Comments by "Cactus" (@laetrille) on "Fox News" channel.

  1. Tesslynn Amburgey Have you already forgotten the teachings our oir founding fathers? Benjamin Franklin once said: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Where do we draw the line?
    1
  2. ***** You have not addressed my points, until you do I will ignore all your points
    1
  3. The Conservative Right once were the defenders of America from Russian agression and interference. In fact we fought so hard that we brought down the USSR with guidance from Regan. Its so dishearthing and disgusting seening my once co-patriots on the Conservative Right be so eager to suck the Kremlins leadership's cock. It saddens me that I have to leave and join the liberals, yes the fucking liberals in order to defend my country agaisnt an invader who is foreign. I vow to protect The United States of America from all threats. Shame on you all.
    1
  4. Why do you support trump??
    1
  5. ***** Yes, as a intellectually centered person, I cannot quantify this.
    1
  6. Liberals thats that shit i dont like bang bang I am not a liberal, lets debate this, or are you scared?
    1
  7. You guys want to know something funny?? Trump supporters have a lower IQ than your average person. Most don't have any college education, yeah leave it to the stupid to expose themselves.
    1
  8. Bethany nelson Just what one would expect from a remedial Trump follower. #thetruthhurts
    1
  9. The Conservative Right once were the defenders of America from Russian agression and interference. In fact we fought so hard that we brought down the USSR with guidance from Regan. Its so dishearthing and disgusting seening my once co-patriots on the Conservative Right be so eager to suck the Kremlins leadership's cock. It saddens me that I have to leave and join the liberals, yes the fucking liberals in order to defend my country agaisnt an invader who is foreign. I vow to protect The United States of America from all threats. Shame on you all.
    1
  10. Dennis King You only display your ignorace ny not rebutting my argument, sonplease countinue to be ignorant.
    1
  11. ***** Where is your source? Also, why is trump being so petulant over such a non-issue? Come on man "Alternative Facts"?? Really? Arw you willing to defend this kind of stupidity?
    1
  12. Ha Re I am not saying trump is doing nothing, I am horrified that you people are following and diffending and making excuses for him at every turn no matter what he does. Will you still defend him for placing our brave troops in danger just so he can make some ignorant and irresponsible comments about looting another countries oil? I am willing to bet you wont reply because you are a coward
    1
  13. ***** Listen up coward and listen good, your child of a president has placed our brave men in needless danger because of his irresponsible comments about looting oil. Our enemies will use this a MAJOR propaganda victory which will help in recruiting terrorists and creating even more anti-American sentiment. I dont know if you realize this, but there are American troops in Iraq, who are now in even more danger because of Trump. Oh and a member of seal team six is now dead because Trump decided to try and be a cowbow and send in American comandos into Yemen to attack an Al-Qaeda camp/headquarters, instead of launching an airstrike. Go on, go ahead and defend him you cowardx spinless sheep.
    1
  14. ***** Ah yes, ignore my comment and try to dance around my points. You countinue to make excuses for Trump despite the fact that his irresponsible comments has placed our Brave Troops in needles danger. The draft dodging coward is now placing our troops in needless peril.
    1
  15. ***** So your excuse for Trump is to use the Russian propaganda tactic of whataboutism? Exactly what I expected from a staunch trumper, I higly doubt that you are a Marine because a real Marine would never support anyone who would needlessly place his brothers in harm. Had Obama said the same, you would be on him like flies on shit, for your hypocracy knows no bounds. "Every president has put soldiers in harms way" >no shit moron, if there is a war to be fought, out troops will be in harms way, but adding to the danger just to make irresponsible comments that our enemies would use as propaganda, inflame anti-American rhetoric, and even possibly used as an excuse to attack our troops. You went after Obama over for the Yemen missle attack, so are you prepared to stop being a biased tool for Trump and at least say he was wrong for making those ?
    1
  16. ***** Wtf are you talking about?? Stop running around and evading the debate topic at hand. The fact remains that ignorant staunch trumpers countinue to make excuses for Trump like blind sheep. Even when he is placing our troops in unessesary danger just so he can make irresponsible comments. This is not the campaign any more if you have not noticed, being the leader of the most powerful country on Earth entails being careful with your words. Because of Trumps comments, terrorists will use his "looting" oil comments as propaganda and say, "see potential terrorists, America is here to steal and pilage, lets go kill them". Also, American troops are in Iraq working with Iraqis, how the fuck do you think they will respond to a foreign leader saying he would have looted the oil? You really think they will look upon our troos too kindly? So stop being an ignorant ass and call trump out for his bullshit.
    1
  17. ***** I know reading too much is hard for the uneducated, but fear not, community colleges are cheapin and provide the same material as state and private universities, its never too late man. After you take care of that reading deficiency, I HIGHL recommend you read this book, "Why people belive wierd wierd things" -by Michael Shermer. God Bless our tropps.
