Youtube comments of Cactus (@laetrille).
-
2700
-
1700
-
1700
-
1400
-
908
-
832
-
831
-
622
-
604
-
549
-
517
-
364
-
282
-
252
-
240
-
237
-
234
-
229
-
218
-
213
-
203
-
192
-
189
-
188
-
186
-
186
-
186
-
186
-
185
-
178
-
158
-
153
-
149
-
144
-
136
-
133
-
131
-
128
-
123
-
121
-
106
-
103
-
96
-
88
-
87
-
87
-
84
-
83
-
81
-
80
-
78
-
72
-
72
-
71
-
71
-
71
-
69
-
67
-
67
-
66
-
65
-
61
-
60
-
59
-
59
-
58
-
57
-
56
-
55
-
55
-
53
-
52
-
50
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
46
-
46
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
31
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@wrath2008
You started off great but then devolve and climb onto your pedestal, losing my respect in the process. And then you go on to throw around the word karen thus contributing to the death and power this word currently holds.
Now lets educate your sorry ass. Mr. Floyd was given several chances to pay for his cigarettes, he did not want to. $20 might seem like nothing to you, but have you ever owned a small business? I have, our margins are low and even a $20 loss is bad if just let go, it also invited more problems.
2. Counterfeit money is a HUGE problem, it can literally threaten the value of everyones money, its a federal crime!! What you are basically saying is, "counterfeit money is not a big deal". Well guess what karen, it is a big deal, jaywalking, parking ticket, smoking weed, etc... ok that passes as "not a big deal", but not counterfeiting money. Now let the adults talk kid.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
That guy has no idea what he is talking about. In 2016, Venezuelans overwhelmingly voted for opposition candidates for congress, who on control of the Legislative branch. Maduros response was to jail supreme court judges, and install his cronies as substitute judges to rig the court. Using that rigged court, Maduro stripped congress from its legislative function, essentially consolidating all power in the president. Imagine Trump disbanding congress simply because he lost the mid-term elections. Would Americans find that acceptable enough for their high platform? Once that was done, fearing another overwhelming electoral defeat, Maduro illegally suspended the presidential elections that were due on December of 2017, while opposition parties were banned, and any high profile politicians who may become a candidate was jailed or banned from running (using the rigged court). The elections were finally held in 2018, and in that election, no international observers were allowed, no opposition candidates were allowed to run, and only about 20% of the population registered to vote ended up voting. This was not a legal or fair election. Consequently, the Venezuelan Congress, as well as the international community, refused to recognize the results as legitimate, and therefore, declared the office of President as vacant. As such, the Venezuelan Constitution established that the next person in Presidential line of succession is the head of Congress (equivalent to the Speaker of the House) until new election are held. That person is Juan Guaido, head of Congress, is the on and only Government official in the Presidential line of succession that can trace his legitimacy to a free and fair election. That's why the US AND OVER 60 COUNTRIES around the world have recognized him as the legitimate Temporary President of Venezuela until new fair elections are held. Get your facts right.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I don't see what all the fuss is about, the Arab Muslims were offered large swaths of land early on and the Jews were offered very little, but the waristinians decided that even 1 Jew was wayyyy too much, so they waged war time after time, peace offer after peace offer. The waristinians were still offered large sections of land even after they fought a war against Israel.
So in conclusion, the waristinians squandered their offered land in war after war. So now after all that, they still want more land?!?! Oalestinians, you lost, you decided to go to war against Israel instead of accepting your fair portion of land, so stop crying and deal with it, or move to Syria, Egypt, or any of the other numerous Islamic counties
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. In 2016, Venezuelans overwhelmingly voted for opposition candidates for Congress, who won control of the Legislative branch. Maduro’s response was to jail Supreme Court Judges, and install his cronies as substitute Judges to rig the Court. Using that rigged Court, Maduro stripped Congress from its legislative function, essentially consolidating all power in the President. Imagine Trump disbanding Congress simply because he lost the mid-term elections. Would Americans find that acceptable enough for their “high platform”? Once that was done, fearing another overwhelming electoral defeat, Maduro illegally suspended the presidential elections that were due on December of 2017, while opposition parties were banned, and any high profile politicians who may become a candidate was jailed or banned from running (using the rigged Court). The elections were finally held in 2018, and in that election, no international observers were allowed, no opposition candidates were allowed to run, and only about 20% of the population registered to vote ended up voting. This was not a legal or fair election. Consequently, the Venezuelan Congress, as well as the international community, refused to recognize the results as legitimate, and therefore, declared the office of President as vacant. As such, the Venezuelan Constitution established that the next person in Presidential line of succession is the head of Congress (equivalent to the Speaker of the House) until new elections are held. That person is Juan Guaido. Nobody elected Maduro. Juan Guaido, head of Congress, is the one and only government official in the Presidential line of succession that can trace his legitimacy to a free and fair election. That’s why the US, AND OVER 60 COUNTRIES around the world have recognized him as the legitimate Temporary President of Venezuela until new fair elections are held. Get your facts straight
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
steve jones
Theory? A theory has to have a great body of evidence behind it, I don't have a theory, Mick West does.
Witness accounts ARE SCIENTIFICALLY INSIGNIFICANT.
Your argument is a fallacy, an appeal to authority to be exact because you use this "witness testimony" i.e. Cmdr. Fravor to make your belief unfalseafiable, no matter how much analysis, mathematics, and alternative explanations are brought up, you can always just say, "well cmdr. Fravor super experienced pilot cannot possibly be wrong". And that's where everyone that brings up this argument is demonsterably incorrect.
Cmdr. Fravor is still a human being and susceptible to overexagerarion, now we now know that Fravor was at the very least interested or humored the UFO phenomenon BEFORE his UFO encounter, he admitted to using his F-18 Hornet to try and create UFO sightings, so is he the most reliable witness? Id say no since he seems to be trying to milk his sudden fame by going onto every show and podcast he can.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Bob Marshel
Very weak rebuttal, the thesis of this report was to show that Russia also has a silmilar bomb, it makes for good TV you have the "Mother of all bombs, why not takl about the "father" of all bombs.
As for why they did not mention more details, this is CNN not the Military Channel. Just because they did not tell you that part does not mean its a nefarious attempt at scaring you, your assumption is a fallacy nothing else.
