to be from groups the average Russian doesn't care about. They don't care if "separatists" die either, witness the indifference with which Moscow treats their desperate pleas for resupply! Until/unless the Russian economy tanks in a way their public won't tolerate the war can last indefinitely but it's a mixed bag. Every Russian casualty is demographic good news so the more Ukraine inflicts the better for it and NATOs future and the longer the delay before the next Russian invasion attempt.
    1
  3343. 1
  3344. 1
  3345. 1
  3346. 1
  3347. 1
  3348. 1
  3349. 1
  3350. 1
  3351. 1
  3352. EDIT: In futue it would be useful to have testing advice from engineers who work in the industry and they should be easy to find for the asking since Project Farm has a wide audence. While this is "fun" it's not really science so people seriously interested should be reading Society of Automotive Engineers papers because when it comes to things that appear simple the reality of fuels and engineering is quite complex. SAE octane measurement is interesting stuff but it should be made clear what octane IS NOT. Much love for Project Farm but this particular episode is an example of presumed competence exceeding layperson expertise. Octane is not a matter of "fuel efficiency" nor horsepower IN ENGINES NOT OPTIMIZED BY DESIGN OR TUNING to exploit it. WWII fighter recip engines are an example where high octane fuels permitted optimization permitting higher HP outputs Axis designers were unable to match not due to lack of talent but due to poor fuels. The purpose of octane is DETONATION RESISTANCE which permits higher compression. On vehicles designed for non-ethanol fuel the only point in using higher octane ETHANOL FREE fuel is being kind to your fuel system, for example on vintage engines like my old Nortons. A nice thing about carbs is I can temporarily richen them to use fecal petrol then readjust after fueling with the good stuff. Higher octane on any system not designed for it is mostly pointless. For example the worst modern fuel is often superior to mid-last century fuels which engine ran very low compression ratios to use. Go further back and it's overkill for a T Model or A Model Ford.
    1
  3353. 1
  3354. 1
  3355. 1
  3356. 1
  3357. Bugsmashers are for use against opponents without an air force. Cute toy aeroplane but it still requires horrendously dangerous CSAR because it has meat in the seat. See "Bat 21" for what happens to manned missions gone wrong and their rescuers taking heavy losses, then remember that era is now ancient but MANPADS etc are a far greater threat than they were then. The same format could operate remote-manned in distant locales far less expensively at no risk to those flying it. The aircraft is essentially a sensor platform with weapons (like a drone) and is too small/light to mount an ejection seat, in impressively bad oversight but bodies are worst enemy trade bait than live aircrew. Comparison to drones like Preds misses the mark because not all aircraft are the same. I get that this channel is about EXCITING STUFF but this isn't exciting or innovative, it's just buying an odd duck to get around other services horning in on the missions (which greatly affects funding). Operating at low level with no ejection seat WILL cost lives so the mission had better be worth the blood price. That problem was solved with the highly successful OV-10 Bronco which does (in civilian hands) much more, can take off and land on primitive surfaces and often did, and had the fastest ejection seat in the Air Force thanks to the canopy breaker on top of each seat. When one had an engine failure on takeoff (at that height recovery wasn't an option) those fast seats saved a USAF Bronco crew out of Sembach AB (RIP, it was a very cool duty station) one of whom got but a single swing when his chute deployed. Both lived but had they been in a contemporary O-2 they'd have been paste.
    1
  3358. 1
  3359. 1
  3360. 1
  3361. 1
  3362. 1
  3363. 1
  3364. 1
  3365. 1
  3366. 1
  3367. 1
  3368. 1
  3369. 1
  3370. 1
  3371. 1
  3372. 1
  3373. 1
  3374. 1
  3375. 1
  3376. 1
  3377. 1
  3378. 1
  3379. 1
  3380. 1
  3381. 1
  3382. 1
  3383. 1
  3384. 1
  3385. If the grossly inferior Russian air force tried a NFZ against Israel it would be great live target practice for IAD F35s with plenty of US support. (Previous use of BVR missiles in much older wars helped develop US BVR doctrine.) Russia threatening Israel would enrage US Christians with droll results, especially as Russia lacks power projection with a pathetic navy, overstretched ground forces and an air force that neglected aircrew training for decades. OTOH Israel cannot afford to base foreign policy in the shifting sands of the Middle East on conventional morality. Russian Israelis especially have no interest in what happens to Europeans or anyone else not them or their kin. The fate of Ukrainians is academic to Tel Aviv as it should be because Ukrainians are (mostly) not their people. That's pragmatism, not malice. Israel is infested with Russians of dubious loyalty. If Ukraine loses Israel will gain Ukrainian Jewish escapees which is a huge net demographic win for the Israeli ethnostate. The sooner Israel and Iran go to open war (they're nearly there in Syria) and reroll the Middle East/Persian Gulf dice the better. Iran can never reform (if protesters sufficiently irk the mullocracy it can simply kill them all with religious approval) and has a religious obligation to jihad so that leaves war to periodically readjust the strategic relationship which is what most wars really do. War would damage the Iranian economy and make power projection into Syria unaffordable. Bonus would be skyrocketing oil prices to force more of the world off the Islamofascist/Russian oil teat which dominates global policy so far. Oil is the key strategic vulnerability of the democratic West.
    1
  3386. 1
  3387. 1
  3388. 1
  3389. 1
  3390. 1
  3391. 1
  3392. 1
  3393. 1
  3394. 1
  3395. 1
  3396. 1
  3397. 1
  3398. 1
  3399. 1
  3400. 1
  3401. 1
  3402. 1
  3403. 1
  3404. 1
  3405. 1
  3406. 1
  3407. 1
  3408. 1
  3409. 1
  3410. 1
  3411. 1
  3412. 1
  3413. 1
  3414. 1
  3415. 1
  3416. 1
  3417. 1
  3418. 1
  3419. 1
  3420. 1
  3421. 1
  3422. 1
  3423. 1
  3424. 1
  3425. 1
  3426. 1
  3427. 1
  3428. 1
  3429. 1
  3430. 1
  3431. 1
  3432. 1
  3433. 1
  3434. 1
  3435. 1
  3436. 1
  3437. 1
  3438. 1
  3439. 1
  3440. 1
  3441. 1
  3442. 1
  3443. 1
  3444. 1
  3445. 1
  3446. 1
  3447. 1
  3448. 1
  3449. 1
  3450. 1
  3451. 1
  3452. 1
  3453. 1
  3454. 1
  3455. 1
  3456. 1
  3457. 1
  3458. 1
  3459. 1
  3460. 1
  3461. 1
  3462. 1
  3463. 1
  3464. 1
  3465. 1
  3466. 1
  3467. 1
  3468. 1
  3469. 1
  3470. 1
  3471. 1
  3472. 1
  3473. 1
  3474. 1
  3475. 1
  3476. 1
  3477. 1
  3478. 1
  3479. 1
  3480. 1
  3481. 1
  3482. 1
  3483. 1
  3484. 1
  3485. 1
  3486. 1
  3487. 1
  3488. 1
  3489. 1
  3490. 1
  3491. 1
  3492. 1
  3493. 1
  3494. 1
  3495. 1
  3496. 1
  3497. 1
  3498. 1
  3499. 1
  3500. 1
  3501. 1
  3502. 1
  3503. 1
  3504. 1
  3505. 1
  3506. 1
  3507. 1
  3508. 1
  3509. 1
  3510. 1
  3511. 1
  3512. 1
  3513. 1
  3514. 1
  3515. 1
  3516. 1
  3517. 1
  3518. 1
  3519. 1
  3520. 1
  3521. 1
  3522. 1
  3523. 1
  3524. 1
  3525. 1
  3526. 1
  3527. 1
  3528. 1
  3529. 1
  3530. 1
  3531. 1
  3532. 1
  3533. 1
  3534. 1
  3535. 1
  3536. 1
  3537. 1
  3538. 1
  3539. 1
  3540. 1
  3541. 1
  3542. 1
  3543. 1
  3544. 1
  3545. 1
  3546. 1
  3547. 1
  3548. 1
  3549. 1
  3550. 1
  3551. 1
  3552. 1
  3553. 1
  3554. 1
  3555. 1
  3556. 1
  3557. 1
  3558. 1
  3559. 1
  3560. 1
  3561. 1
  3562. 1
  3563. 1
  3564. 1
  3565. 1
  3566. 1
  3567. 1
  3568. 1
  3569. 1
  3570. 1
  3571. 1
  3572. 1
  3573. 1
  3574. 1
  3575. 1
  3576. 1
  3577. This human drama is not really important to the war and mostly a distraction. The high casualty rates would be important to a nation which cares about its troops and lower classes even slightly. Russia never did. Proof is their actions which speak far louder than words. A half-million dead wouldn't matter much. The government can mumble platitudes about the Great Patriotic War and the majority of gopniks will lick it up. It can say anything and enough vatniks will accept it to maintain status quo. Russians can afford to get their "bullet sponges" slaughtered and historically prefer it that way. This disposes of people Muscovites prefer dead in the first place be they convicts or ethnic minorities. The troops may be equipped with Shmels which are incendiary hence the nickname but it doesn't matter much. The good news is fewer Russians surviving to breed more ontological enemies of civilization. Never forget Putin and friends are not some aberration. They perfectly represent majority Russian culture over centuries. The few decent Russians the rest kill, imprison and exile are the historic abnormals. Cattle are the norm and the childish drivel which constitutes Western PC moral fashion is utterly irrelevant to Asiatics. The West should help decent Russians escape but forget about trying to change the culture for there is no room for social influence from outside. Patton was right about Russians in every respect and their endless record of savagery proves it from Finland to Syria. The fewer Russians breathing the better for civilization of which they at best pretend to be part, a mimicry without understanding.
