Comments by "mabra mabra" (@mabra-mabra) on "Kamala Harris accepts Democratic nomination and vows to be 'president for all Americans'" video.

"FBI: Donald Trump gunman's motive still a mystery as new photos released" Tanggapan lainnya: Jika agency itu tidak dapat menjawab, maka tolong berikan foto baru "pisau dapur" dari jerman pada saat dipergunakan memotong sayuran. Lalu katakan bahwa, "motif memotong sayuran didapur dengan mengunakan pisau itu masih sangat misteri". ---- "FBI: Donald Trump gunman's motive still a mystery as new photos released" Another response: If the agency cannot answer, then please provide a new photo of a "kitchen knife" from Germany when it is used to cut vegetables. Then say that, "the motive for cutting vegetables in the kitchen with a knife is still a mystery".
1
There's no hiding the motive behind the latest Trump indictment: Pertanyaan untuk memperkuat : Dengan berkonspirasi pada 13 juli 2024 untuk membunuhnya, apakah itu bukan menuju kedalam sebuah motif?? Jika dalam setiap mengkampanyekan program kerjanya dapat digambar secara transparan dan tidak diketemukan kebohongan sama sekali, sehingga dapat dipastikan oleh pemilih bahwa kandidat itu mampu membawa mereka keluar dari jurang kebodohan perbudakan... maka untuk mengalahkan kandidat yang benar seperti itu...tentunya dibutuhkan cara-cara biadab, bukankah begitu?? Bukankah berkonspirasi untuk membunuh kandidat yang benar itu telah dilakukan?? Lalu dimana letak perlindungan hukum itu?? Mengapa sampai saat ini tindakan hukum kepada konspirator 13 juli 2024 itu belum terwujud, sebagai pertanggungjawabannya?? ------ There's no hiding the motive behind the latest Trump indictment: Questions to strengthen: By conspiring on July 13, 2024 to kill him, does that not lead to a motive? If in every campaign the work program can be drawn transparently and no lies are found at all, so that voters can be sure that the candidate is able to bring them out of the abyss of slavery...... then to defeat such a righteous that candidate...sure it would require barbaric act, wouldn't it? Hasn't conspiring to kill that the righteous candidate already been done? Then where is the legal protection? Why until now legal action against the conspirators of July 13, 2024 has not materialized, as accountability??
1
"FBI: Donald Trump gunman's motive still a mystery as new photos released" Tanggapan: Jika dilihat dari pernyataan itu, maka artinya agency itu setuju ada motif dibalik pembunuhan yang gagal pada 13 juli itu.....bukankah begitu?? Nah jika ada pernyataan sbb , "Secret Service Director: No Recordings of Radio Communications During Trump Assassination Attempt", apakah hal seperti itu wajar atau di sengaja (disaat acara pesta besar publik yang memiliki jadwal )?? Dan bukankah agency lainnya (selain polisi dan SS) juga berada ditempat itu?? Jika benar terjadi kekacauan frekwensi radio pada saat itu, agency yang berasal dari mana atau siapakah yang mengetahui komunikasi frekwensi yang dipakai seluruh agency itu?? ------- FBI: Donald Trump gunman's motive still a mystery as new photos released" Response: Judging from that statement, it means that the agency agrees that there was a motive behind the failed assassination on July 13....Isn't that?? Now if there is a statement as follows, "Secret Service Director: No Recordings of Radio Communications During Trump Assassination Attempt", is something like that normal or intentional (during a big public party event that has a schedule)?? And weren't other agencies (besides the police and SS) also in the place?? If it is true that there was radio frequency chaos at that time, which agency came from or who knew the communication frequencies used by that all agencies??
1
=================== Fakta kejadian: suara tembakan pertama dari pelaku (a), berbeda hanya 2 detik dari suara rentetan tembakan berikutnya (b). Penjelasan: posisi B sesungguhnya hanya tinggal menunggu pelatuk tembakan dari posisi A. ================== Transkrip percakapan didalam radio dari seluruh anggota dinas rahasia yang berada ditempat itu, sedari awal seharusnya disita ( sebelum dimanipulasi). Karena setidak-tidaknya (profesional yang memiliki keahlian yang paling terbaik) membutuhkan lebih dari 15 detik untuk mencari posisi pelaku penembakan ( jika berpatokan arah suara datangnya tembakan) ditambah membutuhkan lebih dari 10 detik untuk. membidik sasaran dengan tepat dari jarak tertentu ( dengan asumsi didalam jumlah khalayak yang ramai). Hal itu berlaku jika tidak terjadi "konspirasi" ( kejahatan yang terkoordinasi)!! ------ =================== Facts of the incident: the sound of the first shot from the perpetrator (a), differed by only 2 seconds from the sound of the next series of shots (b). Explanation: position B was actually just waiting for the trigger to fire from position A. ================== The transcripts of the radio conversations of all secret service members who were at the scene should have been confiscated from the beginning (before being manipulated). Because at least (professionals who have the best skills) need more than 15 seconds to find the position of the shooter (if based on the direction of the sound of the shot) plus more than 10 seconds to aim precisely at the target from a certain distance (assuming in a large audience). That is if there is no "conspiracy" (coordinated crime)!!!