If you want more info, look it up yourself, or are people to stupid to figure that out? Get a grip, CNN might be flawed and should be taken with a grain of salt, but its not this "Fake News" so many nutters are trying to make it out to be.
Read: 'Why people belive strange things,' by Michael Shermer.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
THANK YOU FOR THIS UNBIASED VIDEO!!!! I cannot tell you how close I was... NO I did lose faith in all of Russia and thought no sane people lived there. Why? Every time I debated a Russian, I would get the stupidest responses and arguments. First we have the Russian fanboys, they swear everything Russian is flawless and everything American or European is flawed. I get retarded responses like, "the Admiral Kuznetsov is better than the new Gerald R. Ford super carrier" or Russia can defeat NATO without using weapons.
Then we have the conspiracy lunatics who make outrageous claims that are obviously false, like, "a single Su-24 disabled a US missile destroyer the Donald Cook" or "Russia has these super-duper ultra advanced electronic warfare weapons that work 100% of the time and are 100% effective that disabled all NATO and US electronics for 400 mile radius.
Them when they are cornered with facts, they run and throw conspiracy theories, they call me a "Zionist Jew fascist nazi junta" blah blah blah... I have heard it a million times.
I seriously said "fuck Russia" and "let's go to Chinese debaters, and lo and behold, no bullshit from them!! I seriously now thing China and the US should work together and say screw Russia, at least with the Chinese, we get real logical arguments, not conspiracy and outrageous carp.
Sorry to have to say this, but it's the truth, hopefully things change course and Russians become more reasonable like you, thank you friend.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
+contactkeithstack
So many people think that Russias paid troll Army is only attacking Ukrainian, Syrian, or MH-17 videos, but the truth is that they have also infiltrated CNN comment sections along with many other western media outlets (Both US and European and others).
They pose as westerners, to try and sell the idea that its everyone who opposes the west.
Our generation is not the first to face this ounslaught of regressive propaganda, during the cold war a similar propaganda attack was launched by the USSR.
Only difference today is internet and social media, these Russian trolls can more effective spread their garbage regressive propaganda.
For this reason we need to be strong, stand tall, stand together, and attack with logic, reason, facts, and science (scientific method to combat conspiracy theories)
So be not stilk my friends and allies around the world, we overcame and defeated this menace once and we will do it once again. 🌎🌍🌏
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Matjaž Bajt
Such generalizations of the American people are unfounded and are not backed up by proper peer reviewed research.
Many people have tossed logic, reason, and science out the window and traded it in for emotionally motivated assumptions.
The vast diversity of ethnicities in the US provides some proof that America is indeed a non racist country, sure racism and sexism still exists but it's not as widespread as SJWs want us to believe.
They like to point to European countries and try to convince us how non racist they are, yet they fail to see that many countries like Denmark, Norway, UK, Germany, etc... have a larger concentration of whites than America. Let's inject millions of Blacks, Mexicans, South Americans, Arabs, Indians, etc... and see how "tolerant" Europe really is.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
contactkeithstack
So many people think that Russias paid troll Army is only attacking Ukrainian, Syrian, or MH-17 videos, but the truth is that they have also infiltrated CNN comment sections along with many other western media outlets (Both US and European and others).
They pose as westerners, to try and sell the idea that its everyone who opposes the west.
Our generation is not the first to face this ounslaught of regressive propaganda, during the cold war a similar propaganda attack was launched by the USSR.
Only difference today is internet and social media, these Russian trolls can more effective spread their garbage regressive propaganda.
For this reason we need to be strong, stand tall, stand together, and attack with logic, reason, facts, and science (scientific method to combat conspiracy theories)
So be not stilk my friends and allies around the world, we overcame and defeated this menace once and we will do it once again. 🌎🌍🌏
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Absolutely Hilarious
Oh and for the record troll, you imbecils still dont get what the United States of America represents, my country is not about a single people or identity, it does not matter what past nationality or country of origin Americans are, the idea of a meliting pot is that all peoples come together to form a more perfect union, so if a German or Russiam emigrate to the US and become citizens, and create something, that "thing" is an American creation. There is a reason so many imtellectuals of all types come and came to the US, including Albert Einstein and Edward Teller.
So please spare me your propaganda, I see what tactic you are trying to use, its a common paid muscovy tactic to try and minimize American acheivments and advancments.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Jay Paul
like the CIA isn’t on the ground there
>>>No, the CIA is not on the ground there, you pulled that straight out of your ass.
, but sure keep moving the goal posts, bitch
>>>You do a lot of talking but little in the sector of explaining your position, scared I might debunk your assertions? Also, look how cute the little boy is trying to use logical fallacies to sound smart, too bad you don't really understand them.
. You don’t need troops to intervene
>>>Intervene can mean many things, if the US send aid then that is considered and "intervention", you use words in a general sense, spice up your understanding of words kid.
US sanctions are devastating the local population.
>>>US sanctions were put in place in 2017, and the economic crisis was already in full swing. And even if they were in place earlier, they were meant to target the Maduro and his associates, not the people. The sanctions are available online kid, how about you read them before making yourself look like a fool.
Venezuela isn’t allowed to export oil,
>>>This is false, you pulled it straight out of your ass, the only thing going on is that the US stopped buying Venezuelan oil.
Trump has managed to stop capital flows
>>>Nope, Maduro caused the crisis, his foolish move was to print more money which worsened inflation, lenders don't typically let counties with hyperinflation borrow money. They would have more capital if they did not destroy their oil production capacity.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@chrishakala528 Hmmmmm and where do those scientist and engineers work at?? At the post office? NO!! They work for private contractors aka private companies that make a profit.
Fun Fact: NASA itself did not build the Saturn V rocket, contractors and subcontractors like Rocketdyne, Northrup Grumman, and Lockheed Martin, etc... build the systems involves and developed many of the technologies.
Absolutism is a plague, and you are part of it, extremes lead to failure, balance leads to prosperity, only capitalism leads to ruin, only socialism leads to ruin. I know you are still young and think you have it figured out, how old are you, you cant be older than 25.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
ECCM by a peer adversary will degrade any ECM used by the defending force.
