Comments by "Lepi Doptera" (@lepidoptera9337) on "A New Theory of Everything Just Dropped!" video.

  1.  @Thomas-gk42  Energy, by definition, is a scalar quantity. It just doesn't transform like a "Lorentz scalar" because it is actually one component of a four-vector and the components don't transform properly. You could say "energy-momentum is a four-vector". That would be the correct way of talking about all of this.
    2
  2. Energy is a scalar, it's just not a Lorentz scalar. Its the first component of a four-vector. The relativistic momentum are the other three components.
    2
  3. Most people are smart enough to understand that "a theory" is a rational description of nature. Nobody can publish a "theory of everything" because "everything" has simply not been observed, yet. So the question is... are you "most people" or not even? ;-)
    2
  4. This is not overproduction. This is a jokester who wanted to know if the journal will publish completely random rubbish... and the journal did, probably without even checking if the authors actually exist. It's a pretty trivial test for a journal. If this gets published, then you can forget about the entire journal content because ANYTHING will get published.
    2
  5.  @gammakeraulophon  If it looks like a joke, then it is a joke. No theoretical physicist will write nonsense like this, at least not if they didn't have a stroke or have taken a mixture of LSD, meth and cocaine with a good dose of horse tranquilizer for dessert. ;-)
    2
  6.  @miloszforman6270  Are you getting help with your desperate need for attention? If not, then let me give you some. We don't want your basement to stay cold forever. ;-)
    1
  7. Nature is not a theory journal. Phys Rev D used to contain a lot of theory, but there are theoretical journals like "Classical and Quantum Gravity" that would probably be better places for ToE kind of work.
    1
  8. Hardly. A qualified editor would have rejected this in ten seconds flat and not even bothered sending it to the reviewers. There simply was no editing and reviewing going on here.
    1
  9. Nobody asks you to trust anything. We were asking you to learn about it. Oh, wait, that's too much work, isn't it? ;-)
    1
  10. Awh, you are so cute when you are begging for attention. ;-)
    1
  11.  @goldendome-l1l  Here. Have some. Let's warm your basement. ;-)
    1
  12.  @goldendome-l1l  I don't care who you are. I just like to feed trolls. ;-)
    1
  13. What is happening here is that a joker sent a joke to a publisher to prove that the publisher is shite. The joker won. :-)
    1
  14. She did read what they wrote and she points out that even an undergrad student taking his first general relativity class should be able to notice that this is nothing but a random bunch of meaningless symbols with language that tries to imitate theoretical physics language.
    1
  15. Awh, you are so cute when you are begging for attention. ;-)
    1
  16. No, but if you ask a serious physics question, then it will hallucinate similar nonsense.
    1
  17. What for? Anybody who knows theoretical physics can tell a good paper from a bad one.
    1
  18.  @thomasschwarzenberger8943  If something like this is in your citations, then you are intellectually dead yourself.
    1
  19.  @m-h1217  Not everybody knows music, either. Should we mark every piece of sheet music with annotations for those who can't read it? You aren't making any sense. ;-)
    1
  20.  @m-h1217  Dude, if you can't read Hindi, then don't go into a Hindi library. Now let me give you some more attention. ;-)
    1
  21.  @m-h1217  See, you are enjoying my attention, already. ;-)
    1
  22. Awh, you are feeling so sorry for yourself right now, it's not even funny. ;-)
    1
  23.  @SciD1  Right until you go to the physics lab. Then these "models" become trivial, hands-on reality. Oh, wait, they would never let you into a lab with expensive instruments. You would break them. ;-)
    1
  24.  @gammakeraulophon  Perhaps. There are enough folks around who are pumping it with gauge 12 syringes. ;-)
    1