Comments by "" (@SnakePliskin762) on "Военное телевидение" channel.

  1. its a last minute short range point defence so doesn't need to be any faster. Please keep up.
    13
  2. They have inertial guidance if GPS jammed.
    11
  3. It still hasn't gained air superiority over Ukraine's tiny air force.
    11
  4. Shame that's all bs for both Abrams & Bradley's
    10
  5. ​ @kobked-x  🤔 plonker of the week award goes to you sir.
    9
  6. They haven't fought 1 NATO country yet
    9
  7.  @alexpavlov3535  nope, Ukraine crews trained in the west.
    7
  8. They aren't,any tank without cover can be taken out by a drone.
    7
  9. Have you been drinking?
    6
  10. According to Russian bias YT channels
    6
  11. What a load of nonsense
    6
  12. A B-2 wasn't damaged or shot down
    6
  13. what a load of bs
    5
  14. No it's just fighting Ukraine
    5
  15. ​ @YourGardenerJesús sounds more like Russia after this debacle
    5
  16. What a load of bs
    5
  17.  @Glenoidio  as did a lot of Russian toys,remember that convoy of death on it's way to Kyiv? Still not NATO forces or it's best equipment.
    5
  18. Getting invaded wasn't really a choice.
    5
  19. It didn't shock any first time round.
    5
  20. Ukraine built a lot of tech when it was part of the USSR ever heard of Antonov. And it's continued that trend.
    4
  21. no
    4
  22. Neither has Russia
    4
  23.  @Ludak021  NATO hasn't fired a shot or lost a casualty If you could kindly point me in the direction of a NATO armoured reginent or fighter squadron deployed that would be much obliged.
    4
  24. You keep believing that 😂
    4
  25. Ask that su-35 pilot that.
    4
  26. It's never fought NATO
    4
  27. It's Ukraine
    4
  28. ​ @TrevorCrook-c1s that's nuclear and basically both sidea have lost if that gets launched.
    4
  29. Bollocks
    4
  30.  @Pestoglass  so was a lot of aircraft in gulf war 1,if you fire up enough missiles eventually some will hit. Ask the Russians in Afghan.
    4
  31. and now a bridge
    4
  32. what a load of utter shite
    4
  33.  @KishorTwist  limited number of soldiers and hardware? 😂
    4
  34. Nope Ukrainians
    4
  35. Nope
    4
  36. More bollocks
    3
  37. Nope
    3
  38. Tucker Carlson 😂
    3
  39. ​ @tamdang8346  still holding off a country with a population over 4 x biggerr. Funny that
    3
  40.  @walterbrunswick  That they where American,a lot of volunteers have come from the US,that is if the flags are true,i fail to believe until i've seen it and the source myself. You do realise they've only just allowed maintenance techs in and that's only in the west of the country near the Polish border to allow overhaul of the missile systems and that took some doing.
    3
  41. Quite the opposite,in open warfare the coalition won everytime. It was years after when the Afghan gov fell to the taliban, after not paying it's soldiers & police.
    3
  42. Bs
    3
  43. ​ @YourGardenerJesús  they weren't a threat then never mind now 😂
    3
  44. 0 dead
    3
  45.  @Rooikunbo  except we do inquests into our training deaths in the west,we also have witnesses. Must be a Russian thing covering up deaths.
    3
  46. ​ @JamieClarke-zk7wo  the same navy that's still there? Just changed carriers over
    3
  47. It's amazing the amount of bollocks Ignat is alleged to have said.
    3
  48. ​ @rogeroeyen If only those YT vids where real life hey
    3
  49. More bollocks
    3
  50. ​ @Hotstepper2569  you keep believing that 😂
    3
  51. ​ @lexburen5932  There's plenty of sources able to list what Russia has lost.
    3
  52.  @Yuri-z2y  Like the Kursk?
    3
  53. @Benz2533  old assets which still needed a NK intervention to contain.
    3
  54. 1 challenger to how many Russian tanks? and the crew survived
    3
  55. ​ @FTM1fenn according to you?
    3
  56.  @l1and238  and in convoys towards kill zones dictated by minefields without any air cover whatsoever.
    3
  57. The F-16 that downed the Su-35?
    3
  58.  @KishorTwist  With your writing? You make Joe Biden look like Albert Einstein.
    3
  59. The one that fell off was below deck fell off the elevator. 2nd malfunctioned landing.
    3
  60. NATO isn't fighting. Ukraine & Russia are.
    3
  61. course it did....
    2
  62.  @sudhakarrane7076  It's little ukraine alone against that Bear,same has it has been for 4 years my third world friend.
    2
  63.  @Its_JasonBourne  the agreement part is nonsense spread on X are B-2s stored in the open? 8 completely destroyed and the rest damaged but unless they can reopen the production line for Tu-95s and Tu-22s,they're a write off
    2
  64.  @Its_JasonBourne  Tu-160 takes a long time to build,it'll take a long time to replace both the tu-22 and Tu-95s with it and that's without the sanctions biting for the parts needed for them. I never said they could hide all the tu-95s in hangers,the B-2s have to be stored in special climate controlled hangers for their coating.
    2
  65. ​ @journeyintococo6996 I never said it would but losing 30-70% of your strategic bomber force in this way is quite an embarrassment for Russia.
    2
  66. nope
    2
  67.  @jameschalkwig787  absolute bs,only one has been shot down and that was a friendly fire.
    2
  68. Proof = Russian claims and a made up YT vid
    2
  69. ​ @roychain4877  Yes it was only playing,losing all those men,armoured vehicles and aircraft for something 4 years later still nowhere near accomplished.
    2
  70. ​@patriarshiewhat a load of absolute tosh,what NATO military,I'll be intrigued to hear?
    2
  71. The initial invasion was most shocking,you'd think they'd of learned something from 2 goes at Chechnya.
    2
  72. And I'm sure NATO will respond in kind.
    2
  73. @uraveragefriend2 kept in very good condition
    2
  74. Wrongly speaking
    2
  75. It's not used because it's 💩
    2
  76. @jcistw3639  no it isnt what is known. Just because volunteers have gone to fight,most of them with little to no experience,does not mean those countries are at war with them. Volunteers are fighting on both sides from countries all round the Globe. There's undoubtedly Romanian volunteers fighting Russia, doesn't mean Romania is fighting Ukraine. Supplying does not mean fighting,otherwise we'd be saying Russia & China fought the US in the Vietnam war etc.
    2
  77.  @funnycatvideos7596  That we don't know,it's like saying Vietnam wouldn't of won the war without Russian help. It's the tech part i was getting at,some of those vehicles i was driving round in 30+ years ago.
    2
  78. @Valhura77  NATO supplies didn't start until well into the war. Remember the state of the initial imvasion forces. No better than what went into Chechnya and they gave Russia a bloody nose with no help.
    2
  79. @Magnus-c6v  i obviously did read it depth and questioned quite a lot of it especially the source.
    2
  80. ​ @ZincFold and Russia's up front with the truth?😂
    2
  81.  @alexgo1034  you're not making any sense in your relevance to the context of the subject.
    2
  82.  @viktorsvinin5591  completely wrong despite what your government made you believe. The Russian army had to make a deal with the mudge not to let it's convoys get massacred on the way on the way out like they had been for 9 years. And even then the Russians still broke the deal as a commander lost his nerve. Do you want to sources for this information,authors etc
    2
  83. @tamdang8346  he never stated any facts hence why i challenged him on it but give him his due least he tried making the bs look convincing. Any words on holes in Odessa hotels roofs yet or maybe missing Danish pilots? Anything?
    2
  84. @Hans-zq4ig do you like meeting men? Is that how you met your husband?
    2
  85. The amount of patriot's has nothing to do with the wars outcome.
    2
  86. Pac-3 can
    2
  87. Old clips made up with Russian claims.....next
    2
  88. And how do you draw that conclusion when the US military isn't at war?
    2
  89. ah the old oreshnilk bs,a missile so inaccurate it hasn't been used again.
    2
  90.  @fabricosta9488  so basically it's an ICBM,a concept that's been around since the 60s.
    2
  91. @chillian321  except the warheads aren't accurate and produce little damage. The cost of it to be produced means it'll be produced in tens per year. Basically it's better just being resigned to be a nuke like originally planned. It's an expensive way of doing very little conventionally the experts &;Russia have found out.
