Comments by "" (@SnakePliskin762) on "" video.

  1. Bs
    3
  2. ​ @VeteransVillage-r3d  no they weren't
    2
  3. What about the Russian Su-30 brought down by the sea drone it was hunting?
    1
  4. Russian losses are far higher,the su-34 has suffered badly
    1
  5. Based on?
    1
  6. ​​ @ErnestRomanovich  old m1s (31) c2s (14) and some L2s/L1s dating from the early 80s are doing well against an army that's lost over 13000 armoured vehicles. Quite embarrassing for Russia really.
    1
  7. 3rd
    1
  8. Fact 😂Yes because NATO would risk it's pilot's being shot down and paraded on RT wouldn't it?
    1
  9. It's 3
    1
  10. They've never referred to it as that
    1
  11. According to you?
    1
  12. No they don't
    1
  13. Su-34 has been downed more
    1
  14.  @grunthorful  course it does...,it's dual role same as the F-16 but then again the other aircraft didn't fair so better either.
    1
  15. Sounds like a dock? Su-37? Bit early for the vodka
    1
  16. ​ @frank-y8n  it hasn't got one
    1
  17. ​ @PatrickJBird they've all been updated and toting the latest aim9x,amraam and GBUs as for kursk where was the Russian air force stopping the Ukrainian fighters flying over and launching storm shadows? Sleeping off their hangovers?
    1
  18. ​ @alpejohnson491  Russia has lost well over 100,infact they lost more than that to the flip flops in Afghan. Now that's a shambles.
    1
  19. 0 are NATO pilots,the ukes are trained in NATO countries to fly them.
    1