Comments by "Two-Row Euro" (@fun_ghoul) on "" video.

  1. "Fucking up" is not how I characterize a grown-ass woman who spent half a weekend fuming, only to go to her safe space in the Vermont woods to assail Black people for wanting/planning for/expecting the same courtesy. IOW, I'd say a fuck-up is something that something done in the heat of the moment, not premeditated or calculated as was Claudia's ad hominem "racist!" cries against Black organizers. She actually had lunch with several of them, and didn't say one fucking word about her self-proclaimed "victimization". Did it slip her mind? She did seem to remember to trash Jacqueline Luqman to them, though (didn't work). Occam's Razor would seem to indicate that backstabber Frau Stauber kept quiet because she knew she'd be in for some harsh instant lessons about white fragility if she piped up. Instead, she opted to air her grievances publicly to her virtually all-white audience. And she's sticking to that, no apology or concessions of any kind. Same for Debbie "Sane" Lusignan, who is making copyvio threats to Anoa over an honest misunderstanding (or worse, over a video she yanked then reposted on F***book?), but not retracting or apologizing for the content of said video, where she tars Anoa Changa, Jacqueline and others with the "identity politics" slur because her bestie wasn't allowed to livestream. The whole issue here is intellectual honesty. In that vein, I think we have to be intellectually honest enough to address Claudia's betrayal of trust, which is the crux of the issue. For the same reason, we also can't ignore the day and a half that passed between Stauber's "victimhood" and her "racism!" video. I also don't like that your video kinda mirrors KKKlaudia's latest video, which has a "let's move on" tone...but no apology, no regret, no acknowledgement of wrongdoing or even of her oppressors' (ha!) humanity, in the way you are at least ascribing it to both camps. Anoa didn't misunderstand anything, and dismissing it as such is wrong. As with the Maher video, we're not gonna agree on this. Still love ya though, buddy. In militancy, Uncle Joe ✊☭
    5
  2. 4
  3. 4
  4. Jamarl is trying to be fair to all involved on principle, which is admirable, but you're 100% right that the 2 positions/camps/sides of this are not remotely equivalent. Even Jamarl seems to concede this when he says (I'm paraphrasing) that safe spaces for Black people are not only perfectly fine, but that being offended by them is fucked up. I, and perhaps you, go a step further in saying that their offence is not merely fucked up, but racist as fuck, and actually foments hatred and, potentially, violence! I don't know Jamarl's life besides what he lets us see, so I don't want to presume to know what's in his head. That said, I think he either doesn't have a full grasp of the pervasiveness of institutional racism, or has decided that it's not as important as "real" issues like Stauber and Lusignan apparently have. I choose to believe the former, until proven otherwise. In any case, I didn't mean to imply he's intellectually dishonest in my other comment per se, but that perhaps his line of thinking led him away from the most salient point, which is Claudia's intellectual dishonesty in claiming "RACISM!" when she didn't get her way. And Debbie? That copyvio threat at Anoa, without any acknowledgement of what happened at the conference, sealed her fate for me. She can eat the shit that her new Nazi followers will surely feed her. Thanks for your reply, Anastasia. I enjoyed it, as well as a few of your other comments I saw elsewhere (maybe Anoa's videos?). I'm still subbed to Jamarl, but if this is a bridge too far, I hope to see you around. Solidarity, comrade. ✊☭
    3
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1