    1
  3578. 1
  3579. 1
  3580. 1
  3581. 1
  3582. 1
  3583. 1
  3584. 1
  3585. 1
  3586. 1
  3587. 1
  3588. 1
  3589. 1
  3590. 1
  3591. 1
  3592. 1
  3593. 1
  3594. 1
  3595. 1
  3596. 1
  3597. What I see is that harbor is effortlessly disabled by a blockship. It wouldn't take much for an adversary (small nations included who can send containers by proxy) to load a container or several with explosives and redundant detonators to blow the bottom out of (someone else's if budget matters!) container carriers in a simultaneous (or near enough) move to disable major US ports without killing anyone (or with depending on desired escalation level) outright. Future harbor modifications should include multiple access routes where practical. Ideally the bridge should be replaced by a tunnel though that's far more expensive because that permanently solves the problem. Being a strategic asset the Federal government should invest in that project. The US used to be able to do large infrastructure projects and because it did so many was rather good at it. We should remember the strategic lesson of 9/11, which is that US industrial society is easily broken at microscopic cost to the attacker. 9/11 was the worst defeat in US history by economic and social impact but much of that was due to how leadership responded. Conside the effect of blocking Baltimore, Charleston, New York and Savannah even for a short time. Humans are simple beasts and easily panicked, amplifying effects of logistic disruptions by hoarding or worse. This poses what I think is a question Sal is qualified to answer in detail and that might generate intelligent government response. What does each key US harbor require for SELF-recovery from a blockship or future accident at the worst possible location? The Navy and our shipyards should build the vessels and equipment so no one is at the mercy of private contractor availability as they may be elsewhere, though if available they could team to clear the blockage quickly. I consider Baltimore a useful civil defense recovery exercise because without something like that no serious public attention will be paid to such problems. Of course self-recovery units can deploy, train and perhaps assist useful civil engineering projects like other harbor mods if wisely configured. Sal, what do you think the US should learn from Baltimore and what would be optimal preparation? For example bridges should be sufficiently protected that no vessel can get at them. Obstacles that would ground accidents and ramming attempts (ships were hijacked thousands of years before aircraft) could be retrofitted to legacy bridges, and future crossings mandated to be tunnels where that matters.
    1
  3598. 1
  3599. 1
  3600. 1
  3601. 1
  3602. 1
  3603. 1
  3604. 1
  3605. 1
  3606. 1
  3607. 1
  3608. 1
  3609. 1
  3610. 1
  3611. 1
  3612. 1
  3613. 1
  3614. 1
  3615. IF YOU ARE CONSIDERING EMIGRATING TO THE US TO MAKE YOUR FORTUNE, READ THIS FIRST. It may save your life. Many immigrant business owners make the naive mistake of buying into lower class US hoods. They're perhaps used to countries where most poors aren't trash, but there is no excuse for being a healthy, employable adult poor in the US unless you are personally defective. The poor locals will rob and murder each other for fun. Do you REALLY want to do business with your racist enemies? You aren't them and they do not want you. That's why at first opportunity they steal you blind then burn the wreckage if feeling extra frisky. I welcome ambitious new arrivals but DO NOT locate in poor US high crime areas. I don't care about the tempting low cost. It's low because sane Americans don't want to get murdered, robbed and raped. They don't want to live there because it's not possible to improve poor hoods without demolishing them completely then gentrifying them by dispersing the inhabitants. There are many wise reasons smart Americans who escape poverty scrape off their old hoods like shit from a shoe. I don't pretend to respect bottom feeders who don't respect themselves. Good people should locate with other good people to mutual benefit. If you would not happily raise your children to adulthood in a given neighborhood do not do business there. Ask the innocent Korean shopowners burned out in the LA riots, then choose a state where you have the right to self defense and to stand your ground. There are many inexpensive semi-rural and suburban areas you can locate your business and many are near the east coast in steadily growing but affordable areas where your property purchase will appreciate so you can sell out when you retire. Many Asian and Mexican restaurants do well there and are quite popular with the locals. Just do your homework and don't forget to discreetly ask police where a safe place to locate would be. Do this one on one on the street since they are more likely to tell you the truth. Look for growing stable areas close to transportation arteries and with a diverse business base. The vast majority of Americans are hardworking decent people. We hate those who defile our nation and do the best we can to keep them out of our neighborhoods. Gated communities for example can be great places to serve from just outside with food deliveries and service businesses. Choose law abiding customers and you'll make more money sooner. Then you can join them!
    1
  3616. 1
  3617. 1
  3618. 1
  3619. 1
  3620. 1
  3621. 1
  3622. 1
  3623. It could but there are so many better targets it would be silly to waste drones which could more productively take out "force loss multiplier" targets and troops. Hit oil storage and all the vehicles depending on it are affected. Hit some tank sitting in a boneyard and that may never have a meaningful effect on the war. Drones are not like conventional aerial bombing raids. Drone payloads are so small they best suit high value more flammable targets. Stored tanks have no ammo to ignite and their fuel was likely drained before storage (or to sell on the black market or just use in other vehicles). While tanks are exciting to spectators taking out POL immobilizes or severely restricts all vehicles which use it. It's better to destroy fuel trucks than tanks for example because one truck fuels multiple tanks and to get fuel trucks to and from the front requires multiple fuel trucks. POL storage, running locomotives (moving trains do much more damage if hit and derailed), ammo dumps etc are always better targets than trying to set off what's basically a salvage yard. Tanks that don't burn out or explode would remain easy to patch and even easier when they're sitting right next to spare parts donors. Alternately if one is damaged it can be stripped for usable parts (which teardown is necessary for full refurb in the first place) then set aside. Cutting and welding steel on small weldments like tanks (a bridge or a ship is a large weldment, tanks are baby weldments!) is easy enough to do in the field with basic equipment. Large portable engine driven welders are simple, mobile and inexpensive by industrial or military standards. Cutting torches are cheap and oxy-actylene equipment has changed little as it was perfected in the 1930s/40s (I overhaul and collect classic OA gear large and small to use which is useful fun). BTW tank "workshops" (large steel and concrete structures require heavier payloads unless they've flammable or explosive contents) aren't great targets either because Russian tank repair and refurb is not exotic work. Vehicle repair units can set up shop most anywhere including simple bare warehouse space. Commercial equipment can R&I turrets or other heavy loads. Key parts/ordnance manufacturing bottlenecks like munitions factories and specific electronics makers would be much more lucrative and softer targets.
    1
  3624. 1
  3625. 1
  3626. 1
  3627. 1
  3628. 1
  3629. 1
  3630. 1
  3631. 1
  3632. 1
  3633. 1
  3634. 1
  3635. 1
  3636. 1
  3637. If you do your own do NOT make the mistake of using a worn out container (the "WWT" -Wind and Water Tight grade is a fancy way of saying "condemned for maritime use). They're fine for storing hay etc but normally have corrosion issues (Corten does corrode), damage, worn out end door gaskets etc and need so much additional work it's not economic vs. buying a "one trip" grade container which is essentially new. The most useful size are the 40' or longer "High Cube" containers because the extra interior height is so useful and far less claustrophobic. For example my shop containers have sufficient room for me to fab heavy duty shelving (hung from the interior tiedown loops, which are easy to torch bend from round bar if you need more) higher than my head (I'm 6'2"). The container used in the video is of course not a one-trip. The users to copy are industrial and military, not hobbyists except for some of their creative layout. If you want to try your hand at a container house I strongly advise building a workshop from one first for the experience and because any serious DIYer needs a workshop. You can then live in the shop while outfitting the residential structure. Containers are fine but do NOT be one of the silly, giddy people who fail to study and methodically analyze how to best execute the project. They're basically a single-wide mobile home shell (though you can easily join them side-by-side by welding the corner fittings which I did for my welding/machine shop). I had my power pole placed first with an outdoor service panel and outlets so I had immediate site power.