Lets make a scenario, a US strike package attacking a russian base,
Currently a battalion of S-400s use 6 erector launchers with 36 ready to fire missiles of various types, remember, not all can engadge nimble targets. Then meduim range buks with about 20 ready to fire missiles, and Pantsir with about 16 ready to fire missiles plus ECM. Lets say a carrier strike group can fire off a salvo of 100 Tomahawk missiles, EA-18G Growlers with HARM missiles and MALD, and 6 F-35s loaded with 2 bombs and 2 AMRAAMS, and 4 F-22s for cover against russian jets.
The question is, can Russian air defenses protect the base from being completley desteoyed before the American force wipes out the air defenses??
Reloading missiles takes time and in a surprise attack, there wont be enough time, seeing as it takes time to reload missiles.
This is the major flaw of all air defenses, magazine depth, its the achilles heel of all systems, including American ones. Its why the US is investing so heavily in railguns and lazers with significant magazine depth. So I think the US will take losses but in the end achive air dominace in a conventional war.
Russia does have alot of anti-air systems but they cannot be everywhere all the time. Fighter jets can fly fast and are more flexible.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The person who should be embarrassed is you, give me a break, your sources of information are probrably bullshit sites like InfoWars, global research, zero hedge, AMTV, RT, Sputnik, and varuous other videos on YT.
Its so hillarious how so many consporacy morons proclaim themselves to experts just because they saw some documentary on YouTube, lol, then they call you "sheep" hahahaha!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
RJ Lee No. I proved how dedicated paid trolls, such as yourself, are. If what you say is true, then I can in effect discredit anything you claim by simply saying what you said. There is nothing more I can do to "convince" you because trolls are supposed to deny deny deny at any cost. I leave you with the various sources that have reported on the trolls: TIME, Newsweek, new york Times, BBC, Al Jazeera, various internet sources, and even The Moscow Times. Several former trolls have come forward as well. Many of the paid trolls do it for the money, to help their families. Some do not have allegiances to anyone and these people can be coerced into talking about their work.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yasser Salem All those countries rate low on the "worlds most charitable countries scale."
Yes the US spends more on its military then the next 10 countries combined, but we also give more than the entire world combined. Feel free to look this up.
Every country is guilty, none are innocent. Mothers/wifes in the USA lost over 100,000 sons/husbands in WWII . They died to fight Hitler and Japan. The US has done some stupid things, but it has also done plenty of good things for the world e.g. Marshal Plan---although not an excuse. The CIA and warmongering politicians are response for our wrongdoings. The people are complicit as well, because we do not protest and speak out enough. I do. Fortunately this is changing, example being the police brutality riots and the white house petition website.
What is the difference between the USA and Russians or Chinese people?? We acknowledge our mistakes and we even teach our children in school about US mistakes. In high school my textbooks even had the Iraq war in it, it talked about the mistakes we made.
The Russians and Chinese that I have encountered never admit fault---very few do. When I ask they will insult me, say how evil we are, or just plainly lie. Russian won't even admit what a tyrant Stalin was. Same with Mao. All I ever hear is "fascist jew swine junta nazi ukripo americunt." The US is far from perfect, but would you rather have two countries that Amnesty international has condemned for human rights abuses as the dominant power on Earth??
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
***** I gave mayweather his chance over the years, but he pissed it all away (my respect) on cherry picking, being an asshole, beating women, clinching like his life depended on it, cowardly Boxing, complaining about stupid shit , excuses, and most important ducking real boxers until he thinks he could beat them. Sorry to break it to you but mayclincher is nowhere near the caliber of the greats like Ali, Robinson, Mario, Chavez, ext. Mayweather exemplifies everything most Boxing fans, casual or not, don't want to see— a boring fight full of cowardly hit and runs, hugging, bad sportsmanship, cockiness, running, not fighting everyone, ext. Take Oscar de la hoya for example, he is not undefeated, but he fought everyone. He did not care about fame or money, he fought the best of the best in a timely manner without making excuses, he fought Hopkins!! Knowing that he had a slim chance of winning. Let's not forget about Julio Cesar Chavez Sr.; 80-0 enough said.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
+budred123 - Bernie Sanders FTW - Yes, citizens United was a mistake, but Bernie is wrong. Taxes on corporations, small businesses, or entrepreneurs in general hurts the economy via loss of potential growth and income. Me and my dad are business owners, and we know first hand how government taxes and regulations hurt prosperity. We found it nearly impossible to cut through all the red tape and paperwork just to get a business established. Then once a little success is starting to sprout, the government wants more and more. Bernie is a fool, because only a fool would keep repeating the same mistakes. Maybe he would be more credible if ran on a more moderate platform, you know promoting social welfare and also promoting the dissolution of the suffocating regulations we business owners have to put up with.
Face it, in a Bernie America, having a lemonade stand is unacceptable because you do not have the necessary licensing and training, poor kids.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I don't see what all the fuss is about, the Arab Muslims were offered large swaths of land early on and the Jews were offered very little, but the waristinians decided that even 1 Jew was wayyyy too much, so they waged war time after time, peace offer after peace offer. The waristinians were still offered large sections of land even after they fought a war against Israel.
So in conclusion, the waristinians squandered their offered land in war after war. So now after all that, they still want more land?!?! Oalestinians, you lost, you decided to go to war against Israel instead of accepting your fair portion of land, so stop crying and deal with it, or move to Syria, Egypt, or any of the other numerous Islamic counties
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Let me start off my saying that you Joseph are a HUGE trump sheep, not willing to be critical of him.
Did you forget how Trumps irresponsible comments has placed our brave troops in even more dange? Saying that he would have kept (stole) Iraqs oil has given terrorists a golden propaganda tool that they can use to recruit more terrorists, spread even more anti-American propaganda. Oh and did you forget US troops are working with Iraqi troops? Come on Watson I am a supporter and subscribe, but if you dont stop being biased and unwilling to critic Trump, I will Unsuscribe.
Watson, you need to be more impartial, unbiased, and not sheep-like. You start your video with attacking Obama, you know what thats called?? Whataboutism and spinning the situation to avoid criticising Trump in any way. You pride yourself as supporting the "facts" but you dont address the fact that the vetting process is already quite stringent (over 2 years for Syrian refugees). You spin the fact that Saudi Arabia is responsible for the most American deaths from terrorism. In fact, all the countries in the ban have not produced a terrorist attack that led to a single American death.
