Comments by "红火树 RedFireTree" (@firetree2007) on "ISRO Successfully Injects Chandrayaan-3 Into Translunar Orbit; Here's What Is Expected On Aug 5" video.

  1. for China to get to the with 4 days, takes India 40 days. haha.
    6
  2. one thing Indians should know, your module for Chandrayaan lander, is the one that had never been proven, all other successful landers of USSR, USA and China, used 1 single descending engine to slow down and land, only Chandrayaan used multiple engines, since 2 already crashed, so up to today, there is no proof this kind design can be successful. and this design was from a MS student's thesis in MIT in 2004, haha, ISRO just took it, for 2 and for 3, ( I can claim I know your Chandrayaan better than all of you in here) anyone wants to challenge me on your design of Chandrayaan? I guess none. all very quiet as expected.
    5
  3.  @ss304_82  you need to count failure times into cost, Chandrayaan-3 cost is doubled since it needs to count Chandrayaan-2's cost in it, Chandrayaan-3 may crash too, then cost add again
    4
  4.  @ss304_82  also you need to count the cost for building deep space network, you do not have it, so you beg NASA and NSA for help but not paying them for the cost
    4
  5. Chandrayaan-3 will be ended just like 2
    4
  6. journey may be very happy just as 2, but end may not, as 2 too.
    3
  7.  @TheWokker  it is an irresponsible risk for ISRO to take and may waste tax payer's money again as it did for 2, but hey, it is your money, waste as much as you like
    3
  8.  @sarathkannaya7487  haha. BS logic, your goal was to soft land it, it failed, 100% failed.
    3
  9.  @Abhishek-ef2er  poor thing haha
    3
  10. typical India is very excited even tooooo excited, too over confident, just like 2, once they launched they all thought it would land successfully,so they invited Modi to the control room,only to see 2 disappear :)) but hey ,they never learn, now they do the same to 3 calm down, wait until it landed and then you can boast whatever you like such as "greatest contribution in space exploration, or other big BS boasting " :))
    2
  11.  @Mindlyt u dmb stupd cannot even understand, I said Chandrayaan used multiple engines, go back to read again,
    2
  12.  @Mindlyt  u dmb stpd know sht, Chandrayaan used the same design in pressure source for the fuel as the US with helium pressure, that is a copy, China used stepper motor , go to learn before you open your stky mouth
    2
  13.  @ss304_82  truth is truth, big mouth empty words do not help anything
    2
  14.  @ss304_82  why India cannot down load, do not play angel, you copied all western patented drugs
    2
  15.  @ss304_82  recently India just stolen Pepsi's patented potato seeds, but protected by Indian court for this
    2
  16.  @ss304_82  tell me what can you make by yourself? NOTHING, haha
    2
  17.  jatinkumarjuyal6263  we will see,
    2
  18.  @Abhishek-ef2er  why Indians drink cow lemonade?
    2
  19.  jatinkumarjuyal6263  that is called teasing. or making fun of it, since you are just big joke for the world.
    2
  20.  @TheWokker  that is a BS, go to check before you open your mouth
    2
  21. ​ @TheWokker  for India, As of 26 November 2022, there have been a total of 84 launches, including 68 successful launches, 5 partial successes, and 10 failed launches. with successful rate of 80.095% List of Satish Dhawan Space Centre launches - Wikipedia for China, Launch statistics. Rockets from the Long March family have accumulated a total of 468 launches as of 17 March 2023. Of these, 450 were successful, 11 were failures, and 7 were partial failures. The cumulative success rate is 96.2%.___Wiki
    2
  22. India cannot even send a man into 200 km above earth, you expect it can send a man on to the moon? haha, amazing
    2
  23. journey may be very happy just as 2, but end may not, as 2 too.
    2
  24. BS, without NASA, your probe cannot find where Mars is, you do not have deep space network, I guess you do not even know what that is and what it is for
    1
  25. haha ignorance cannot be used for argument, you cannot find things does not mean anything, go to learn before you open your mouth. Changer3 is 1000% success, you are full of BS
    1
  26. Chandrayaan-both 2 and 3 used valve for controlling the amount of fuel for burning, for 2, it used 5 level so 20% change each one, for 3, it modified into 10 levels, with 10% of change at each level, you know a sht.
    1
  27. read what I said carefully, I did not say using multiple engines caused the crash of 2, only said, it has no proof this kind design would work. since none has done before.
    1
  28. nobody gives a fk what Blinken said
    1
  29. all US USSR and China used 1 so to you all of them technically illiterate? haha, so you are not, but why you let 2 crash into pieces??
    1
  30.  @ss304_82 it only means you are POOR, nothing so glorious about it, space game is for the rich countries.
    1
  31.  @ss304_82  NASA did not say they have no failure. I did not say that either, I only said you need to add cost of failures, your launch successful rate is 80% compare to China' s 96.5%
    1
  32.  @ss304_82  but you do not know is you do not have deep space network, all the conduction, instruction and navigation were done by NASA
    1
  33.  @ss304_82  i only said fact, unlike you with a big mouth BS
    1
  34.  @ss304_82  yeah, so dumb cannot even copy, haha
    1
  35.  @ss304_82  that is true, who reported 4.7 million in India,
    1
  36.  @Abhishek-ef2er  so?
    1