    2
  92. They're still in quite good nick though,not many Russian tanks looking like that or looking like the crew survived.
    2
  93.  @Pythoner  no it's called independent. Some of us rely on more than YT & RT for our information.
    2
  94. ​ @Volkodav-1  what a load of nonsense
    2
  95. it's made up bollocks?
    2
  96.  @Glenoidio  you mastered 14 year old boys? I'd keep that to yourself mate.
    2
  97. @oofoof1206  those tanks aren't worth anything now,you seen the stores in the US,full of m1a1s
    2
  98. Those countries aren't at war to deploy those,Russia is
    2
  99.  @ffboysyt8309  as in much hyped and relative ease,you could say the same about the SU-34
    2
  100. According to those reliable telegram sources ....😂
    2
  101. ​ @Yuri-z2y  no it isn't
    2
  102. Very true. UK sonar tech is decades ahead of any including the US
    2
  103.  @BigDankDickDad  Ukraine used them
    2
  104. ​ @mog404 utter nonsense. Russia has lost far more than the few outdated NATO armour. NATO can replace them with better models,whereas Russia digs out T-72s and T-62s.
    2
  105.  @elwahabiabdsalal6632  that's an opinion not fact. There's plenty of more advanced Abrams plus other tanks to replace them that don't have the T-90s survivability drawbacks. As for Ka-52,again it's your opinion as AH-64 wins time and time again in sales trials against it.
    2
  106. That wasn't the reason
    2
  107. @shadowreaver1851  industrial juggernaught 😂 who has Russia fought? Chechnya was a disaster and 3 years later with this debacle they need NK to help kick Ukraine out of their own country.
    2
  108. No that was in a US/NATO all arms battleground. Neither side fighting here has that ability.
    2
  109. 😂 same bollocks as the Danish pilot nonsense?
    2
  110. Russia can't even take out Ukraine's rear area logistics so hows it going to manage against NATO & the US?
    2
  111. Nato didn't invade Ukraine. Russia did,that's the source of evil.
    2
  112. Invasion
    2
  113. There isn't. It's bs
    2
  114. what a load of nonsense,even western forces are saying Ukraine is the lead in this type of tech. You got pummeled,accept it.
    2
  115. The most accurate
    2
  116. It's intercepted Kinzhal
    2
  117.  @Yuri-z2y  it's possible and it's been done,check out the shootdowns from May 2023. As for the mach 10 speed well that's debatable as the experts have said.
    2
  118. Most of the aid has gone to making more munitions and arms factories in Western countries for Ukraine.
    2
  119. According to you.Yet the ukraine crews in action say the opposite. It's not hard to see who's talking tripe.
    2
  120. because it's crap
    2
  121. Yeah after 3 years we're really in awe 😂
    2
  122. NATO isn't there
    2
  123.  @Mr_Burke  well it's more plausible than what's been said from Indian YT news channels 😂
    2
  124. nope
    2
  125. Russia has had the same support as Ujraine from Iran & NK. As for those advisors,they only exist in NATO countries training ukes.
    2
  126. You're an embarrassment to all those actually in the military. Should be ashamed of yourself.
    2
  127. not even good propaganda at that
    2
  128. ​ @jb-xc4oh  Russia isn't a peer opponent. Chechnya,Georgia and now Ukraine put paid to that myth.
    2
  129. Those air defenses need upgrading after last weekend then 😂
    2
  130.  @Станислав-с6п8я  they where launched dead on the front line hitting an airbase,hence why the Russians had to pull their aircraft out of range,further back.
    2
  131. Even with the warheads its only delivering a ton of explosive power and that's if it was accurate,which it isn't
    2
  132. ​ @VovikPomidorov  it wasn't the negotiations it was the nlavs on that convoy!
    2
  133. ​ @КириллГайдукович  no they weren't
    2
  134. ​ @VeteransVillage-r3d  no they weren't
    2
  135. Then you woke up
    2
  136. @vaninec  no that's how the Russians used their tanks unsuccessfully,in a tank v infantry debacle. In your army they may be used like that in NATO and mine it's part of a battlegroup. The infantry side is taken care of with other assets. It's how we train and always have done.
    2
  137. What a load of bs
    2
  138. exactly
    2
  139.  @imrussian6638  Going by the accuracy from the first one,i'll take my chances
    2
  140. Ukraine's tiny air force is still flying missions regularly
    2
  141. Last paragraph hits the nail on the head.
    2
  142. Downing drones
    2
  143. They're flying daily against drones. Same for the mirages,just the mirages have a better EW suite.
    2
  144. Other way round.
    2
  145. It was bs,they didn't hit anything apart from water
    2
  146. You're the king of BS today
    2
  147. The country still struggling against Ukraine? Imagine what the US would do 😂
    1
  148. The US had plans to build prompt global strike with a conventional warhead then realised it was a waste of time and money.
    1
  149. Based on what bonehead?
    1
  150. ​ @sudhakarrane7076  and bought P-8s and Apaches from the USA
    1
  151. Based on?
    1
  152.  @BehshadSamimi  how many times have they hit the Truman again on this channel? 😂
    1
  153.  @Yuri-z2y  Maths isn't your strong point i see.30 Abrams and 14 c2's? hardly 99% is it NATO Instructors in NATO countries teaching the ukes like my former regiment but still the Ukes doing the fighting in their country. You grasping at straws again Botsky
    1
  154. ​ @Yuri-z2y  yeah lets do some maths. You do realise a large proportion of that aid is going to building munitions factories in NATO countries but let's look at what's been delivered earliest model M1A1s and C2s alongside old L1s and L2s. Hardly earth shattering NATO stuff is it botsky? Lets look at the aircraft,approx 60 1980s models F-16 and Mirage 2000s yet you still bang the fighting whole of NATO drum 😂
    1
  155. ​ @Yuri-z2y  see just nonsense again. Nothing to add of any substance botsky
    1
  156. ​ @Yuri-z2y  It's called an education and 5 decades of a varied much travelled life Botsky.
    1
  157.  mossablahmaza  loads of su-34s have been downed
    1
  158. It's fiction
    1
  159. ​@BlakeCresseyit only has approx 120 strategic bombers
    1
  160. ​ @EXPLODINGGM-j9c  what a load of bollocks
    1
  161. ​ @somadityasohini6502  no they don't
    1
  162. ​ @coyoteeffect  the wing numbers are online with the exact numbers
    1
  163.  @zombieGI  it's not the us on the ground.
    1
  164.  @zombieGI  explain why the US would risk Patriot crews when ukes can just as easily be trained stateside or in Europe?
    1
  165.  @zombieGI  it doesn't take that long to train someone on a missile system,believe me. We've been selling them to most of the world for years.
    1
  166. @zombieGI  So you found out that Ukrainian crews have been trained on them,hallelujah.
    1
  167.  @zombieGI  I don't who this is aimed at but the reply i was responding to was the comment of its a mix of ukes & us troops which is incorrect. The ukes have been trained up in Europe & the US to use these amongst other systems.
    1
  168.  @seanou2837  no it doesn't,23 weeks in total with10 being specialised but this will be weekends off,5 o clock finish etc. A fast track course will knock down the days and hours.
    1
  169.  @zombieGI  i just state facts
    1
  170.  @seanou2837  I disagree,the course length is a package that's taught at the same time frame regardless of nationality same for gunnery,tactics,other systems etc obviously some pick it up quick some a bit slower but this is built into the courses.
    1
  171.  @seanou2837  no it isn't
    1
  172.  @rolisreefranch  The Ukrainians are taught how to use them in both the US and NATO countries that operate the system. Ukrainians with a background in systems obviously pick it up quicker. They are Ukrainian crews using them. Why does everyone who sits on YT think it's an hard system to operate. Like all systems such as archer,himars etc it's just a matter of training. It was harder teaching Jordanians and Egyptians how to use it.
    1
  173.  @seanou2837  ex mechanised now working in aerospace yourself?
    1
  174. utter nonsense
    1
  175. ​ @ethercruiser1537 no it didn't. Putin started the war in 2022.
    1
  176.  @andreisokolenko7719  it's a war,regardless of what he or you call it.
    1
  177.  @andreisokolenko7719  it's a war no matter how much you provide smoke and mirrors,a war that's cost Russia more casualties than every war combined the west has fought since ww2...now that's a war
    1
  178.  @ethercruiser1537  go on then mystic meg?
