Comments by "Two-Row Euro" (@fun_ghoul) on "" video.

  1. You are missing the point, perhaps intentionally: Talkong about this shit normalizes it, thus opening the door to, for example, the possibility of a false flag attack by Amerikkka on itself or an ally. When the major non-NATO nuke countries -- Russia and China -- deny it, will they have any remaining credibility with a brainwashed "Western" population? If not, then what? I would assume this would be pretext for a "counter"-strike, all of which we would only hear about after the fact, as this shit would all happen in well under a half hour. EDIT: We (workers) might not "hear" anything, ofc, with state propaganda at fever pitch as in the wake of 9/11.
    2
  2. Good comment, but WRT your username, it's nonsense. You can't "denazify" capitalism using capitalism. Also, if Nazis are bad, why did RF wait EIGHT FUCKING YEARS to engage their (actual, non-mercenary) armed forces? Nah. This is an inter-imperialist war. Putin's capitalist masters demand continued access to Ukrainian markets, and if he wants to stay president, he will necessarily do as they demand. This is no different for Amerikkka/NATO, except that Ukraine is even more important for RF than Unkkkle Sam, so they will fight harder to keep it subjugated...
    1
  3. They don't explicitly say "Russia" because it's more powerful as propaganda if people "figure that out" for themselves.
    1
  4. Oh, and ideology is based on material factors. Jesus Christ.
    1
  5. Does a bear shit in the woods?
    1
  6. Another commenter said RF is telegraphing not a direct hit on land, but a sea-level blast to cause a tsunami. New York City is ~2.4m above sea level, so...yeah. Get a life vest!
    1
  7. (TBC, I'm not suggesting RF is imminently planning an attack. Au contraire, I think a US false flag nuke on home soil or that of allies is far more likely.)
    1
  8.  @AmelieZh  Perhaps themselves/Canada/Europe...
    1
  9. "The big one"...isn't that usually an earthquake? Also, as opposed to just a wee little nuclear attack?
    1
  10.  @elusive6119  Another commenter seems to think RF is eluding not to a direct hit on a city, but a sea-level detonation to cause a tsunami, which would wipe out tens of millions of people on Amerikkka's Eastern Seaboard. I think it's a definite possibility, at a minimum.
    1
  11.  @elusive6119  I didn't say RF's goal would be to destroy civilian populations, but all those people are there because that's America's industrial core. Military bases, nuclear power plants, light and heavy industry, and arguably, the world's financial centre. IOW, you can't take out one and not the other. To be clear, I'm not saying RF would necessarily strike first at all. OTOH, as long as capitalism controls the nukes of both adversaries, nothing can be definitively ruled out!
    1
  12.  @elusive6119  Oh, and nuclear power plants are great...until you have to store the spent fuel. Also, nice of you to not account for inputs. Is RF mining for uranium with corded electric machines? I have my doubts...
    1
  13.  @elusive6119  One more: Methylmercury is bad, and hydro dams release tons of it into the environment. Churchill Falls is a well-studied example...
    1
  14.  @elusive6119  P.S. I live in so-called Canada; I dunno what CANDUs are using for fuel these days, but given they can use natural uranium like the stuff in Northern Saskatchewan, I doubt they're importing anything from Russia. The Yanks buy from Russia because their reactors require enriched fuel, and capitalism demands the cheapest source...that's Russia! It's like the McDonald's for plutonium.
    1
  15.  @elusive6119  Russia does factually need a war to retain (regain, actually) control over UA economy. That's why they're there.
    1
  16.  @elusive6119  This reasoning for the Russian invasion is thoroughly debunked* in the recent Prolekult film entitled "For Peace" (41 minutes). You seem like you care about the truth; I implore you to watch it, and then tell me if your opinion is unchanged. I would value your opinion either way, inasmuch as you're a smart cookie with vast knowledge of Russia, and I'd love to hear (read?) your opinion on James' analysis... *at least, I was buying it!
    1
  17.  @elusive6119  Nationalist jingoism and boosting "crypto"? Shit...maybe your comments were less insight and more incite. Socialism in one country must begin with SOCIALISM, bud. I dare you to say RF is socialist. Then, if not, who cares if control over industry is centralized in government? It's the capitalists' government!
    1
  18. In short, NYPD AND PBA know who butters their bread.
    1