1
Kondisi: A.Pelaku penembakan - Usia relatif muda ( kestabilan emosi sangat kurang) - Tidak pernah memiliki sertifikat "sniper" - Tidak pernah memiliki pekerjaan dibidang kemiliteran organik ataupun kepolisian taktis. B. Penembak pelaku - Personil dinas rahasia - Memiliki sertifikat keahlian sebagai "sniper" - Bekerja dan dilatih didalam kepolisian khusus. Fakta kejadian: suara tembakan pertama dari pelaku (a), berbeda hanya 2 detik dari suara rentetan tembakan berikutnya (b). Penjelasan: posisi B sesungguhnya hanya tinggal menunggu pelatuk tembakan dari posisi A. Tingkat akurasi tembakan dari B (profesional), diatas 95% dari jarak tertentu. Dan tingkat akurasi tembakan dari A (pelaku penembakan) adalah dibawah 50% + kestabilan kurang dari jarak tertentu. Artinya berhasil atau tidaknya penembakan itu, maka pelaku itu 95% harus di eksekusi di tempat. ---- Condition: A. The perpetrator of the shooting - Relatively young age (emotional stability is very lacking) - Never had a "sniper" certificate - Never had a job in the field of organic military or tactical police. B. Shooter of the perpetrator - Secret service personnel - Have a certificate of expertise as a "sniper" - Worked and trained in the special police force. Facts of the incident: the sound of the first shot from the perpetrator (a), differed by only 2 seconds from the sound of the next series of shots (b). Explanation: position B was actually just waiting for the trigger shot from position A. The accuracy rate of shots from B (professional), above 95% from a certain distance. And the accuracy rate of shots from A (the shooter) is below 50% + less stability from a certain distance. This means that whether or not the shooting is successful, then the perpetrator 95% must be executed on the spot.
1
(kutipan fakta tersebut, Membuktikan bahwa lembaga penegakan hukum di amerika itu sesungguhnya adalah lembaga politis yang tidak memiliki kredibilitas sedikitpun dalam penegakan hukum serta perlindungan hukum) (The above quote proves that law enforcement agencies in the United States are actually political institutions or not have the slightest credibility in the field of law enforcement and protection).
1
"FBI Director Asked How Trump Shooter Was Able To Acquire The Gun He Used" (July 30 2024) Jika direktur fbi itu berada di jerman pada 29 agustus dan keesokan harinya terjadi sbb, "Several killed in knife attack in Solingen, Germany (Agust 30 2024) apakah direktur fbi itu akan bersedia mengubah pertanyaan politisnya sendiri menjadi, "FBI Director Asked How The man Was Able To Acquire The kitchen knife He Used" (kutipan fakta diatas tersebut, Membuktikan bahwa lembaga penegakan hukum di amerika itu sesungguhnya adalah lembaga politis yang tidak memiliki kredibilitas) ------ "FBI Director Asked How Trump Shooter Was Able To Acquire The Gun He Used" (July 30 2024) If the fbi director was in Germany on August 29 and the next day the following happened, "Several killed in knife attack in Solingen, Germany (Agust 30 2024) would be willing to change his own political question to, "FBI Director Asked How The man Was Able To Acquire The kitchen knife He Used" (The above quote proves that law enforcement agencies in the United States are actually political institutions or not have the slightest credibility in the field of law enforcement and protection).
1
=================== Fakta kejadian: suara tembakan pertama dari pelaku (a), berbeda hanya 2 detik dari suara rentetan tembakan berikutnya (b). Penjelasan: posisi B sesungguhnya hanya tinggal menunggu pelatuk tembakan dari posisi A. ================== Transkrip percakapan didalam radio dari seluruh anggota dinas rahasia yang berada ditempat itu, sedari awal seharusnya disita ( sebelum dimanipulasi). ------ =================== Facts of the incident: the sound of the first shot from the perpetrator (a), differed by only 2 seconds from the sound of the next series of shots (b). Explanation: position B was actually just waiting for the trigger to fire from position A. ================== The transcripts of the radio conversations of all secret service members who were at the scene should have been confiscated from the beginning (before being manipulated).
1
"FBI Director Asked How Trump Shooter Was Able To Acquire The Gun He Used" (July 30 2024) Jika direktur fbi itu berada di jerman pada 29 agustus dan keesokan harinya terjadi sbb, "Several killed in knife attack in Solingen, Germany (Agust 30 2024) apakah direktur fbi itu akan bersedia mengubah pertanyaan politisnya sendiri menjadi, "FBI Director Asked How The man Was Able To Acquire The kitchen knife He Used" (kutipan fakta diatas tersebut, Membuktikan bahwa lembaga penegakan hukum di amerika itu sesungguhnya adalah lembaga politis yang tidak memiliki kredibilitas) ------ "FBI Director Asked How Trump Shooter Was Able To Acquire The Gun He Used" (July 30 2024) If the fbi director was in Germany on August 29 and the next day the following happened, "Several killed in knife attack in Solingen, Germany (Agust 30 2024) would be willing to change his own political question to, "FBI Director Asked How The man Was Able To Acquire The kitchen knife He Used" (The above quote proves that law enforcement agencies in the United States are actually political institutions or not have the slightest credibility in the field of law enforcement and protection).
1