    1
  179.  @ethercruiser1537  you haven't a clue what I'm talking about do you.
    1
  180. ​ @Yuri-z2y  Only to Russian Propaganda reels...
    1
  181. ​ @Yuri-z2y only in your head botsky
    1
  182. No it isn't. These are 80s tech and crews are still surviving
    1
  183. ​ @bigcoolviking  his numbers are far from accurate,it's nonsense
    1
  184. ​ @bigcoolviking same as yours are about the UKR side.
    1
  185. What about the Russian Su-30 brought down by the sea drone it was hunting?
    1
  186. most has gone on building munitions factories in the west
    1
  187. @kathrynck  only according to YT they're small. Defence spending has went through the roof in the last 3 years on them. 3 factories built in the US alone last year. That ordanance was taking up space for the new to come in,for example the ATACMS and Javelins etc.
    1
  188.  @harmonsalmon7739  still doing a job against Russia.
    1
  189.  @kathrynck  quite a good point. You're forgetting the part about the level of training that has been given which also has a financial cost. In my country 25% of our training areas are now dedicated to training Ukrainians hence why they can make older equipment work so well in smaller numbers against superior numbers and laat so long.
    1
  190. Did you type this with your elbows?
    1
  191. They've still got at least 50% flying from day 1 and these have been adapted to drop western guided munitions. And that's before the F-16s and 2000s enter service in numbers.
    1
  192. Not the most intelligent comment.
    1
  193. Enough bollocks,tell us about that Ukrainian strike on Vladivostok
    1
  194.  @cal82252  need an air asset to guide them
    1
  195. ​ @bqcjm2ldnstuff  shells mean nothing. Look how many where fired before the somme. You need to look at the Russian tactics compared to Ukraine's and then you'll see why they've incurred such huge losses.
    1
  196. Its an invasion regardless of what the Russians call it
    1
  197. Shame task & purposes recent vid from kursk pisses all over the content in this vid.
    1
  198. Sometimes?
    1
  199. Truth? 😂
    1
  200.  @Yuri-z2y  Only in your emptyhead
    1
  201.  @Yuri-z2y  It's called Sarcasm woodenhead, not that you'd understand.
    1
  202. Russia and Ukraine
    1
  203. Russian losses are far higher,the su-34 has suffered badly
    1
  204. Can be trialled against L2s & Abrams
    1
  205. must be true then......
    1
  206. They've been near Russian air defences in Syria.
    1
  207. You need to look at missiles Ukraine has and they are fully trained up on them.
    1
  208. @TwiceStruck  storm shadow and ATACMS are simple weapons to train on and fire. Inertial navigation with gps back up. If you can train Moroccans who've never fired a surface to surface missile you can train anyone.
    1
  209. @TwiceStruck  and experts disagreed with their reason for not supplying. Maybe Germany didn't want to give them up with having so little.Taurus is as simple to use as ATACMS and storm shadow. The ukes can fire them inertially as simple as putting coordinates in your car sat nav.
    1
  210.  @catadoxas  course they will,the systems not rocket science pardon the pun. Ukraine has used missile systems before so it isn't hard for them to train on and guide themselves. They way people on here talk,it's like they've given them to Papua New Guinea.
    1
  211.  @nolga3569  is that the sum total of your input? NATO in fancy dress 😴
    1
  212.  @nolga3569  you should get yourself down there instead of sitting in your basement eating turnips,see for yourself.
    1
  213. nope
    1
  214. ​ @tamdang8346 it's been an embarrassing shambles for Russia tam dung. More casualties than every western conflct since the 2nd world war,billions on equipment lost,13000 armoured vehicles,30% of the black sea fleet. Shambles
    1
  215. ​@patriarshie😂 based on what? What nationalities and regiments? Bearing in mind these occupations aren't in the hundreds. What's your sources? Let's see this,I'm looking forward to this one.
    1
  216. ​@patriarshieit's called inertial navigation you fart,still is that NATO fighting...no
    1
  217. ​@patriarshiewhere are these NATO military captured by Russia. Same as the swedish killed at Poltava Or the Danish Pilot that didn't exisr Or the hotels in Odessa that had holes in the roof but NATO killed you guessed it... Complete bollocks
    1
  218. ​@patriarshie Volunteers you complete numbnut,guess you're saying the Australian teacher,the bit who was kicked out for taking drugs and the 18 yr old brit who had no experience are NATO are you? Are you that thick?
    1
  219. ​@patriarshie You do realise volunteers are on both sides,so the italian platoon on the Russian side means Ukraine is fighting Italy by your logic,what about the indians?
    1
  220. ​@patriarshie That's neither thousands or a NATO country regiment,I'm waiting...
    1
  221. @patriarshie regiments? NATO? need evidence silly man
    1
  222. ​ @МаринаКислая-у5ф a base full of peacekeepers as per peace accords.
    1
  223. They did with ATACMS,the aircraft airfields came in range once they got the go ahead they could target them. Hence why these weapons have gone quiet.
    1
  224.  @kerrydavis7034  that's bs. If they had that many they'd have air superiority
    1
  225.  @bobjones-bt9bh  they airfields haven't moved the aircraft have.
    1
  226.  @santaroio1982  Yes it did invade..with terrible tactics and high losses aswell as multiple attacks on civilians. Where you one of those who did that?
    1
  227. @patriarshie no i'm just someone who likes facts silly fart
    1
  228.  @НквКн  don't like facts don't intervene
    1
  229.  @tamdang8346  you mean those who don't use YT as a source tamdung?
    1
  230.  @tamdang8346  Bollockstube and third world halfwits like yourself Tamdung,think i'll pass on that one.
    1
  231. ​ @SMRMilitaryAnalysis  but entirely true,lifes cheap in the Russian army.
    1
  232. ​ @lexburen5932  it hasn't fought NATO
    1
  233. Yes,3 years against Ukraine and still struggling
    1
  234.  @ReadyOnThree  nope
    1
  235. Based on?
    1
  236. ​​ @ErnestRomanovich  old m1s (31) c2s (14) and some L2s/L1s dating from the early 80s are doing well against an army that's lost over 13000 armoured vehicles. Quite embarrassing for Russia really.
    1
  237. Yt sources?
    1
  238. They didn't hand it to the British or have arms coming in that route.
    1
  239. it's not accurate enough to hit a ship never mind a moving ship.
    1
  240. What century does it start? It's getting a bit tiresome now
    1
  241. Russia hasn't crossed into a NATO country to find that out,when will whoppers like you realize that.
    1
  242. ​ @Yuri-z2y  no that was the Russians who failed to dominate the land and hid in the cities. Hence why their convoys and air supply where masscred. I can recommend some well researched books with references that can validate exactly what I've put. Those references and horrific photographs are Russian before you can insinuate they're western propaganda.
    1
  243. @Martin-f7g2f Iran never downed any,no wreckage or pilot's. Just utter bs
    1
  244. nope,toothless
    1
  245. Exactly. Western arms are coming in via the borders.
    1
  246. So nearly a million dead and injured isn't an invasion. Please give your head a wobble
    1
  247. what is that reliably?
    1
  248. who needs to stop a missile with a 6% chance of hitting a house in a CEP of 150m?
    1
  249. @kathrynck  well the evidence wasn't what the vid looked like,it was actually wider than a CEP of 250m and caused very minimal damage. This was shown on high resolution imagery. This type of weapon has severe drawbacks in accuracy and warhead size hence why the US cancelled it's own Prompt Global Strike when they looked at doing the same. Take into account the cost and the low production per year of these by Russia,it's an expensive way of doing very little.
    1
  250. @vanjamenadzer  except both sides have ICBMs with nukes dummy,they have done for years. That line if crossed will be suicide for both sides. The point of this conversation is the conventional aspect.
    1
  251. @iviciaable  unfortunately for you some of us do a bit more research than YT. High resolution imagery afterwards showed little damage on any of the area,basically it was a dud. No buildings levelled,nothing,too inaccurate.36 warheads at a CEP of 150m gave it a 6% of hitting a house sized target! And all of those waheads combined only gave it the destructiver power of a ww2 v2.And this one's CEP was well out of 150m. It was an expensive way of doing nothing.
    1
  252. @iviciaable  do you want the maths involved or the experts who reviewed all this. 40 tons of rocket to deliver less than 1 ton of explosive power (3.6 million joules compared to 4.4 million for 1 ton of explosive) you can talk all the YT nonsense you want but the facts don't lie.
