Comments by "Crazy Eyes" (@CrizzyEyes) on "Clarence Thomas Demands Example Of SCOTUS Saying The 1st Amendment 'Protects The Right To Censor'" video.

@havable I always wonder how people like you take yourselves seriously when you propose that greed and ambition never existed before "capitalism."
9
@MatthewSmith-o4o Your analogy is flawed. It is more like if you regularly went to a church of a specific denomination, but over time, they decided that talking about specific passages in your religious text was not allowed. Eventually, the church is completely different, co-opted by its own leadership and shaped by what is not allowed to be spoken about. Additionally, the church grew so powerful on the support of its old followers, that it now stomps out any other churches that try to spring up in town using underhanded tactics. Technically legal? Sure, I suppose, if you ignore the underhanded tactics. This is where a problem arises that must be solved through arbitration or legislation.
2
@paulthebohemian Other than illegal activity, that's an absurd argument because virtually every publisher is never held liable for misinformation. I'd be very interested to hear about the last time the AP was held liable for omitting that a murderer was an illegal migrant, for example. The censorship policy is driven by ideology and an ulterior motive to change election outcomes.
1