General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Crazy Eyes
A&E
comments
Comments by "Crazy Eyes" (@CrizzyEyes) on "A&E" channel.
"We're dropping this right now, and we're getting me out of this." "I am not releasing you." "I... uh... well, hmm." So much for his master plan
6900
"The best of..." and they feature a guy with a anxiety disorder being arrested because he had a joint in his car door. I might not have chosen that one if I were making this video.
103
"I'm not a fan of marijuana"
24
@omarm.x2129 Bro, that's an incredibly reasonable question to ask when the cops barge into your home without you letting them in
19
That broad was as dumb as rocks for not knowing what "probable cause" is.
13
Reminds me of GTA 5. "Help! He's black!"
8
Stray pits are a different beast altogether. My own family's dog almost was killed by a passing stray pit. Instead of picking up the family dog and dancing in circles, my dad threw the pit over the fence. I also know that if you grab a dogs back legs, they have no base to attack anything. If your dog gets attacked, wrestle the attacking dog down instead of thinking you can shield your dog and hope the aggression ends. Most dogs are not likely to attack people anyway even if they attack dogs.
7
@resinfarmer OK, sure pal. I'm sure you can trust all of that totally harmless weed coming from the cartels. Nothing bad is ever gonna happen, and I'm a loser for caring what sort of chemicals I put in my body.
7
That's not "public intoxication," even she was actually high. In the same vein, you could be arrested for being driven home by a sober friend while drunk because a cop happened to pull your friend over for a broken tail light and noticed you were drunk in the car. She was not walking around on the street, she was in the guy's car and wanted to leave. Maybe then it would be public intoxication once she was walking home. Still, you can only do so much with 2 cops.
6
Dudes like this prove that Boomhauers really exist out there in the world.
6
"So all of that evidence got to where you were at in the vehicle. Tell me how that got there." "Sir. .... Dude. Nah, bro." ... "OK, you're free to go."
5
There's a difference between selling weed, and selling weed as a random guy on the street. You have no sure way of knowing what's in the guy's product. It's like buying any drug or medication from a total stranger -- shouldn't be done.
4
@calumfoster-bayliss7122 She was just going to be let off with a ticket until she started running her mouth. They effectively arrested her for lying to police. She's the type who would blame an innocent passer-by for anything she did, so she deserves it. How would you like to be the "black guy with dreads" in this situation?
3
@triparadox.c There wasn't a point in my comment where I was talking about the driver.
3
@FartBiter He left to get milk and hasn't come back yet.
3
@cvn6555 Jeez, you really have reading issues don't you? Okay, let me frame it for you like this: The court procedures we have exist because it's a better alternative to mob justice. For a legal issue to be settled, it has to fall upon someone, or a group of people, to decide who is right, or whether someone is guilty or not. This necessarily means that the judge is superior to the other people in the courtroom. Their decision is the one that matters. If we don't follow that procedure, we have no court. Do you have a better idea for a court system?
3
Finds a slam fire shotgun, the most common improvised firearm in existence "It's pretty creative, actually" I hope he was just saying that for the camera.
2
@cvn6555 Not in the court they aren't. If you are summoned to a court of law then it's assumed you may have done something wrong and therefore must submit to court procedure in order to get to the bottom of the matter. By necessity this means you must respect the court and therefore the judge. The alternative is, I don't know, mob justice?
2
@cvn6555 They are quite literally superior to us in the courtroom. That is what I'm trying to tell you and what you seemed to ignore from my last post.
2
The spoon and patches were really suspicious, but I bet he just likes to collect knives and airsoft guns as a hobby. That, or he took away just the right amount of evidence to not get arrested.
2
@whatevernamegoeshere3644 He means your entire body does not become a circuit, only the part between the two electrodes. In other words he was agreeing with you. Contrary to popular belief, human bodies are not "good" conductors of electricity. That's why when we do get electrocuted, it is usually very painful or fatal. Electrocuting a person is analogous to clearing a blocked water pipe by forcing water through it at really high pressure instead of just clearing the blockage by moving it. In this case the person is the blockage. You are right to point out that if the other guy was correct and that the murderer grabbing an officer's hand would put that officer at risk, it would imply that tazing anyone at any point in their body would risk the electric shock passing through their heart and killing them instantly. The tazer only causes your muscles to spasm usually only in that local part of the body. Even still however there is a risk that your heart may stop depending on where the tazer is applied. Conversely there are some people who are very resistant to being tazed.
2
@dirtyyybastard She wouldn't have been able to effectively defend herself anyway, just throwing the gun haphazardly in her purse like that. Doubt she's been to the range more than once, if at all. It was more of a liability than anything. Having a gun and not taking responsibility for it is more dangerous than not having one, for reasons shown in this video and others besides.
1
He served his sentence. Felons can't own firearms after they've served their sentence.
1
Not sure if anyone mentioned this already but funny you should say that, because gas is used for most (non-CGI) theatrical effect explosions. The fireball that gas produces is much more visually spectacular than most real explosives that are designed for kinetic impact, but in actuality gas exploding doesn't have that much kinetic energy.
1
@LtColDerp1 No, slam fire is a type of action, namely the action of a cartridge firing as it is being loaded into a chamber, as opposed to a separate action. This is the only way that shotguns made from a pipe can fire. Some pump shotguns CAN slam fire, but it is a malfunction, not intended usage.
1