    1
  18. really you are realizing this now? come on.
    1
  19.  CLureCo  exactly
    1
  20.  @fred2903  you are the moron
    1
  21. Francisco Herrera russia is shit
    1
  22. Francisco Herrera Yes I do, USA, EU+UK, and China are the big dogs not weak and pathetic rASSia
    1
  23. Francisco Herrera No
    1
  24. Fire tucker carlson!!!
    1
  25. Rot in hell old fuck, i will piss on his grave
    1
  26. koma lati Moment of silence for the conspuracy nuts, as their 9/11 conspiracy has been shattered by Plasco building and now collapse in brazil due to fire and falling in their own footprint. please spread this comment in support of conspiracists, they need emotinal support now
    1
  27. Keep crying
    1
  28.  @davidwatts2963  Notice how conspiracy minded the right is now, glad I left that circus.
    1
  29. Patrick Lilley Comment was meant for the conspiracy idiots, but you are enabling these cunts by not calling them out. You people make me ashamed to be a conservative, its no wonder libtards are gaining ground.
    1
  30. Patrick Lilley What do you mean by "documentes fact"?
    1
  31. Patrick Lilley So people are 1 dimentioanl beings incapable of having opposing views?? So are you saying the left vs right issue is an artificially created? >>> Created civil wars? So how exactly did the CIA motivate thousands upon thousands of people to fight each other in these "civil wars"? Did cia agents go an wisper into the ears of X coutries citizens? Does this leap in conspiracy not force you to deem the peoples of X country as morons who cannot tell when they are being subverted? Yeah tell them that to their face.
    1
  32. Patrick Lilley 9/11 was an outside job in my opinion
    1
  33. As a conservative I am disguisted seeing so many pro-pootin comments. its a shame
    1
  34.  Darmok  stfu
    1
  35. I'm not a fan of Tucker Carlson but I liked this video.
    1
  36. Mr4thetruth Nope, this shatters your decade long conspiracy, your emotional reaction is expected
    1
  37. Snollygoster Demagogues No missiles were intercepted, this is easy to debunk. The missiles used by Syria are blast-fragmentation that radiate out in a 360° r^3 pattern, thats how they attempt to take down a target so large intact pieces should be in the ground just like we saw in Serbia after one Tomahawk was shot down. Yet after 71 supposed missiles no images or videos of a single missile? Yeah sorry but your propaganda is debunked.
    1
  38. Snollygoster Demagogues Do you have the balls to enter a debate with me about the issue or will you just ignore me and hide in your troll cave?
    1
  39. Snollygoster Demagogues Oh looks like everyone will see you are too much of a coward to respond, hide little troll hide :)
    1
  40. Snollygoster Demagogues Why are you keremlin stooges always so afraid to discuss the issue?
    1
  41. Snollygoster Demagogues 1. No missiles were intercepted. 2. Where exactly do you see a missile being intercepted? Interceptor missiles will self-destruct after a certain distance has been traveld if nothing has been hit to prevent it from falling into a population center. 3. Only FLIR or Foward Looking Infared can visually see an interception occur. 3. Only 3-5 videos of supposed interceptions exist, dafaq? if 71 were "shot down" at least 142 interceptors should have been launched, but only these few videos? 4. Interceptors Syria has are blast fragmentation, meaning they spread shrapnel in a 360° r^3, the shrapnel is how it attempts to get a hit. So the missiles would most likely be intact or large sections should be scattered, 71 is alot of missile, but no images? Ok now refute my points and ill do the same to yours. Come on dont be scared
    1
  42. Snollygoster Demagogues Oh wow please do cut the rhetoric, rhetoric and fallacies are for those who cannot stand on facts, logic, critical thinking, and most importantly EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE! So please feel free to run away like a coward, a scared little coward, to cowardly to even debate this "uneducated American" surely you can make me look like a fool right? So please do not reply, it will be in my interest and will show precisely what we in military enthusiast circles have concluded, you idiots don't have a leg to stand on :)
    1
  43. Snollygoster Demagogues Blah blah blah rhetoric rhetoric rhetoric and fallacies and fallacies and Ad Hominem and Ad Hoc and non-squiers. Come on troll, don't be scared, remember, you damn well know my points are more than valid, so when I screenshot everything, you will look like an impotent tool, and when people read out exchange they will see how you flee like a spineless coward :)
    1
  44. Snollygoster Demagogues Fallacy I can attribute to you "I can write long rhetorical comments on YouTube therefore any points brought up that challenge my narrative are invalid" Thank you Aristotle :) Thank you Occams Razor.
    1
  45. Snollygoster Demagogues Tick tock tick tock waiting for a rebuttal to my points.......................................................................................................... any day now.......................................mmmmmmmmmm no missiles were shot down.......... you lose :) DeepBlue 12 Paid troll 0 12-Number of paid Kremlin trolls I have made run like little cowards to their caves.
