Comments by "Cactus" (@laetrille) on "USAF is fly testing next gen fighter tech! The race for the 6th gen is heating up." video.

@Rio..o7.. And the Axis took their inspiration from the real father of modern rocketry American Robert Goddard even Werner Von Braun admitted this.
31
@belialclaytix4190 Yeah pretty much, but you have to have respect for your elder.
24
Tom Musial No, the analysis made by Mick West and others who have shown that there is nothing out of the ordinary. And to cement my position, the release documents clearly state one of them was probably a ballon.
5
@manofsan you man Fravor? His credibility was shattered after he admitted that he was already into UFO before his "encounter", he is hardly the most reliable person.
5
Fake
4
steve jones Theory? A theory has to have a great body of evidence behind it, I don't have a theory, Mick West does. Witness accounts ARE SCIENTIFICALLY INSIGNIFICANT. Your argument is a fallacy, an appeal to authority to be exact because you use this "witness testimony" i.e. Cmdr. Fravor to make your belief unfalseafiable, no matter how much analysis, mathematics, and alternative explanations are brought up, you can always just say, "well cmdr. Fravor super experienced pilot cannot possibly be wrong". And that's where everyone that brings up this argument is demonsterably incorrect. Cmdr. Fravor is still a human being and susceptible to overexagerarion, now we now know that Fravor was at the very least interested or humored the UFO phenomenon BEFORE his UFO encounter, he admitted to using his F-18 Hornet to try and create UFO sightings, so is he the most reliable witness? Id say no since he seems to be trying to milk his sudden fame by going onto every show and podcast he can.
3
steve jones I am talking about the videos, particularly the go-fast one. In that video there are no solid movements. Mick West figured out the size and potential speed using mathematics. You cannot get more precise than that.
2
Tom Musial So you dislike science? Science is never definitive, your can only improve on, add on, or introduce a new hypothesis until you have enough evidence for a theory. Which is what Mick west is doing. What are you basing your belief on? What makes you so sure that those three videos show something extraordinary or alien?
2
@WanderAbroad Cut the BS semantics and go straight to the point, let's see where you think your lie and where you really lie. Do you think go fast, gimbal, and tic tac, are examples of extraterestial craft?
2
@Sean2002FU A patent does not equal a working system, you don't even have to have a prototype to get a patent. There are literally patents for time travel and teleportation. Sorry but nothing that said proves anything.
2
@nguxurr9667 Your response is cringy af, how old are You? If you are in grade school or if english is not your primary language I'll give you a pass. Otherwise I'll rip into you for responding with such a dumb response.
2
@WanderAbroad hiding are we
1
Tom Musial Come out
1
@ogc9649 for the hundredth time, the Pentagon DID NOT say that the objects were extraterrestrial. Read the release documents ffs.
1
@ChrisSmith-ig9jq That's all they are claims, you need extraordinary evidence if you are going to make extraordinary claims. I don't get the fuss over these 3 videos, they are nothing special, in fact I can think of 3 other videos that are way more compelling.
1