Comments by "红火树 RedFireTree" (@firetree2007) on "'Wrong to say democracy since 1947...': Amit Shah on Centre, states, law u0026 order, and freedom" video.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6.  @kiranjha4760  OKOK to prove I am not a bot, I will write something 1. BJP better than Congress, does not mean it is good, ok do you have concept of logic?? BJP can be bad, Congress could be worse. they are both bad, haha :)) 2. as I have said, your GDP growth dropped to 4% before the pandemic, seems you never read things carefully. 3. If less population is an excuse for India income got less than Bangladesh then how can you explain China got more population but has average income 5.7 times of yours?? secondly seem you suggest that India should break up to 50 small countries so they will get more average income?? hah :)) good idea 4. what BS about industry hub?? what you make all by yourselves??? nothing, 70 % of your cellphones are China brand, 20 % Korean, 10% apple and others none of your own, you cannot make any weapon but import from rifle, bullets to jets, what attraction?? show real thing, which you have none! 5. as for Ambani thing, while millions of Indians dropped back to poverty level, these two guys 's wealthy in jumped sky high, to $80 billion and $55 billion respectively, the reason is Modi provide them with huge benefit and policy beneficial to them. Read the article Titled, " India’s New Industrial Policy Is Doomed to Fail" on July 16, 2021 by Mihir Sharma 6. China's products are mainly for the small business, by boycotting China's products, Ambani's and such big capitalists win since ordinary Indians will buy more from them to make them get more Monopoly to make them richer and at same more people will have to pay higher price to make their living harder, and hurt small business in India since it makes them more difficult to compete with Ambanis big capitalist. 7. Farmers, with new bill, Indian government will not be responsible for farmers products, and all pushed into market , however, India's farming is very low efficiency, India has 25% more arable land than China, but the total yield is only less than 1/2 of China's, the low efficiency means high cost, India's grain has not much profit space to compete in world market, Ambanis, can simply import from world market, and sell to India, and at the same time, they can use it to set the price for the grain or other agriculture products to form monopoly too, India farmers and ordinary people will suffer , only Ambanis got huge benefit. as for your personal insulting? it only showed how low you are, I am not going to lower myself to your level.
    1
  7. 1