    1
  253.  @nolga3569  no it isn't it's been tested against ballistic targets for a long time.
    1
  254. @iviciaable  I'm not arsed where you think you worked or what you think. I've explained the science,what the resolution images reported after,what the damage assessment was and that this was done by experts not the likes of you with an opinion on YT.If you want all the links and sources i can kindly supply until then go and give your head a shit. They weren't accurate or penetrated anything,you just don't get it do you.
    1
  255.  @nolga3569  exactly they worked,what targets in Israel have been hit? Please tell
    1
  256. Facts? 😂
    1
  257. Nope,going by the first one. It's an expensive folly.
    1
  258. it didn't
    1
  259. More the opposite,that handfuls of antiquated western weapons due for retirement can still hold their own against Russia's best. Quite a shambles.
    1
  260. Nonsense
    1
  261. ​ @C200michmich  trying to deflect from the nonsense of thousands of NATO dead with more nonsense?
    1
  262. @krabbe9078  what a complete load of tripe. All this slav nonsense. You do realise where Ukrainian soldiers are getting trained? NATO countries. 25% of my countries training areas are taken up by them. Why do you think that is?
    1
  263. What a load of bollocks
    1
  264. Do you believe everything you see on YT?
    1
  265. End most life on earth on both sides? Sounds intelligent
    1
  266.  @OzzyBloke  proved what? 10,000 Rissian tanks destroyed? An air force that can't maintain air superiority over it's little neighbour. A black sea fleet that's lost 30% of it's ships? What part needs keeping up with?
    1
  267. They have done and can
    1
  268. ​ @Longcloud  countries elect to join NATO it doesnt take an invasion
    1
  269. Shame they sold out to GM,they made great cars. I remember the 80s car advert with a viggen in it.
    1
  270. ​ @mpopenker it took less than 6 weeks to kick them out the country. It was the corrupt government in charge that let them back in,years after the US withdrew.
    1
  271. Obviously Russians didn't
    1
  272. The treaty part is nonsense
    1
  273. ​ @phildobson8705  treaty on open skies or start has nothing it it about keeping bombers parked on aprons. Hence why the b-2s get away with being in hangers. They do need to be accessible for inspection with prior notice.
    1
  274. ICBMs apart from nuclear use are meaningless as for the drone part,NATO & the US definitely won't be behind in that department. You need to concentrate on developing an air force more importantly.
    1
  275. @FantasticNPC  They're too inaccurate and ineffective going by the Oreshnik results. Hence why the US dropped the idea of PGS years ago. As for the drone tech,do you not think they'd of thought of a solution for this.
    1
  276. Still beats any Russian tin can one on one
    1
  277. Propaganda bollocks
    1
  278. @funnycatvideos7596  still isn't fighting NATO though. Or using it's best equipment M1a1s,F-16s,Leo 1s? Exactly
    1
  279. @funnycatvideos7596  if it was managing the shit it wouldn't be at the negotiating table.That rising inflation and interest rates will be biting into that 32% defence budget.
    1
  280.  @petpara  What* was the point in an education system if you didn't attend?
    1
  281.  @Valhura77  So what NATO units are they fighting? See any F35s or B-52 strikes? Tomahawks? etc etc It's getting tedious now
    1
  282. ​ @YourGardenerJesús  Putin hides behind nukes,that's the only threat. It's not NATOs fight but if they entered and no doubt pummeled his forces he'd use them.
    1
  283.  @Lady.Aviator  source....?
    1
  284. ​ @Манлетопия  no it isn't
    1
  285. ​@PlaneBoyRadar no it isn't
    1
  286.  @Манлетопия  go on then show it?
    1
  287.  @Манлетопия  you can't put links on,but if its Borzzikman,Ritter or nonsense like it I'm not interested. Type the link without hyperlink
    1
  288.  @Xtremedia01  it's a pro-Russian channel
    1
  289. @Rooikunbo  absolute nonsense. Even sf in NATO are given the same inquests and lengthy investigation plus barracks have ears and talk. No NATO are on the ground or have suffered deaths. It's a YT myth. Volunteers from western countries have been captured and killed,quite a lot with no or little military experience such as the British one the other week but these aren't NATO forces.
    1
  290. @lonniesides9302  not the tattoo nonsense. Next you'll be saying the captured flag was proof too. It's all nonsense.
    1
  291.  @Hamidkhan193-s  We don't do that nonsense in NATO. You'd have to be a complete half wit to believe it. Let's cherry pick the regiment for someone with no friends or family that no one knows in the regiment or has worked with to auddenly disappear.
    1
  292. ​ @sudhakarrane7076  lets see the source then
    1
  293.  @davemccrillis1470  truth & this channel belong in the teaspoon sized brains that believe it.
    1
  294.  @davemccrillis1470  well I'm sure you can write those veritable sources and links without an hyperlink
    1
  295.  @alexgo1034  speak English please
    1
  296.  @Hamidkhan193-s  course they do and all that nonsense
    1
  297. It was designed for peer warfare from the start.The m1a3 is a completely different beast altogether
    1
  298. Your safer being where it's aimed at so you would personally want to be on the receiving end.
    1
  299.  @АлександрШко-м2щ  He's speaking the truth
    1
  300. ​ @MarkSegall  nope he's correct,you can't alter history
    1
  301. ​ @MarkSegall  mudge tortured Soviet soldiers beyond belief if you think they respected thwm or still do you need to read up on that confluct. Statt with Afghansky,a well sourced book
    1
  302. ​ @Yuri-z2y  only by ppp,which doesn't mean shit compared to GDP.
    1
  303.  @Манлетопия  no i just like stating facts,you should try it
    1
  304.  @joe420shmoe  it's pointless explaining to the wooden heads,they'll believe anything on YT
    1
  305.  @tamdang8346  any facts to add or more bs? I suspect none of the former and all of the latter.
    1
  306.  @tamdang8346  so you agree it was bullshite apart from 3 paragraphs,what 3 paragraphs?
    1
  307.  @tamdang8346  In the english language it's been split into paragraphs,which is 3 sentences or more. If it had been sectioned he would of itemised it as such. Another squirm,pilots? Hotel roofs? Copying text and tantrums,you've sadly got me mistaken for someone else who probably seen you as you as a prize plonker.
    1
  308. ​ @jovancemitrevski4505  😂 more bollocks
    1
  309.  @m.j.debruin3041  by asking for facts? Are you that thick really?
    1
  310. @Hans-zq4ig As much as i find it flattering,flying to Sweden for some cottaging with strange men in toilets isn't my thing.
    1
  311. It's very biased for the Russians this channel
    1
  312. No it wasn't it was designed during the cold war for Europe
    1
  313. ​ @RadicalTek  well they didn't really did they. They couldn't hit a barn door with an Oreshnik 😂
    1
  314. ​ @JamieClarke-zk7wo  where have they said it couldn't you absolute whopper.
    1
  315. ​ @RadicalTek  Won what? Most pointless loss of countrymen competition?
    1
  316. ​ @justsaying2112  according to?
    1
  317. ​ @LC2025-e8n  get your arse back in that river for a dump before the family gets in for the monthly wash 😂
    1
  318. Utter bollocks
    1
  319. su-33? Mig-29k?
    1
  320.  @chris4321das  why wouldn't i be? did you check on those two aircraft?
    1
  321. ​ @GyulaHUN Ukraine*
    1
  322. they done 2 A-50s
    1
  323.  @robertklimczak5630  Looked new,especially dishes,straight from the factory.
    1
  324. 3rd
    1
  325. What's your source for the F-16s flying from Romania or the iskandr?
    1
  326. @alexandrualex4202  that's NATO not Ukraine's
    1
  327. Houthi detected? claim? that's the point the nonsense went to a new level
    1
  328. Oreshnik the inaccurate wunderwaffe?
    1
  329. ​ @Chickenworm9394 NATO hasn't fired a shot,it's a weak excuse to say Russia is fighting NATO
    1
  330. Fact 😂Yes because NATO would risk it's pilot's being shot down and paraded on RT wouldn't it?
    1
  331. Didn't work out great last time.
    1
  332. How many tank losses has Russia had?
    1
  333. Only in your head
    1
  334. Obviously you're that simple to not research the war NATO equipment was designed to fight.
    1
  335. ​ @Irishpotato81  because Russia's hit plenty of other non military urban targets killing civilians
    1
  336. Most of that uke aid has gone on building munitions factories in the west.
    1
  337. Neither of them are NATO or their top tanks.
    1
  338. ​ @Yuri-z2y  m1a3,c3, L2a7 and a8,Leclerc
    1
  339. ​ @onanysundrymule3144  Nope,it's a fact. I wouldn't of written it if it wasn't.
