Comments by "Crazy Eyes" (@CrizzyEyes) on "Alex Jones \u0026 Kanye West Just Broke The Internet" video.

Well technically he's right, just expressed his opinions in a clownish way. If the Nazis didn't do anything good, the US and the Soviets wouldn't have competed to scoop up their scientists like spilled candy from a pinata right as the war ended. Animal cruelty laws were, ironically given how he treated people, introduced to German legislature for the first time under Hitler. And of course, Germany was suffering from crippling depression and a lack of industrialization before the conservative alliance which included Hitler as chancellor went into power. This doesn't mean that I think they were overall "good," mind you, or that the good things they did could not have been performed by other leaders, just that they have good qualities which are often contradictory or ironic given their other actions or stated goals. Furthermore, the point that we should stop "dissing on Nazis all the time" is a salient one. Again, not because they weren't bad, but for the same reason we don't constantly shit on Henry VIII's monarchy. Or Genghis Khan. Or Joseph Stalin. We're approaching the 100-year mark for the point at which this radical regime controlled Germany for just 12 or so years and we still talk about them as if they're a party running for office in every Western nation. On the other hand many other things he says are flat-out wrong and typical of a newly "red-pilled" buffoon who has not done his proper research. For example, Hitler was not Christian, Hess's writings and talks from his closest associates confirm that. His Christianity was a political play to win supporters, just like many politicians do today. Like most radical authoritarians, he was atheist and concerned only with his people worshipping the state. This is sadly a bad symptom of our modern anti-free speech culture where we aren't allowed to talk like this without first putting on a full body suit and going on an "alternative news source."
9
@andreaaldrich4046 Who the fuck defends Kim Kardashian?
3
@Allmybotsarewoke The Nazis came to power because Hitler really, really wanted it and the German people didn't have much of a choice. It was either vote for the puppet regime installed by the French and British after WW1 which resulted in the terrible situation they were in, or vote for the conservatives -- not the Nazis. Something most don't realize is that the Nazis were never explicitly on the German ballot in that fateful federal election. Hitler was going to be chancellor as part of a deal because the traditional conservative party needed to make an alliance to have any hope at success, but they would retain congress. What they, and the rest of the German people, didn't count on was Hitler murdering everybody who stood in his way and abusing emergency powers once he was instated. Even with Hitler's charisma and impressive speeches, the Nazis earned a minority of support, something like 30% at the absolute most. Before Hitler their members literally numbered in the dozens. It was always a niche party for pissed off war veterans. Then Hitler artificially inflated support by promising socialist reforms, and backstabbing all the socialists once he was in power. Communism was indeed bad, but the simple fact of the matter is that political street brawls only affected a minority of Germans living in large cities like Berlin. To any reasonable person, the choice between Nazism and Communism was between "really authoritarian guy" or "really authoritarian guy with different uniform." Nazism and Communism simply aren't that different from one another. Mussolini, the guy Hitler was inspired by, was himself a former Marxist. The point of all this is, even with our media being bought out by interest groups, the Nazi regime was lightning in a bottle. It's not going to happen again and if we arrive at a similar situation here in the US (pray that we don't, and no we aren't even close yet) the reactionary movement will look quite different. The mere fact that Antifa and related "protests" are typically made up of paid goons instead of genuine activists proves that we aren't close to that level of internal strife. It's almost entirely an artificial movement. Hitler defined the Nazi party more than anything with his blatant illegal power grabs and you would have to see a very similar leader for a similar party to take hold. As much as the media likes to compare, Trump never murdered anyone. The worst they could come up with is "he peed on some hookers that one time" which isn't even true. You'd need a madman who is somehow able to game the system and fool everyone while secretly wanting to murder everyone in Congress. It's virtually impossible in the age of the internet and there is no large contingent of pissed off veterans from a losing war to draw from.
1
@Allmybotsarewoke It certainly isn't headed in a good direction. My question is, will there be a catastrophic event to shock society out of the moral stupor it is in? Or will a world government form first? Because that is certainly the direction that organizations like the EU, UN and WEF would seem to have us head towards. There is certainly a reason why the same news stories with the same bias get published in the same nations at the same time. Or why certain stories DON'T get published after a certain time, like those involving Hong Kong.
1
@Heathmcdonald The term skinhead comes from Britain and it did indeed have to do with their hair cut. It was working-class youths who used Nazi imagery to shock the public at the time, in the 1960s and 70s. The British public was always especially susceptible to it. They were not usually unironically neo-Nazis, just punks.
1