Why not ban Saudi Arabia first?
point #2: The way you just dismiss the Iraqi translators is just ignorant as fuck, those translators assisted American troop in Iraq and potentially saved American lives. They did this knowing their families and themselves were in danger. We need to protect and help them, not make their life harder.
I am dissapointed in you Watson.
Do you also belive in
"Alternative Facts" and lashing out at the park service over a tweer?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
+contactkeithstack
So many people think that Russias paid troll Army is only attacking Ukrainian, Syrian, or MH-17 videos, but the truth is that they have also infiltrated CNN comment sections along with many other western media outlets (Both US and European and others).
They pose as westerners, to try and sell the idea that its everyone who opposes the west.
Our generation is not the first to face this ounslaught of regressive propaganda, during the cold war a similar propaganda attack was launched by the USSR.
Only difference today is internet and social media, these Russian trolls can more effective spread their garbage regressive propaganda.
For this reason we need to be strong, stand tall, stand together, and attack with logic, reason, facts, and science (scientific method to combat conspiracy theories)
So be not stilk my friends and allies around the world, we overcame and defeated this menace once and we will do it once again. 🌎🌍🌏
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
***** It is ludicrous to think that corrupt Chinese leaders will ever be the leaders of the free world. The past 100 years of Chinese politics has brought nothing, but death and oppression (Mao). Yes, the US is not perfect, but if you compare the world of 200 years ago you will find we live in a much more peaceful and prosperous world. US naysayers like to predict doom for the US at every corner and have been doing so ever since the US came into being. Unfortunately for the naysayers the US has time and time again shown that it will endure (great depression, war, civil war, soviet union, civil rights ext.). The mistreatment of blacks is a scar on our history, but we changed that in < 100 years, and there is the defining factor of Americans, we are willing to change.
You forget the US is only 200 years old and has a long way to go before we Americans can truly call ourselves great. China has been around for thousands of years and its only been mediocre on the world stage and as long as they operate like the dynasties of past, china will never rise. Only a truly free people can call themselves powerful.
1
-
Sun Shine Of course I cannot point out every historical event and I am not keen on writing college level essays on YouTube. As for losing our freedom, sure evil people exist in the US that try to undermine our freedom, but first they have to get by 150,000,000 pissed off Americans with guns. No society in completely free, if there were such a country their would be chaos, but in comparison the US in indeed "free". I can talk shit about politicians without mysteriously disappearing, unlike china or Russia. I a lowly student can run for government office and actually win. I can walk down the street without being followed by secret police and if criminals try to rob me I have a handy gun, unlike china. In fact I can do most things here in the land of the free as long as I don't hurt anyone. Its not perfect, but in an imperfect existence, it is as close to perfection you can get so I am perfectly happy to live in the great US of A. Indeed.
Yes I do know about the NSA, if they keep their foolishness up I will strangle them with their own mouse cords.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Sally Stewart Sally Stewart
Follow me on google+ and my friend Lara Lazar.
So many people think that Russias paid troll Army is only attacking Ukrainian, Syrian, or MH-17 videos, but the truth is that they have also infiltrated CNN comment sections along with many other western media outlets (Both US and European and others).
They pose as westerners, to try and sell the idea that its everyone who opposes the west.
Our generation is not the first to face this ounslaught of regressive propaganda, during the cold war a similar propaganda attack was launched by the USSR.
Only difference today is internet and social media, these Russian trolls can more effective spread their garbage regressive propaganda.
For this reason we need to be strong, stand tall, stand together, and attack with logic, reason, facts, and science (scientific method to combat conspiracy theories)
So be not stilk my friends and allies around the world, we overcame and defeated this menace once and we will do it once again. 🌎🌍🌏
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Abortion is wrong. Yes, I am for contraception and welfare for single moms, sex happens and mistakes happen. This is a weak argument for allowing the killing of unborn children, I would rather be working at McDonald's and unsuccessful than to be aborted. Just think about it, when a woman is pregnant what do people ask?? How is your body? or How is the baby? The answer is obvious, is it not?? Also, if a murderer killed pregnant woman, it is considered a double murder according the Unborn Victims of Violence act. There are some exceptions though, like rape and medical reasons, but being irresponsible while having sex is not one of them. Abortion is barbaric and as an advanced human civilization we should outlaw this practice. I applaud the women who despite financial difficulties, pushed through and raised their baby, god bless you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I don't see what all the fuss is about, the Arab Muslims were offered large swaths of land early on and the Jews were offered very little, but the waristinians decided that even 1 Jew was wayyyy too much, so they waged war time after time, peace offer after peace offer. The waristinians were still offered large sections of land even after they fought a war against Israel.
So in conclusion, the waristinians squandered their offered land in war after war. So now after all that, they still want more land?!?! Oalestinians, you lost, you decided to go to war against Israel instead of accepting your fair portion of land, so stop crying and deal with it, or move to Syria, Egypt, or any of the other numerous Islamic counties.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
*****
A strong leader that uses strong arm tactics to to suppress dissent, political opposition, and controls the national media. The murdered opposition like Anna Politikovskaya, Boris Nemsov, Alexander Litvinenko, the latest Denis Voroenkov, etc... have been killed under suspicious circumstances. Luckily one escaped before Putler got to him, Mikhail Khordokovsky, an oligarch close to putin, exposed him on tv and was thrown in jail, fortunatley he escaped to Sweden.
Also don't get me started on his corruption, cyber attacks on the US and allies, and his Kremlin controlled media used to undermine our western democracies.
Seriously, you trumpers and leftist morons are equally dumb on some aspects, only difference is you both are on different sides of the spectrum.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@xyzsame4081
no troops - that could not be kept secret. But CIA and mercenaries. Ever heard of death squads ? (They are still in business, they just switched to drug and other crimes as a full time job, when the wars on behest of the U.S. financiers were over).
>>>Ever heard of something called evidence? If you have evidence that there are CIA death squads on the ground in Venezuela, lets see it. And it has to be from reputable sources, not some shady fringe website.
And the Republicans (Reagan, Bush = former CIA boss, the same crowd that was at large under Bush2) got really creative so the CIA had the black budgets after Congress had explicitely forbidden to fund any regime change in Latin America.