    1
  340. ​ @John-tronic  you keep believing that propaganda and YT vids.
    1
  341.  @leckomio3  It's not Russia's decision to dictate whether a neighboring country joins NATO.
    1
  342. ​ @dirkhuman760  No it isn't. The only conditions on it where the 1994 return of nukes. The rest is a Putin land grab.
    1
  343.  @MangueBeat  nope
    1
  344. First one proved useless and inaccurate. A 40 ton rocket to hit with 1 ton of explosive, Whoopee
    1
  345. Have you been drinking?
    1
  346. nope it's Between Russia & Ukraine
    1
  347.  @viniciusbueno2160  They're doing excatly what the USSR and China did in the Vietnam war albeit to a lesser degree. The personnel part is nonsense.
    1
  348.  @societyreborn33  Regardless of what you think they've said it isn't. Not one NATO country has deployed a regiment or a fighter squadron into this war.
    1
  349.  @societyreborn33  Proxy wars have been around centuries,look at the Vietnam war it was basically the US v Russia/China by proxy
    1
  350.  @pablomaloosorio3015  No they didn't.The US is well versed in drone warfare,my former regiment is over there now in the states training at Fort Irwin in it with the Australians. Stop peddling this nonsense
    1
  351.  @House_Of_Cards_  You keep believing all that nonsense but ill take word of mouth from those actually doing it and the Defence analysts opinions over your unsubstantiated comments any day.
    1
  352.  @Yuri-z2y  They haven't declared any wars. Russia lost more trying to take Chechnya first time than what the US lost in both Afghan and Iraq. Then we have their losses in this shambles. Let's talk about the Russians Comedy show in Afghan then...
    1
  353. ​ @tangofox7124  are you out of nappies yet?
    1
  354. ​ @Yuri-z2y  well Russia was abysmal. Nearly 500 aircraft lost,15k troops+ dead and had to make a deal with the mudge so they could leave the country unscathed. Shambles really,all in 9 years.
    1
  355. ​ @svenhanson398  no worse than the 'smo' smokescreen then.
    1
  356. ​ @Nick-v2d  Russian prisoners getting flayed,tent pegged out and surrounded by landmines for their comrades to find.
    1
  357. The wreckage of kinzhals was recovered over 2 years ago from Patriot shootdowns.
    1
  358. ​ @Hotstepper2569  truth a bitter pill to swallow?
    1
  359.  @Hotstepper2569  why would they reverse engineer something they're already producing better?,you done any research on the hyper sonic missile's the west is producing now? and you ever seen the effects of a missile hit?you'll realize there's nothing left to reverse engineer.
    1
  360. ​ @hu9678  plenty of proof not vids like on here and the rest of distorted bollocks. Do a bit of research like i did if it's allowed in your country.
    1
  361.  @wsbchk_  who goes by them as the source?
    1
  362. No it's between Russia and Ukraine.
    1
  363. Ukraine hasn't got them that's why.
    1
  364. course they can.....
    1
  365. most missed it
    1
  366. There's only been 100-200 in action so carry on with the ridiculous claims
    1
  367.  @Yuri-z2y  at this made up tripe? nah,you crying at your losses? or your family members losing limbs and lives for this nonsense?
    1
  368.  @Yuri-z2y  It is accurate dumbarse,unlike your telegram bollocks channels
    1
  369.  @Yuri-z2y  ah did they escape it by being 'special' bit like yourself?
    1
  370. Not really
    1
  371.  @javasrevenge7121  I'm not actually do you want links to the experts who've reviewed all this. I'm damn sure their credentials beat yours.
    1
  372.  @DemiGod..  according to you more like
    1
  373. All my information is widely available in a free country to research. Try it
    1
  374.  @BertMerlin57  no it's just a training exercise that's cost nearly a million casualties 😂
    1
  375. ​ @hansjorgkunde3772  completely wrong,get yourself to Fort Till and get yourself educated.
    1
  376. ​ @steveb890 you can't explain this to the woodenheads. I simply ask does your car sat nav need to be connected to the net to find a route?
    1
  377. What a load of nonsense
    1
  378. ​ @Yuri-z2y  Everything,from start to finish. Report to Fort Till and tell me otherwise.
    1
  379. Nonsense there's plenty of photographs and analysis of the first strike. It was inaccurate infact the factory had been more damaged from previous raids.
    1
  380. No they didn't claim that
    1
  381. Utter nonsense
    1
  382.  @katyushatman5187  complete and utter nonsense.
    1
  383.  @tamdang8346  how is that beating NATO tam dung? Grasping at straws again i see.
    1
  384.  @tamdang8346  again how is that beating NATO tam dung my fly infested street 💩 friend?
    1
  385.  @victoriasvirskaia267  no they're not
    1
  386. course he did.....
    1
  387. Nonsense
    1
  388.  @giuliobuccini208  The equipment's from all sources,i guess the North Vietnamese where Russians and Chinese by your logic then?
    1
  389. @Максим-ж5п2ю what a load of nonsense,the Russians where comprehensively defeated on that Road to Kyiv,the Peacetalks failed due to Russia's unrealistic demands.
    1
  390.  @donjuliogonzalez-fraustoes159  Russia wouldn't of won without those supplies and it was a lot more than 1.5%,want some sources?
    1
  391. @Максим-ж5п2ю not the NATO soldiers nonsense again,Danish pilots's? Swedes at Poltova,Officers in Odessa? that type of nonsense,list a few wars where Nato have gone to war in disguise?
    1
  392.  @donjuliogonzalez-fraustoes159  Sorry,i don't speak infant.
    1
  393.  @donjuliogonzalez-fraustoes159  no it's because you can't keep up with an adult conversation.
    1
  394. what a load of nonsense
    1
  395. ​ @Jthe12344  Its not NATO personnel doing it.Simple reason is,Russia hasn't the ability to target the Ukranians doing the supply routes.It's airpower is woeful.
    1
  396. You mean a country that can't take it's neighbor 10 times smaller after nearly 4 years?
    1
  397. ​ @TheChampFighter  War* a few old Abrams & Leopards is not roided up. Its a sad excuse for a shambolic invasion.
    1
  398. It was designed to fight in Europe,remember the cold war?
    1
  399. @Pythoner  plenty more sources out there than oryx. You still getting yours from borzzikman?
    1
  400. @Alex-l3z1r Ukraine*
    1
  401. Nonsense
    1
  402. Even the US admits the UK is far ahead of anyone else in sub tech and sonar.
    1
  403. ​ @Yuri-z2y  no it isn't botsky,sevastopol is our of bounds. It's storm shadow territory
    1
  404. ​ @Yuri-z2y  Kursk* unfortunately it was. Silly
    1
  405. ​ @Yuri-z2y  Slight damage but that was caused by arson not the submarine being a complete shambles. There's a big difference.
    1
  406.  @Yuri-z2y  You're still trying your best to look a prize turkey i see. It was deactivated after the damage estimate came in and whether it was worthwhile repairing with the sub nearing decommissioning. If it had been completely destroyed they wouldn't of spent a year debating whether to repair it or decommission would they numbnuts.
    1
  407.  @Yuri-z2y  You botting on here now i see,hows the Kursk? it was nuclear by the way,the Miami wasn't completely destroyed amongst other facts you've got wrong. I think your handler needs another typist Yuri,you're looking a complete turkey at this game.
    1
  408.  @Yuri-z2y  One was decommissioned,one was sunk from being shite. Big difference but nice try anyway.
    1
  409.  @Yuri-z2y  still at it being a plonker. Nope the state of the Russian navy is hilarious,how is the Kuznetsov by the way? How many crew where killed from the Miami being sabotaged by 1 crew? How many crew where killed on the kursk? my guess,without looking it up...all of them? See the difference is the USS Miami could've been recommissioned whereas the Kursk was fishfood.
    1
  410.  @Yuri-z2y  Who brought USS Connecticut into it? check with your handler Yuri,he's making you look stupid.Not that it's hard.
