Comments by "Crazy Eyes" (@CrizzyEyes) on "CNN" channel.

Yeah that "I was just following orders" excuse doesn't work here. They didn't need to manhandle her in the way they did or talk to her as if she is a criminal intentionally barring their investigation, especially when her own supervisor told her to deny them the sample. Not to mention you should always second guess your superiors, this isn't a war zone and people are always fallible
37
Well she expected them to be civil and not immediately manhandle a nurse I guess. What an outlandish set of expectations that turned out to be.
19
@lordvoldemort1561 Women, on average, have 50% the upper body strength of an average man. When physical effort and violence are involved, sex (not gender) is absolutely important. It would be like a video of a cop tazing a man sitting down on the sidewalk complying to his orders. You expect a lower level of violence from the cop because the person he is dealing with is not as threatening to him.
16
Police departments are perpetually shortstaffed. If you want to help, then join a police academy and fix the problem by commanding them yourself
12
@OrdellRob Well, okay, I guess we can keep being smarmy on the internet while bitching about it then. Here's the deal: When cops get fired, worse cops get hired. Take a look at places like rural Alaska where they hire convicted criminals to be constables on a regular basis. There are a shortage of good cops because few people with morals want to be cops. The only way to solve that problem is by providing more people with morals.
12
@AbyssalMelody That's a catch-22. Cops are seen as deplorable by many because of bad cops. To get rid of bad cops, we need more good cops. To need more good cops, we need to increase faith in the system. To increase faith in the system, we need to get rid of bad cops.
9
 @kelleysnider9536 Yeah it's definitely not the government offering shit pay and archaic working conditions for software engineers
5
This guy: Yeah there's definitely no reason for service members to be able to carry their service rifle at all times! Fort Hood victims: pal are you serious
3
@Sycopathy I like the idea of tipping because it would ostensibly be non-taxable income. But sadly that isn't the case anymore. What you're talking about isn't even the half of it when it comes to delivery drivers. Pizza delivery drivers have to use their own car. Easily a quarter of your pay goes straight into your car for wear and tear. I have never asked for change from a delivery driver, although I also haven't paid in cash in ages. I didn't even think they carried change. The idea that I would ask the driver to drive back and forth just because I accidentally gave them a tip is absurd, not to mention a $7 tip is basically the exact average tip proportion for that order so there's no way a reasonable driver would expect to give change back.
3
@trekinseattle Ideas like this only work in comic books. The real world is not so forgiving. If bad cops are a persistent problem, that means there are other staff covering for them or supporting their actions. That means the "good cop" in your scenario would be in the minority, ignored and demoted or fired, or in the worst case get himself shot and his death covered up as an unfortunate incident in the line of duty.
3
 @G-howie I mean, one of them is directly distributed by China and the other one isn't
2
wait, so they were free to continue developing their properties until they decided to sue this unassuming old woman, then idiotically stumbled into a town ordnance that prevented them from developing due to their own lawsuit? poetic
2
Meanwhile in Britain parliament sessions are won by virtue of who can yell the loudest. Yeah other nations aren't better.
2
@slaphappybullet Only the super modern EVs and certain other vehicles could be shut down directly by remote hacking. Everything is not interconnected on the same grid exactly and every vendor has different standards for security. What becomes a problem is when a vendor with a huge amount of market share or infrastructure control has a security hole.
2
@ldchappell1 The people are being provided, not the morals.
2
@jonathanlogan7621 Your argument is also nonsensical, as unless you are a cop your job doesn't require you to "be a thug." The difference between being a thug and being a good cop is always a snap judgment away on every single day of their jobs. There is never a point where you would consider manhandling someone to be a legitimate part of your job if you were a cashier for example. I also have no idea which of my replies you are responding to because YT's comment system is awful.
2
@dwpwdlgovasitsb4id13orlife2 You're a funny guy. First you shit on me for not writing an essay in my initial post, then you shit on another guy for writing an essay in response. "If I had used this much energy in my initial comment?" What does that even mean? I'm supposed to predict that someone like you would misinterpret my comment and write a perfect explanation that perfectly communicates my ideas to you ahead of time? How absurd. Sounds like you need to use more energy in your own comments... and less condescending emojis.
