General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Crazy Eyes
Nate The Lawyer
comments
Comments by "Crazy Eyes" (@CrizzyEyes) on "Nate The Lawyer" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
@jamesbizs Again, it's amazing how you people fail to grasp that he had no way of knowing he was the subject of their stop.
19
People like him and in the media believe that words have power almost like they're casting magic spells. It's pathetically superstitious but that mindset has granted them amazing control over the narrative.
19
@uploadvidz4490 He didn't know he was being pulled over and he was already at the destination. The reason he approached was literally so he could comply and see if he did anything wrong. I understand it is slightly unorthodox but there was no attempt from the cops to behave like a functional human being. They immediately assumed he was going to attack them.
18
@sufferedlearnedchanged What cues did he have to stay in his vehicle? Sure are a lotta clowns commenting that didn't watch the video.
12
This reminds me of the time that African nations were duped into rejecting GMO crops (that would grow much more easily in their climate) simply because they are GMO
8
@OriginalJoseyWales do you think people have a right to privacy? should I have to buy a home big enough for a home gym, then all of the equipment for said gym, because you believe that everyone must submit to being filmed?
7
She admitted she knew the car was on the tracks but didn't think it was a risk. That is the definition of recklessness: inability to comprehend risk
6
@carnivoreisvegan He knows American Sign Language. I'll leave it to you to understand the significance of that first word.
4
Racially segregated charity? Lol.
4
@kenonerboy A lot of things. I was bullied for most of my grade school career. Not to sound arrogant but I find that most people are a bit more fragile than I am.
3
Most people just don't have the mental energy or wherewithal to sue over incredibly banal issues like this. I am most likely one of them. In a sense, if you allow such a petty, ridiculous person to monopolize your time and resources, you give them power over you. That includes filing a lawsuit, paying a lawyer, etc. If it were the only gym the blind guy could go to, it would be different though.
3
@jonthecarguy It doesn't matter? He's only one clown in a city of clowns.
3
I'm worried about a situation like this but thankfully it hasn't really come up yet. I have poor vision, poor enough that I have decided driving is a terrible idea, but not so poor that you can immediately tell "he's blind" just by looking at me and how I act. My glasses lenses are quite thick, but not very noticeable from the front.
2
We should prosecute false accusers, however, you can be falsely thought to be a liar because the evidence is not good enough. It is a completely reasonable fear to have. Same reason you would be nervous around a cop even though you have done nothing wrong. There is no guarantee that the person questioning you is competent.
2
@fumeck1674 You didn't even understand the point of what I was posting, and indeed conveniently ignored where I explicitly stated that liars should still be prosecuted. I'll leave it as a fun brain teaser for you to re-read my posts and understand your mistake. Enjoy.
2
In my father's family she would be the most hated relative for that. He worked hard to move out of their ghetto neighborhood and earned nothing but spite for it
2
@qua7771 This isn't even a problem in 95% of gyms. Social media amplifies the minority through over-reporting. I go to a public gym multiple times a week, with fat-assed Instagram influencers that work out in it (I can tell just by the body type), and have never been approached by anyone for this.
2
@YoStYtOaStY100 You mean by randomly tipping them hundreds of dollars and telling them good job?
2
Protest votes and abstains are meaningless nonsense. Either campaign for a third candidate, and I mean really campaign because that's the only way there will be a chance is if everyone makes their name known, or pick an issue that's most important and vote based on that. The only reason one should not vote is if one acknowledges that they are an uninformed moron and their vote could possibly hurt the election. I voted for Trump because I wanted to avoid WW3 (Hillary was awfully fiery with the Russia rhetoric... and look where we are now that a Democrat is in office, coincidence? Unlikely) and Trump was a possible criminal, while Hillary was a proven traitor. But even that did not matter except in the capacity that Hillary was even more unlikely to deliver good policy. Etiquette, politeness, morals... these are all meaningless in politics. Vote for policy and the ability to execute said policy. There are no moral people in the race for president.
2
@499y60iogbuy She didn't dress him down thankfully just sheepishly explained what happened and then left as fast as possible because she knew she had fucked up severely.
2
That's why field sobriety tests are completely idiotic. There's such a host of reasons someone would fail those tests other than being drunk.
2
Well, he's believing the guys in prison, to be fair... I'm speaking from a US perspective, but statistically, most SA claims and reports are simply not acted upon due to lack of evidence. This is what feminists complained about in the late 2000s and early 2010s. That narrative shifted drastically, to instead believing whatever an accuser says at face value. However that type of "listen and believe" prosecution only occurs in extralegal "courts" like college campus arbitration. If someone is in jail for SA in the US, it is because there is generally overwhelming evidence against them.
1
@68camaro-b5s We do?
1
@amethonys2798 The problem is that there is a VERY narrow "grey area" for the accuser being "honestly wrong" in a SA claim. The victim is the one making the claim. They either got assaulted or they didn't and it's obvious that they should be aware of that. The only question is whether they might have been unconscious at the time and didn't know it happened, thus filing the claim later than one might expect, or they have trouble identifying the perp due to masks, lighting or other circumstances. I am a bit paranoid, but from my perspective, it's not difficult to see how a person might be afraid of being labeled a liar simply due to a lack of evidence, because there is very little room for someone making an honest mistake in such a claim.
1
It's an incredibly stupid argument when applied to any other crime. I don't quite understand where it comes from.
1
@kosmique Russia says hello. But yes, your point is correct.
1
@nickthompson1812 name a single politician other than Trump who has ever admitted guilt to anything, despite incriminating evidence. no seriously, I'll be impressed if you can give me a real answer. it's standard operating procedure. don't blame Trump for acting like a politician normally does
1
It's been people like Biden for many years now. I think the last outsider that was in office was Reagan.
1
The lack of action from the police over a consistent string of burglaries is the deciding factor in this case. They are responsible for the state of this man's mental health, and he did not lure or entrap the teens any more than simply making it seem as if he were not home. They are burglars, and they should have understood the risk of burglary.
1
Trump's distasteful behavior is out in the open where everyone can see it. Any other "respectable" politician (especially his opponents) do their distasteful business behind closed doors and pretend to be sophisticated. Their business (such as the Clintons making deals with African warlords) also tends to get far more people killed.
1
Keep dreaming and abstaining while our country swirls the toilet bowl.
1
@kurokumo8169 Assholes who want plausible deniability when the footage is reviewed talk like that. "He's comin' right for us!" Bang.
1
They've been safe in their coastal cities for years and years. Bussing migrants over is probably the most politically influential thing that Abbott and the other southern governors have ever done.
1
"Black national anthem" doesn't even make sense from the start. Black is an ethnicity and nationality is separate from that. What is a black nation? Which nation?
1
@JGD714 That money wouldn't really go towards him, it would go towards the lawyer.
1
@chimyshark Yeah, eating a turd with corn in it is still better than eating a turd. You're not making the point that you think you're making bud.
1
And the face of the protest... a Chicom spy. It's all so predictable.
1
You answered your own question. The Jewish left hate Israel. Why, I don't know, but they do. Probably the same reason why other leftist white Americans hate America.
1
@brettstarks1846 you have this option in the US too, but many people aren't savvy enough to use it. objectively speaking it's better even if you're drunk because the drive to the station gives you time to sober up. personally, i have a hard time following spoken instructions -- because the speaker is usually bad at speaking. i've always done great with written instructions
1
NIMBY on a national scale. It's infuriating. The electoral college is the only thing preventing a total blue takeover of the country.
1
Previous
1
Next
...
All