    1
  411. ​ @catfishtricks_starlightfarms  Taliban was defeated in a matter of weeks back in 2001,controlling a population that doesn't want democracy is a different matter.
    1
  412. ​ @andreandre3942  because Russia can't. It's simple enough. As for arms help,they've received some,not a lot of, F-16s that's been updated. Hardly cutting edge numbers or tech against the might of Russia. The satellite part doesnt even matter,it's just excuse after excuse for Russia failing.
    1
  413. ​ @5tre55full  where did you get all that bollocks from? NATO and the US isn't fighting in Ukraine,if you could kindly say where the F35s and F15s have went? As for Afghan you're getting mixed up with the wrong country again. It was Russia that had the staggering air losses even before stingers started arriving,not NATO
    1
  414. ​ @5tre55full  not the mercenary bollocks too 😂. Like the Danish pilot and the Swedes at Poltava? Or the Odessa hotel? All that turned out to be complete bs. Try and stick to the subject though,i asked you where's all the NATO airpower you talk of?
    1
  415. Utter tripe
    1
  416. ​ @Yuri-z2y 😂
    1
  417. Humvees,mraps and a few black hawks and you're going on like you've won the world cup.😂
    1
  418. Yes it can
    1
  419. We've actually overestimated them,we've had to adjust our training accordingly to meet demands.
    1
  420. It's 3
    1
  421. Russia can't match the US never mind NATO.
    1
  422. ​ @Longcloud  borzzikman? 😂 and you call that being educated 😂
    1
  423. What a load of shite,what army where you in? Bangladesh?
    1
  424. It's an invasion regardless of troop numbers.
    1
  425. Did you think before writing this bollocks?
    1
  426. Your numbers are incorrect
    1
  427.  @Yuri-z2y  He doesn't need glasses to see this shite is nonsense
    1
  428.  @Onan-u3b  the us coalition done it in a few weeks in 2001,it was Corrupt government left behind that fell
    1
  429. According to who? 😂
    1
  430. Explain how the houthis have proven this?
    1
  431. They've never referred to it as that
    1
  432. Russia invaded in that time Czechoslovakia,Afghanistan,Checnya (Twice) Georgia and Ukraine multiple times. All with heavy losses i might add.
    1
  433.  @milanmarinkovic3016  the butchers bill on this one will top the lot
    1
  434. Because it's crap.Conventionally, air launched weapons are more accurate and can deliver bigger payloads.
    1
  435. Bs
    1
  436. It's hitting civilians,the NATO nonsense is a sick excuse.
    1
  437.  @Glenoidio  I didn't admit anything, it was a play on your stupidity
    1
  438.  @Glenoidio  you say about my age with lols and gotcha,what a cretin
    1
  439.  @jithlalmg1872  what bit explain your worthless opinion
    1
  440. @oofoof1206  what a load of pro RT Coprophilliac nonsense
    1
  441.  @oofoof1206  like i explained those western vehicles are virtually free,sat in stores as they've been replaced by newer models.
    1
  442. @oofoof1206  Free as in Free,they're just sat in stores. Their replacements are in service and coming into service regatdless of any going to Ukraine. Look at the thousands of M1A1s that the US still has sat stored,it's a 40 year old tank. And as for Russuan tanks being up to M1a3 level. Not a chance. Those M1a1s and C2s are holding up against latest level tech whereas the Russian T-62/T-72 doesn't. Also those old Russian tanks need crews regardless of how many they can throw into the fray,why waste them in a T-62.
    1
  443.  @oofoof1206  i replied,read it
    1
  444. ​ @denazify_the_banderites  no it isn't. It's getting supplies but doesn't mean the west has to send everything or it's best. Russia would need to cross into a NATO country for it to face them.
    1
  445. ​ @denniscrork318  31 Abrams plus a few leopards isn't fighting 50 nations.
    1
  446. ​ @Chris-bb2cb 600 just in trying to take Povrosk
    1
  447. Ask a Russian sat in his freezing basemenr this winter how his life compares.
    1
  448. ​ @butterzz6913  they did when they where there but why keep bailing out a corrupt government that can't fight it's own battles.
    1
  449. NATO isn't out of weapons
    1
  450.  @andy_NQ  it's already been ramped up. NATO also has extensive stores for example the US with it's Abrams etc. Yet it's only supplied 31.
    1
  451. @neeladridas2096  negative
    1
  452.  @linejumper8204  We don't know yet what trump or NATOV will do but it's irrelevant to the answer i put. He stated NATO is out of weapons which it clearly isn't.
    1
  453.  @lorneiggulden7123  nice piece of complete bollocks you're talking there
    1
  454.  @gibbs677bg  source for the fact?
    1
  455. Russia is fighting Ukraine
    1
  456. ​ @FTM1fenn  who watches tv? Some of us are intelligent enough to read and do our own research rather than sit in front of YT,Telegram,X etc watching what bollocks others are putting on. Try it
    1
  457. According to you?
    1
  458. @bdleo300  they weren't US they where downgraded M1s in the Iraqi Army.
    1
  459. It was an own goal,shot down By a Patriot. How many of Russia's newest bomber the SU-34 been downed?
    1
  460. Mraps,humvees and a few blackhawks are hardly groundbreaking technology.
    1
  461.  @sudhakarrane7076  IAF ran out of su-27 widow makers?
    1
  462.  @RandleBeckford  seen on here you mean?
    1
  463. ​ @sudhakarrane7076 you can't even get the Taliban out your country 😂
    1
  464. They haven't downed either
    1
  465. ​ @dalibordupor3979  NATO has plenty of surplus. It always has done. There's nearly 5k of Abrams sat in storage,storm shadows and ATACMS are old tech nearly shelf life date and needed getting rid of.
    1
  466. No they don't
    1
  467. That wasn't part of the treaty,hence why B-2s are hangared and not stored in the open.
    1
  468. Russia invaded Ukraine,now that's war mongering
    1
  469. ​ @rudovessel4151  that's the Russians
    1
  470. ​ @rudovessel4151  nearly 16k (admitted) against a country with no army,imagine what Russian losses are in this shambles.
    1
  471. truth?? haha
    1
  472. They're used daily and very effectively
    1
  473. it's not NATO's war to enter
    1
  474. @lepiss9683  NATO did supply and train them to use them,that is correct. Russia responded with an ineffective and inaccurate conventionally armed ICBM.
    1
  475.  @TokitoLee  no it didn't. I've been in long in-depth conversations about that hit with other wooden heads on here and it's getting tiresome. It was inaccurate with it's CEP being too large and warhead being too small. Also the factory was an old rocket factory not producing NATO arms.
    1
  476.  @TokitoLee  patriots and other area defense systems don't cover everywhere,even a country as small and densely packed as Israel with one of the best layered air defenses in the world has area's they can't cover or of low value they won't.
    1
  477. @tamdang8346  you obviously don't. It hit with a combined 3.6 billion joules including kinetic energy,a 1 ton bomb is 4.4. So basically it's expensive,its shit,inaccurate get over it.
    1
  478. Su-34 has been downed more
    1
  479.  @grunthorful  course it does...,it's dual role same as the F-16 but then again the other aircraft didn't fair so better either.
    1
  480. The corrupt Afghan government did who handed it to the Taliban who funnily enough want the US back to help fight ISIS-K.
    1
  481. How did those Russian helicopters do against those goat herders pretty heavy losses wasn't it,what about the 2 hinds that had to ride suicide alongside the transports as they took off,take the missile instead of the troops
    1
  482. I had to study the Afghan-USSR conflict especially the air campaign Gamer Craig,I've got loads of sources i can highly recommend
    1
  483. What a load of nonsense
    1
  484. NATO isn't fighting. He's right,you're wrong.
    1
  485. They didn't
    1
  486.  @jamescook7713  That's not been verified
    1
  487. A decent army could.
    1
  488.  @JamesJones-c7g  excuses excuses.Russia had it's arse handed to it in Chechnyna and that was with the gloves off. Simply hadn't learned.
    1
  489. exactly,let the woodenheads have their minute of belief watching this tripe
    1
  490.  @cmdrTic  Doesn't take much research to find out when an aircraft goes down or 3 patriot's get destroyed,an amount of hardware like that would be all over the defence pages around the world.
