Comments by "红火树 RedFireTree" (@firetree2007) on "" video.

  1. Our war philosophy is : you fight your way, we fight our way. we can achieve our military goal with our own weapons, which is not too far behind US, and some weapons are better than US weapons, such as in hypersonic missiles.
    5
  2. China catching up so fast, make you guys so nerves haha :) it shows, "copy" "steal" "......." ".", haha :)) call it whatever you like, as long as we can get our job done, we are not going to invade US, we will just use them to take TW back to China, our weapons are more than enough for that purpose, US, just like to Ukruaine, will just watch, and do nothing.
    2
  3. seems you friend knows J20 better than US AF general, hah : "Air Force Gen. Kenneth Wilsbach noted that the J-20 fighter displayed impressive command and control functions. "
    2
  4. copy, steal, not stealthy, ,...............for 20 years, already, can you be more innovative yourself(ves). it is getting boring,dont you think??
    2
  5. Putin said, we do not have as much money as US has, so we cannot just follow US to make all the weapons, but we can make weapons that will not cost so much, but can achieve our goal. it is the same for China, you may keep enjoy and of proud of your stealthy fighters, we have our own ways to deal with any threats.
    2
  6.  @petersouthernboy6327  still Ukraine has lost 25% of its territory, Russia has achieved most of its military goal, US dare not to join the war, that shows how Russia weapon worked, your argument is out of your original logic, shows you have no concept of logic, stay in the point your made, please. or I guess you already forgot about what was your original question, it shows.
    2
  7. you do not know a sht, shape is the most important factor in radar stealthy, coating is the second, go to learn first before you open your mouth, hah :) 2ndly, who told you China cannot make the coating? in your dreams? hah a:))
    1
  8. full of speculations and BS, the only real RCS data can only be obtained by radar testing itself as J20 has been tested by China.
    1
  9. with all your almighty F22 and B2 or B21 or whatever, you are just watching Ukraine lost 25% of the territory to Russia, haha :) so wonderful !
    1
  10. yeah right, so US wont save Ukraine, how can US save TW?? haha :)) we will use our J20 mainly for TW, we are not going to invade Hawaii.
    1
  11.  @miraphycs7377  victory of a war is not determined by who got killed, war is determined by achieving the political goal
    1
  12.  @miraphycs7377  with your logic, Nazi killed more Soviets, so Nazi Germany won WWII, hah :) go back to learn first!
    1
  13. China made weapons for defending China's interests, not to invade US, they are quite capable of achieving China's goals. copy? why not you just copy a Ferrari to show off on your streets for yourself if it is so easy?
    1
  14. seems US top secrets are all open for free stealing, ha a:)
    1
  15. the simple fact is you do not know a sht about J20 or H20, but all guessing and speculations.
    1
  16. haha :) yeah, as shown in Oct 10th 2021, The Express Tribune, with title "Indians furious......."
    1
  17. we do not need stealthy fighters, wood sticks just worked fine for India, as shown in Oct 10th 2021, The Express Tribune, with title "Indians furious......."
    1
  18.  @-lucentdawn-1445  China can make jet engines for WS10B 132 kn, WS 15 180 kn, jet engines cannot be copied so easily, even you know each part, key is the material, you need to make mono-crystal alloy and with ceramic coating on the blades, today, even France cannot make jet engine that powerful, M88 is only about 75-85 kn,
    1
  19. so boring, with all 20 years old (or even much longer) "copy" "steal" haha :) at the same time China is catching up and passing over, :))
    1
  20. US military will not like what you say, if all Chinese weapons are junks, then why US congress needs to spend so much money on military???
    1
  21.  @NtDs90  so your friend with eyes as AESA radar ? hah a:) what BS!
    1
  22.  @NtDs90  yeah right, at the time China did not even send any J20 to Tibet, let alone near India border, haha :)
    1
  23.  @NtDs90  China has Su 30 MKK with the exactly the same radar, we know if it can detect J20 or how far away it can detect J20, it is not that easy to make lies, it needs some brain, which you have none.
    1
  24.  @NtDs90  hahahha :) you do not know a sht, so do not pretend, that BS was from Indian Air Force Chief Marshal Birender Singh Dhanoa said the "Su-30 radar is good enough and can pick it (J-20) up from many kilometers away," in 2018, total BS! tell me what is "many many kilometers"?? haha :)) J20 would shoot Su 30 MKI down 150 km away. Su30 will not be able to detect J20 at 30 KM range
    1
  25. right China first put DF 17 hypersonic missiles to service, imitate from what??
    1
  26.  @SparkBerry  hahah :)) so why not US does not have it?? yeah, 70s? go check Qian Xuesen - Wikipedia see that photo? that was in 1940s, haha :) so all copied from him??
    1
  27.  @SparkBerry  go to learn first before you open your mouth,
    1
  28.  @SparkBerry  what name game? that was based on your logic, it shows you know nothing, go to learn, so not pretend, useless
    1
  29. US put too much efforts in jets, Russia and China put more efforts in missiles, now US is trying to copy Russia and China on hypersonic missiles. (your logic, not mine)
    1
  30. ​ @andreteofilovic2240  tell me the name.
    1
  31.  @andreteofilovic2240  "The United States has actively pursued the development of hypersonic weapons as a part of its conventional prompt global strike (CPGS) program since the early 2000s"_______Congressional Research Service____updated, July 20,, 2022
    1
  32.  @kareemhaddad3455  as its name,your GAM-87 is Air Launched Ballistic Missile, not currently termed hypersonic missile, the difference is current hypersonic missile's trajectory can be changed, GAM-87 cannot change trajectory
    1
  33.  @petersouthernboy6327  US dare not to join war to save Ukraine to fight Russia, that shows how it worked for Russia.
    1
  34. we have quantum communication, ever heard that? we have hypersonic missiles in service,US Does not, what more original you need?
    1
  35.  @EthanAdey  you have no logic, that is not what your question was, go figure out, no time to waste on you, it shows.
    1
  36. the original stealthy theory and its math calculation was from Russia , it is not original from US, was that considered "copy" "steal" ???
    1
  37. just remind you, 72 years ago, we did not have any weapon made in China, that did not stop us to send army into Korea for fight US army, in 3 months of time, we kicked US army completely out of North Korea to the other side and kept them there for 72 years.
    1
  38. for those said US had hypersonic missiles since 1980s, please to go argue with US congress service, ""The United States has actively pursued the development of hypersonic weapons as a part of itsconventional prompt global strike (CPGS) program since the early 2000s"_______Congressional Research Service____updated, July 20,, 2022
    1