    1
  3638. 1
  3639. 1
  3640. 1
  3641. 1
  3642. 1
  3643. 1
  3644. People too emotionally weak to coldly treat handheld computers as tools SHOULD use whatever works for them to master themselves. Even most intelligent people are of narrow competence and most never were nor will be techies. Their addiction to trifles is mentally deadly leading to "oversocialization" and other psych problems. Ignorance is a problem because the ignorant confuse "quantity of infotainment" meant to hold the attention of the less intelligent with access to vital information. If you have no PRACTICAL use for a thing you don't need that thing. The internet puts the libraries of history at our fingertips but most users just defecate trifling idiotic despicable mind-numbing garbage into their own minds because they never learnt HOW to usefully process information. I don't need to discard my phone because it is strictly a tool for navigation, (functional) communication and (functionally useful) information like weather conditions and finding restaurants on the road.. I don't crave the social aspect because I don't value silly things. Become the kind of person who regards popular culture with proper contempt and free yourself from that waterfall of garbage. "News" not directed at professionals is mostly trash to be ignored. I don't need different equipment to limit my access to trash because I'm insulted that trash is proffered to me. Free your mind, despise trifles, and if you want entertainment make it truly educational. A day you learn nothing is a day wasted. BTW I do not game or even watch much fiction. The real world is vastly more interesting and useful to learn about, not what some thot wore to the Grammys.
    1
  3645. 1
  3646. That poor lab worker should have left long ago for a professional department in a good town instead of a city which was never a good place to live by national standards. It is irresponsible to raise a child in such a low education area even if you don't care about yourself. Louisiana is 48th in education and when things have always been that bad they will not improve in one lifetime. That's not an insult but observation. A profoundly rustic society cannot choose to become different. That requires newcomers of superior culture and values but who in their right mind with a choice would live in NOLA? Police only "control" what the public permit them to control. They are not an occupation force and as we see in many countries even armed occupiers cannot maintain order against sufficient public will. Criminals are OF the public. Those who want a better life must leave. Life is not a Hollywood movie and good can not always triumph no matter how much we pretend otherwise. The only way to truly lower urban crime rates is gentrification but there is no reason for anyone with money to live in a dangerous area whose economy was never and will never be a compelling draw. I left the NY metro area long ago when it was dangerous (well over one thousand murders a year) and been safe and happy ever since. Remaining accomplishes nothing. Gentrification fixed NYC as nothing else ever could. Flight is right if you care about yourself and your loved ones, particularly in an area INEVITABLY destined to be repeatedly devastated by nature. Knowing the battles you cannot win is basic military strategy and should be a life strategy. Dying bravely is still dying. The US has millions of refugees who escaped toxic countries so if they can do that why remain in a doomed city whose best years were still bad by national standards? All the pride in the world won't fix it (see what the Bible says about pride).
    1
  3647. 1
  3648. 1
  3649. 1
  3650. 1
  3651. 1
  3652. 1
  3653. 1
  3654. 1
  3655. 1
  3656. 1
  3657. 1
  3658. 1
  3659. 1
  3660. 1
  3661. 1
  3662. 1
  3663. 1
  3664. 1
  3665. 1
  3666. 1
  3667. 1
  3668. 1
  3669. 1
  3670. 1
  3671. 1
  3672. 1
  3673. 1
  3674. 1
  3675. 1
  3676. 1
  3677. 1
  3678. 1
  3679. 1
  3680. 1
  3681. 1
  3682. 1
  3683. 1
  3684. The REAL Linux community (coders, admins, i.e. professionals who use it to make tools for business) or the NEETs wasting time on Youtube between distro debates and other trifles while pretending their T60 with Coreboot is somehow important in the grand scheme of things? Computers are complex and learning any new OS takes HUNDREDS OF HOURS including serious study. Normal users NEVER install an OS. Not Windows, not Linux or anything else. The serious Linux community (not a bunch of entertainers entertaining for views and never confuse the two) is busy getting work done and doesn't care what Linus does, thinks or anything else about him. He's a nice fellow and deserves to make money from his entertainment channel but it's really all just amusing wank. The soy face is to get views because the average moron reacts to it (thank algorithms for proving that) but the average moron doesn't need Linux and should stick to gaming on Windows. There is no desktop operating system for people who aren't serious about study because the immense choice range OS offer simply requires clueful users. Of course using meme distros (the main reason for distro fragmentation is DEs and esthetic issues) is not brilliant either. For some reason people hallucinate they need bleeding edge packages when LTS (like adults running stock exchanges, Googe, Youtube etc use) is more than sufficient. Bleeding edge distros are for testing. That is all. The influx of silly people into Linux is not good for Linux because USING IS NOT CONTRIBUTING. It's just use and accomplishes nothing else or different. People who aren't utterly hardcore techies don't need Linux and Linux has zero need for them. LOTD doesn't matter in the real world as serious users will be on the command line for the granular control that offers. The average user does not need Linux. The average user does not install OS. The average user happily uses an Android phone and a Windows PC and should stay there because nothing Linux could ever, ever do for THEIR use case matters. Zealots really hate that but autspergies and other obsessed mentally ill people desperately looking for a badge of agency are why zealotry (all kinds) exists. Disregard them. It won't hurt their feelings because they live in their own insular self-made online world of self-affirmation on 4chan. If you are not interested in Linux as a tool to become far more than a mere user, go away for your own and community good. What happens when clueless normal users infest a community is everything gets dumbed down to the detriment of users who want a professional grade tool. To use a car analogy, Windows is something to drive, but Linux is a professional mechanic's workshop. (I'm also a mechanic.) The average driver doesn't need and cannot use what's in their mechanics shop and should stay the hell out for their and everyone else's happiness!
    1
  3685. 1
  3686. 1
  3687. 1
  3688. 1
  3689. 1
  3690. 1
  3691. 1
  3692. 1
  3693. 1
  3694. 1
  3695. 1
  3696. 1
  3697. 1
  3698. 1
  3699. 1
  3700. 1
  3701. 1
  3702. 1
  3703. 1
  3704. 1
  3705. 1
  3706. I saw this obvious future back in the 1970s, quit my free ride to engineering school, then chose only jobs then a career which were and remain very difficult or impractical to outsource. Unless you were coding in utero there is no point wanting an office job which cost too much to get, too much to maintain, and too much to live near. I retired, not rich but quite comfortably, in my forties because I chose my life after long study of bad times from the Great Depression onward. I learnt how people adapted then did so beforehand. I have never lacked employment and turned down job offers in retirement. I did a few years college in retirement for fun but everything I studied was both useful to me and marketable. Never have a useless interest, make all interests complementary, then disappear into a niche which is necessary but has little competition. I ignored what was "promoted" in school because as usual that was always marketing bullshit. Social media is for morons (most people) so ignore it. Copy success, be versatile (I've done many jobs but all were complementary. If I took boomer advice I'd have been wiped out with the auto industry. If I took later gen advice I'd have been crushed in crashes and recessions. I don't take advice, I seek knowledge. I've done warehouse work, industrial maintenance, auto mechanics (great for personal independence even if you don't do it as a job), aircraft mechanics and more. I do nothing for clout as I dislike the sort of person clout engages. The more options you give yourself the better.