>>>Ok, what does this have to do with Venezuela? Spouting off random gibberish does not strengthen your point.
Screw the founders that had thought congress should have the most say because they are voted in and in theory should be the most responsive columns of power - responsive to the will of the voters).
>>>LOL WTF? Are you going off on tangents on purpose to fluster me, or are you really this stupid and unaware?
Smuggling drugs into the U.S. under protection of the CIA.
>>>Wow, we went from importing oil, to CIA death squads, and now CIA smuggling in drugs. What are you on? LSD? Or maybe your copy and paste skills are letting you down.
Or selling arms to Iran (with help of israel).
>>>irrelevant to Venezuela. No dice, try again.
speaking of Mossad .... maybe Bibi wants to thank the current admin .... if some agents, mercenaries, terrorists, provocateurs are caught they would NOT be U.S. citizens ....
>>>jajajajahahahahahha ESTAS BIEN BABOSO!!!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@illiamchristian5532
You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. In 2016, Venezuelans overwhelmingly voted for opposition candidates for Congress, who won control of the Legislative branch. Maduro’s response was to jail Supreme Court Judges, and install his cronies as substitute Judges to rig the Court. Using that rigged Court, Maduro stripped Congress from its legislative function, essentially consolidating all power in the President. Imagine Trump disbanding Congress simply because he lost the mid-term elections. Would Americans find that acceptable enough for their “high platform”? Once that was done, fearing another overwhelming electoral defeat, Maduro illegally suspended the presidential elections that were due on December of 2017, while opposition parties were banned, and any high profile politicians who may become a candidate was jailed or banned from running (using the rigged Court). The elections were finally held in 2018, and in that election, no international observers were allowed, no opposition candidates were allowed to run, and only about 20% of the population registered to vote ended up voting. This was not a legal or fair election. Consequently, the Venezuelan Congress, as well as the international community, refused to recognize the results as legitimate, and therefore, declared the office of President as vacant. As such, the Venezuelan Constitution established that the next person in Presidential line of succession is the head of Congress (equivalent to the Speaker of the House) until new elections are held. That person is Juan Guaido. Nobody elected Maduro. Juan Guaido, head of Congress, is the one and only government official in the Presidential line of succession that can trace his legitimacy to a free and fair election. That’s why the US, AND OVER 60 COUNTRIES around the world have recognized him as the legitimate Temporary President of Venezuela until new fair elections are held. Get your facts straight
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1. No missiles were intercepted.
2. Where exactly do you see a missile being intercepted in the videos? Interceptor missiles will self-destruct after a certain distance has been traveld if nothing has been hit to prevent it from falling into a population center. None of the videos show interceptions.
3. Only FLIR or Foward Looking Infared can visually see an interception occur.
3. Only 3-5 videos of supposed interceptions exist, dafaq? if 71 were "shot down" at least 142 interceptors should have been launched, but only these few videos?
4. Interceptors Syria has are blast fragmentation, meaning they spread shrapnel in a 360° r^3, the shrapnel is how it attempts to get a hit. So the missiles would most likely be intact or large sections should be scattered, 71 is alot of missile, but no images?
5. The same ruMoD that shows the world a clip of a video game claiming it to be "evidence" of US helping isis rats are the same that claim 71 were shot down. Really?
6. There is precedent to know how a Tomahawk looks like when intercepted, one was downed in Serbia, would you like to see it?
7. The video being circled by russian trolls as "proof" has been debunked, this is the video they are circling, take a look and look, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1Q-s7SRurU (note: At 1:30 you can see the end, the coward channel owner cut the clip out.) at 1:25 this idiot shows a clip of hamas rockets at night posted in 2014 XD
My refutation:
literally a video of the American C-Ram counter airtillery system XD
SAME EXACT VIDEO POSTED IN 2014!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQ6YChXRn_A&feature=youtu.be
BOOM 100% THOUROUGHLY DEBUNKED
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Snollygoster Demagogues
OMG you are making this so utterly embarrassingly easy to expose you, BORING!
Again,
1. No missiles were intercepted.
2. Where exactly do you see a missile being intercepted? Interceptor missiles will self-destruct after a certain distance has been traveld if nothing has been hit to prevent it from falling into a population center. None of the videos show interceptions.
3. Only FLIR or Foward Looking Infared can visually see an interception occur.
3. Only 3-5 videos of supposed interceptions exist, dafaq? if 71 were "shot down" at least 142 interceptors should have been launched, but only these few videos?
4. Interceptors Syria has are blast fragmentation, meaning they spread shrapnel in a 360° r^3, the shrapnel is how it attempts to get a hit. So the missiles would most likely be intact or large sections should be scattered, 71 is alot of missile, but no images?
5. The same ruMoD that shows the world a clip of a video game claiming it to be "evidence" of US helping isis rats are the same that claim 71 were shot down. Really?
6. There is precedent to know how a Tomahawk looks like when intercepted, one was downed in Serbia, would you like to see it?
Ok now refute my points and ill do the same to yours. Come on dont be scared
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Snollygoster Demagogues
Dont know why you dont pay attention to real debate, stop being a little coward,
Again,
1. No missiles were intercepted.
2. Where exactly do you see a missile being intercepted? Interceptor missiles will self-destruct after a certain distance has been traveld if nothing has been hit to prevent it from falling into a population center. None of the videos show interceptions.
3. Only FLIR or Foward Looking Infared can visually see an interception occur.
3. Only 3-5 videos of supposed interceptions exist, dafaq? if 71 were "shot down" at least 142 interceptors should have been launched, but only these few videos?
4. Interceptors Syria has are blast fragmentation, meaning they spread shrapnel in a 360° r^3, the shrapnel is how it attempts to get a hit. So the missiles would most likely be intact or large sections should be scattered, 71 is alot of missile, but no images?
5. The same ruMoD that shows the world a clip of a video game claiming it to be "evidence" of US helping isis rats are the same that claim 71 were shot down. Really?
6. There is precedent to know how a Tomahawk looks like when intercepted, one was downed in Serbia, would you like to see it?
