Comments by "Crazy Eyes" (@CrizzyEyes) on "Andrew Tate Destroys Piers Morgan" video.

@jemmajames6719 I hope you understand you're acting like the most typical promiscuous person here; you assume that when someone doesn't want sex every day that they're a weirdo incel basement dweller and other them to make them feel better about yourself. It is not as "unusual" as you think and your lifestyle is not as normal as you think. There is more to life than sex.
6
@ezioauditore3128 Here's the thing though, it is a fact of life. Conservatives tend to talk pragmatically and progressives tend to talk in ideals; "what should be" vs. "what is." The reason a dowry exists is because the family giving away their daughter to be wed feels like they need to give a gift as compensation. That's the degree to which women are seen as property. In reality the relationship is more complicated than that, but both members of a marriage have some degree of "ownership" over the other. Otherwise there would be no commitment and no point in marriage. Promiscuous dudes are just as bad as promiscuous women if not worse. I've met quite a few, they tend to think all women are worthless and they never have relationships that last longer than a year, because whether they realize it or not they only tend to attract women with low self-esteem or other problems, then complain about how "all" women have those problems. Conservatives hold standards for men too, but when they're attacked they single out their standards for women to make them look misogynist. I don't know Tate's history; if he's a typical PUA type then he's a hypocrite. I've seen the "conservative PUA" type and they're all hypocrites. But it is a fact that marriage is an act of giving each other ownership over the other.
4
Margaret Sanger.
3
@benten1453 You're just arguing semantics because you think "own" is an icky word. For all intents and purposes parents do own their children to quite a massive degree. They have far fewer rights than an adult and mistakes that they make are usually given the benefit of the doubt and blamed on the parent. Much like you wouldn't blame a car for running someone over, you'd blame the driver. At certain age(s) depending on your country, parents lose ownership of their children by having less control over them.
2
@eddiewillers1 Indeed there is. HR practices it every day when they vet people for hiring.
1
@Bancomnin "Troll" is a bit simplified but he is a controversy monger without any real principles or ideological stake in any of the discussion he makes. He's a slimeball. He is a "troll" in that none of his political arguments are genuine.
1