    1
  3707. 1
  3708. 1
  3709. 1
  3710. 1
  3711. 1
  3712. 1
  3713. 1
  3714. 1
  3715. 1
  3716. 1
  3717. 1
  3718. 1
  3719. 1
  3720. 1
  3721. 1
  3722. 1
  3723. Containerized TEL are cheap enough they don't need to be magnificent, just plentiful. The US is fond of fielding small numbers of highly effective systems, but those systems cannot be in two places at once. Chinese ships can dispatch from Chinese ports and not enter foreign ports at all if the missiles are to be used. Chinese ships do not need to hide their missiles to be a threat, and NOT hiding them makes a credible deterrent! Chinese ships do not need to be "Q" ships though the idea excites normies. They need only be disposable missile platforms good for one launch at the beginning of conflict. The "Q" nonsense is a media distraction. As both TEL and missiles are developed the angle of launch will cease to matter. Power is easily provided by containers fitted with gensets. Fuel is easily provided by flat rack tank containers and common hose and fittings. Power and plumbing quick disconnects are long solved problems. Second-layer containers could be fitted with passageways, power raceways, piping and gasketed connections between containers like the diaphraghms between railway passenger cars but with positive mechanical connections (ideally flanged QDs but bolts work fine).. They do NOT need to remain at sea at all times which would be a maintenance nightmare. Damage control doesn't matter because no one is more expendable to Beijing than its own troops. As with Russia there is a tradition of blithely expending manpower (see Mao's comments on nuclear war and take my word for nothing). Sinkings have little domestic visibility and even less in the bloodbath of an invasion. Crew survival doesn't matter because people lost at sea can be written off as heroes. The ships could be expended during an initial launch at Taiwan and supporting targets. They are easily replaceable over time.
    1
  3724. 1
  3725. 1
  3726. 1
  3727. 1
  3728. 1
  3729. 1
  3730. 1
  3731. 1
  3732. 1
  3733. 1
  3734. 1
  3735. 1
  3736. 1
  3737. 1
  3738. 1
  3739. 1
  3740. 1
  3741. 1
  3742. 1
  3743. 1
  3744. 1
  3745. 1
  3746. 1
  3747. 1
  3748. 1
  3749. 1
  3750. 1
  3751. 1
  3752. 1
  3753. 1
  3754. 1
  3755. 1
  3756. 1
  3757. 1
  3758. 1
  3759. 1
  3760. 1
  3761. 1
  3762. 1
  3763. 1
  3764. 1
  3765. 1
  3766. 1
  3767. 1
  3768. 1
  3769. 1
  3770. 1
  3771. 1
  3772. 1
  3773. 1
  3774. 1
  3775. 1
  3776. 1
  3777. 1
  3778. 1
  3779. 1
  3780. 1
  3781. 1
  3782. 1
  3783. 1
  3784. 1
  3785. 1
  3786. 1
  3787. 1
  3788. 1
  3789. 1
  3790. 1
  3791. 1
  3792. 1
  3793. 1
  3794. 1
  3795. 1
  3796. 1
  3797. 1
  3798. 1
  3799. 1
  3800. 1
  3801. 1
  3802. 1
  3803. 1
  3804. 1
  3805. 1
  3806. 1
  3807. 1
  3808. 1
  3809. 1
  3810. 1
  3811. 1
  3812. 1
  3813. 1
  3814. 1
  3815. 1
  3816. 1
  3817. 1
  3818. 1
  3819. 1
  3820. Any such diagnosis will trigger many threatened high functioning Level 1s. I took interest in some of my "narrowly awesome but otherwise socially impaired" creative bros who do superbly at their crafts in ways normies do not generally manage. Being a non-"foamer" railroad buff I've met a few there too. Level 1 is emphatically NOT "crazy" on its own but it can have observable effects especially when someone so afflicted is easily triggered by things which do not trigger normies, become angry when questioned normally (especially about something outside the scope of their real abilities in regions where they presume competence but are obviously haven't a clue). Level 1s who are high functioning often have low self-awareness. Story time because this works better than dry dead terms: My bro is brilliant at a particular branch of military history with a superb grasp of detail such that he has a fair number of senior officers rightly taking him seriously on his key specialty. The challenge is he presumes the same (VERY) high competence elsewhere and has the following symptoms: Messianic religiosity in which he's the sole valid believer (a Christian sect of one, himself) and instantly freaks out when (calmly and with utmost diplomacy) queried about any logical or reasoned support (despite superior competence in his military field of specific interest). He unironically references inappropriate "humor" attempting to mimic humor but has zero idea how wit works. He has rather odd, messianic social ideas such that Putin appeals to him. When I asked why he preferred Putin (he is unable to study history in other than highly mechanistic ways without social insight) he said "Putin seems stoic and moral". He managed to be an expert on war yet immune to social/political understanding. The are plenty more like him. He's kind, generous, otherwise decent but in that respect the lay term "batshit crazy" is not an exaggeration. His type is startlingly common once you are alert for them. Putin's skill and will likewise enabled his high competence (mastering Soviet then post-Soviet structures) at which he is of course outstanding. Putin's failures likewise are due to his apparently compulsive narrow perspective. How does a former FSB agent trained to understand humans manage to reconcile the epic graft he had to know about with maintaining the very armed forces he relies on for his power and legacy? Ukraine demonstrates he wasn't even cunning and there is no 3D chess in play. I'll gently suggest to the offended they NOT take it personally BUT carefully learn about the subject (not presume anything based on their experience or ANYTHING personal which impairs perception of others) because if you're high functioning yet also aware you can use your advantages over normies to adapt to your reality. Many skilled and creative people have a bit of Aspie (self included!) but if you're able to self-guide through self-awareness your life can be quite rewarding. There's no need to become a normie but learning mimicry (after first learning why it's useful) can serve you well as it serves others. Observing Putin's choices over time is more instructive by far than observing his trained FSB simulated stoicism and (traditional, deliberate) Russian cultural preferences for facial expressions. I watched for many years and his actions fit a pattern of narrow high competence, blaming others he installed for decisions anyone capable of social insight would not have hired to run the armed forces, firing reformers, and generally behaving like my bros. (This is not tied to conventional "good" or "evil" which are subjective, but to functional performance. Putin demands unconditional affirmation which has obvious problems when dealing with humans of vastly greater subject matter expertise. (Putin fired Russian military reformers.) BTW those who don't get what I just wrote would be happier ignoring it so do that and toddle off happy and self-affirmed. The above is not intended for you and you'll be comfortable skipping it.
    1
  3821. 1
  3822. 1
  3823. 1
  3824. 1
  3825. 1
  3826. 1
  3827. 1
  3828. 1
  3829. 1
  3830. 1
  3831. 1
  3832. 1
  3833. 1
  3834. 1
  3835. 1
  3836. 1
  3837. 1
  3838. 1
  3839. 1
  3840. 1
  3841. 1
  3842. 1
  3843. 1
  3844. 1
  3845. 1
  3846. 1
  3847. 1
  3848. 1
  3849. 1
  3850. 1
  3851. 1
  3852. 1
  3853. 1
  3854. The economy always tanks enlistments when it's good and coerces them when it's bad. If the American public want armed forces they should be delighted to pay what the market will bear and everyone who does NOT enlist is really voting for better compensation. This USAF career vet approves. People don't typically join in some patriotic frenzy, they join to improve their lives with an interesting career. Anyone qualified to become part of a modern armed force has multiple options (even if it doesn't feel like it at the time) so why not choose what pays? Focusing on patriotism is a mistake. This is the second (historically recent) Hollow Force era which are normal after failed constabulary mistakes. It will fade over time like the last one but very, very few Americans take interest in the domestic social history of recruiting. Conscription was a disaster (which no one who hasn't studied that really understands) for many reasons. Drafted armies bleed badly during their learning curve (US in WWII for example) while the KD ratios of professional forces tend much better. The US needs a professional CAREER force because it takes longer than one enlistment to mature a technician (fmr. maintainer here, this is not speculation). Want one? PAY FOR IT. Patriotism is fine but doe not make house payments and if you really support the troops then show it with funding not just direct compensation but quality of life. A troop living in a moldy barracks or decaying base housing knows actions speak louder than words.
