Comments by "Lepi Doptera" (@lepidoptera9337) on "The Quantum Computing Collapse Has Begun" video.

  1. Not in the case of Sabine, though. Sabine is mostly very good at selling nonsense. ;-)
    3
  2. They are very limited.
    1
  3.  @MarcusPereiraRJ  It is being leaked all the time... by people who are simply handing it over to hackers on a golden platter. You don't need a QC for something that social engineering can accomplish or that can be gotten through a bug.
    1
  4. Too costly.
    1
  5. Why? It's perfectly legitimate physics research. If you want to see a real waste of money, Meta's desperate attempt to replicate "Second Life" at a thousands times the cost of the original would be a better target for laughs. ;-)
    1
  6. No, but it doesn't matter. Bitcoin was designed as a pump and dump and it is being operated as a pump and dump. As long as people believe that they can make money with it, fools will be losing theirs.
    1
  7. No, it isn't. That's like saying you can't use your Wifi because of time-energy uncertainty, which is EXACTLY the same formula for EXACTLY the same mathematical reasons. ;-)
    1
  8.  @wayofages184  I am not responsible for your education, child. I am only here to point out that it went wrong. ;-)
    1
  9. Why are you telling us that you don't understand physics? Quantum mechanics describes ALL of matter and radiation correctly. It's the most successful physical theory of them all. There is not a single known counterexample in which it fails. There are pretty trivial mathematical reasons for that, by the way. You just don't know them. ;-)
    1
  10. It can't. Eventually it will do useful things, but the question is whether they will be "noticeably useful" for "the man on the streets". I kind of doubt the latter. A typical application for a quantum computer might be something like chemical catalyst research. There is plenty of that using conventional computing and all kinds of chemical methods. It's probably an R&D area that the chemical industry spends billions of dollars on every year. Do you really care about that? It's something "nerds in the chemistry department do", right? So why would you care if those nerds add one more methodology to their field by using QC? You won't.
    1