Comments by "红火树 RedFireTree" (@firetree2007) on ""Lander Vikram In Single Piece, In Tilted Position": ISRO Official" video.

what is the evidence, you have a photo image of it?
6
@TheRajdeepKarmakar suppose it fall down to the surface of the moon from 300 meters high then the impact is A=mgh (A, impact energy, m, mass, g gravitation acceleration, h, distance) A=1470 kg (mass of Vikram)x 1.62 meters/S^2 x 300 meter (distance of free falling) = 714420 Newton or 486 times of Vikram's weight. Indians are suppose to be very good at math?
3
@auraalot5558 you mean Indians all depend on mouth?
2
@Shreya Singh Soviet union found water molecules on the moon 40 yrs ago by taking sample back to the earth, you?? go to learn first
1
@Shreya Singh again, and again, you showed you know nothing, Luna 24 study showed that the samples returned to Earth by the 1976 Soviet probe Luna 24 contained about 0.1% water by mass, as seen in infrared absorption spectroscopy (at about 3 μm (0.00012 in) wavelength), at a detection level about 10 times above the threshold.[7]
1
@Shreya Singh go to learn first before you open your big mouth, do not you feel shamed about yourself??
1
@Shreya Singh also the Chandrayaan 1 carried instrument from NASA which found water molecules,data analysis was done by USA, not by India
1
drop a car from 2100 meter high sky and after land it drives itself away, ............wonderful things happen all the time, in dreams
1
@vinodchugani2303 typo, changed already
1
@vinodchugani2303 i chose not to answer your question.
1
@Shreya Singh it may not as strong as a car since it suppose to be "soft-landing" not "hard-landing". 2, if the antenna cannot face the earth accurately then communication cannot be established.
1
@TheRajdeepKarmakar go see my calculation again, where I used 1.62 instead of 9.8
1
@jaiveersingh7567 I do not think so , for example, your beloved Chairman of ISRO does not even know where China's lunar lander landed, he told reporters China's lunar lander landed in the equator region on the moon, but actually China lunar lander landed at South Pole region in the dark side of the moon, it shows he is not as you expected, not very intelligent and not very knowledgeable and under his leadership, this mission failed, is it a fact?
1
@Shreya Singh like you? and whole Hinduism, there is no logic in it.
1
@Shreya Singh go to watch the computer image of last minute, the lander started off the preset course at 2.1 km to the destination at the height about 2 km to the moon surface, it is just a free fall with trails track as parabola curve. it means, at this stage, the thrust from onboard lander all failed already. so my calculation should use the height of 2000 meters instead 300 meters. now you may calculate the impact force.
1
@Shreya Singh you are good at nothing, since you cannot find where China's lunar lander landed.
1
@Shreya Singh The landing site is within a crater called Von Kármán[8] (180 km or 110 mi diameter) in the South Pole-Aitken Basin on the far side of the Moon that was still unexplored by landers.[9][61]
1
@Shreya Singh can you read?? :)))
1
@Shreya Singh you are not good at math nor physic, your failed moon mission is a proof.
1
@Shreya Singh but since your top beloved ISRO Chairman is at a very low level, I certainly understand what the level of the most of Indians can be.
1
@Shreya Singh one reason is your media gave you too much bullshit, such as India would be the first one land on the south pole on the moon, which is based on the chairman of your ISRO
1
@apurvchaturvedi read again !! The landing site is within a crater called Von Kármán[8] (180 km or 110 mi diameter) in the South Pole-Aitken Basin on the far side of the Moon that was still unexplored by landers.[9][61]
1
@jaiveersingh7567 before you bullshit, can you read this first? "The landing site is within a crater called Von Kármán[8] (180 km or 110 mi diameter) in the South Pole-Aitken Basin on the far side of the Moon that was still unexplored by landers.[9][61]"
1
@apsanpvarkey3841 your aim of the mission is to soft-land on the moon, right?? have you succeeded?? no, you hard landed on the moon, so the mission is failed. got it?
1
@siasen8046 right, I know, but I am not teaching you guys, since you are hopeless, I am here just teasing you guys, got it?
1
@apurvchaturvedi what are you talking about?? using earth south pole as example at a certain time, earth is half with sunlight half at night, but somewhere near the south pole will not change at least will not change to equator, so your ISRO Chair said China's lander landed on the equator on the moon is totally wrong. I said south pole region, i ti scalled The South Pole–Aitken basin I did not say it landed on the south pole of the moon.
1
@Shreya Singh then how about dark side of the moon?? anyone landed there before China?
1
@apurvchaturvedi I posted 3 times where my country landed on the moon, go read them,
1
@vinodchugani2303 there are thousands of much smarter people in China than me, so that with has landed on the moon twice, and one of them still working on the darkside of the moon after 9 months, but India cannot even do a single one but failed. that is the fact
1
@siasen8046 at least I know where China lander landed on the moon,but he does not, hah :)) and under his leadership, the mission failed. that is the fact
1
@apurvchaturvedi at least you cannot call austria on the equator
1
@apurvchaturvedi And China is the first landed on the far-side of the moon in the whole universe
1
@Shreya Singh wish you get this kind result all the time :)) congratulations !! you got the results, it crash-landed.
1
@vinodchugani2303 no, i only do it to others
1
@siasen8046 oh, it landed tilted, cannot communicate with earth, great success! happy now??
1
@apsanpvarkey3841 HAHA :)) SEND A PIECE OF METAL JUNK ON TO THE MOON IS INDIA'S MISSION. VERY GOOD.
1
@NIGHT WING go to watch the computer image of last minute, the lander started off the preset course at 2.1 km to the destination at the height about 2 km to the moon surface, it is just a free fall with trails track as parabola curve. it means, at this stage, the thrust from onboard lander all failed already. stupid
1
@NIGHT WING good condition?? who told you that?? 1. it can only locate where it is 2. it can only show it is in one piece, you drop a car from 300 meter height, it may be in one piece, but will not be drivable. 3. thermal images from 100 km away cannot provide any high resolution image 4. I wish or not it failed, I am not god.
1