    1
  3855. 1
  3856. 1
  3857. 1
  3858. 1
  3859. 1
  3860. 1
  3861. 1
  3862. 1
  3863. 1
  3864. 1
  3865. 1
  3866. 1
  3867. 1
  3868. 1
  3869. 1
  3870. 1
  3871. 1
  3872. 1
  3873. 1
  3874. 1
  3875. 1
  3876. 1
  3877. 1
  3878. 1
  3879. 1
  3880. 1
  3881. 1
  3882. 1
  3883. 1
  3884. 1
  3885. 1
  3886. 1
  3887. 1
  3888. 1
  3889. 1
  3890. 1
  3891. 1
  3892. 1
  3893. 1
  3894. 1
  3895. 1
  3896. 1
  3897. 1
  3898. The adjective "elite" gets overused. Is there anything GENUINELY special about the training supposedly "elite" Russian forces actually receive that can be proven? Have any of their forces accomplished anything of note against skilled, experienced, professional (the Western European/US version of professional) and determined opponents? Ukraine is in a militarily fascinating situation because Russia is a PERMANENT enemy, not an enemy with some temporary warmongering party in power. Russia has never not been an existential cultural enemy to Ukraine and Europe. Russian culture cannot be changed in that respect. Naive spectators who never seriously studied the eternal conflict between the Eastern hordes and European civilization (of which Russia was never part, their rulers sometimes aping that alien world badly and Tsar Nicky being related to European royalty are irrelevant) tend to imagine the conflict in mindless "politically correct" terms when it's no such thing. Russia killed more people over time than Nazi Germany and quite enjoys the sport. Its nuclear umbrella makes it permanent. Any Russian troops and assets Ukraine doesn't destroy or take out of the fight in this war will return in the next war or build the next invading Russian armies. Russia has nukes so it cannot be completely defeated but it can be contained (like the former Warsaw Pact) until its economy weakens or other events trigger regime replacement. Of course the replacement will inevitably be at least as toxic but may delay the rematch for a few decades giving Ukraine time to integrate with NATO and jointly solidify the Eastern front. If the war ends too soon Russia will be essentially undamaged. Russian lives do not matter to other Russians as proven by centuries of despotic rule, not just its wars. Casualties just form the basis of the Russian death cult (the Cathedral of the Armed Forces perfectly employs superstition as that opiate of the people Bolsheviks once scorned) where expendable bottom feeders exist to die for social experiments of zero benefit to the simpleton masses. Russians do not care of their wars benefit no one. Martial pride is enough for a culture with nothing else to be "proud" of but perpetual conquest, oppression and murder of its neighbors from Finland to the eastern Med. If the war goes on too long Ukraine may wear down and though this war costs the West pocket change compared to Afghanistan or Iraq, contrarian fools ignorant that Russian subversion is why the Left they hate exists in the first place are eager to abandon what the US once stood for (besides money...). The West is no longer the NATO of the 1960s or '70s. It's gone soft, even more ignorant and the uneducated (in the real sense of education) masses have no ideals. Had Ukraine not set an inspiring example NATO would continue rocketing into the shithouse but the public have the attention span of a gnat and are infested with contrarians. Amusingly Russia have mostly subverted the Right instead of its previous domination of the Left, and the Right bereft of principle just want power. This war must be exquisitely managed by Ukraine continuing to inspire the few Westerners capable of inspiration, and Western proponents of this war must do a MUCH better job explaining STRATEGIC and IDEOLOGICAL reasons the NeoSoviet enemy is a threat. Intellectuals have a terrible habit of assuming the average moron has the slightest idea what's going on. OTOH Ukrainian media are brilliant (cat pictures on Twitter and other maudlin memes remain absolutely necessary) at communicating on an ordinary level. Other groups acting in NATO interests should study this and individuals with Twitter followings do likewise. The outcome is not a sure thing and the only "victory" will be Ukrainian and NATO survival with breathing space bought by damaging Russia so the inevitable next Putin/Stalin/Lenin has less wealth and people (enemy demographic decline is key to delaying the next war).
    1
  3899. 1
  3900. 1
  3901. 1
  3902. 1
  3903. 1
  3904. 1
  3905. Until people return to understanding most of the lower classes are where they are because of synergistic PERSONAL DEFECTS and relentless bad adult choices they will live in cloud-cuckoo land. The lower classes are far less oppressed than self-destructive, ignorant and savage by choice. They naturally and bitterly resent self-discipline so they follow ideologies which affirm their defects as virtues. They are instantly enraged when that's pointed out because their found out their tantrums are tolerated. Democracy inevitably devolves to idiocracy but importing cultural enemies accelerated this. Today we have a nation collectively incompetent to operate a secular democracy. The Enlightenment ideals of the Founders are alien today. The Left was PERMITTED through mistaken tolerance to rule academia since the 1960s thanks to superbly effecive ComBloc subversion. Once that sets in Fascism is the only cure and decisive elimination of cultural enemies an unfortunate necessity but one which cannot be implemented without acceleration forcing the issue. The Left will provoke its own deletion because otherwise decent people are degnerately tolerant as if that tolerance was a virtue. The solution for the Left is exactly what their ideal Stalinist and Maoist societies wanted for everyone who was not Stalinist and Maoist. Intelligence is neurodivergent so there is no winning lesser hearts and minds, but enemies can be deleted and eventually their escalation will provoke that so the wise will prepare. The only tragedy at Kent State was poor marksmanship.
    1
  3906. 1
  3907. 1
  3908. 1
  3909. 1
  3910. 1
  3911. 1
  3912. 1
  3913. 1
  3914. 1
  3915. 1
  3916. 1
  3917. 1
  3918. 1
  3919. 1
  3920. 1
  3921. 1
  3922. 1
  3923. 1
  3924. 1
  3925. 1
  3926. 1
  3927. 1
  3928. 1
  3929. Sorting those problems requires self-mastery, planning, and focus. Most people are silly so ignore them and only associate with capable smart humans you can learn from. (Then one day others will learn from you.) The following worked for me. I am not rich but lack nothing. The more you can do yourself the further any or no money goes, and the more you can do the more you can do for yourself. Learn to maintain and repair everything you own. Make knowledge your entertainment and have zero useless hobbies or interests. Learn to work on cars because that includes electrical, hydraulic and mechanical systems. Wrenching saves money for life and lots of it. Labor costs these days make owning your own tools a bargain. My wife was a skilled helicopter mechanic and my mum worked on WWII PBY Catalina flying boats. Just do it. Learn to DIY everything your house and other structures require. Learn to work on computers at a basic level (troubleshooting, OS reload etc) if you use one. Take formal training when you can. Have more than one skill. Your local community colleges is an underused resource. (I took welding and CNC machining to expand what I can do in my home shop, volunteered in return for more shop time, then worked for the school for a couple of years as they like to hire from within.) Many courses are effectively free, especially low income workforce training programs. The Financial Aid folks exist to find you money. Do not aspire to any work that's easy to automate. Forget office work as those jobs are easy to outsource. Do learn skills which require a human on the spot. Do not assume everything will be automated then do things impractical to automate. Most poverty is self-inflicted. Choose skills that pay well and gets or can sustain you far away from your home (too many people never leave the state they were born in). Military, Merchant Marine, welder (many females have better fine motor coordination males including some welders I worked with), electrician (they never lack work), HVAC (stick to commercial work, my bro makes a mint repairing convenience store chillers because the owners refuse to upgrade which is common) etc are options most of which give you DIY skills that serve you for life. If you can't find work that means you chose wrongly so choose something different. My "turd herder" bro learned wastewater management in the military and had so many job offers he left after his first enlistment. Unless humans stop defecating he will always have work. Think outside the box because the box is a prison of conformity.
