Comments by "" (@SnakePliskin762) on "Sky News" channel.

  1. ​ @korencek if that's their special forces I'd hate to see the regulars.
    95
  2. ​ @johnfreeman9358 yep same way they've took Ukraine since 2022...
    83
  3. not a chance,sod serving for these corrupt governments again
    11
  4. Is watching the vid too hard?
    8
  5. He is former. Was working as a custody officer in a nick after being kicked out the army.
    5
  6. Ex
    3
  7. Their isn't
    3
  8. A few bombing raids wasn't exactly a NATO deployment was it
    3
  9. It was nothing to do with NATO missiles and the initial invasion force was a lot more. The reason they failed was because tactically they where inept from general to soldier level and the condition of the equipment they used. Wars are fought with logistics.
    3
  10. Same way NK & Iran Is involved with their missiles then? The NK missiles even.have NK crews firing them as the Russians won't go near incase they blow.
    2
  11. ​ @CarlCaf  he wasn't at war,he was murdered behind the front lines.
    2
  12. 1 against 1. NATO isn't fighting and he wasn't NATO. There's a platoon of Italians fighting for Russia (according to RT) does that mean Ukraine is fighting Italy?
    2
  13.  @basithali1196  so a British nationality who left the army years ago and was killed in Ukraine is proof of all NATO fighting 😂 so Ukraine must be fighting Italy then by your logic,seeing as RT ran a report on a group of Italians fighting for Russia 😂.
    2
  14. If a democratic country wants to be part of NATO,that's nothing to do with Russia. Hence Sweden,Hence Finland etc etc.
    2
  15.  @cwpv2477  There is no nato fighting in Ukraine. We don't send out our soldiers in fancy dress and in other countries tanks despite what some believe on here.
    2
  16. Neither has the Russians hence why most of it's Black sea fleet has fled the crimea or got extremely wet.
    2
  17. No it isn't
    2
  18. Nonsense,he wasn't even NATO
    2
  19. Korean government sent them
    2
  20. it isn't really is it,there's no F35s or B-1s going in anywhere...
    2
  21. Imagine all that money we could've spent on defence instead of wasting it on Afghan,Iraq and Libya
    2
  22. No he isn't
    2
  23. not that 'mercenaries' chestnut again
    2
  24. No it didnt and NATO isn't in this.
    2
  25. Ex
    2
  26.  @shsh-he5qg  he was ex signals,booted out and then working as a custody officer in a nick.
    2
  27. Or the Russian loss there and all the landmines we had to clear up?
    2
  28. ​ @heartofsteel7821 I bet that's what Russia thought taking on little Ukraine.
    2
  29. A platoon of Italians are fighting for Russia,does that mean Ukraine should fight Italy?
    2
  30. not all the dead where military,the hospital next door was flattened
    2
  31. NATO isn't there
    1
  32. No they haven't
    1
  33. He is ex-soldier,he was kicked out and had a job afterwards
    1
  34. Bs
    1
  35. Bodybags*
    1
  36. No he is ex,he was kicked out
    1
  37. He left the Army well before this started.
    1
  38. No it hasn't,it can't be guided onto a carrier without a spotter plane getting in range of being shot down.
    1
  39. NATO isn't fighting.
    1
  40. The US pulled out years before 2021,they left a small training team in kabul.
    1
  41. @KM00872  no they don't. He's technically a wally
    1
  42. A lot of that aid has been to build munitions factories
    1
  43. No it's made up nonsense from Putinbots to try and excuse a shambolic Russian performance.
    1
  44. Gov isn't lying,he was kicked out the army and went there of his own choice.
    1
  45. Nonsense
    1
  46. Must be true then...
    1
  47. Former,he was kicked out
    1
  48. That's 🐂💩
    1
  49. ​ @KazimierzSurma can Ukraine retaliate against Italy,India and Scotland then by your reasoning?