    1
  491.  @isaacunrau5255  volunteers* funded by Ukraine. It's still not fighting NATO the same way that Ukraine isn't fighting Iran. Russia would need to cross into a NATO country for that to happen which we know it can't and won't.
    1
  492.  @Bort9878  exactly a weak country but still supplied thousands of headless chickens to the slaughter quite embarrising really. NATO has supplied supplies,quite a large portion of it well past it's sell by date.
    1
  493. @mamabazzz  it's more a change of role. Why spend money replacing one of the oldest m1 models when you're prioritising air mobile assets.
    1
  494. @moonZe_konZa  grafenwoehr was far from funny as was Poland when we do this shit
    1
  495. Sounds like a dock? Su-37? Bit early for the vodka
    1
  496. According to the woodenheads they where all sunk on a ship in the black sea.....ah that was bollocks too 😂
    1
  497. They didn't
    1
  498. They are not too heavy,it's a YT myth.Polish mud is the same as Ukrainian mud where they've been used for the last 30 years.
    1
  499. Only if you believe this
    1
  500.  @envya2774  funnily enough it was the himars that done the hitting but why let a bit of state sponsored YT get in the way.
    1
  501. What a load of tripe
    1
  502. Sa-3
    1
  503.  @andyvonbourske6405  NATO name
    1
  504. Your opinion isn't very good
    1
  505. ​ @Тивиал like Russia's 13k + losses?
    1
  506. ​ @frank-y8n  it hasn't got one
    1
  507. What a load of bollocks
    1
  508. They where 💩
    1
  509. They where designed for the European battlefield. They entered service in the 80s when the USSR and the cold war still existed.
    1
  510. @bdleo300  first gw1 they where. Afghan and GW2 where coin ops so just in supporting roals so no you can't judge their performance from those two latter environments.
    1
  511. ​ @momcilopucar8749  what a load of nonsense
    1
  512. Hacked secret documents only the Russians have seen and not released..😂
    1
  513.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  nobody wins a nuclear war,anyone that thinks otherwise is a complete idiot.
    1
  514. more bollocks then
    1
  515. @ knows its bs?
    1
  516.  @РафаэльСаркисянц-ъ2т  Russia hasn't the ability to do it. I spent 24 years in uniform waiting.
    1
  517. ​ @РафаэльСаркисянц-ъ2т  chill out,you'll give yourself an heart attack. I was asked will i be fighting Russia,i spent 24 years in uniform in a NATO army. Russia won't attack and never will. End of story.
    1
  518. ​ @Yuri-z2y  Your countrymen where skinned alive in Afghan remember. Ours weren't.
    1
  519. Then both sides will be annihilated. Not an intelligent thought.
    1
  520. Airpower wins wars
    1
  521. They'll come up with some bollocks like the Ukrainians are hiding military in them.
    1
  522.  @greatmartini1  they can't,simple enough
    1
  523.  @Yuri-z2y  They can't hence why it's untouched
    1
  524. They tried,it was a shambles
    1
  525.  @simonbelmont548  9 years for the Russians,at least 15k dead troops.
    1
  526. Conventionally it's a waste of money. 40 tons to deliver 1 ton.
    1
  527.  @Yuri-z2y  it's a war for Russia,count the bodybags,aircraft and vehicles lost. That's a war regardless of how you try and talk your way out of it
    1
  528. ​ @Yuri-z2y  nope it's a war
    1
  529. Well it hasn't really. These are older NATO equipment handed down and not used in the way NATO would.
    1
  530. It didn't have to remain anything.
    1
  531. No they're not
    1
  532. Source for 80%?
    1
  533. Because it's crap and ineffective
    1
  534. Only on YT
    1
  535. you been at the witch doctors potions again i see
    1
  536. Nope it's NATO supplying a country that was invaded,no invasion,no war,simple.
    1
  537. Experts analysed the damage and the inaccurate spread of it's warheads. The damage to the factory was minimal,in fact more damage was done from previous strikes on it.
    1
  538.  @valeriozini2832  except it doesn't work like that
    1
  539. ​ @lexburen5932 it's because theirs not much left of the Russian tanks.
    1
  540. what a load of nonsense
    1
  541. ​ @olliefoxx7165 like the US v Vietnam/China/USSR one?
    1
  542.  @MtaFto  how's that black sea fleet doing?
    1
  543. ​ @AZ_Earthman  And you know this how?
    1
  544. Russian claims...😴 like Patriots would be left in the open like that.
    1
  545. ​ @FaithnGod1558  volunteers are on both sides from all over the globe
    1
  546. course they where....
    1
  547. And miss
    1
  548. ​ @motorsports6608  didn't have to,had the ability to. Something the Iranians couldn't deal with.
    1
  549. Nonsense. A thousand built says otherwise
    1
  550. Nope
    1
  551. ​ @vladimir08090  According to who? You? So I'm going to take your word over respected defence analysts? 😂 Give your head a wobble
    1
  552.  @samueloabilemunyari3717  course they where............
    1
  553. ​ @boy_ngiwi  because you where there in may 2023?
    1
  554. That was fact checked to be nonsense
    1
  555. @ except it isn't,the Danish pilot pool isn't that big to find out it was complete nonsense. The amount of bs peddled on telegram and these channels is beyond belief.
    1
  556. ​ @yiannimil1 it's a war
    1
  557. Did you read any history before writing that nonsense?
    1
  558. ​ @golden-x2y still both there
    1
  559. No it hasn't
    1
  560. ​ @ashish_p_s  Is this a stupid question of the week entry?
    1
  561. ​ @kean-leongang1167  china is selling the same parts to both Ukraine and Russia. It's a well known fact buyers from both countries bumped into each other in the same chinese supplier.
    1
  562. YT is not a source
    1
  563.  @xxxVEYRONxxx  course it was...
    1
  564. Conplete nonsense. The F35s took out a large portion of Iran's air defence and Iran couldn't do anything in return.
    1
  565. ​ @PatrickJBird they've all been updated and toting the latest aim9x,amraam and GBUs as for kursk where was the Russian air force stopping the Ukrainian fighters flying over and launching storm shadows? Sleeping off their hangovers?
    1
  566.  @maximusfl3926  complete bs
    1
  567. Except what you're talking is complete bollocks. Do you think we don't train constantly and study other armies in nato? it's the difference between a meatgrinder war what Russia is doing and what nato would do.
    1
  568. @neowuwei7851  you've read wtong aswell as never been on exercise or in war. Full time professional armies that deploy and train round the world realistically perform when it becomes the day at the races. The logistics is in place,medical support is,artlilery and air support knows how where to go,engineers know how to recover vehicles,they get fed etc etc. This takes years and years of practice like a well oiled machine. The front line part is just a small part in the sum. I've worked with some 💩 armies and I've worked with some that you could see the professionalism come through. The running out of shells part is nonsense,the vast majority of that funding for Ukraine has funnily enough...gone on shell production and increasing production lines. 3 factories in the US alone last year. It'll just become a copy of cold war 80s,When the US & NATO ramped up it's spending then,Russia couldn't keep pace and eventually collapsed.
    1
  569. @neowuwei7851  As for NATO fighting a different war,yes completely different. The amount of airpower,drones and helicopters going in plus combined battlegroups with bigger numbers of higher quality armour would make a significant difference.
    1
  570. @neowuwei7851  do you honestly believe sitting in a trench getting shelled is combat experience? When professional armies deploy the combat is actually easier than the pre-employment training. Have all those conscripts took part in large manoeuvre warfare training? It just turns into a numbers game,a war of attrition. And who mentioned nukes,is that your fall back option to resort to? An attack on Finland or Sweden will invoke a NATO response,something conventionally Russia would lose.
    1
  571.  @neowuwei7851  you ever done tank warfare at grafenwoehr? Nah thought not. Do you not think we watch what happens in warfare?
    1
  572. @neowuwei7851  grafenwoher,batus,poland,Kosovo etc etc you? Like i said train in peace like you fight in war. The us had no experience compared to the Iraqi republican guard yet went through them like mince.
    1
  573.  @neowuwei7851  so what fish and chip army have you done training in?
    1
  574. It was crap first time round
    1
  575. The vids are no proof going by the bollocks on YT and Telegram.
    1
  576.  @НоннаГусева-о5н  40 aircraft where hit. What a shambles for Russia.