Ok now refute my points and ill do the same to yours. Come on dont be scared
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Snollygoster Demagogues <----Look everyone, this little coward troll is to scared to debate me on the very issue it brought up :)
Again,
1. No missiles were intercepted.
2. Where exactly do you see a missile being intercepted? Interceptor missiles will self-destruct after a certain distance has been traveld if nothing has been hit to prevent it from falling into a population center. None of the videos show interceptions.
3. Only FLIR or Foward Looking Infared can visually see an interception occur.
3. Only 3-5 videos of supposed interceptions exist, dafaq? if 71 were "shot down" at least 142 interceptors should have been launched, but only these few videos?
4. Interceptors Syria has are blast fragmentation, meaning they spread shrapnel in a 360° r^3, the shrapnel is how it attempts to get a hit. So the missiles would most likely be intact or large sections should be scattered, 71 is alot of missile, but no images?
5. The same ruMoD that shows the world a clip of a video game claiming it to be "evidence" of US helping isis rats are the same that claim 71 were shot down. Really?
6. There is precedent to know how a Tomahawk looks like when intercepted, one was downed in Serbia, would you like to see it?
Ok now refute my points and ill do the same to yours. Come on dont be scared
1
-
1
-
Snollygoster Demagogues
Again you fail miserably, there is no evidence whatsoever that any missiles were shot down. So if you keep running like a scared little girl and refuse to address my refutions of you claims, you are for all intents and purposes... DEBUNKED.
1. No missiles were intercepted.
2. Where exactly do you see a missile being intercepted? Interceptor missiles will self-destruct after a certain distance has been traveld if nothing has been hit to prevent it from falling into a population center. None of the videos show interceptions.
3. Only FLIR or Foward Looking Infared can visually see an interception occur.
3. Only 3-5 videos of supposed interceptions exist, dafaq? if 71 were "shot down" at least 142 interceptors should have been launched, but only these few videos?
4. Interceptors Syria has are blast fragmentation, meaning they spread shrapnel in a 360° r^3, the shrapnel is how it attempts to get a hit. So the missiles would most likely be intact or large sections should be scattered, 71 is alot of missile, but no images?
5. The same ruMoD that shows the world a clip of a video game claiming it to be "evidence" of US helping isis rats are the same that claim 71 were shot down. Really?
6. There is precedent to know how a Tomahawk looks like when intercepted, one was downed in Serbia, would you like to see it?
Ok now refute my points and ill do the same to yours. Come on dont be scared
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1. No missiles were intercepted.
2. Where exactly do you see a missile being intercepted in the videos? Interceptor missiles will self-destruct after a certain distance has been traveld if nothing has been hit to prevent it from falling into a population center. None of the videos show interceptions.
3. Only FLIR or Foward Looking Infared can visually see an interception occur.
3. Only 3-5 videos of supposed interceptions exist, dafaq? if 71 were "shot down" at least 142 interceptors should have been launched, but only these few videos?
4. Interceptors Syria has are blast fragmentation, meaning they spread shrapnel in a 360° r^3, the shrapnel is how it attempts to get a hit. So the missiles would most likely be intact or large sections should be scattered, 71 is alot of missile, but no images?
5. The same ruMoD that shows the world a clip of a video game claiming it to be "evidence" of US helping isis rats are the same that claim 71 were shot down. Really?
6. There is precedent to know how a Tomahawk looks like when intercepted, one was downed in Serbia, would you like to see it?
7. The video being circled by russian trolls as "proof" has been debunked, this is the video they are circling, take a look and look, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1Q-s7SRurU (note: At 1:30 you can see the end, the coward channel owner cut the clip out.) at 1:25 this idiot shows a clip of hamas rockets at night posted in 2014 XD
My refutation:
literally a video of the American C-Ram counter airtillery system XD
SAME EXACT VIDEO POSTED IN 2014!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQ6YChXRn_A&feature=youtu.be
BOOM 100% THOUROUGHLY DEBUNKED
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The you make your voice hear, not do these petty jestures against a symbol of the country you live in.
The National Anthem is a symbol of our Republic regardless of who wrote it or when. The politicians or actions of police do NOT reflect what the US stands for, you want.
These idiots think, "oh look police have killed black people and I hate trump so the US must be a racist country". WRONG!! The founders of these Unites States outlined it very clearly, "All men are created equal", it does not say all white people or black yellow or whatever, it says, "ALL MEN". So those who would place others above themselves based on superficial motives are the ones actually being unAmerican.
Colin Kapernuts would receive more support if he says, "these cops, politicians, racists are subverting what America stands for". Instead of targeting symbols of our nation. Does he not know that black people were instumental in the creation of this nation? In fact blacks fought in the revolutionary war, backs have died defending what America stands for, so why target a symbol of that? Its just plain stupid and only serves to hurt your own cause.
And to the Alt-Right and Trump dickridders, Putin disrespects and hates our country, but you accept Trump liking him and calling him a great leader? LoL Get a grip.
And to the Alt-Left, the National Anthem is not racist you imbeciles, you make yourselves to be as stupid as the alt-right. Calling the US a racist country is stupidity on another level.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1. No missiles were intercepted.
2. Where exactly do you see a missile being intercepted in the videos? Interceptor missiles will self-destruct after a certain distance has been traveld if nothing has been hit to prevent it from falling into a population center. None of the videos show interceptions.
3. Only FLIR or Foward Looking Infared can visually see an interception occur.
3. Only 3-5 videos of supposed interceptions exist, dafaq? if 71 were "shot down" at least 142 interceptors should have been launched, but only these few videos?
4. Interceptors Syria has are blast fragmentation, meaning they spread shrapnel in a 360° r^3, the shrapnel is how it attempts to get a hit. So the missiles would most likely be intact or large sections should be scattered, 71 is alot of missile, but no images?
5. The same ruMoD that shows the world a clip of a video game claiming it to be "evidence" of US helping isis rats are the same that claim 71 were shot down. Really?
6. There is precedent to know how a Tomahawk looks like when intercepted, one was downed in Serbia, would you like to see it?