    1
  46. Snollygoster Demagogues Blah blah blah... more rhetorical nonsense, I'm not one of the idiots that follows FOX news troll. I only deal in facts and EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE. I wipe my ass with bullshit rhetorical nonsense that hold no weight in intellectual debate or debate in general. So please your little tirades do little in making me divert from my points into emotionally charged rabble. So again, ready to refute my points? Or will you just keep up this dodging? Or run back to your troll cave? Your choice, running means I win by default.
    1
  47. Snollygoster Demagogues Again, 1. No missiles were intercepted. 2. Where exactly do you see a missile being intercepted? Interceptor missiles will self-destruct after a certain distance has been traveld if nothing has been hit to prevent it from falling into a population center. None of the videos show interceptions. 3. Only FLIR or Foward Looking Infared can visually see an interception occur. 3. Only 3-5 videos of supposed interceptions exist, dafaq? if 71 were "shot down" at least 142 interceptors should have been launched, but only these few videos? 4. Interceptors Syria has are blast fragmentation, meaning they spread shrapnel in a 360° r^3, the shrapnel is how it attempts to get a hit. So the missiles would most likely be intact or large sections should be scattered, 71 is alot of missile, but no images? 5. The same ruMoD that shows the world a clip of a video game claiming it to be "evidence" of US helping isis rats are the same that claim 71 were shot down. Really? 6. There is precedent to know how a Tomahawk looks like when intercepted, one was downed in Serbia, would you like to see it? Ok now refute my points and ill do the same to yours. Come on dont be scared
    1
  48. Snollygoster Demagogues Oh wow look more bullshit rhetorical paper to wipe my ass with! Again the copy and paste troll strikes again with weak ass rhetorical crap in a desperate attempt to avoid defending its initial comment. Looks like you don't even have the balls to defend your assertions XD sign of a coward. Now if you are don't tootin your own horn, can we get to business? You can start by refuting my points, here I'll put them down again. 1. No missiles were intercepted. 2. Where exactly do you see a missile being intercepted? Interceptor missiles will self-destruct after a certain distance has been traveld if nothing has been hit to prevent it from falling into a population center. 3. Only FLIR or Foward Looking Infared can visually see an interception occur. 3. Only 3-5 videos of supposed interceptions exist, dafaq? if 71 were "shot down" at least 142 interceptors should have been launched, but only these few videos? 4. Interceptors Syria has are blast fragmentation, meaning they spread shrapnel in a 360° r^3, the shrapnel is how it attempts to get a hit. So the missiles would most likely be intact or large sections should be scattered, 71 is alot of missile, but no images? Ok now refute my points and ill do the same to yours. Come on dont be scared
    1
  49. Snollygoster Demagogues You know how to spot a troll who is cornered and trying to avoid the very issue it brought up? If you see it going off on random tangents that have nothing to do with its original comment, you know you have a troll on your hands. Now if you are done bullshitting here, I made my points. 1. No missiles were intercepted. 2. Where exactly do you see a missile being intercepted? Interceptor missiles will self-destruct after a certain distance has been traveld if nothing has been hit to prevent it from falling into a population center. 3. Only FLIR or Foward Looking Infared can visually see an interception occur. 3. Only 3-5 videos of supposed interceptions exist, dafaq? if 71 were "shot down" at least 142 interceptors should have been launched, but only these few videos? 4. Interceptors Syria has are blast fragmentation, meaning they spread shrapnel in a 360° r^3, the shrapnel is how it attempts to get a hit. So the missiles would most likely be intact or large sections should be scattered, 71 is alot of missile, but no images? Ok now refute my points and ill do the same to yours. Come on dont be scared
    1
  50. Snollygoster Demagogues OMG you are making this so utterly embarrassingly easy to expose you, BORING! Again, 1. No missiles were intercepted. 2. Where exactly do you see a missile being intercepted? Interceptor missiles will self-destruct after a certain distance has been traveld if nothing has been hit to prevent it from falling into a population center. None of the videos show interceptions. 3. Only FLIR or Foward Looking Infared can visually see an interception occur. 3. Only 3-5 videos of supposed interceptions exist, dafaq? if 71 were "shot down" at least 142 interceptors should have been launched, but only these few videos? 4. Interceptors Syria has are blast fragmentation, meaning they spread shrapnel in a 360° r^3, the shrapnel is how it attempts to get a hit. So the missiles would most likely be intact or large sections should be scattered, 71 is alot of missile, but no images? 5. The same ruMoD that shows the world a clip of a video game claiming it to be "evidence" of US helping isis rats are the same that claim 71 were shot down. Really? 6. There is precedent to know how a Tomahawk looks like when intercepted, one was downed in Serbia, would you like to see it? Ok now refute my points and ill do the same to yours. Come on dont be scared
    1