Comments by "iampdv" (@iampdv) on "What Actually Happens When You Are Sick?" video.

what's the difference between giving it and triggering it? How do you identify which was the case? My allergy has worsened a lot at some point when I was already adult. Incidentally, shortly before that I have been vaccinated with something that is not usually done for general public. I have heard two similar stories from other people. Guess what - these three cases of potential side effects have not been officially recorded. It took me a couple of years before I realised that what I started having from time to time is allergy, so it is hard to even imagine how to properly control such things.
18
@queeny5613 thanks captain obvious! In principle, there is a possibility that an individual has a predisposition, but it can only be triggered by a limited amount of events, of which a certain vaccine is the most common and thus far more likely. In such a case, when your are very unlikely to encounter other potential triggers, triggering it and giving it becomes more or less equal. So my question was - how the author of that comment knows which is the case?
5
it is just another covid propaganda piece that we have been fed over the past three years. Manipulation and distortion. Disgusting. Especially now, when many problems with covid injections are publicly acknowledged.
2
@quartzmerlin As I write in my other comment - in principle, it is possible that there is a limited amount of triggers, such as certain compounds encountered in a limited amount of drugs and foods, or, that a certain complex sequence of events serves as a trigger, such as living in a too sterile environment at an early age. In such cases, triggering it and giving it becomes more or less equal. Allergy is heritable. However, exactly 0 of my parents, grant parents, great grand parents and other relatives had such strong allergies as I do. In fact, with one exception of a weird allergy non of them has any. They did not grow up in as clean environment as I did, and their vaccination schedule was much less crowded.
2
is it? that explains why they decided to chose these covid injections over proper vaccines as an example in this piece...
1
A well-deserved dislike for covid injections propaganda. You could have chosen an example of any other vaccine that works far better and is far less controversial. Instead, you chose these particular ones, which a recent (I think) lancet paper shows are not better than natural immunity in terms of protection, and which do have a considerable range of acknowledged side effects that according to some governmental health agencies are too high for certain demographic groups. And who knows how much more there is given the lack of freedom of debate and information in the current extremely politically biased environment? In fact, even if the censorship etc were removed, how to be sure that all long-term side effects are properly captured? My allergy have worsened a lot after one vaccine that is not usually made to general public. Could this be related? Judging by some titles found it google scholar, it could. But how is this monitored? Nobody checked on me, that's for sure. And on two other people with similar experiences that I know. In my case, it actually took me years before I realised that the condition I started having from time to time is allergy (well, I did have it before, but it was so mild, that I did not really care what it is).
1
Oil drilling companies probable care the least. This bs is pr of your gates and other lizards that installed and sustain excessive consumption economy and want to pass their guilt to you so that they keep profiting.
1
@quartzmerlin I know all of that. Now you could read again my previous comment without assuming that I am ignorant.
1
@quartzmerlin I am not asking you any questions. I am just saying that if there is a mine in one corner of your garden, and you never need to go to that corner, then going to that corner and triggering this mine is quite close to intentionally exploding it. Same goes about medical interventions. The boundary between triggering it and giving it somewhat fuzzy. You may have never gotten the condition without that medical intervention because it is that sort of specific trigger for it. In such a situation a risk to benefit analysis is important. And returning to my initial comment - to do such analysis one needs to properly collect data.
1
@kindlin 🤣 Another arbiter of truth through whom the will of gods (aka The Science ™) descends to plebs. It it just hilarious how you fail to notice that actually it is you and the likes of you who "parade" your point "just like you solved all the problems somehow". In contrast, my point is that even proper vaccines (let alone those covid injections) may not be a panacea all things considered. And this point comes from someone who has been vaccinated more often than the average citizen around him. By the way, I do understand quite well how the scientific process works, and all of my earnings thus far came from contributing to it.
1
@Diamond4luck well, key takes of pussies who got scared of covid and rushed into a digital gulag are being debunked at an impressive rate, given the environment of unprecedented censorship. Examples include the recent (I think) lancet paper on natural immunity over vaccines and the Cochrane review on inutility of masks.
1
@LoveOverwhelming as means of pedolizards to put general public in a digital gulag
1
It is astonishing how many people in the comments have rejected this propaganda piece for covid injections! No wonder youtube now hides dislikes!
1
@antonio70d so how many are they? I don't install extensions.... And generally don't care about dislikes...
1
@antonio70d Thanks! Actually I saw some extensions for youtube stats, and they seem to collect these data independently (so these may be dislikes of those who use that extension). i don't use google chrome, so I don't see ads In general, I don't use extensions, because may track your activity and sell your data. Most of the time it is unclear who are their authors ect... So I am reluctant to use them.
1
@antonio70d I come pretty close to that in most of my use of the internet lately. Youtube is one of only few exceptions...
1
🤣
1
@ballisticboi2411 personal experiences is the only thing that remains when there is not freedom of speech and information. There is plentiful information that any descent from people that the likes you would normally consider as qualified (such as Stanford or Oxford profs) was intentionally suppressed by the ruling class.
1
@ballisticboi2411 well, you clearly live under a rock. Evidence for the suppression of speech is plentiful. Even here I can't cite sources any more, which occurred over the past three years. And I only used to cite peer reviewed papers and government stats. Youtube would erase not only links, but also the titles of documents that contained opinions and data that questioned the mainstream narrative. There was a cooperated effort to suppress freedom of speech and information as we know for a fact from examples that went public. One such example, is a direct order of the nih directer to take down one stanford professor - just open your eyes and see! Another, personal, example - I have found out that there there is that lab in wuhan only after about a year since the start of lockdowns. How come so? The answer is simple - there was suppression of this information, and the media that I followed did not care to expose it. I heard the rumour, but I dismissed it because legacy media did not acknowledge that. it's a fallacy that a global-scale conspiracy requires informed cooperation from millions of people. It is enough to have a handful of people and millions of useful idiots whom they chose to put into the position of power, such as make a chief editor of a large newspaper. P.S. Did you care to check who sponsors this channel?
1
apparently yes
1