7. The video being circled by russian trolls as "proof" has been debunked, this is the video they are circling, take a look and look, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1Q-s7SRurU (note: At 1:30 you can see the end, the coward channel owner cut the clip out.) at 1:25 this idiot shows a clip of hamas rockets at night posted in 2014 XD
My refutation:
literally a video of the American C-Ram counter airtillery system XD
SAME EXACT VIDEO POSTED IN 2014!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQ6YChXRn_A&feature=youtu.be
BOOM 100% THOUROUGHLY DEBUNKED
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Alfredo Crocetti
Again you are paroting the russian ruMoD, which has provided no radar data or images of downed missiles or any type of evidence Only 3 targets were attacked, the people making the claim that there were 12 targets is the russian MoD, which I remind you has a conflic of interest in prepetuating the lie, its Pantsir system failed to bring down any missiles, and you may lie here but potential customers for russian SAMs cannot be fooled and thats the truth.
I am not making my arguments based on the Pentagons statements, but rather from logic, reason, and critical thinking.
Logic dictates that if a claim is made, EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE must be provided, 'burden of proof' demands this. Its a universally accepted rule of the scientific method.
I already outlined all arguments pertaining to the central point and you have yet to privide a single rebuttal for any of them. You insist on images, ok sure, here are some before and after pictures of all 3 targets https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2018/apr/15/satellite-pictures-airstrikes-syria
"Any claim made without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence"
Asking to prove the negative is a fallacy. --->"You cannot provide evidence for my claim therefore it proves mine"<---this is what you are doing.
So stop with all the non-sequiters and Ad Hoc nonsense, it does not look to good that you are being schooled by an American :)))))))))
1
-
Highlighted reply
Alfredo Crocetti
1 hour ago
"Great parroting the most discredited rag in the western Universe might as well parrot the Sun or the Ny slime. Yes video satellite shows all one hundred an 17 missile strikes no. First failed forensics does not prove that all missiles hit there target. We can agree missiles were fired"
>>>Again, its your job to prove your claim, you made the claim so now provide evidence, the more you stall the more stupid you look, getting schooled by an American :)
"Last year the day after four new agency showed the after math of the 69 missiles had not reached there designated target Homs airbase was still operative. So the burden of proof Satellite image weak. your statement from a legal point and empirical data weak."
>>>This is not evidence that missiles were shot down, only wreckage will prove missiles were shot down, where is it? No images? No video? yeah explain that troll. Still getting schooled by an American
" Hence using reason and logic three sights were designated by FUKUSA one of them was the Ayr AlShat airbase in Homs province hence doing the maths divide by three means roughly 40 missiles per target. My Client being the SAA states minimal damage was sustained at the airbase. ONe second point precedent and evidence from last years strike which was reported by your client states that 69 were fired and they all hit there Targets . News report from last year from four news outlets showed the after math and showed that 69 diid not all hit the designated target."
>>>Still no evidence to prove any were shot down, no missile wreckage, no FLIR footage, nothing, you are only going by things you pulled straight out of your ass. Still being schooled by an American :)
"Hence second point precedence Evidence is a bitch. So video confirms hit does not confirm 117 missiles so if a parroting RUaf prop. You on the other hand are telling statements from known proven liars and precedent proves this. Hence you categorically stated that no missiles were intercepted . No proof of your statement. The Homs Ayr AlShat airbase is still operative. Incubator s anybody Iraq 1 war. Qadaffi giving Viagra to soldiers . Yugslavian army committing acts of Genocide. By the way Milosovic guilty verdict over turned by the Hague two years ago. That my dear sir is what we call in the legal fraternity Game set and Match slam dunk case that the Judge will find your statement to be dubious at best. So it is not me that has to prove anything"
>>>What does viagra have to do with the strike you imbecil? Again, being schooled by and American, dont be too sad :)
"Your blanket statement was that no missliles were shot down. The oinly forensics you have is satellite imaging. Does not account for all the missiles and the people claiming the blanket categorical absoluteness is you sir. Hence Being cynical and reason and logic and witnessed accounts plus past verifiable evidence putting the character of the people claiming this makes swiss cheese look solid with no holes. Last years evidence and the video narrator admitted that last years missile strike does appear to show that not all missiles hit the airport."
>>>Here we are and a paragraph of useless rhetoric and still not a single image of a downed Tomahawk lol
what does syria have missiles that vaporize cruise missiles? XD I took you to school you fucking idiot, you have been debunked an made to look like a fool by an American :)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Random Person
"Magically omitted"
>>>You are assuming it was, like I said, it was a short overview of a conflict that has nothing to do with everyday Americans.
2. ITS YOUR responsibility to get the facts behind what is being reported, it's stupid to just rely on ANY media source large or small to inform you.
You yourself are trying to push a narrative, a narrative that there was a nefarious plan to deceive you about a war in the Caucases?
Come on man, I'm not a fan of msm but even I understand that there is no boardroom of anchors and journalist actively making evil plans to deceive you, that's the job of idiots like Glen Beck, Rachel maddow, Keith oberman, Hannity, etc etc... well not not evil plans maybe but to try and persuade you to one side or the other.
Both large and small dissimenators of information on mainstream television or here on YT will never be 100% unbiased or give you all the facts, it's YOUR responsibility to research and read.
If I wanted to learn more about the conflict I would read a book about it and research it.
All in all, not a shred of fake news in this report.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Maduro is a dictator pendejo
That guy has no idea what he is talking about. In 2016, Venezuelans overwhelmingly voted for opposition candidates for congress, who on control of the Legislative branch. Maduros response was to jail suproeme cout judges, and install his cronies as substitute judges to rig the court. Using that rigged court, Maduro stripped congress from its legislative function, essentially consolidating all power in the president. Imagine Trump disbanding congress simply because he lost the mid-term elections. Would Americans find that acceptable enough for their high platform? Once that was done, fearing another overwhelming electoral defeat, Maduro illegally suspended the presidential elections that were due on December of 2017, while opposition parties were banned, and any high profile politicians who may become a candidagte was jailed or banned from running (using the rigged court). The elections were finally held in 2018, and in that election, no international observers were allowed, no opposition candidates were allowed to ron, and only about 20% of the population registred to vote ended up voting. This was not a legal or fair election. Consequently, the Venezuelan Congress, as well as the international community, refused to recognize the results as legitimate, and therefore, declared the offiece of Presedent as vacant. As such, the Venezuelan Constitution established that the next person in Presidential line of succession is the head of Congress (equivalent to the Speaker of the House) until new election are held. That person is Juan Guaido, head of Congress, is the on and only Government official in the Presidential line of succession that can trace his legitimacy to a free and fair election. That's why the US AND OVER 60 COUNTRIES around the world have recognized him as the legitimate Temporary President of Venezuela until new fair elections are held. Get your facts right.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
kentucky fried
ECCM by a peer adversary will degrade any ECM used by the defending force.