    1
  3930. 1
  3931. 1
  3932. 1
  3933. 1
  3934. 1
  3935. 1
  3936. 1
  3937. 1
  3938. 1
  3939. 1
  3940. 1
  3941. 1
  3942. 1
  3943. 1
  3944. 1
  3945. 1
  3946. 1
  3947. 1
  3948. 1
  3949. 1
  3950. 1
  3951. 1
  3952. 1
  3953. 1
  3954. 1
  3955. 1
  3956. 1
  3957. 1
  3958. 1
  3959. 1
  3960. 1
  3961. 1
  3962. 1
  3963. 1
  3964. 1
  3965. 1
  3966. 1
  3967. 1
  3968. 1
  3969. 1
  3970. 1
  3971. 1
  3972. 1
  3973. 1
  3974. 1
  3975. 1
  3976. 1
  3977. 1
  3978. 1
  3979. 1
  3980. 1
  3981. 1
  3982. 1
  3983. 1
  3984. 1
  3985. 1
  3986. 1
  3987. 1
  3988. 1
  3989. 1
  3990. 1
  3991. 1
  3992. 1
  3993. 1
  3994. 1
  3995. 1
  3996. 1
  3997. 1
  3998. 1
  3999. 1
  4000. 1
  4001. 1
  4002. 1
  4003. 1
  4004. 1
  4005. 1
  4006. 1
  4007. 1
  4008. 1
  4009. 1
  4010. 1
  4011. 1
  4012. 1
  4013. 1
  4014. 1
  4015. 1
  4016. 1
  4017. 1
  4018. 1
  4019. 1
  4020. 1
  4021. 1
  4022. 1
  4023. 1
  4024. 1
  4025. 1
  4026. 1
  4027. 1
  4028. 1
  4029. 1
  4030. 1
  4031. 1
  4032. 1
  4033. 1
  4034. 1
  4035. 1
  4036. 1
  4037. 1
  4038. 1
  4039. 1
  4040. 1
  4041. 1
  4042. 1
  4043. 1
  4044. 1
  4045. 1
  4046. 1
  4047. 1
  4048. 1
  4049. 1
  4050. 1
  4051. 1
  4052. 1
  4053. 1
  4054. 1
  4055. 1
  4056. 1
  4057. 1
  4058. 1
  4059. 1
  4060. 1
  4061. 1
  4062. 1
  4063. 1
  4064. 1
  4065. 1
  4066. 1
  4067. 1
  4068. 1
  4069. 1
  4070. 1
  4071. 1
  4072. 1
  4073. 1
  4074. 1
  4075. 1
  4076. 1
  4077. 1
  4078. 1
  4079. 1
  4080. 1
  4081. 1
  4082. 1
  4083. 1
  4084. 1
  4085. 1
  4086. 1
  4087. 1
  4088. 1
  4089. 1
  4090. 1
  4091. 1
  4092. 1
  4093. 1
  4094. 1
  4095. 1
  4096. 1
  4097. 1
  4098. 1
  4099. 1
  4100. 1
  4101. 1
  4102. 1
  4103. 1
  4104. 1
  4105. 1
  4106. There is far more to NATO than the US who Europe should no longer need to defend itself. Poland (being wiser than the rest invests in its freedom and that of others!) spends ~4% on self-defense so the rest have no excuse. It was an honor to help defend NATO in the 1980s but soon as the Berlin Wall came down the usual deluded subversives (the USSR was as good at subversion as it as economically and socially incompetent) talked adults who should have known disarmament invites invasion and unlike armed pacifism is an excuse to be a helpless future victim. I've no use for Trump but absolutely nothing else would coerce Europe to do the right thing. The generations who defended Western culture and secular free democracy in the early decades are dead or will soon be pushing daisies. Fresh motivated younger Europeans must pick up the sword unless living under a NeoSoviet respawn looks like a good idea. Blaming armies for wars is absurd. Politicians start those and their public support them. A just people will seek peace and only wage just wars. Be proud of your armed forces for they always were and always will be the force which keeps barbarians from sacking and enslaving you! The profession of war is a noble one where the war is itself noble. Warriors are ennobled by their cause. Ask the former Warsaw Pact members who promptly joined their European brothers and sisters in NATO why they chose freedom. BTW self-defense against nuclear powers REQUIRES nuclear weapons and not someone else's so Poland in particular would be wise to build a domestic nuclear deterrent of the mainland Chinese style which is ample to deter invasion but not sufficient for a first strike which would be destabilizing. HAVE ADULT DISCUSSIONS about your armed forces and their role in your society because national and collective defense is too important to permit yourself ignorance. Democracy is only as good as its voters. Do not let your political party think for you. That is not their purpose. Inaction is consent.
    1
  4107. 1
  4108. 1
  4109. 1
  4110. 1
  4111. 1
  4112. 1
  4113. Liberalism like democracy is inherently weak which in a society of friends is a feature but elsewhere a severe bug. As it is natural for Bolsheviks to dominate Communist systems (because genocide of anyone not Communist is a practical necessity to eliminate capitalism and genocide requires killers) it is natural for fanatics to dominate liberal discourse. They unlike weaklings have will to power and do not shy from pandering by affirmation to gain adherents or purging the less motivated. The masses can only be understood by admitting their vulns but that's considered disrespectful. Hamas, Hez etc are as natural a fit for the liberal Left as Che-style killers were in the 1960s. They benefit from (often valid) anti-colonial narratives. The masses are not sophisticated people and educated liberals make a grave mistake identifying with the mob. (That same mistake broke the GOP turning it into the hilarious mess we see today.) The idiot beastmob (any ideology which fails to admit it is that is delusional) require engagement on THEIR terms. Liberalism prefers purity spirals. Long ago the "classic" Buckley-style conservatives imagined they could rule their simple base forever. Liberals have a similar challenge and are losing theirs too. As for Israel marketing only goes so far. Anyone not Israeli or bound to them by Christianity has no coldly pragmatic reason to care what happens to it. Let that sink in and remember not to confuse one's own beliefs with the world at large. The transactional relationship of American Jews with the old civil rights movement (the few true believers should not confuse themselves with anyone else) succeeded for decades but POC always understood it to be transactional. The bright young sabra narrative of 1967 doesn't work in 2023 so Israel faces permanent enemies who now have an (imported, thanks to liberal values which are a suicide pact) base inside the USA. Liberals opened the gates to the most savagely patriarchal anti-liberal superstition because their ideology excludes realism. It's a cloud cuckoo fantasy land unsuited to dealing with real people. This cannot change because the masses cannot change and do not care for the lofty debates of theorists. Only acceleration offers the possibility of change and because politics is war that will get messy. Harmlessness defends nothing.
    1
  4114. 1
  4115. 1
  4116. 1
  4117. 1
  4118. 1
  4119. 1
  4120. 1
  4121. 1
  4122. 1
  4123. 1
  4124. 1
  4125. 1
  4126. 1
  4127. 1
  4128. 1
  4129. 1
  4130. 1
  4131. 1
  4132. 1
  4133. 1
  4134. 1
  4135. 1
  4136. 1
  4137. 1
  4138. 1
  4139. 1
  4140. 1
  4141. 1
  4142. 1
  4143. 1
  4144. 1
  4145. 1
  4146. 1
  4147. 1
  4148. 1
  4149. 1
  4150. 1
  4151. 1
  4152. 1
  4153. 1
  4154. 1
  4155. 1
  4156. 1
  4157. 1
  4158. 1
  4159. 1
  4160. 1
  4161. 1
  4162.  @cjunknown1422  Easily done with methanol or "denatured" alcohol blends used to deter consumption of untaxed alcohol. Early last-century vehicles used alcohol anti-freeze because it's so inexpensive to produce compared to glycol coolants. Russia use alcohol much longer than most and alcoholics not being a bright lot sometimes drank the coolant. Death won't be quick (depends on consumption of course) so targets may be well away from their looting site when symptoms set in. The source of poisoning may not be apparent especially given the lack of modern medical care. Invader access to dialysis equipment is obviously limited. Invaders will beg for help motivating (while demoralizing) their unit to waste resources caring for them while drawing enemies to "bunch" around the target. Alcohol taken by invaders is inherently looted making it quite selective. Unless there are visible medical personnel not also abusing Red Cross/Red Crescent markings (like transporting ammo in an ambulance) it's lawful to bombard retreating (retreat is not surrender) or stationary combatants. Those curious should study Hague and Geneva conventions along with any other applicable laws reflecting accepted international LOAC. "Crime" refers to violation of written law not random "feelings" so whenever some calls an act a crime it's their customary burden in debate (onus probandum) to support their assertion with legal precedent. No lay interpretation of law matters so anyone interested should go directly to the source then reference it properly. https://casebook.icrc.org/glossary/law-hague has sufficient references for noobs to begin. War is about destroying/damaging enemy humans and military/war production assets until the remainder lose interest, and civilians have an advantage over uniformed forces as there is no reasonable way to attach blame to them if they're not involved. Unlike military units with command responsibility, civilians are generally considered independent actors (not that this matters when the invaders indulge in mass reprisals). LOAC makes freedom fighters/terrorists (name choice is situational and subjective!) difficult to deter as demonstrated by UN and US constabulary operations.
    1
  4163. 1
  4164. 1
  4165. 1
  4166. 1
  4167. 1
  4168. 1
  4169. 1
  4170. 1
  4171. 1
  4172. 1
  4173. 1
  4174. 1
  4175. 1
  4176. 1
  4177. 1
  4178. 1
  4179. 1
  4180. 1
  4181. 1
  4182. 1
  4183. 1
  4184. 1
  4185. 1
  4186. 1
  4187. 1
  4188. 1
  4189. 1
  4190. 1
  4191. 1
  4192. 1
  4193. 1
  4194. 1
  4195. 1
  4196. 1
  4197. 1
  4198. 1
  4199. 1
  4200. 1
  4201. 1
  4202. 1
  4203. 1
  4204. Heavy is the way to go for survivability. M113 like all APCs was a horrible mistake designed for the post-nuke battlefield and clung to for cost reasons.(The drivetrain is extremely simple using a truck engine and automatic transmission.) The APC concept was fundamentally idiotic because its good feature (light weight with commensurate mobility) coerced it's use as an AFV where it's nearly helpless. Infantry require heavy weapons which either arrive by wheels or tracks, with tracks having much lower ground pressure. Clinging to the idea of a "battle taxi" (wheeled or tracked with worthless armor) that's neither fish nor fowl killed and wounded thousands of troops around the world because APCs are nearly unarmored with the exception of Namer. The APC concept ignored that RPG existed since before the APC, whose ancestors like the US M2 "purple heart box" halftrack were also grossly inadequate at protecting their human cargo. Militaries hated change so they clung to their various APC, Russia because they don't care about casualties and the US because it didn't care much during the Viet Nam era then later because it's sexier to spend procurement dollars on other systems. The AMPV concept is about sixty years overdue but that's expected from the Pentagon who failed to armor their wheeled transport until enough Americans died that hillbilly armor (for the second time, the first being SEA gun trucks) was fitted then public anger coerced adoption of Force Protection's MRAP (interesting beast, I helped train new welders for their production line in SC).