    1
  50.  @KazimierzSurma  because some Italians fight on the Russian side.
    1
  51. facility was near a hospital
    1
  52. Fallout spreads
    1
  53. After seeing the performance of the L2 in Turkish hands I'm not surprised they are hesitant.
    1
  54. Not confirmed so just an urban myth at the moment
    1
  55.  @Luiz-w5s  no considering the amount of Patriots Ukraine has the majority of them are based at logistical centres or Airfields well away from Russian forces. Lyiv is only a major logistical hub by YT sources. Patriots system relies on 'kill boxes' which aren't that large. Hence why Israel layers it with other systems.
    1
  56.  @bencarter1666  no they don't,tunguska,s300 and s400 have all been taking out by Himars and ATACMS. No weapon system is infallible in war.
    1
  57.  @bencarter1666  according to pro-russian hindustan YT channels on here they've had that many destroyed but the reality is far different. More systems are getting supplied daily as well as more advanced tech. It's one big arms bazaar and the Russian tech never wins when it goes up in arms trials against western systems for sales.
    1
  58.  @bencarter1666  NATO's air defence and Ukraine's are completely different entities. Russia after 3 years still hasn't air superiority over a much smaller air force so imagine what a full on NATO attack would do on their air defences with Growlers,F35s and HARMS. Anyone who thinks otherwise is sadly delusional.
    1
  59. Utter nonsense
    1
  60. ​ @boogzyoverseer7088 what a load of tripe
    1
  61. They aren't
    1
  62. and what happens if they don't?
    1
  63. On both sides
    1
  64. Because it's a dud. An old ballistic missile with tiny warheads,only able to hit large static targets.
    1
  65. Evidence?
    1
  66. Nonsense
    1
  67. He definitely isn't 😂
    1
  68.  @TheIceland2000  Actually in open warfare the Taliban was pounded out the country in 2001 then it became a state building coin war where heavy armaments such as above became redundant. The Ukraine war and gw1 where the opposite where they'd thrive.
    1
  69. He was kicked out
    1
  70. Bs
    1
  71. ​ @dougalmacguire9749  landlords are bailing out and fast at record levels due to changes in tax the last few years. Blame the government
    1
  72. NATO isn't at war so can't be defeated.
    1
  73. ​ @cmanlovespancakes  supplying arms is not being at war or being defeated. Not one NATO members borders have been breached or attacked.
    1
  74. They'd of easily won if they'd been fighting Russia on it's own.
    1
  75. He wasn't
    1
  76. He is,he was kicked out last year and had a job since
    1
  77.  @WalkOverHotCoal  or some just can't hack it
    1
  78. Nope,he was kicked out
    1
  79. More Russians where killed by Russian shelling in that region.
    1
  80. Got kicked out last year
    1
  81. He's ginger
    1
  82. No
    1
  83. 1 brit volunteer is not a regiment of 10k troops sent by it's country.
    1
  84. Made some decent money for the local codheads who's land it went under.
    1
  85. Complete bs
    1
  86.  @Intelligent-q8u  NATO is not fighting anywhere. He's a British volunteer
    1
  87. He was former when he got kicked out
    1
  88. He is,was kicked out last year. Do a bit of research.
    1
  89. JRM listed all the nonsense that should be cut last night to pay for it. The money's there,we just waste it.
    1
  90. Falklands was a decisive win. When was Russia's?
    1
  91. ​ @PHOTON-v3r no was kicked out. Had a crap job before going out there.
    1
  92. ​ @kyuupichan  any base sttacked is an attack on NATO so your point is moot.
    1
  93. I'm sure they'll manage
    1
  94. They've lost more in Ukraine than every western nation has lost in every conflict since ww2
    1
  95. Negative,more the opposite
    1
  96. He was kicked out alrhough in the uk service is voluntary so minimum term is 3 years.
    1
  97. Patriots can only cover so much same as any sam system.
    1
  98. He's a deviant. Must be true 😂
    1