Lets make a scenario, a US strike package attacking a russian base,
Currently a battalion of S-400s use 6 erector launchers with 36 ready to fire missiles of various types, remember, not all can engadge nimble targets. Then meduim range buks with about 20 ready to fire missiles, and Pantsir with about 16 ready to fire missiles plus ECM. Lets say a carrier strike group can fire off a salvo of 100 Tomahawk missiles, EA-18G Growlers with HARM missiles and MALD, and 6 F-35s loaded with 2 bombs and 2 AMRAAMS, and 4 F-22s for cover against jets.
The question is, can Russian air defenses protect the base from being completley desteoyed before the American force wipes out the air defenses??
Reloading missiles takes time and in a surprise attack, there wont be enough time, seeing as it takes time to reload missiles.
This is the major flaw of all air defenses, magazine depth, its the achilles heel of all systems, including American ones. Its why the US is investing so heavily in railguns and lazers with significant magazine depth. So I think the US will take losses but in the end achive air dominace in a conventional war.
Russia does have alot of anti-air systems but they cannot be everywhere all the time. Fighter jets can fly fast and are more flexible.
1
-
Oh boy here do I start to dismantly this tangled mess of fallacies and propaganda you got from russians state run disinformation outlets.
Lets start with the assertion that russia took down 36 Tomahawks, this has to be the easiest thing to debunk seeing as a thourough analysis by these folks using satelite imagery has already been done, https://www.imagesatintl.com/us-strike-syria/ but lets use common sense here to put the final nail in the coffin. To date not a single image, video, pece of wrechage of a tomahawk has surface on ebay, and we all know how arabs love to parade around wrechage on the rare occasions they take down a western machine. Beliving this contrived fantastical story, just like the Donnald Cook fantasy, one has to drop all reason and give in to insane levels of bias, that or you are just dumb as fuck or blinded by nationalisic ferver.
"S-400 can detect EA-18G Growler from 6000km away, wow this really took the cake, I guess you must be a beliver in flat earth conspiracies because the cruvature of the earth is nonexistent, either that or you will calim that the russians have developed radar that can go through obsticles like mountain ranges.
I suspect your are either a russian paid troll or are making fun of russians because no one can be this stupid.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
kentucky fried
And there it is, the attempt to deflect, fuck no I wont allow you to do that, you want me to debunk your other dumb cinspiracies, fine, but we are arguing the Tomahawk strike at the moment, which you have yet to provide any empirical evidence for, only weak ass conjecture.
Now to debunk your assertion that 59 tomahawks would have destroyed the entire base, uhhhh the base is not a single building!!! It an airfield with nemerous bomb proof hangers which need two missiles to take the out as seen by
https://www.imagesatintl.com/us-strike-syria/
The strike was meant to send a message, not destroy it, if that has beem the case, the warheads would have been adjusted for the job.
Now, are you going to provide images if the supposed Tomohawk wreckage or are you going to run away?? Please provide a cites 3rd party souce, with emperical evidence. Come on, I dare you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Let me guess, 9/11 was an inside job, everything is the gulf of tonkin, USS liberty incident only has one explanation, RT is real news, Julian Assange is a hero, USA is in Venezuela for oil, US sanctions caused Venezuelan problems, russia good, Maduro good, pootin good, GMO's bad, 5G tech bad, Rothschild bankers bad, globalism bad, CNN 100% evil and fake, Petrodollar bad, gold is real money, watches many fringe conspiracy YouTube videos etc etc etc... did I describe you accurately?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@christianp.9074
DeepBlue Omg you’re so dumb you’re completely missing the point.
>>> I know what your point is, but its irrelevant to the central argument i.e. why is Venezuela in crisis? Does Juan Guaido hold legitemacy? I dont give a shit about saudi arabia in this instance.
I’m posing a logical question: Why are dictators like Saudi Arabia not receiving heavy sanctions and condemnation by the U.S for violating international law while Venezuela (who is not U.S backed) is condemned for “starving” its people? I put starving in quotation marks because yes there is starvation,
>>> I think the should be sanctions on Saudi Arabia for this, but the geopolitical climate does not allow it, its a dog eat dog world, if the US does not ally with Saudi Arabia, someone else will. The is evil in the world, no one you do business with will have a squeaky clean record, and for the time being Saudi Arabia as bad as it is, is stable. Also Venezuela is in Americas neighbourhood, they don't need any more unstable counties that will supply US with illegal immigrant. So you see I do get your point, only its irrelevant, its a whataboutism that will do nothing to further the debate at hand, its a tangent that only serves to complicate matters further.
but it is not caused by Maduro
>>>You are right, he did not cause the crisis but he is not helping, a host of reasons led to the crisis, ill leave that up to you.
. The reason Venezuela even has a crisis in the first place is because of the countless U.S imposed sanctions on Venezuela
>>>False, US sanctions were imposed post-2017 the crisis was in full swing.
. If you don’t believe me go and research it for yourself
>>> I have, and even read the actual literature behind the sanctions, I got my info from the source, not some 2nd or 3rd party with potential biases.
. If you are a proponent of “democracy”, which to the U.S means private totalitarianism backed by the “permanent state” (coined by Jeffrey Sachs) that allows the herded sheep to vote every 4 years to maintain the illusion of democracy; then be consistent god damnit.
>>> Again this has nothing to do with Venezuela crisis.
You know you are getting pounded for your ignorance, yet you still don’t seem to get the point.
>>> That is Ad Populum in this case, most of the responses I receive are one liners that are a mix of old tired ass narritives like "durhh its for oil" "durhhh USA bad", or responses that go off on random tangents that have nothing to do with my original post (Read it if you have not seen it). Oh and its not a surprise that have more people against me because this channel is a more left leaning channel that is likely to have people who are more critical of the US than you average joe and are more likely to buy into the idea that Venezuela crisis is somehow a US plot against Venezueal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1