    1
  4205. 1
  4206. 1
  4207. 1
  4208. 1
  4209. 1
  4210. 1
  4211. 1
  4212. 1
  4213. 1
  4214. 1
  4215. 1
  4216. 1
  4217. 1
  4218. 1
  4219. 1
  4220. 1
  4221. 1
  4222. 1
  4223. 1
  4224. 1
  4225. 1
  4226. 1
  4227. 1
  4228. 1
  4229. 1
  4230. 1
  4231. 1
  4232. 1
  4233. 1
  4234. 1
  4235. 1
  4236. 1
  4237. 1
  4238. 1
  4239. 1
  4240. 1
  4241. 1
  4242. 1
  4243. 1
  4244. 1
  4245. 1
  4246. 1
  4247. 1
  4248. 1
  4249. 1
  4250. 1
  4251. 1
  4252. 1
  4253. 1
  4254. 1
  4255. 1
  4256. 1
  4257. 1
  4258. 1
  4259. 1
  4260. 1
  4261. 1
  4262. 1
  4263. 1
  4264. 1
  4265. Everyone should be a prepper and this is yet more proof why because relief from outside depends on restoring destroyed roads and bridges. Timely evacuation (have you checked your bugout bag recently?) is key if your location is especially vulnerable. Prepping slowly over time is affordable (my SSI bros do it on very little income) with careful planning and it's never too early to start because future disasters are guaranteed. (Ask old folks what they've been through. It may surprise ya.) Note to anyone in local government whose area lost bridging: Portable steel bridges civilian and military exist including rentals but don't see much use in the US. They're better made than common bridging and when replaced with permanent bridges can be stored for the next time. The plans are proven and the bridge components were designed to be easy for any welding/fab shop to produce. I don't know what Guard units in the region do but they can find out what military bridging is on hand. Small bridges IMO should be portable for easy maintenance and quick replacement which takes days instead of years, but apparently I'm the only person (I've never seen anyone else mention them) who suggests them for civilian disaster response. Meanwhile the military drive main battle tanks and supply convoys over theirs... https://www.warhistoryonline.com/instant-articles/donald-bailey-bridge-building-hero.html gives some background. A variety including the original designs are globally available. https://www.escpile.com/single-post/bailey-bridge The same beautiful geography which brings in tourists obstructs relief efforts. Reconstruction should include aggressive highway and bridge construction but like Californian geography the eastern mountains make cutting suitably large road nets extremely difficult. Mountainous terrain is pretty but making it more usable requires staggering civil engineering efforts and buying out private property for rights of way. Good luck getting people to give up desirable land in the few areas which suit highway construction.
    1
  4266. 1
  4267. 1
  4268. 1
  4269. 1
  4270. 1
  4271. 1
  4272. 1
  4273. 1
  4274. 1
  4275. 1
  4276. 1
  4277. 1
  4278. 1
  4279. 1
  4280. 1
  4281. 1
  4282. 1
  4283. 1
  4284. 1
  4285. 1
  4286. 1
  4287. 1
  4288. 1
  4289.  @richardmoyer108  That's a popular but mistaken view (the reason professional military scholars in various War Colleges don't teach it). IRL China could always escalate because Nam unlike Korea is not a peninsula meaning resupply could never be completely interdicted. China had no need to repeat its success in Korea (fighting the US back to the 38th Parallel was no small feat) because US strategists understood NATO mattered while SVN had nil strategic value to the US the Domino Theory being nonsense. The US had no options to compel surrender and the SVN government were as worthless as the ANA. Occupying outposts indefinitely simply offered supply lines as targets letting the VC/NVA bleed US support troops (a lesson forgotten in the Iraq invasion to great cost). The Pentagon made many mistakes (the early attrition strategy being a bloody fvckup) but there was simply no way the enemy could not respond to because they had permanent initiative. General Matthew Ridgway (the WWII leadership were vastly more competent than their successors) understood the strategic problems and the absence of value to the US. His advice to Ike kept the US out until idiot hick LBJ thought himself a warrior and the rest is history. American military exceptionalism backfires when we engage cultures our culture cannot understand at a basic level which includes all peasant cultures. https://press.armywarcollege.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3064&context=parameters We squandered the opportunity to ignore the French after WWI then again after WWII and failed to support Ho Chi Minh's nationalists when they asked for it. That left their historic mortal enemy China (who tried to invade them after we left in the Sino-Vietnamese war) as an arms supplier so they did what any nationalist would do and took the assistance. Wild Bill Donovan's OSS had the chance to engage but squandered it. The US attachment to France was a mistake as Paris had nil real leverage. We lavished aid on their incompetently led forces to no avail then basically took over their war. Today the US Navy pays port calls to Cam Ranh bay as both nations have a common enemy in Beijing who tried to crush Viet Nam for centuries. American hick leadership (even our urbanites are fundamentally ignorant rustics) repeated the same mistakes after experienced Nam vets retired. Many of those were military. Our generals lied to get good OERs so the public (who take no interest unless they're veterans or history geeks or both) imagined A-stan was a success and ignored the SOCIAL FAILURE of the Kabul government which no US military action could remediate. The amateur take on war is that it's all technotactical and not social (despite Colonial resistance to the British being key to our own Revolution!) and our civilian leadership come from our ignorant civilian classes. That's why the US is good at nation-state war (mostly a technotactical and logistic contest at which our society is unmatched....so far) but terrible at choosing unconventional wars/missions. The Afghans understood the concept of a punitive raid and offered to negotiate but the US confused Taliban (local nationalists) with Al Qaeda (transnational pan-Islamist global Jihadists) who they made the mistake of hosting. Of course the US had to attack Al Qaeda after 9/11 but we in no way had to switch to the fool's errand of "nation building" which was foredoomed by going against local culture. (Could anyone bomb Americans into renouncing Christianity?) A-stan was a perfect trap and 9/11 the most staggeringly successful unconventional attack in history. It flipped US society into a demi-police state, built government empires, made KBR (Brown and Root of Southeast Asia fame) even richer and profoundly damaged the US military which now has to refocus on nation-state war after two decades of squandering the valor and lives of our deployed troops and civilians. Americans forgot Viet Nam (except the guys who remembered gun trucks and built their own in Iraq because the Army chose to use thin-skinned troop killer trucks) and they'll forget A-stan and Iraq in thirty years too. The Pentagon had free rein in A-stan for two decades yet chose to ignore the grunts on the ground warning it the ANA and Afghans in general had nil interest in dying for Kabul. Like Viet Nam it was in the end a failure of military leadership to speak truth to power. Men can be selfless in battle but gutless before their bosses and our young troops died for their lies in Nam, A-stan and the Pyrrhic victory in Iraq none of which did the American public who paid the cost a bit of good. That public have the attention span of a fruit fly so it will happen again. Each leadership generation imagines itself wiser than the McNamara crew (who may have saved the US in the Cuban missile crisis, a technotactical contest) who buried us in Southeast Asia. At least we're back to the European contest of containing the Russian Federation who are much weaker than the Soviets we defeated. Americans are good at supporting real freedom fighters from COMPATIBLE CULTURES. Our people should stay in their lane if they're serious about winning.
