Comments by "Cactus" (@laetrille) on "Saudi Arabia Says Iran Responsible for Attack on Oil Facilities" video.

  1. 2
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7.  @tomservo5007  "If you go by histroy" >>>correlation is not causation, you cant look at history and use it as evidence for events in the present. Please cite some examples "Oil will stabilize after saudis have made their profits" >>>Ummm the damage caused by the attack will cost millions to repair. Also where are you getting these assumptions? Price per barrel is not that much higher than prices before the attack, any rise in price would bring negligible profits. In fact the attack brings negative consequences for SA i.e. buyers faith in SA ability to keep oil flowing. "Why do you want war with Iran" >>> that's a straw man argument I never said I wanted a war with Iran. The only thing I am interested in is the facts, the way you are looking at the situation it's the same way conspiracy theorist goes about it. I'm not saying you are one but you are heading down that road. Use the scientific method ask these questions first specifically about the evidence that Saudi Arabia showed. 1. What type of missile are they showing us? What type of cruise missile is it what countries operate it. 2. Are the drones homemade or are they made by a state actor. 3. Are any of the serial numbers or information on the missiles available to see. 4. Where did the attack come in from? Was it from the direction of yemeni territory? 5. Does Iran have that model of cruise missile in their Arsenal? These are just a sample of questions, you have to go about it logically and rationally you can go by what ifs or your feelings
    1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1