Comments by "John Donwood" (@johndonwood4305) on "Q+A with Jack Tame"
channel.
-
157
-
16
-
It's all over. This interview was eye-opening in the sense that politicians see the people of New Zealand as merely statistics and figures to be shuffled around to be indexed, calculated, and percentaged which is why much of the discussion had to do with the ability of New Zealand to handle the influx of refugees. Both Dann and Ghahraman run through a series of arguments on why migrants should be brought to New Zealand. However, the interview only looks at the benefits while everyone else is looking at how multiculturalism is failing in the UK, France, Germany, Sweden, and Canada. Why is the prime minister of Hungary, Viktor Orban being attacked by the EU? If the migrants will be a benefit to New Zealand, then let them stay in their own country and rebuild their homes. Who's going to support them? Hordes of migrants are bringing with them diseases thought wiped out as well as crime. There are indeed benefits, but only for the refugees and businesses who perhaps desire a low wage economy. Nowhere in the interview is it mentioned if whether refugees can be sent back to their nation of origin if it is stable enough for them to return because it should be. All Ghahraman does is pour guilt and blame all over kiwis and inviting refugees over to New Zealand isn't going to do any good. This interview was brought to you by the letters U and N.
14
-
14
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
The corporate media criticises "fake news" and "misinformation", but whose statistics and views do they quote? Big pharma, big tech, big agra, big oil, etc. Mocking pizza gate and the anti-vaxxer movement is just arrogant and insulting of the viewer's intelligence and this kind of attitude is what pushes corporate media over the line of what is considered fair-and-balanced reporting into agenda-driven sensationalism in which events become detached from the reality in which they occur and are given a new context with which to suit a narrative. I don't think the idea of children being harmed is funny, Tame. Censorship by other means. The media shouldn't take it upon itself to have the final say as to how information is to be interpreted by the public, such is the "fiction" of Orwell. Distrust, disbelief, and doubt will always be felt whether by instinct or by plain incredulity and in varying degrees and that is normal, but propaganda gets its authority by being convinced of its own authority.
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3