    1
  4290. 1
  4291. 1
  4292. If the USAF sent something like that to an airshow I'd not want my name in its forms... Former career fighter fixer (Bronco, Phantom, F-16 A/B/C/D/CJ, comm/nav then engines then merged to crew dog) here. In what alternate universe does being a "prototype" excuse SLOPPY WORK, especially on a highly visible display bird INTENDED to be seen by millions (modern cameras easily capture the visible errors without needing to get very close)? Sloppy sealant was a CHOICE. Any maintainer has seen some horrors but properly applying faying sealant (or RAM if that's its role) is not difficult nor is using masking tape on the panels before sealing. If a USAF outfit sent that hot mess to display they'd have invested at least the single shift (because cure time) to do it right before showing the world where billions of dollars are on the line. Cosmetics don't matter in combat but function does. Cosmetics do matter when showing off the supposed pride of a nation at war while trying to recover the reputation of Russian Federation hardware in order to sell more overseas. Fighters like sports cars are "halo" vehicles whose rep affects other marketing so doing airshows right in every detail s expected. Enthusiasts who caught the issues at first glance I see failure to rig those doors so they fully close which is the most basic assembly (or much worse, design) error inexcusable since the advent of retractable landing gear doors. This may be incredibly, excruciatingly difficult for some to understand but it being a prototype and test mule does not mean it cannot get the basic pre-airshow prep given other nations aircraft for generations because none of that work is hard. If your panel doesn't cleanly mate with adjacent surfaces that is an error in manufacture and/or assembly which can be fixed in the field by factory techs or ordinary maintainers given factory tech data and phone support. If doors are not adjusted to fully close someone just didn't care. A new USAF Airman straight out of tech school would know better (thousands do every year) and would be working under supervisors who sign off their work. These are simple dumbazz mistakes so who signed off on all that? The choice of Phillips head panel screws suggest the designers wife ran off with a maintainer. The heads wear and get worse over time as panels are removed and installed. You can replace slightly worn panel screws before most heads strip but even the rich USAF doesn't have infinite bench stock on hand. Phillips were invented before affordable torque-limiting installation tools so they rely on the bit camming out of the head under load rather than damaging (other) parts. That was fine on the ground for consumer crap but to use them on a modern aircraft is fiercely stupid because that will slow and delay maintenance for as long as they're used. If you drill out even one screw per panel that's about a half hour minimum and more if you have to dispatch a tech from backshop (some air forces don't trust everyone to drill fasteners which isn't horrible but must be done correctly or you get more problems). Combat aircraft exist to produce as many mission-effective sorties as practical in environments where if your bird doesn't launch on time your ground troops relying on it may die. Every detail matters. What does lack of attention to detail by Russian (factory no less!) techs tell observers? Others point out later SU pics look better, but everything everyone noted reflects rushed, sloppy work on THIS one so if a high-viz jet gets no love what OTHER corners are cut? US techs make mistakes too and thanks to the internet we roast those online too because jet mechs should be held to high standards.
    1
  4293. 1
  4294. 1
  4295. 1
  4296. 1
  4297. 1
  4298. 1
  4299. 1
  4300. 1
  4301. 1
  4302. 1
  4303. 1
  4304. 1
  4305. 1
  4306. 1
  4307. 1
  4308. 1
  4309. 1
  4310. 1
  4311. 1
  4312. 1
  4313. 1
  4314. 1
  4315. 1
  4316. 1
  4317. 1
  4318. 1
  4319. 1
  4320. 1
  4321. 1
  4322. 1
  4323. 1
  4324. 1
  4325. 1
  4326. 1
  4327. 1
  4328. 1
  4329. 1
  4330. 1
  4331. 1
  4332. 1
  4333. 1
  4334. 1
  4335. 1
  4336. 1
  4337. 1
  4338. 1
  4339. The Left (the real Left, not soft centrists who the real Bolshevik types invariably crush then dominate) have always been fanatics since their Anarchist origins. Democracy is for managing affairs between friends with shared purpose. The proper way to deal with the real left is the way Nationalist Spain did during the Spanish Civil War but with much less empathy. The Left are implacable, incapable of empathy and little different from their Bolshevik forbears. Never forget the modern Left are psychological descendants of Lenin, Stalin, and other butchers. The American Left haven't yet got Stalinist power levels which is why every decent patriot is armed legally and prepared to escalate as required to dispose of the Left when the time comes. I do not confuse Leftists with humans and regard Rightist demagogues as an inevitable consquence of an impotent effete conservatism which failed because it sold out. Enemies should not share dirt and I do not consider Leftists either American or human, but savage vermin who will provoke their own destruction. Escalation is wonderful and the tree of Liberty needs lavish, generous watering. The American public must take what they can get and the utter collapse by popular consent of out primary education system no one wants to pay for means the masses are irreversibly ignorant by choice. The average American reads (therefore THINKS) at ~8th grade level so discourse must be at the level theses masses DEMAND. They do not care what anyone else thinks because US leadership classes have ALL betrayed the general public and Demublican or Repocrat are just 304ing for money.
    1
  4340. 1
  4341. 1
  4342. 1
  4343. 1
  4344. 1
  4345. 1
  4346. 1
  4347. 1
  4348. 1
  4349. 1
  4350. 1
  4351. 1
  4352. 1
  4353. 1
  4354. 1
  4355. 1
  4356. 1
  4357. 1
  4358. 1
  4359. 1
  4360. 1
  4361. 1
  4362. 1
  4363. 1
  4364. 1
  4365. 1
  4366. 1
  4367. 1
  4368. 1
  4369. 1
  4370. 1
  4371. 1
  4372. 1
  4373. 1
  4374. 1
  4375. 1
  4376. 1
  4377. 1
  4378. 1
  4379. 1
  4380. 1
  4381. 1
  4382. 1
  4383. 1
  4384. 1
  4385. 1
  4386. 1
  4387. 1
  4388. 1
  4389. 1
  4390. 1
  4391. 1
  4392. 1
  4393. 1
  4394. 1
  4395. 1
  4396. 1
  4397. 1
  4398. 1
  4399. 1
  4400. 1
  4401. 1
  4402. 1
  4403. 1
  4404. 1
  4405. 1
  4406. 1
  4407. 1
  4408. 1
  4409. 1
  4410. 1
  4411. 1
  4412. 1
  4413. 1
  4414. 1
  4415. 1
  4416. 1
  4417. 1
  4418. 1
  4419. 1
  4420. 1
  4421. 1
  4422. 1
  4423. 1
  4424. 1
  4425. 1
  4426. 1
  4427. 1
  4428. 1
  4429. 1
  4430. 1
  4431. 1
  4432. 1
  4433. 1
  4434. 1
  4435. 1
  4436. 1
  4437. 1
  4438. 1
  4439. 1
  4440. 1
  4441. 1
  4442. 1
  4443. 1
  4444. 1
  4445. 1
  4446. 1
  4447. 1
  4448. 1
  4449. 1
  4450. 1
  4451. 1
  4452. 1
  4453. 1
  4454. 1
  4455. 1
  4456. 1
  4457. 1
  4458. 1
  4459. 1
  4460. 1
  4461. 1
  4462. 1
  4463. 1
  4464. 1
  4465. 1
  4466. 1
  4467. The US failed to learn from past failures and will continue to fail because only the "exciting" technotactical stuff gets career-enhancing recognition. We're good at what we're good at but "choose to suck" at many tasks. Inaction is a choice. Military leadership failure is impressively common. Putting on a uniform doesn't work magic on the human inside. Document, document, document! Photograph burn pits if you see them on or off base as future evidence. A problem the naive public and much of the military don't quite understand is the military mind is so mission-focused it ignores everything else. This is normal not new. Buddy letters and all the rest of the documentation the Viet Nam vets had to come up with after that war are still a necessity. A heretical way to reduce waste is reduce the complexity and go full Spartan with no luxuries. Keeping it real all you need is clean water, MREs, field sanitation and shelter. Everything that is not mission-essential should be questioned. While Americans really like luxurious FOBs they forget how many logistics humans are maimed and killed bringing NON-ESSENTIAL items by road. I personally don't need a DFAC if my brother or sister dies trying to deliver consumables. The US desperately needs military reform but the military is (all complex systems inherently operate in degraded condition) too large and complex to fix even if the will existed which never has been the case. Nothing will change that matters so choose your service wisely. Your buddies may have your back. The system does not and never has.
    1
  4468. 1
  4469. 1
  4470. 1
  4471. 1
  4472. 1
  4473. 1
  4474. 1
  4475. 1
  4476. 1
  4477. 1
  4478. 1
  4479. 1
  4480. 1
  4481. 1
  4482. 1
  4483. 1
  4484. 1
  4485. 1
  4486. 1
  4487. 1
  4488. 1
  4489. 1
  4490. 1
  4491. 1
  4492. 1
  4493. 1
  4494. 1
  4495. 1
  4496. 1
  4497. 1
  4498. 1
  4499. 1
  4500. 1
  4501. 1
  4502. 1
  4503. 1
  4504. 1