    1
  577.  @lexburen5932  Only 2 😆 What a load of tripe,who was the source for that? Borzzikman or RT? 😂
    1
  578.  @walterbrunswick  Karachi aviation news 😂
    1
  579.  @jamesgreen1116  Except they pushed the Taliban out of Afghan in a matter of weeks,the corrupt government left behind handed the country over to the taliban years later and are now fighting ISIS-K. As for the other two,Saddam's gone and Gadaffi's gone. Job done.
    1
  580. ​ @tamdang8346  course they did 😂 all those burnt out vehicles where just for show then tamdung?
    1
  581. @patriarshie Ukraine ended it in a week with a few NLAV's remember
    1
  582.  @tamdang8346  those burned out vehicles a figment of everyone's imagination? what a whopper
    1
  583. @patriarshie you keep believing that nonsense
    1
  584.  @tamdang8346  Weill you keep looking at it that way as your population drains away tam dung but in the 21st century we tend to value our people a bit better
    1
  585.  @tamdang8346  how many Russian's for this debacle tamdung? ask your Bangldeshi handler that?
    1
  586. ​ @toro-g9n except they prefer using both the bradleys and the Abrams more than the Russian origin equipment,hence the losses.
    1
  587. What a shite vid
    1
  588. ​ @alpejohnson491  Russia has lost well over 100,infact they lost more than that to the flip flops in Afghan. Now that's a shambles.
    1
  589. Which neither side does
    1
  590. It's designed for the opposite
    1
  591. No one wants*
    1
  592. Apart from tanks,which the west still has stores of up to date ones still. The west is now out producing Russia and it's going to increase as % increases with GDP
    1
  593. ​ @societyreborn33  in theory
    1
  594.  @andreisokolenko7719  a few outdated Abrams and Bradleys and suddenly it's the whole of NATO? Are you thick?
    1
  595.  @francoisvorster3914  I'm not saying they are. I'm on about supplies here,the same as Iran. Please keep.up.
    1
  596.  @andreisokolenko7719  I'm well aware of NATOs old stock going to Ukraine. No F35s,Abrams M1A3,Rafales,Typhoons etc etc.
    1
  597. The ship part is bollocks,the footage isn't even from Odessa.
    1
  598. ​ @ChristianThePagan  Exactly.The lack of intelligence in the comments is bewildering.
    1
  599.  @abracadbra9788  then you woke up
    1
  600. according to a telegram channel.......😴
    1
  601. Who has Russia won against?
    1
  602. Only on YT and Telegram
    1
  603.  @craig4867  If you call outing you as a walt harassment so be it. Walt's are lower than pedophiles. From all us in the military or ex-military.
    1
  604.  @Константин-е2е4м  Nearly 4 years in and still moved no more than an asthmatic tortoise. Now that's something to laugh at. How's those airfields doing? And that Black sea fleet?
    1
  605.  @jb-xc4oh  are you 5 year old?
    1
  606. ​ @AstraVisst  You're fighting Ukraine with a few old supplies coming through. Even without those it still held Russia off,remember Hostomel and that 40 mile convoy shambles? Russia's one sided truce deal? Full demilitarized Ukraine? no chance 😂
    1
  607. NATO isn't in it
    1
  608.  @Graveyaad357  you believing the AI Scott Ritter nonsense? If NATO was in it,we'd either have a completely free Ukraine or a nuclear winter now.
    1
  609.  @Graveyaad357  The research that shows where they done their training in the western countries? NATO is not there,get over it.
    1
  610. ​ @luka2298  they definitely would have air superiority,Russia can't gain air superiority over Ukraine's tiny air force so imagine what the US & NATO would do.
    1
  611. ​ @GyulaHUN Ukrainians regularly fly over Russia,there was footage of 6 su-27s firing storm shadows over kursk the other week.
    1
  612. based on?
    1
  613. Nonsense
    1
  614. ​ @cristeaadrian7419  The NATO being close is a bollocks excuse. What's Russia going to do about Finland and the Baltics? Absolute zero
    1
  615. nope
    1
  616. ​ @Yuri-z2y  truth hurt botsky
    1
  617. ​ @djape1977  yes those videos certainty are proof.....😴
    1
  618. what a load of bs
    1
  619.  @9iht6ihgt43rzhijj  no just the NATO losses is complete bullshit,do you want to argue me them figures more with sources? I'll be waiting
    1
  620.  @inquizative44  many experts have already reviewed it's impact over the last few months and it's accuracy. With a CEP of 150m and 36 warheads it's got a 6% chance of hitting a house sized target and the strike last year was way outside that. An expensive way for a 40 ton rocket to deliver an effect of less than 1 ton inaccurately.
    1
  621. @ It's not my opinion you wooden head,do you want qualified sources for a factual debate? I can get really deep into the science but i think it'll be well above your level.
    1
  622. What a load of shite
    1
  623.  @bdleo300  1v1 against a Russian adversary. My money's on the c2.
    1
  624. @historysciencebooks  what a complete load of bollocks. Kursk says otherwise they quite easily managed to move around there the same way the UK troops move them in every conflict they've been involved in. Now the Armata that's the ornament you're looking for.
    1
  625.  @chargedx5768  bro has seen enough footage of abrams &c2 holding their own in Ukraine and Kursk, Bro has also seen Nato competitions in Germany with all 3 western tanks. And back to that did the penny finally drop in your head bro what i was on about reference cost?
    1
  626. 0 are NATO pilots,the ukes are trained in NATO countries to fly them.
    1
  627. Ukraine v Russia*
    1
  628. you keep believing that propaganda about the ATACMS comical Ali
    1
  629. NATO hasn't entered
    1
  630. ​ @Ludak021 NATO hasn't fought them to fail
    1
  631.  @3rdFloorblog  no they didn't
    1
  632. ​ @tangofox7124 You're not the brightest spark are you?
    1
  633. Why would you need that when you're in an all arms battlegroup. Air supports only a call away same as an infantry fighting vehicle.
    1
  634.  @vaninec  tanks aren't for infantry,look what happened to Russia's tanks in Chechnya 1. Tank v tank is what they are designed for in a peer conflict.
    1
  635.  @vaninec  48 with 24 years in a mechanised unit,you?
    1
  636.  @dusanskacel7479  i did,hence why i written what i written.
    1
  637.  @Samuel-hd3cp  did they bomb Moscow? did they invade into kursk to start it?
    1
  638. @189Blake  what a complete load of bollocks
    1
  639. Arms travelling by ship? 😂 what a load of nonsense
    1
  640. ​ @Pathfinder1932-t5d  India's has the toilet on the outside
    1
  641. ​ @BhekimpiloSmanga  except it can and ditched the idea of 'rods from the gods' years ago as being expensive and inaccurate. Proven with the oreshnik strike.
    1
  642.  @BhekimpiloSmanga  Why would they it's shite
    1
  643. ​ @BhekimpiloSmanga  lost what?
    1
  644. ​ @mirba6933  so you're arguing with accredited scientists now? Interesting,shall i forward your credentials?
    1
  645. ​ @BhekimpiloSmanga they had oreshnik type tech decades ago but decided not to,research prompt global strike
    1
  646. Russia v Ukraine and still 3 years on,that's laughable
    1
  647. This isn't top level NATO equipment
    1
  648. Ukraine did it
    1
  649. What a load of bollocks
    1
  650. Except it didn't
    1
  651. Must be true.....😴
    1
  652. ​ @marcusaetius9309 no they haven't
    1
  653. Like they tried in 2022? That didn't go so well.
    1
  654.  @dirkhuman760  no that's propaganda you spout
    1
  655. @ Considering the low numbers of both systems provided and they're still in regular use,it's Bullshit regardless of what nonsense vids appear on here.
    1
  656.  @dirkhuman760  Source and Patriot numbers? 13? And thats over 3 years? 😂 yes defintely like no tomorrow. The Russian numbers of losses are breathtaking.
    1
  657. then you woke up
    1
  658. Abrams numbnuts
    1
  659. what do you think will happen in return?
    1
  660. Have you been drinking?
    1
  661. They won't supply F35 and F22 to Ukraine.
    1
  662.  @walterbrunswick  I know bs when i see it. How little the wooden heads know about NATO.
    1
  663. Wasn't because of the air defences,it was the capability of the stand off weapons and the flying range into Iran.
    1
  664.  @hansjorgkunde3772  only if it was true
    1
  665. ​ @k.-uwespengler9104  Back to the real world. Anything to add to the conversation subject matter? Nah thought not
    1