2
Dunno about anesthetics but I've had a similar experience taking mushrooms. Woke up after a nap, forgot who I was for about 30 minutes and laid in bed happy to be alive.
2
JazzKeyboardist1 "Amazon.com" is a website and "Amazon" is that website's company owner. Neither are misspelled or nonexistent. "Emanciptation" is a bad misspelling because it isn't just using the wrong letters to create a word pronounced the same way (i.e. rize versus rise), it's pronounced completely differently and creates a word that doesn't exist. The key here is giving an answer that verbally resembles the correct answer.
1
JazzKeyboardist1 I mean, I am just stating the rules as they are in the show. If an answer is misspelled, it's only wrong if it's spelled such that it's mispronounced. Mispronunciations are also wrong; i.e., the man who said "Wimbleton" instead of "Wimbledon" had his answer retracted after the fact.
1
shane pennington Your guess is as good as mine.
1
@eat_ze_bugs That is actually not true. China cannot feed its population without importing food. Most people forget we are an agricultural powerhouse. They import tons of soy and pork from us.
1
Shooting ranges exist in places other than America.
1
I don't think he was internal exactly. This was a commander of a mercenary company contracted by Putin.
1
 @bengarciamusic4life Ah yes, we could vote for sleepy Godless childsniffer, or Godless stereotypical New York braggart. Lots of Jesus to be had in this election.
1
Uhh... fighting ISIS, guys. You know, ISIS? Those guys? The ones we supplied to fight Russia? Yeah thanks to the CIA we'll never stop making that dumb fucking mistake. Been going on since the 80's at least... you'd think we'd learn...
1
@vanessamcgrew4486 It's a catch-22, do you pay attention at all? The reason 9/11 happened to begin with is because we've been sticking our fingers in the Middle Eastern pie. Specifically, because we prop up the laughable Saudi royal family in exchange for favorable oil prices.
1
Thank goodness Chinese Bruce Willis was here to give us the scoop
1
@abrakkehakka1357 It's a catch 22 buddy, if the US pulled out of the Middle East entirely then there would be no hateful sentiment towards the US over there. What you really think a bunch of rural goat herders and opium farmers just woke up one day and said "You know what, fuck Americans?" Of course everyone conveniently ignores that we also crawl up the Saudi family's ass too. That's a huge part of the problem and a major reason why so many people hate us over there. We will never pull out because we have too many economic interests that only benefit specific very wealthy people.
1
To be fair, he learned it from Hitler. His playbook is 100% the exact same. Claim there is an oppressed minority that shares ethnicity with the citizens of his nation in a foreign nation, then invade to "liberate" them. He's done it at least 3 or 4 times at this point.
1
@macdonaldmaurice Whatever flavor of circus suits you.
1
@Jeff-zf6uy That will not work. Laws move slowly and technology moves fast. What standard will that be? You would have to use a relative standard, such as "the best security in the world," rather than an objective standard, like "512-bit encryption." Or you would need an audit/penetration testing. But who will do the testing? Government employees? That would likely be a joke.
1
@dwpwdlgovasitsb4id13orlife2 You're intentionally misreading my comment because you have a fetish for moral crusading. I never excused anyone's actions, I merely pointed out that firing the cop isn't going to solve the problem in the long term. We've been doing that for a while now and it hasn't solved the problem yet. In the long term, the problem can only be solved by having a better pool of candidates to hire from in the first place. Furthermore, bad cops cannot be reprimanded or fired if the problem is systemic in nature. There are two approaches to solving this: The top-down (Fire all the heads of staff) or the bottom-up (fire the bad beat cops and/or only hire rookies of strong moral character). The top-down approach does not last in the long term because cops of lower station naturally get promoted to management positions. This means the only real solution is to have a better pool of rookies.
1
@trekinseattle You first buddy.
1
@boobyhill6921 Yeah sure, I'm definitely a cop even though I'm too blind to drive. Better get off the internet or I'll have you arrested bucko, my handcuffs go through the screen.
1