Comments by "Crazy Eyes" (@CrizzyEyes) on "Warhammer made everyone mad.." video.

  1. 28
  2.  @groundmasterc  Those of us who care about the worldbuilding understand what this means. The Emperor was either incapable of creating a gene-seed that would work on anyone but men (because it was crafted in his image) or unwilling, because he was afraid of what would happen if Space Marines could reproduce organically (the Horus Heresy would have had even more dire consequences). It would be one thing if they said someone like Bile or Cawl figured out how to implant women with the gene-seed and turn them into Marines or Custodes, but no. They went for the pants-on-head retarded route and said that there have always been female Custodes. This means that necessarily there should have also always been female Marines. This means that necessarily the Sisters of Battle shouldn't exist, because why have worse Marines when you could just have Marines? And so on, and so forth. The "no female marines" and its related topics are not just some minor detail in 40k. It is literally a cornerstone of the worldbuilding of the Imperium and the Emperor that would have insane butterfly effects if changed. It also undermines the satirical elements of the setting. All that stuff about the Ecclesiarchy and being outlawed from mustering "men" that bear arms, gone and undermined. It undermines the depth in general. When someone is told that Marines or Custodes are male-only, the natural instinct is to ask "why" and then a writer can provide an interesting reason. When there is nothing different about them, no one has any line of inquiry and therefore there is no reason to provide interesting reasons.
    14
  3. 4
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1